Comments (1856)

Welcome to r/TikTokCringe!

This is a message directed to all newcomers to make you aware that r/TikTokCringe evolved long ago from only cringe-worthy content to TikToks of all kinds! If you’re looking to find only the cringe-worthy TikToks on this subreddit (which are still regularly posted) we recommend sorting by flair which you can do here (Currently supported by desktop and reddit mobile).

See someone asking how this post is cringe because they didn't read this comment? Show them this!

Be sure to read the rules of this subreddit before posting or commenting. Thanks!

Don't forget to join our Discord server!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

And here I am scrolling reddit at midnight. "Nah they won't get me"

Don't look at your phones "app use time" metrics... Too real

As someone whose ā€œapp use timeā€ (including Netflix) could occupy a full time job, all I have to say is

ā€˜^ā€˜help

That is why you do it at your full-time job img.

Team flip.

Flip phones, call or text; that's it. No joke you'll feel serious serious withdrawal, because all this stimulation and information is drug like

Any models in particular that don’t make texting a chore? I don’t text a lot, but when I do need to send a text out, I don’t want to have to press one button up to 5 times to get a single letter on the screen.

i'd prefer to press 1 button to get 5 of these god damned letters on the damned screen you have any idea how combersome it is to write these messages with each type being pressed only causing me to have one letter appear and then sometimes correcting typos or spelling errors;

It's so tedious it causes my fingers to feel tired and very very sore.

I have an app that tracks how often and what apps I use and how long. Mainly on reddit more than anything

if you use Android, open settings, search for digital wellbeing and you can check your stats there. you can also add a widget to your home screen

Oh great, so I can see how big of a piece of shit I am every day!

Honestly, what is even a good number? We have such a negative attitude towards screen time, when is the screen time numbers ever going to be "good"? It's like it's purposefully designed to be a huge bummer so you'll stop looking at it and surrender to the warm embrace of the pixels.

The value is to face the bad habit and work toward fixing it. Honestly, as much as it sucks to see the number, I’ve found it to be a really useful tool. I’ve made it a personal challenge to reduce my screen time, and I’ve gone from 10+ hours/day down to 4hours/day.

The really valuable thing is that it adds a lot of extra time towards your life to beneficial activities. Some phone usage is good, it’s a great tool to relax with, but there is a huge degree of diminishing returns. With those ~6hours/day, I’ve picked up reading, spent more time introspecting instead of mindlessly watching YouTube, gotten involved in sports, started studying more for school, and improved my mental clarity. IMO it is absolutely worth using screen time stats to challenge yourself to do better, rather then take a stance of ā€˜ignorance is bliss, why should I ruin that?’

That's not what I'm saying. What I'm saying is that screen time is not necessarily bad. You said it yourself. We are in agreement there.

What I'm saying, is that the app is completely lacking in any reward system. It's the opposite. It uses our predisposed attitudes that Screen Time = Bad, to make us feel as bad as possible so we'll stop looking at it, and just surrender.

I think the app could be better and could encourage healthier living much more effectively, but where's the money in that? It's the opposite. There's money in getting us to surrender, so the app is bad on purpose.

I'm really just saying that the screen time app sucks. Is there a better one out there? I'd love to see it. I'd pay for it, if it's good enough.

Do you expect these companies to create a fiscal reward for not using their product? Most likely the idea of screen time being an issue (it is) was a hot button issue for lawmakers or interest groups so Tech industries pushed the screen time metric on phones to mollify people. But it existing is not in itself bad even if it is the least that can be done. That’s like saying the calories on food is bad because you feel bad seeing it.

You are so completely missing the point, just forget it

[deleted]

Holy crap lol. You must be either a kid or using it while at work.

What the fuck... I check my phone 321 times a week on average.

That just blows my mind.

50 times a week the first app I open is reddit too. And that's not even counting desktop usage.

Damn...

Makes me want to give up on everything.

January 2022 I looked at it and I decided to cut my social media daily time at 1/3. I read 19 books since then.

So tired of everything and anything having an app now. This is why i don't download apps i don't have to. I use reddit on mobile browser.

Pretty dumb considering there are several Reddit apps that have zero ads and the mobile browser has tons of them.

and it's literally the same content, what is even the benefit other than making shit more annoying to browse.. doesn't even make sense

Did you really misread the one sentence I wrote? Several mobile apps (like Apollo) have no ads. It's way nicer to browse in these apps because you don't have to look at ads.

I was agreeing with you, that the person above you should use the apps for that reason

Sorry, I'm an idiot. Need more coffee this morning.

That's the point. If it's more annoying/tedious, it's not as satisfying, and you are more likely to stop the mindless browsing

They're really easy to ignore. So easy i don't notice them.

I decreases screen time by 40 percent last week! Now down to 8 hours a day!

Bo Burnham is a smart and funny guy

This is why Reddit wants to you verify your email address.

Jokes on them, I'm never going to Verify! I'll just save my username and logon details to my google account instead!!

I knew I was losing when I saw ads painted on porn actresses in videos

That advertisement had NO effect on me! ……

That’s it, you people have pressured me longe enough! I’m going to Clown College!

"But I'm not gonna let 'em catch me, no Not gonna let 'em catch the midnight rider"

I am grateful for this man.

Who is it? This is the second talk I’ve seen and he’s very well articulated.

Bo Burnham. Go watch Inside on Netflix. This is not an ad. It is legit just great.

Inside is an absolute comedic masterpiece; loved every part of it. I love his stand up and the parts he’s played on different shows, but Inside was such a great representation of the pandemic and his creativity and just what makes him so absolutely amazing

I think it might be better to watch some of his other stuff first, so you end on some of the most creative different type of "stand up" he's made.

Expanding on this, I'd say, specifically watch "What." (His first 1st special),then "Make Happy", and then "Inside" in that order. I feel like the growth you see in all three makes a really nice complete package. Almost feels like a lil trilogy of standup.

What about "Words Words Words"?

Haven't seen that one :/ but I'm sure it fits in well.

That show and the stuff he was doing at the time is the early work that he rails against in Inside

this is correct

Make Happy is a glorious masterpiece of comedy and theater. Not just his material which is both hilarious and deep, but his use of lighting and auto tune are spectacular. I watched it again yesterday.

Honestly Inside was too real for me especially when compared with his older stuff. I loved the cut songs so much more than the ones featured on it but that’s also potentially because I lost my mom during the pandemic so looking back on that time is super fucking hard.

Wow that’s Bo! I remember watching him sing and play piano during the infancies of YouTube. Glad he’s still doing well and speaking to these issues….I have a 6 year old kid and I’m terrified what social media might do to him down the line.

Bo wants to make you feel comfortable

So sit back, relax, and enjoy a healthy dose of

Prolonged Eye Contact

That is exactly what an ad would say

These damn bots are getting real good at passing the Turing test. IM ON TO YOU

[deleted]

I was joking but your inability to identify the joke makes me start doubting whether the joke was right

I am so jealous you get to freshly discover him.

He is one of the OG Youtubers, he does comedy music. This is the one that really got him famous, but this is likely the most famous now

bo burnham. he has a few comedy specials but his interviews are some of his best content

Go watch his video ā€œKlan cook outā€ on YouTube.

I’m downvoted but I didn’t make this up

Agreed. Burnham is the modern George Carlin. "Inside" will be remembered as the defining artistic statement about Covid.

What a talent.

Welp he's right, ill see you guys tomorrow

See you tomorrow. šŸ˜”

This comment brought to you by Gfuelā„¢ļø

[deleted]

Sponsored by MomCorp

"It's got electrolytes!"

That’s what plants crave!

But what are electrolytes?

It’s what plants crave!

Water? You mean like from the toilet?

Fuck you, I'm eating.

Brought to you by Carl’s Jr.

Carl's Jr. Eat like you mean it.

Brought to you by Carl's Jr.

Is that Idiocracy reference?

Unlike the toilet water.

And make sure to smash that upvote button.

Please drink verification can to continue.

Please rate this interaction.

Before you proceed, ACCEPT our cookie policies ^(or click reject on 50 options in an unnavigable menu.)

Please smash responsibly.

Please only smash with consent

Smash and follow for more!

Like, subscribe, and follow! šŸ’…šŸ»

Don't forget to enter our code at checkout so they know we sent you!

Zero gee brew; it’s the ale to cure what ails you.

Gfuel sucks ten more please.

How many verification cans do you need me to drink before you subscribe to my OnlyTwitch?

They must have updated that. Never before and recently after an order, email after email asking for my fucking opinion.

Is that the one with the electrolytes?

Welcome to Costco I love you

Brought to you by Carls Jr.

If youre down with mind colonization be sure to smash that like button, hit subscribe and ring that notification bell to be sure you dont miss any colonization.

Sleep well!

US Military Encrypted

im here for people with your sense of humor. theres always a good laugh to be had.

turbofuel

https://youtu.be/MLBHr03Aj1s?t=4

Uggghhh Gfuel I can't stand that still. I drink Booty Juice myself!

I wish I could get a reddit comment sponsor. Just tag all your comments with a plug. Brought to you by Huggies. We got you, baby.

I'm hijacking this comment to beg people to read "the age of surveillance capitalism" I'll put a link below. Bo (who I actually don't care for as a comedian that much, sorry bud) is touching on some very complicated topics that really deserve more of your attention. It's a long and dense read but it's extremely well deduced and quite easy to follow.

https://www.amazon.com/Age-Surveillance-Capitalism-Future-Frontier/dp/1610395697?ref=d6k_applink_bb_dls&dplnkId=d6fb3f09-1caa-40a1-a8a3-ad5d949ba80c

I included the Amazon link for maximum irony but it's probably at you local library. Again "The Age of Surveillance Capitalism" by Shoshana Zuboff

Here is the Libby link if your library has it and you like free. https://share.libbyapp.com/title/3063955

How do I get the free version?

Z Library:

https://b-ok.global/s/Age%20of%20surveillance%20capitalism%20

It’s available for download on the internet library archive.org just grabbed it

Almost nothing is free; I like sharing.

thanks! just got it from my local library!

Yes! And fuck Amazon! (Even though they own half the servers of the internet, but here's to solidarity for the worker union efforts meanwhile)

Seconding this book, it's this video but even more in depth, written by someone who has been intently observing the progression of harvesting data for profit for like the past 20+ years.

Well that's what it is, the new oil is information. If you're not living in a third or fourth world country, business will make you rich. If you know or your company knows your demographic and can hook them in, that's money. Information is key. We're no longer crafting shoes to sell, we're all tech up.

I'm going to take this challenge and hit up the 2 public libraries, which for a town of 500k sounds like such a small number, and see if they have this book. Thanks for the recommendation

And I love that about you

And I love that you unabashedly share knowledge with the world <3

Well, neither library carried this book....

Thanks for checking in. If you are genuinely curious and you can promise me right now that you will read the entire thing and disagree with some of it (I know I did) I'll buy it for you right now. Dm an address to send it to and I'll do it once I can.

If they don't,you can get it here at Z Library:

https://b-ok.global/s/Age%20of%20surveillance%20capitalism%20

well, that didn't last long

NYPL has an intra-branch (inter?) loan system. You can log in online and request a book and as soon as it is available anywhere, it will be shipped to your local branch.

Maybe you have that, too?

does your library have an online catalog? You wouldn't have to physicaly walk in and check if its there

If anyone wants to read this but cant afford to buy it, or purchasing it from a corporation (especially the linked one?) rubs you the wrong way given the subject, PM me and I'll link you an epub.

If you don't know how to get it yourself that is , obviously.

Or here's the author's website if you just want other options that probably return more to the author.

https://shoshanazuboff.com/book/

Or ask your friendly search engine what "zlib" is.

that's not as simple. for example I come from east-europe and I live in france right now, there are a lot of pirated sites that are restricted at ISP level (in france), some might work with vpn; but anyway sometimes if you don't have or want vpn it appears as though they are expired

You said you’re not a fan of him, yet seem to be really interested in this topic. Have you seen Inside? It’s thematic center is this exact idea. I understand not finding his previous work funny, or his type of comedy funny, but Inside can stand more of a performative art piece that happens to have jokes in it. I would recommend giving it a shot if this is the sort of stuff you’re interested in..

I was thinking this morning that he isn’t the funniest comedian in my opinion, but at the same time he’s at least tied for first as my favorite comedian.

I judge other solely on their response to Inside. If they haven even seen it then do they even exist?

How can I find the full interview?

Here's the full interview—it's at a Child Mind Institute event on Children and Social Media where Bo was invited to speak because of his (phenomenal) film, Eighth Grade. His lead, Elsie Fisher, describes her experiences as well.

By the way, I work in marketing and read about this stuff all the time. Bo tells NO lies. My tip—remove any notifications you can!

I knew that already, fucks with the reward system in your brain regardless if your aware of what’s going on pretty crazy

Is that who was sitting next to him?

Yes! That's Elsie with the long blonde hair on his right. She's wonderful in Eighth Grade—highly recommended! :)

It's terrifying how people don't let others have an opinion without trying to force then out of it

I literally said I understand not liking his style of comedy. Most people are turned off by his early work and everyone’s entitled to their opinion.

I was just curious because this person is talking about all the points Bo hits in the special

It’s terrifying how many opinions on Reddit are unnecessarily added in the comments and how many of them are virtue signaling drivel.

Inside seems more like Bo Burnham's decent into madness than a comedy special.

Edit: I should have been more clear. I wasn't saying this was a bad thing. I quite liked the special. But people who are looking for a comedy special might write it off. I was more prepping new viewer for the art piece that is rather than the "comedy special" Netflix advertises it as.... Bo Burnham's fans are brutal. Jeez.

I don’t know why you are being downvoted, it was an apt description. My only change to your description would be to add ā€œand it’s hilarious, dark, touching, and thought provoking.ā€

Yea, I liked it. "Funny feeling" is one of my favorite songs now actually. I thought Id let new viewers decide for themselves what they thought. I just didn't realize Bo Burnham fans were so touchy.... The downvotes are kinda meta tho. The internet has made people super reactionary and impulsive. Even fans that think they get his message. Lol.

Yea, it’s a great watch. A Little Bit of Everything (I think that’s the name?) is my favorite. In fact I think I’m due for a rewatch

Do you mean Welcome to the Internet? And in case you haven't seen the outtakes, this may increase your appreciation for the work he put in to make it :)

Yeah, but… it’s good

No its bad, but thats entertaining.

I mean how many awards did it win? Like 6-7?

No he's saying that Bo descending into madness is bad, not that the special is bad

Can confirm. I enjoyed the special but worry about Bo's mental health. He stares too long at the machine greased by human bodies. One must not look too long at the machine.

Well there is the idea that he's done. The end of Inside implies that he kinda lost the fight... So I don't think he's going to be doing something like this again at least not for awhile. He does know how to get better

Ooh gotcha

Yee it was worded a little strange tbf

Sorry for the downvotes. The show is literally a found footage tape of a (fictional?) Comedian falling into madness in isolation. It's tonally a horror film which features musical numbers that just happen to be funny. Sometimes.

It's an amazing work of art.

If you enjoy that description, I think you’d enjoy reading ā€˜House of Leaves’ by Mark Z. Danielewski. It’s brilliant.

That’s exactly the point, yeah. But it’s insightful and poignant even when it’s not funny.

Also The World Computer by Jonathan Beller.

https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-world-computer

Is there something new in there? We pretty much know what it is that they are doing, we just don't care, cause we are addicted at this point.

Being relatively powerless isn't the same thing as not caring

Understanding why might be useful.

Because it's profitable and also for control? Good way to funnel money from the herd to the top 1%? Am I close? Not to mention added bonus of easy way to control the masses by abusing the reach of these platforms and information they have gathered about us.

I don't think there is a deeper conspiracy. It is 100% for profit and a symptom of the need for constant growth driven by the market and these publicly traded companies.

No. It's because if they get enough data they can kill the next Karl Marx as an infant, or prevent their parents from meeting.

It's a pretty in depth analysis. It's a lot more than what they are doing, it's why they are doing it, and all rhe possible implications.

Jumping in to recommend: Platform Capitalism, The Marvelous Clouds, Discourse networks 1800/1900

For something in between the short and this book, I recommend this philosophical/poetic video from exurb1a

I don't appreciate Zuboff's work. I have read this book and her conclusion seems to basically be that surveillance capitalism is a corruption of neoliberalism and not somehow its natural progression. Corporations did not evolve into extracting every second of your personal lives because they "wanted to", it's because of the exact reason that Bo points out—that shareholders demand increasing value from their investment. The only way that we can live in a comfortable society is if the wealthy can tolerate a world that does not exist to continually enrich them, that a business can make some level of profit and maintain that indefinitely instead of searching out new ways of ruining people's lives to gain value.

Exactly. The whole idea of "the free market" is ultimately in service of pushing to have unlimited growth.

700 pages on surveillance capitalism? I’ll just take Bo’s word for it

I think Bo is done a disservice (Shoshana might as well given the 2019 publication) that this is from the tour for his movie Eight Grade which came out in 2018, and it's only in the last couple of years that AI has really become supercharged in the public sphere. It entirely removes the human element from the surveillance and supercharges it, while leaving it inherently unintelligible to humans and so impossible to supervise, or even improve based on what we want the world to be instead of what it is.

AIs are already proving to be incredibly discriminatory against minorities, amoral in what they disseminate, unbound by any sense of privacy and capable of basically 'solving' macro-human behavior.

We might see in the future government run AIs linked to all globally available databases, as well as all government available databases, with them then doing (in the best case) policy suggestions or (in the worst case) identifying dissidents even before they've participated in any kind of anti-government action.

Reviews seem to say the author is circle jerking too much with verbose language for the sake of it.

Is this going to help me feel less anxious? Otherwise I can't afford mentally to read it right now šŸ˜ž should probably just get off the internet completely.

It was very eye opening. Also Brad Troemel is helpful to me.

Library genesis..... Fuck paying.

This is just American version of MAXIMUM FREEDOM.

Citizen, you have the freedom for your life force to be converted into imaginary value that can be channeled upwards into the imaginary coffers of the richest people in the world, who only know and understand one thing: own and control everything.

MURICA.

Did you watch his Netflix special?

These types of books use real issues to shill for left-wing politics. Real problems with terrible solutions, typical reddit crap.

Jesus would never stop puking if he met you.

THE ADAM BUXTON PODCAST - ADAM BUXTON https://podcastgo.pl/listen/?appleid=1040481893 Great interview with Shoshana Zuboff

Also, I came here to suggest something similar in Manufacturing Consent or Inventing Reality.

I mean, you could have left that part out about his comedy and linked to your book. But I guess everyone has to get their swipe in.

Piggybacking on this, read ā€œWeapons of Math Destructionā€. It’s about the growing rise in opaque data algorithms and the irreparable harm done by companies using them. Amazon link included, but probably available elsewhere.

https://www.amazon.com/Weapons-Math-Destruction-Increases-Inequality/dp/0553418831/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?adgrpid=56345491352&gclid=Cj0KCQjwqoibBhDUARIsAH2OpWjPg8oBlFLY6wQ-uXBUA2h1YeZ1gtDxZdiV9n4ySGrwwp74GHBDxioaArIWEALw_wcB&hvadid=274727355488&hvdev=m&hvlocphy=9024251&hvnetw=g&hvqmt=e&hvrand=11758322930731854147&hvtargid=kwd-329809828004&hydadcr=15806_10362720&keywords=weapons+of+math+destruction&qid=1667395213&qu=eyJxc2MiOiIxLjk2IiwicXNhIjoiMS41NiIsInFzcCI6IjEuNjQifQ%3D%3D&sr=8-1

Damn. I'll definitely have to read this sometime.

Dope, I love books <3

Don't lie. It's only been 2 hours and I know you're reading this.

Wait no come back I have more things to show you

You will back here in 3 minutes.

Reddit is the one place I’ll allow myself to be engrossed in because the communities I’ve found have actually helped my wife and I with understanding anxiety, stress, and abuse. Shout out to /r/raisedbynarcissists and similar communities. This place could still be better but I enjoy it. I don’t feel stressed compared to other forms of social media where my profile is tied to myself and not a random handle

Fuck you & I'll see you tomorrow!

This place sucks, I wonder what kind of suck it will bring tomorrow. I guess I'll find out

ā€œI grew up on the internet… I suffer from anxietyā€

Alex I’ll take understatements for 1000

Thank goodness for this Reddit app or I never would have known any of that!

Srs tho he is right

I'll see you in the dream world 2.0

This place really does suck. Why would anyone waste time here?

Oh, look! I've racked up 1,027,277 worthless points and I was just admitted to the "10 year club!"

See you tomorrow (or later today)!

Alright it's tomorrow where you at?

Jeremy Piven has a point!

Welcome the internet!

Same dystopian place. Same dystopian channel. Same dystopian time.

[deleted]

A fragile soul (anxiety) that knows... KNOWS shit is fucked up, and he's clearly suffering from that knowledge. But hey, what a tremendous source of his art.

Now if only everyone with lingering existential dread regarding identity in the face of a careless world could tap into that creative side

Oh well, gonna go play some games now

I had to start taking an SSRI (for depression but ended up helping my anxiety more) to handle like... existing in all this. and it just doesn't seem to affect other people the same way.

I wish I could have channeled it creatively, but it was literally killing me.

I’m in the same boat, but haven’t found one that works just yet. I’m on my… fourth or fifth? Different medication. They all help a little, but it is rough waking up every morning and just being like… ā€œBut why thoā€

The first one was the worst. Didn’t do much for the depression besides just cause me to zone out mentally, and it gave me the jitters. Constant anxiety attack for like three months.

meds aren't for everyone unfortunately. I have been very lucky.

I started on a low dose of Lexapro which obliterated my anxiety but didn't help much with the depression, it also made me feel constantly exhausted and I slept A LOT for the first couple of months.

added a high dosage of wellbutrin to it which fixed my exhaustion problem and also honestly really balanced out the depressive symptoms. tried Wellbutrin on its own for a while and ended up catatonic in a full bathtub from like 5 to 7 am one day, begged my docs to put me back on Lexapro in conjunction with it.

I feel fortunate. obviously all of the things still bother me but they don't utterly devastate and emotionally cripple me anymore and I needed that to... well, to literally not die. I hit a wall of "it's either suicide or meds" and fuck, I lucked out hard on the meds.

I hope you can find something to bring you more peace than you're working with. sorry things are like this.

Fuck /u/spez. reddit is now a platform to libel good developers. I will be deleting all my accounts including the first one I made over 15 years ago. Once again FUCK /u/spez. Move to Lemmy https://join-lemmy.org/

I saw so much of my old situation in what you said.

It took me 7 years and 7 different medications, on top of meds to help me sleep, to get the point where they said "there arent really any more to try, so pick the one that sucked the least"

Last month was my first year off meds altogether.

You will get there! I don't know what "there" looks like, it might be meds that work, it might be no meds, it might be something else, but you'll get there!

Have you ever addressed the underlying cause of your problems, rather than just fighting the symptoms?

You know you can’t just like, get anti depressants at most doctors offices right? There’s steps you have to take. Hell, in my wellness plan, undiagnosed ADHD is something we’re going to look into, but they want to try these steps first, since that would end up medicating me with legal speed.

Some doctors I’m sure hand it out like candy, but not all. Mine certainly didn’t. I’ve been dealing with depression and anxiety since I was a kid.

And by the way, that’s a real dick move. I really hope you don’t spew that kind of shit to your loved ones when they come to you about their mental health issues. You don’t know me, my journey, why I have anxiety or depression. At no point did I say ā€œoh yeah I’m just doing medication because fuck therapy.ā€ It’s a childish worldview that gets you nowhere, makes me feel bad, and also makes you look like an asshole.

Read The Sane Society by Erich Fromm. I think you will find some validation there.

Huh me too, I only noticed my anxiety go away which made all the difference really.

Just got on Lexapro for same reasons. Cynicism and hopelessness were engulfing me.

There is more to creativity than drawing pretty flowers.

I'm sure you (we) can get pretty creative while gaming.

The video touched on that, but same goes with memes. Memes are considered dumb and useless, but as a communication medium and creative platform they are extremely complex and often require deep knowledge, a lot of thinking and creativity to make and understand.

I understand you meant to be sarcastic, but don't downplay yourself.

Now if only everyone... voted

And all the existential dread would be gone. 71% haven't tried voting in primary elections.

Don’t worry bud, I got it! Right after this ADHD goes away

Your identity is just who you are and who are is just what you do.

It isn't complicated. There's no need for dread.

Dude holy shit you solved my problem

Oh my god I can't believe I didn't think of it. Of course there's no need for dread! This local fuckin' genius has the keys to the kingdom.

Thank you so much, random redditor, for solving my decade and a half long problem with your powerful, weighty sentences, coated and dripping in dogshit.

Having anxiety doesn't necessarily make me or anyone else with anxiety fragile. I don't see how this kind of language is beneficial to anyone. Anxiety is a condition many people (including myself) live with that is manageable via medications, therapy, and/or various behavior modifications. Nothing about anxiety is easy, but "fragile" is such a self-serving pitying term. All humanity is fragile. Our lives are short and full of emotional challenges. Don't pity people that don't want it.

He's such a smart guy who can also tap into such human, real emotion. There were parts of his Netflix covid special that were so deep I found myself crying.

[deleted]

A FEW THINGS START TO HAPPEN!

MY HEART IT GETS TO TAPPIN!

AND IT FEELS LIKE IM GONNA DIIIIE!

Yeah, so... yeah. I'm not doing... great.

"love is a homeless guy searching for treasure in the middle of the rain and finding a bag of gold coins and slowly finding out they're all filled with chocolate and even though he's heart broken, he can't complain because he was hungry in the first place..."

— boseph burnz em

This is great! But it's anyone else 110% sure this guy is definitely on some kind of stimulant in this vid...?

His whole persona is dark comedy surrounded in a blanket of anxiety. I think, if anything, he’s not on enough drugs

Yeah, his vibe reads like the kind of genius that's dangerously unhinged. I don't mean crazy but lacking means to come back down from where his mind takes him. Comics and geniuses have a pretty dark track record. He's got such insane talent, I really hope he doesn't hurt himself.

That's just how he talks/is

It's called anxiety. But sure just say people take drugs, great leap to conclusions there buddy.

Tbf tho, anxiety is a helluva drug.

One of his slightly older songs gives me that feeling is ā€œfrom gods perspectiveā€ the end is * chefs kiss *

One of my all time faves! ā€œYou can eat pork, because why would I give a shit? I created the universe, you think I’m drawing the line at the fucking deli aisle?ā€ gets me every time

One of my personal favorites from that song was ā€œI sent gays to fix over population… boy didn’t that go well!ā€

As a "gay", I'm not thrilled about that line. Christians shouldn't "let me exist" just because I serve some utility. To any Christians, my response would be "God made me gay. Why are you trying to defy his grand design?!?"

Hey while I agree with you about Christians shouldn’t just ā€œletā€ you exist, I’m a fellow gay and I think you’re looking into it a bit too much. Give the whole song a listen, it’s very satirical. Just classic Bo Burnham style. It’s also not a song about Christians, but every religion in the world.

Give the whole song a listen

Oh, I have. I've been listening to that song since its release, before I even realized I was gay. I love the bits about "drawing the line at the fucking deli aisle" and how "you shouldn't rape because rape's a fucked up thing to do". I just find it hard to swallow that the line where gays are part of God's plan since were sent to fix overpopulation, as it immediately follows the line "I don't think masturbation is obscene / It's absolutely natural and the weirdest fucking thing I've ever seen". So masturbation is fine because it's just a thing that occurs in nature, but being gay is only okay because God invented it to fulfill some purpose?

Look, I love Bo. Inside is one of the most moving and insightful works of contemporary art I've ever seen, but there's an entire track in there ("Problematic") about how he regrets some of the shit he said when he was younger. what. came out when Bo was 23 and just before the era when "edgy comedy" started falling out of fashion. I think he would agree that line wasn't framed the best in hindsight, which isn't the same thing as saying "we should cancel Bo because of some shit he said 9 years ago!"

If you think for one second that anything Bo is presenting from that perspective is meant to be a guideline or taking it literally in any way, well I’m sorry but you missed the joke.

I don't think Bo is trying to lay out some kind of grand edict about how people should live their lives. I'm merely pointing to the following list, which includes every sin that Bo mentions

Things which are intrinsically valid

  • Being a good person ("Who needs a thousand metaphors to figure out you shouldn't be a dick?")
  • Not being a rapist ("Pretty obvious, just don't fucking rape people")
  • Jerking Off ("[Masturbation is] absolutely natural and the weirdest fucking thing I've ever seen")
  • Eating pork ("You can eat pork because why the fuck would I give a shit? / I created the universe, you think I'm drawing the line at the fucking deli aisle?")

Things which are valid because they serve a function

  • Being gay ("I sent gays to fix overpopulation, and boy, did that go well")

I'm not trying to "cancel" Bo or this song. I like it. It's one of my favorites from what.. I'm just not completely, 100% jazzed about the part where Bo—a cishet guy—says that all of these other sins are obviously bullshit, but when he gets to gay people, he's like "well yeah, those people exist to fix overpopulation"

I think the difference here is the religious assumption that God makes everyone intentionally. Every 'sin' listed there was a personal choice by the sinner except being gay, which is an intrinsic trait. Operating on the assumption that God makes each person the way they are intentionally means that God chose gay for people for some reason, as they would for every individual trait of every person.

I think you're putting your own interpretation on top of what bo is saying and then you're slightly offended or not completely jazzed about your interpretation of what bo said and meant.

But at no point in the song is the point you're making the intended message, or even implied. He never makes the point that gay people are only valid because they supposedly serve a function. The contrast you pointed out between the things that are 'intrinically valid' and 'valid only because' could be explained by the fact the the 'intrinically valid' things are choices humans make, and being gay is not a choice. A human can be gay, and God made human, therefore God made gay humans. So the joke simply makes more sense phrased the way that it was, rather than treating it like the others.

With most things it's easy to find an angle to be offended by (especially in satire), but it's not always worth putting your foot down for

As a die hard Bo fan myself, your criticism won’t go over well here because unfortunately people tend to be incapable of accepting criticism of things they love. In Inside Bo even jokingly but also seriously admitted a lot of his older material had unnecessarily offensive and not well thought out shit it in. I agree with you though, dude was like 19 when he wrote some of those songs and it’s okay for us to look back at it and be like ā€œoof that was not a good look or well putā€

I can see why you see it that way but you should listen to the whole thing. It's not about a christian god, it's about every god. It's all very ironic and detached

I find it very funny how two people have now asked me to listen to the whole thing, considering that what. came out during my edgy atheist phase and I listened to that particular song enough times that nine years later I can still recite the full lyrics from memory.

You can replace "Christians" in my response with "religious people" and my point stays the same.

I find it very funny how two people have now asked me to listen to the whole thing, considering that what came out during my edgy atheist phase

Honestly, maybe that's because if you listened to the whole song your take is very hard to take seriously

As if every religion gives a flying fuck whether or not you exist at all...

Abraham-centric, much?

Oh bore off fs.

Also growing up entrenched in catholicism, I've formally adopted that last bridge as absolute reality

[God's] love's the type of think that you have to earn, and when you earn it, you won't need it.

Dude was spot fcking on.

There is nothing within catholic christian doctrine that stipulates that you must earn God's love or approval.

to genuinely wrap your mind around the intrinsic truth in these words, it's likely you would have to have been unwittingly indoctrinated into catholicism (or another vein of christianity/possibly other abrahamic religions), genuinely wanted it all to be true (or at least god to be real), but have discovered, with absolute indisputable certainty, that there is just no possible way that's the case.

you also would likely need to have a profound sense of compassion & empathy, enabled by the ability to psychological put yourself in anyone else's shoes, and see their struggles for what they are, to those they impact.

you would also need a moral compass that takes laps around that of the biblical god, and virtually all teachings of both the OT & NT.

I'd say this was the most imperative element, but the biblical god was a murderous, deranged, egotistical, manipulative sociopath — so there may very well be modern serial killers who have even achieved this. though, i do admit, I've met many people who vehemently follow christianity, and have yet to even come close.

Word salad.

I repeat myself, there is nothing in these doctrines that suggests your claim. I am sorry that you experienced this in your life/education.

I don't think masturbation is obscene.

It's absolutely natural and the weirdest fucking thing I've ever seen.

ā€œNone of you are going to heaven. There’s a trillion aliens cooler than youā€

You pray so badly for heaven Knowing any day might be the day that you die But maybe life on earth could be heaven Doesn't just the thought of it make it worth a try

Is the part that really stuck with me.

If you want love, then the love has gotta come from you šŸ’œ

It's funny you say this because people keep repeating "chef's kiss" as if your mind has already been taken over.

I…uh…what?

His songs have been worrying me for a while. He’s gone into such a dark place and it’s hard to tell if he wants you to think he’s considering suicide for art and music or that he’s actually crying for help.

His special definitely helped me grieve pre-covid. I work in healthcare and I was definitely not coming to terms with things in a healthy way.

It was a similar moment when South Park made a Bin Laden looney tunes episode after 9/11, collective trauma needs a collective release.

I can bet that Bo is his worst critic, but I certainly hope he understands how many people got something tangible out of his work.

I cannot even begin to explain how his music makes me feel, inside was rough, and there were a couple songs that made me cry;

Then I went through a car crash this year,followed by a 6 year breakup, right around that time he released the deluxe version and songs like "the chicken" and "five years " absolutely broke me

I just wanted to agree with you and share your sentiment. I had my second child when Inside came out, I was in Covid lockdown for months with a toddler and a newborn. Inside made me feel and yell and cry, which is what I desperately needed at the time.

I hope you’re doing okay after those big moments in your life!

One day at a time! It might seem trashy of me out of context but I'm an expectant dad now, In a new relationship.

The way that previous relationship was and how it ended, it was easy to get over it and "find another life" as Lil Uzi Vert would say

A new chapter and new responsibilities, my friend circle changed and I'm struggling financially, but my "spirit" is staying strong, because the always happy child in me came back as soon as the toxic relationship was over

The chicken is my absolute favorite song by him, one of those songs that I immediately had to learn how to play when I first heard it (I play piano too), and spent the next week with it stuck in my head

The Chicken is like that part in White Woman Instagram that makes your heart drop…but an entire song.

As someone who doesn't really listen to music it's always so fascinating to me when I hear people describe music as an emotional experience. It's like, idk man. It like someone talking about a candle getting them through a breakup or something. It's super interesting to think about other people having a completely different interaction at a fundamental level.

Oh man, there's songs that make me cry because they are simply beautiful, and there's songs that make me cry because the artists is translating there feelings so well. Like in Eminem Fine Line when he repeats "AND I said this vanity surrounded by these lights here is likea nightmare"

In context with the previous parts of the verse and the lines following, the tone, the way it matches the music, it sounds meant to be yet it's so personal for that artist.

Music is wild and magical in some way, idk how to truly ever explain it. I envy your ability to not feel what I feel, because sometimes I'll be tryna do my job and just start crying for, what seems to everyone else, no reason

Can any one.. shut the fuck up? Can.. can anyone... any.. any ... any ONE ... any SINGLE one ... can any ONE... shut the fuck up? About any-- about anyth -- about any sss-- about any single thing?... Can any single person, shut the fuck up, about any single thing, for... an hour? Ya know, is that -- is that possible?

And I know you’re thinking, ā€œYou’re not shutting thе fuck up right now,ā€ and that’s true, but…

I was watching his special in my home office on my computer and in one of the final songs he yells at you to get up and he looks into the camera and really yells it. Like stop thinking of this as a show for a second, I'm actually taking to you and I want you to actually stand up. The first time I saw it it shocked me, I actually stood up. Now if it's ever playing in the background I always stand up during that part of the song because I've usually been sitting for too long anyway and it's as good of a reason as any to stretch and walk around for a second to get blood flow back in my legs.

I'm talking to you, get the FUCK UP.

I was rapt by All eyes on Me

That is a perfect description of how I reacted too. The first time I heard it I just stopped what I was doing, completely entranced by it.

In addition to being an incredible filmmaker and world class musician

Bo Burnham is many great things, but world class musician is not one of them.

All Eyes On Me won a Grammy, so he’s definitely at an elite tier of songwriter/musician.

His songs are deceptively simple but he puts a lot of jazz theory into his work

World class may be hyperbole, but the dude could literally just switch to music straight up right now if he wanted.

All eyes on me could be a club hit. That funny feeling is basically a Father John Misty song. He knows how to make things catchy. He could be a music producer in his sleep.

You've obviously never heard "A World on Fire"

That one's great, but I prefer "It's hard to be a lizard" myself.

INSIDE would not work unless the songs were absolutely spectacular.

Put all the same insights and jokes into amateur songs and it does not land.

He’s always been good at songwriting, but his stuff was more jokey and referential… the melodies on INSIDE are so simple and perfect it’s approaching McCartney level.

There it is again…

That funny feeling...

I watch Bo Burnham's inside and it triggers me into being emotional. I hear that song he sang that funny feeling. I tear up. especially that pheobe bridges version of it makes me cry literally everytime.

ā€œA gift shop at the gun range, a mass shooting at the mallā€ makes my breath catch in my throat every time I think about it.

I’m a 39 year old bearded dude.

I get tears every time I hear White Woman’s Instagram.

…….it might be the first song on my playlist

It's been a decade since you've been gone

Mama, I miss you

I miss sitting with you in the front yard

Still figuring out how to keep living without you

It's got a little better, but it's still hard

Mama, I got a job I love and my own apartment

Mama, I got a boyfriend, and I'm crazy about him

Your little girl didn't do too bad

Mama, I love you, give a hug and kiss to Dad

Literally every time I hear those lines, I think of losing my own parents and start crying

Inside came out shortly after my daughter was born, and this song made me cry so hard. This bit and the part after where she gets married, got me thinking about what if something happened to me and I missed all those milestones in my daughter's life. Or even my husband as well, and she had to do it all alone. Really messed me up. Still makes me cry everytime.

I've told people that IRL and everyone says, "that song, but it's just so fun and funny?!" I'm like, I think you missed the point lol.

I think that songs hits hard for either new parents or people aged 18-30 who haven't quite made it yet. I know my parents love me, but I'm not yet sure they're proud of me. I want them to know that they raised a child who grew up to be a capable, independent adult of my own. That line "Your little girl didn't do too bad" is the one that kills me every time. I want my parents to know that their work paid off.

They were wonderful and loving, better parents than anyone could have deserved, and I want them to know that it was worth it, that I did all their work proud.

[deleted]

I love you people. That song really did sucker punch me. I fell into the trap of laughing at the beginning like ā€œhaha basic white womanā€ but that song is just amazing. Behind every act we call basic is a real human being who probably enjoy it. Those ā€œlive laugh loveā€ things we make fun of, might actually be inspiring to people. Those pumpkin spice lattes we trash on every year might actually be something they really like. We keep pushing for uniqueness and shame people for commonality, for being basic. But you know what else is common and ā€œbasicā€? Fearing the loss of your parents. Wondering what they’d think of you now. Wishing that they were there for your milestones.

I’m a black guy and I’m just as ā€œbasicā€ as the white woman in that song. And it’s fine. I miss my dad so fucking much it hurts and he passed 11 years ago. Nearly the same amount of time the white woman in the song lost her mom. And if those ā€œbasicā€ things bring her happiness and help propel her forward, what sort of crap person am i, knowing how crap life is, to mock her for it?

This song out of all the others and ā€œLook Who’s Inside Againā€ (which really fucking hit me too) are just so fucking good. I literally just don’t know of any other album that connects with me so personally.

[deleted]

Yes! This is exactly it! Now I’m gonna see how great this pumpkin spice latte is

Those pumpkin spice lattes we trash on every year might actually be something they really like.

That reminds me of one of the CollegeHumor sketches from after they became good again. Being ā€œbasicā€ is just enjoying life.

Lol that’s crazy someone else just replied that to me. Pretty basic. But i like it!

I completely agree. The way I perceive it, and this may be just a rephrasing of your analysis, is that the bridge rips away the facade of a woman who is projecting a life of comfort and happiness to satisfy a goal she believes she needs to fulfill. Her seasonal decorations, her healthy eating, her arts and crafts—everything she posts is just an act she puts on to look like the woman she thinks she’s supposed to be.

These trends are also that of a woman in her late 20s to early 40s, an age much younger than typical to lose both your parents. She’s scared. She’s lost. Without her parents to congratulate her, she doesn’t know if she’s ā€œmade itā€. She’s seeking external validation because she doesn’t know how to find it internally.

The bridge changes the song from being about someone who is boastful and overconfident to someone who is scared and self-conscious. The lyrics are genuinely one of the greatest works of poetry about the modern era I’ve ever read.

After scrolling for a few minutes, I feel like I know everything about this guy except his name.

Another famous and influential person I’ve never heard of. The world keeps getting faster and more information rich

Yes! It’s like…

ā€œdid you miss the part where the focus shifts and the aspect ratio closes in and he goes from superficial to deeply, deeply emotional? and then immediately back to the superficial? but now that superficiality is coming from a three-dimensional character you appreciate as a human with pain and triumph and feelings and almost love on a gut level? Oh, you did? Well okay.ā€

It's in the middle of all this "haha these basic white girl things, am I right?" then just hits you with this bit where you realize this is someone who's lost both her parents at a relatively young age and it's devastating. Like, yeah, there's all this fluff that's kind of attention-seeking but there's also a real person under it trying to deal with things we all ultimately have to face. It's one of my favorite parts from the special but it's goddamn brutal

Given that she's updating her dead mother that she got a job, a boyfriend and a flat (whether rented or owned is not specified) she must have lost her parents as a literal child, as those are usually early twenties milestones.

A goatcheese salaaaad!

A backlit (backlit) hammock

Incredibly derivative political street art

[deleted]

My parents are both alive and I’m crying reading this comment section about that part.

I don’t know if I’ve EVER made it through the actual song. Of COURSE someone who lost a parent and then went into lockdown would !

I love the way the video for this song is cropped down to the Instagram aspect ratio until this part. It expands to full 16:9 as we get a glimpse behind the White Woman's perfectly curated Instagram appearance and see her for real.

Then it crops back down to Instagram after it ends.

The crazy part? I don’t even cry over my dad (my mom is still here). I was in a LTR and she had a daughter that I love very much. Kiddo lost her dad to COVID. Her and I used to watch the video and she would ugly laugh at everything in that video. We would offer each other an avocado or a goat cheese salad randomly all the time.

I think about when she’s a little older and missing her dad and how perfect Bo’s sentiments are. I fucking miss that kid a lot. I miss her mom too, but I couldn’t stay on the crazy train. I got to tell the kiddo goodbye and that when she’s older and on her own, I hope she tracks me down.

Friggin’ Bo Burnham, making grown ass people feel their feels

The way the camera zooms out & the image ratio changes; the square "instagram" image becomes full screen, bc now the woman is being sincere & open vs constructed "instagram perfect", adds this whole other level to that bit for me. It's so subtle & such a clever visual that adds so much meaning.

I get weepy every watch even w/o that sort of loss in my life yet. My GF lost her mom in 2020 & watching her go through it was hard, I can only imagine the heartache šŸ’• I'm sorry for your loss.

Are you me?

Maybe, what’s your favorite dinosaur?

You should watch him being real on green room

I think why some people didn’t like that special was because of how real it was, he left in parts where he was genuinely frustrated or depressed as fuck instead of cutting it out like he could’ve, but then the point doesn’t really get across

If you don't cry during his special, something must be wrong with you. No but for real, it was hard for me to watch the special because I hated seeing Bo fall down into the depression spiral once again, was so happy to see him back and feel better, only for the isolation to break him down once again. And I could really relate to his suffering so it made it even harder. I really hope he is doing better today

He's a smart fella. And a fart smella!

I've been on a Bo Burnham kick lately and rewatched all of his specials this weekend. Surprisingly his "Kanye Rant" is the one that touched me most. When he's singing "I don't think that I can handle this right now" and he screams a few times I can feel so much pain from him. He makes me feel a lot of things. I belly laugh and nearly cry in almost all of his specials. I can never get enough of him.

His self titled album, about 12 years ago, is the only music I've ever bought.

It wasnt about covid. Inside is about exactly what he is talking. Its about the role the internet and social media play in our lives.

They didn't say it was about covid.

They called it the "netflix covid special". It wasnt a covid special

How did you know they were talking about Inside?

Since the original comment was deleted, I'm hijacking the top response to provide the context that people are talking about Bo Burnham here.

His comedy songs are funny to me, as well

I wouldn'ta got the lettuce if i knew it woudln't fit

How did you reply to my comment before I posted it?

It was like watching Pink Floyd’s, ā€œThe Wallā€ to me. It was an experience to warp tech and reflect on.

That’s pretty lame ngl

George, at least in his later years, had a detachment that came from the knowledge that he was going to die. He outright stated on Bill Maher, "I have no stake in the outcome," because the part he didn't say is 'I will be dead by then.' Bo's in it. Bo's sitting next to us on the bus three seats behind the driver being like, "Okay, don't be alarmed? But I'm like 85% sure the driver is dead." The whole world at your fingertips and the ocean at your door.

I’m assuming that last line is in reference to rising sea levels—that’s a chilling ass statement, I love it.

The whole song, no the whole special, is a work of art. It belongs in the Smithsonian so when kids ask what the pandemic was like 50 years from now, we can just show them that.

Assuming there are still kids 50 years from now, of course.

I would say they are both spitting the same type of truth insofar as they are both just making the standard critique of the exact same thing: capitalism. You're never gonna get to the heart of the malaise and alienation we all feel on a daily basis without talking about capitalism's involvement in that sense. We have no existential purpose greater than ourselves. We are only here to consume the slop that's fed to us by entities seeking to profiteer and to labor most of our lives for those same entities.

they are both just making the standard critique of the exact same thing: capitalism

Like really the absolute most basic, too. Literally all of these problems come from the infinite-growth style capitalism that's been the norm since like, the steel barons of the 1900s.

I don't know what other good paths there are to be honest, I just know capitalism is fundamentally a horrendous meat grinder that perhaps a tiny portion of the population legitimately benefit from. Even that is unclear because we've all seen how empty and unsettled the uber-rich can become.

Idk, I'm just rambling. What's even weirder is that past times were definitely way worse for the average Joe, but it was also way less obvious to everyone (probably even to rulers) how much better things could have been.

Look into history you'll find we've actually tried other models of living. We've all been fooled into thinking how we live and think today is how its always been and always will be when really this system has only existed for a few hundred years.

Looked into history and before this horrible capitalism everyone on Reddit is fighting against all history prior was really shitty for simple folk on the bottom of the ladder who couldn't own a jack shit and couldn't rise above that due to being born in lower class.

Capitalism is like democracy - it might not be the best system, but it is the best system we have right now as others we had tried have failed.

This is madness. Capitalism is not the only system that hasn't failed. And it could be argued that capitalism has failed on multiple occasions, only to be bailed out.

Tell me a large scale system for a country of millions that is not capitalism that has not failed? Im curious, i never heard of it

What about socialist democracy like that in Sweden? I know it broadly follows the capitalist principles but it does at least attempt to treat people with dignity rather than as means to an end

https://www.heritage.org/index/ranking

https://www.heritage.org/index/country/sweden

11th place on economic freedom. This is all that is about capitalism - free market and economic freedom.

Some quotes:

"Deregulation, budgetary self-restraint, and a stable political environment encourage low rates of corruption and strong government integrity."

"Business freedom is high with a culture of innovation, transparent regulations, solid infrastructure, and a highly sophisticated and dynamic consumer market."

"Open-market policies that sustain competitiveness facilitate large flows of investment."

This is capitalism. Free and open market with cleanly written laws and government that restrain itself from spending too much tax money on bullshit to gain votes and is not heavily corrupted.

BTW Sweden just had election and "far-right"(far-right for Swedish standards, so they are completely liberal towards LGBT and any races of people who work, but want to get rid of those who do not work and migrate there only for benefits) won.

This is capitalism. Free and open market with cleanly written laws and government that restrain itself from spending too much tax money on bullshit to gain votes and is not heavily corrupted.

I was with you until this statement. Capitalism also requires restraint on capitalists that use market power to oppress people just as easily as any government.

Funny how all the defenders of capitalism seem to forget to this part.

[deleted]

Didn't know that about foundation yet the index is made in cooperation with Wall Street Journal afaik.

And still considering Sweden is multicultural, liberal, socialist country - it should be hated by alt-right. Yet is given a high score alongside Denmark which is also a scandi soc-liberal country. One can assume they tried to make this index quite objectively due to this.

[deleted]

Everything exists to push specific agenda. And yes I read WSJ because it is pro business and pro capitalistic specific paper. Duh.

You whine like Medical Journal is at fault for pushing WHO agenda because they write about health issues.

Still why Sweden a social-democratic scandinavian pro-LGBT pro-multiculturalism pro-migration country would be high in anti democratic far-right pro-capitalism pro-business anti-LGBT anti-multicultiralism paper if it wasn't for Sweden just being pro-capitalistic and pro-business country?

You must start reading data and understand what you read instead of ripping paper into pieces because owner of the paper has some "agenda" you do not agree with so you ad hoc assume everything they write is bullshit.

[deleted]

Can you follow your own thought?

You asked "what about socialist Sweden" going about how capitalism is bad and how socialist Sweden is doing great.

I pointed out this "socialist" Sweden is actually a great place for doing business and gain capital - so it is in fact a capitalistic state benefiting from capitalism.

That's all I wanted to say. And you started rambling how heritage company is anti-climate change and so on.

"Property Rights, Judicial Effectiveness, Government Integrity" all of which Sweden utterly excels at (95%-97%) because it is a very safe country.

It is a safe country to do business because of these things - this is what brings capital in.

Take for example Poland - country where government says one thing and does another and changes taxes from day to day (yes without any vacatio legis!). We have already 3 parallelly working tax laws - one from 2020, one from 2021 and one from 2022 and you can choose which you follow. But then it is up to government to decide if you could follow the one you chose, which will probably change again in half a year...
Country where government will try to shut down privately owned TV station because they do not like them.
Country where government run TV will smear shit over your business because they do not like you.
Country where if you do not lick ass of certain politician you will have problems, massive controls from financial institutions, could be arrested for nothing etc.

Where would you rather run business? In Sweden where government is coherent or in Poland where you have tax laws changed every other month?

And in the end - you agree with Heritage foundation that Sweden is a safe country to do business.

So is their agenda false or do you agree with what they wrote about Sweden?

[deleted]

I do not agree that Sweden's tax burden is a bad thing.

So you agree workes should be taxed twice as much as corporations?

"The top individual income tax rate is 57 percent, and the top corporate tax rate is 21.4 percent."

I do not agree the size of Sweden's government is the worst thing about it.

It is not about size but about spending. And they spend more than they earn which is always a bad thing.

"Government spending has amounted to 49.5 percent of total output (GDP) over the past three years, and budget deficits have averaged 0.9 percent of GDP. Public debt is equivalent to 38.5 percent of GDP.

I do not agree that Swedish workers are paid too much.

Considering costs of living they are not paid too much and they write about it:
The cost of labor is also high, and labor legislation and regulations are rigid. The high cost of living makes it hard to attract and maintain labor from abroad.

I do agree that Sweden is a safe and uncorrupt country, and I posit that is partly because of all the things they do that the Heritage Foundation complain about.

So you think Sweden is a safe country mostly because government spends more than they get from taxes and because workers are paid so much they cannot afford living there, and yet they are taxed 2.5 times more than corporations?

And surely it is not because Sweden is fiscally and judiciary stable country where business knows what they go into and can be legally prepared to do business according to Swedish laws.

[deleted]

Now we're getting into debating economic policy and I have no interest in doing that with you.

And what do you think capitalism is about? About economic poilcies. Duh.

The point was simply to highlight that The Heritage Foundation's metric is a subjective listing based on the assumed values of a capitalist, and whilst Sweden does come out quite well in general, most of that is despite all of the social policies that the Foundation counts as an unquestioned negative.

Well it seems that capitalism and ease of making capital is a bit more complex than only taxing or not taxing the rich.

Which was already known in 18th century when Adam Smith wrote his opus magnum Wealth of Nations, where he points at stupid, unfair and lobbied laws hindering capital gain by the people.

Because they are propagandists.

It seems to me that you are just as brainwashed by counter-propaganda

Sweden has been a small homogenous socialist country which now has a socialistic system that is failing thanks to globalisation and immigration

Ahh homogeneous The word you want to use when you can’t say you are actually just calling yourself a racist. Every single time with you people

You have no idea what you are talking about.

There are many Poles (from my country as I am also Polish) who migrated to Scandinavia. And the autochtones had to learn to close their homes and cars because of Poles. Because Poles who migrated there stole cars and were burglars. Something that wasn't happening massively before migration. Because before polish migration they were homogenous people respecting their taboos and laws.

Similar thing is with Japan, where most of them respect their own customs and are homogenous so there are low property crimes. Though they have completely different problems there.

You cannot have mass migration form unstable countries with different laws and different culture and believe it will not fuck up locals.

PS "you people" is a fucking racist remark "you anti-racist people" always spout.

Lmao just can’t help yourself can y’all

Ahh I see you cannot understand proper English and think everything and everyone in life is black and white. Sorry for bothering you.

šŸ˜…šŸ˜…šŸ˜…šŸ‘Œ

I didnt name any race as superior to another, so where am i racist, pathetic rethorics!

Interesting. Do you mind sharing any official statistics which show what you claim?

https://www.sns.se/en/articles/researcher-shortage-of-hospital-beds-and-crowded-emergency-departments-associated-with-increased-mortality/

Its difficult to show you since what metrics should i use. Well here is one example

Dude usa fucked up just about any place with resources it could extract. Since the 50s we have hit basically every country in South America twice with coups and shit. We even did it at the beginning of the pandemic.

You think Africa and South America two heavily resource continents just magically can’t get their shit straight? That some how these ppl just never managed to figure out how to make a buck even though they got the shit every one else needs?

When not actively being fucked with and a good government watch dog with teeth you’d be surprised what can actually work.

[deleted]

And you think communism doesnt exploit people, im not from USA btw, im from a country USA would consider socialist. I agree that uncontrolled ultra-capitalism is bad, but the other way around with communism or some other forced ideology is probably worse. Look at history in soviet union and talk about inequality, mass starvation. Look at Cambodia, mass starvation and genocide. I dont know what to say about China since it seems like some weird mix of capitalism and communism, but i wouldnt call it an utopia. Genocide and extreme inequality. Thats the problem with idealism, you somehow think YOU are unique and can create a better system that will bring on utopia, you are not like those russians/chinese/cambodian. Comon bro, get real bro. Capitalism is somehow built on a free market and exploitation of other just the same way it happens in nature. I dont say its good. But it seems to me that its a law of nature. Not everyone are winners. So tell me again one big scale utopian society? Who will make the rules, ahh another crazy human being will make the utopian rules which will end in genocide the end of free speech and an inequality overdrive

Yes, communism is not inherently exploitative. No, examples of communism failing in its infancy is not proof that it can't work. It turns out that the rich and powerful really want to stay that way and the long dick of the capitalist empire has a way of ensuring any other economic "experiments" fail. Then they tell people that things must be the way they are because capitalism is better and anyone who says otherwise has accepted Satan into their heart.

examples of communism failing in its infancy is not proof that it can't work.

How long does infancy lasts? 1917(1922)-1991 is quite long time not to call USSR an infant.

If a global economic system can be functionally bailed out at all, I’d argue that’s still more of a success than a failure.

It’s not being bailed out by people injecting money into it like you would bail out a company. It’s being bailed out by throwing the bodies and souls of millions of disenfranchised people into the meat grinder to keep the gears oiled. I wouldn’t ever call that anything but a failure

Again, name your alternative. People tend to dodge this step

[deleted]

any bandaids you put on capitalism will eventually be torn off by the capitalists. a socialist revolution is the only solution

Name one countries system other then Capitalism that hasn't collapsed under it's own weight with large scale population, so horrendously it could not be as you put it "bailed out"?

*come back when you have some facts children.

Tumbleweed

They don't seem to realize they only have the spare time to sit on Reddit and complain instead of working 14 hours a day because of how affluent capitalism has made them.

You have actually been brainwashed. I hope it gets better for you.

Those people for whom life "sucked" their social relationships were far more meaningful than ours. Imagine if meeting a new person were a rare thing. Think of the last cashier you interacted with, that wasn't much was it? Because your relationship to eachother has been reduced to employee and customer. We used to be more, we used to matter to eachother.

That's nice delusional post.

Why do you post on Reddit instead of going to have a chat with cashier? Is capitalism keeping you from doing it? Or it is that you yourself do not want to do it?

And believe me, in commie state you would talk to people only to get arrested a while latter because one of these "closer people" to you would end up being a government spy. This is how my father was arrested in 80' in Poland. For approving strikes against government in his private talks. When communistic government shot at protesters who wanted to go to work to feed their families.

No capitalistic corporation arrested or shot at my family for protesting government doings or even for complaining about corporations to this day after the fall of communism.

I'm getting more shit from deluded reddit posters than from corporations or capitalistic governments ever.

Did... did I say communism in my post, like, at all? No I did not. I am talking about history, before the industrial revolution. When the organizing force was religion, not the market(praise be unto it's name).

But sure, go off.

By every metric, people throughout the world are better off today than they were during the time frame you are describing.

Well, except for THE ONLY METRIC I MENTIONED.

No, you only think capitalism rules because you live in the heart of the empire and receive it's spoils. Capitalism has been nothing but a destructive force to so much of the world that we've successfully regime changed into doing the bidding of our corporations. Literally countless examples of nations' deciding to nationalize their resources for the benefit of their own people and the US immediatly deposing their leaders and instilling puppets that will give their resources back to our corporations.

No, you only think capitalism rules because you live in the heart of the empire and receive it's spoils.

I do not live in heart of capitalistic empire. I live in post commie state in eastern europe. I lived my teens under commie state and had seen how my country went into capitalistic state.

And my life conditions only did improve since then and they decrease with every single socialist idea like giving free money to retired people to get votes from then.

You are probably the one who never tasted how it is to live somewhere where capitalism does not exist. I can see it in the form of your writing about corporations. You do not understand that under commie state these corporations will still be the same, but run not by you, not by proletariate, not by workers, but by the same people who will just get a party license to govern these corporations for "state". The only problem is somewhere along the way ruling party will put there some incompetent but devout party member into power over these corporations who will just ruin this business.

So, you agree that corporations are the problem, just not that socialism is any better? Well, we can say that capitalism sucks, without saying that communism was better.

Yes corporationism isn't great. Still their lobbying and government applying lobbyst laws has nothing to do with capitalism being a bad system in its roots as people here tend to go on. It is the problem of corruption and not that one can freely gather capital.

You see corruption and you yell "CAPITALISM BAD!!!"
You see corruption under socialism and say nothing.

And as a person who lived under both I will say to you - both are the same. Corruption will not cease if you change free market to central planning. It will not cease if you raise taxes or make laws that will raise the minimal wage. It will still be there.

And I am talking here to show you that this corruption has no roots in capitalism. It is the problem of corruption which will not change under socialism or communism because it is the problem with people exploiting laws. And there will always be people who will try to do that under any law, and they will succeed in doing so.

Especially if people under them instead of fighting corruption fight imaginary "capitalism". You watered down the problem. They are free to go. Lobbying by certain persona isn't bad. Certain politicians taking money from corporations aren't bad. It is capitalism which is at fault!

And to add to that what is difference between corporationism under "capitalism" and under commie regime:

What is the difference between privately owned corporation which lobbied with money for law that allowed this corporation to monopolize market

And the same corporation being ran by government officials who make laws which allows this corporation they run to monopolize the market because they are government?

One could say there is no difference. But if you look closer the first one at least has to earn money on its own to buy politicians. The second one can just change law for themselves because they are the government and the company in one. And that is how it is under "proletariate dictatorship" or other state mantained markets. It is the same exploitation of laws and gaining power for one but by different party.

The separation of the market from the government (free market) should be as natural as separation of a legislature an executive and a judiciary (trias politica model) between themselves.

I'm calling BS. What country was this? I don't recall any country in recent history that has had communism of any kind, except possibly Cuba.

Take a moment. Think. The Nazis were the "National Socialist Workers' Party". China is under the Chinese Communist Party. Were either communist? Hell no. Is either one for the benefit of the people? Hell no. Both are capitalist.

Anyone can call themselves whatever they please. I imagine your "communist country" was little more than another dictatorship with a pretty name slapped onto it

Where are you that conditions improved POST-USSR??? In Russia the moment the USSR dissolved the lifespan dropped like over a decade and economic conditions were horrendous and still are. The USSR was an economic powerhouse during its time despite the constant aggression from the US and losing like all of its young men and half its cities in WW2. Both my parents are from the USSR and both went to college for FREE for engineering and nursing and had good jobs and a good quality of life there. They only left because the USSR was dissolving at that point as the neoliberal US consensus began to win out in the 80s.

Almost certainly the Baltics. Maybe Poland. Probably Latvia or Estonia though.

Capitalism has been nothing but a destructive force to so much of the world

I'm a critic of capitalism in many respects, but this is just false.

I think a lot of people conflate increases in productive capacity with capitalism. Building up your industry and benefiting from export/import trade is doable without a middleman who owns all the production and siphons excess wealth from the country in the form of profits. In fact some of the absolute greatest and fastest increases in productive capacity and industrialization in human history under the USSR and China were done through central planning by the state.

And for the global south its very difficult to argue that capitalism hasn't totally fucked them over. I mean all these places, Bolivia, Guatemala, Nicaragua, the Congo, Venezuela, Colombia, Haiti, Jamaica, Iran, wanted to use their resources for their nation's benefit and we were absolutely not having that so we deposed all their leaders and put in guys that will continue to let American corporations siphon all their wealth, whether it's the United Fruit Company, or Exxon Mobil, or some host of Mineral mining companies. I think all these Global South countries would be in better shape today if they had control over their own destinies and were not subject to our regime change operations.

So tell me, is the history you looked into exclusively Eurasian national history from the last 500 or so years, with a bonus flavoring of Roman? Or did you take the time to look at the last 200,000 years of culture we have on our collective existence on this rock?

I actually know European history well starting from ancient Greece and Roman Empire overlapping with Egypt and Persian history a bit. It is standard in our school curriculum to learn about that. Plus I have some understanding of Chinese history because I learn it lately due to talking with chinese.

And you cannot realy have a take on 200 000 years of history due to lack of much data about culture then you edgy moron who thinks this answers anything. All archeology without writings is mostly guessing about how people lived then.

And we have a lot of weird stuff to check like Cucuteni–Trypillia culture and their Maidanetske settlement. A lot of lost data about central and south americas cultures due to colonization etc.

So you tell me - what do you know about history?

PS. The word "culture" roots in cultivating the land. So if you want to talk about culture then you should only talk about settled ones so no hunter-gatherers' "culture" which narrows the history of culture to about 15 000 years as far as archeological data of settlements goes.

How is it any different for people at the bottom of the economic ladder right now?

I mean, that's why I called out the industrial revolution as the beginning of what we know as capitalism now. Unfortunately, the period of prosperity before that was built off of colonialism raping distant lands so the people could profit, and before that... well, there wasn't much prosperity to go around at all, honestly.

Idk, life is tough, I think that's the only takeaway. Capitalism just seems to be uniquely fucked up compared to other systems in that no one actually seems to be benefitting from it. The tiny, tiny percentage of ultra-hyper-rich can't even enjoy life typically because they're so hardwired to think about money, 60% of the world pop has virtually nothing, and everyone in between lives in a constant state of anxiety about slipping down into destitution.

60% of the world pop has virtually nothing

It's more complicated than that; global inequality has fallen since about 2000 due to higher growth rates in poorer parts of the world.

There's a lot to criticize about capitalism, but it seems pretty clearly tied to the industrial revolution, and that brought us everything from childbirth no longer being deadly to most people not living in grinding poverty for the first time in history.

I understand the model you're describing: a few hyper-wealthy oligarchs control everything while everyone else toils in poverty. But that's the situation before the industrial revolution.

Oof... you... need to brush up on your ancient history. There have been eras of prosperity before feudalism. Every society has had its issues but the progress we have made now isn't as linear as you think. Even with technology. The only think we have today thats different is eletronic tech, instant communication, and modern medicine. All I'm saying is you need a more nuanced view, your comment is incredibly hyperbolic

Back during feudalism they also said ā€œwe’ve tried all other models of livingā€ as well. And then we made capitalism.

We’ve come up with new systems, but nobody has had the balls to go all-in, rather settling for half measures that eventually collapse because they weren’t willing to toss off the shackles of capitalism.

There's a reason that modernity is popular, and it's not that "we've all been fooled", unless we've been fooled into thinking that expecting that your offspring will survive their childhood is desirable, or that nearly everyone living in grinding poverty is bad, or that prosperity makes it easier to be happy or that it's good that we don't have famines any more, or that women shouldn't die in childbirth. All of this flowed from the industrial revolution, and its idea of ongoing progress.

Burnham is pointing out a very real problem: we've invented superstimuli for social interaction and social reward, and that has consequences.

But you can't just undo the industrial revolution. Or, rather, you shouldn't, because the world was worse than you can imagine before it. So you're going to have to be more specific about "other models of living", because most other models suck.

... all I was saying is that are are other systems of govt existing in the world today, and other kinds of societies that have existed in the past that are different than the typical capitalistic model we know right now.

If you actually read my comment I said fooled into thinking this is how its ALWAYS been. I was making this appeal to someone who was saying they hate capitalism but can't imagine any other way for things to function than how they do right now.

I just know capitalism is fundamentally a horrendous meat grinder that perhaps a tiny portion of the population legitimately benefit from

It's very important to understand that capitalism is fundamentally necessary to expand our systems to a global scale, and that's required in order to manifest the next stage of our social organization.

Let's not hate on capitalism, so much as view it as a consequence of the social order before it, and a cause to the social order that will follow it. If we can view it through that lens, we can drop ideology from our motivations and begin working toward a better future.

This of course requires the defeat of conservatism, one way or another - but that's a whole other challenge.

I mean, I'm still gonna hate on capitalism though. It deserves it.

Naa, you should be proud that your forefathers laid forth and struggled through a system that was necessary for you to have a better life.

It was only a step in human progress, appropriate for its time, and helped create a substrate for a better system. We should regard capitalism as our ancestor - with respect and honor. But it's dead now, and life is for the living, and we must live the way best suited for us.

capitalism is dead? since when? where was the post capitalist bash, and why wasn't i invited to celebrate the fall?

Ah shit, guess I should have said "as good as dead," but I didn't. You got me, bud. Thanks for keeping me honest.

Naa, you should be proud that your forefathers laid forth and struggled through a system that was necessary for you to have a better life.

Sure, I am proud of that history of struggle. But to say that we should revere capitalism rather than continue criticizing it and struggling against it is where I disagree. To sit back and say "Socialism will just sort of happen on its own, so stop criticizing this violent, oppressive, and exploitative system," is flawed.

As workers, we have very real grievances with capitalism, and we should struggle against it in order to secure our class' material interests. What good is being proud of our ancestors' struggle if we're not going to carry on their fight? That's how we will make the next better system, and how we can make our descendents proud of us for our struggle.

What good is being proud of our ancestors' struggle if we're not going to carry on their fight?

We absolutely should, and I agree with you.

I suppose I just take issue with the stance of it being necessary to hate something you want to change. I feel like it's easier to convince people of a position when the temperature is turned down, and by taking a sanitized approach it's more likely you can disarm capitalists and start convincing them to change their minds.

The throwaway comment on the internet that shit talks capitalism and doesn't provide a normative solution simply causes folks who identify as capitalist to get defensive. It has, after all, provided this person with their material conditions, and their very identity when viewed through the lens of a citizen of a capitalist nation state. You go attacking their belief system so brazenly, and all you'll do is cause deeper entrenchment.

I like to think of it like deprogramming someone from religion. If you push too hard, or criticize their beliefs too sharply, all you will do is push the person away and you won't open them up to critically examine their own thoughts.

Our struggle is that we have to somehow educate people who are highly conditioned to resist education. We have to literally spoon-feed these idiots, with god-tier patience and compassion, the basic, several hundred years old concept that capitalism has internal flaws that are inevitable and inescapable. That's our struggle, and I don't think vitriol is an effective tool.

How well read are you in history? Capitalism has also achieved magnificent things. It's pretty pointless to call a massive economic organisation good or bad

Company Towns

Sorry dude, capitalism sucks. You're partially correct in that it's probably better than hunting and gathering, but that's hardly the only path.

Could you please point me towards some of these magnificent things that couldn't be achieved without owners extracting excess value from workers?

Good way to look at it, I was thinking along these same lines today. Too bad it won’t happen in our lifetimes though. I feel like this system is going to stay around at least another century or 2 before people say enough is enough

I feel like this system is going to stay around at least another century or 2 before people say enough is enough

Marx actually postulated about a magical machine that would lead to the end of capitalism.

The magical machine would have the ability to learn and reproduce itself without much energy, and would have the ability to instantly do a great deal of work that otherwise takes a lot of man hours to do.

I reckojn that machine is the computer we know today.

If what he said was true, and we are starting to experience it, then it is very possible we live to see the transition to a post-capitalist society, and it will happen in the next few decades.

But that's just a theory...a film theory...

It's very important to understand that capitalism is fundamentally necessary to expand our systems to a global scale, and that's required in order to manifest the next stage of our social organization.

This is such a massive assumption. How exactly does it do this? Or is it just impossible for you to imagine the world working differently.

Remember, just because things did happen a certain way doesn't mean it's the only way it could have happened.

This is such a massive assumption.

Uhh, okay, but I am not the one who made it. That was Karl Marx.

How exactly does it do this?

Marx was a student of another philosopher named Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who was (for lack of a better description) extremely influential on modern philosophy, and one of Hegel's biggest contributions to the field was describing how and why society moves forward.

Basically (and I am really distilling this down a lot) it goes something like this: 1) society has a way of thinking or behaving; 2) this way of thinking/behavior has certain flaws/challenges with human nature; 3) society presents an opposing way of thinking/behaving; 4) these opposing ideas conflict a bit as society attempts to address the flaws/challenges both within and without the existing way of thinking/behavior ; 5) Society eventually reaches a new consensus, which is a synthesis of the two conflicting ways of thinking/behavior. 6) Cycle repeats.

And Hegel believed that the human capacity for "logos," or our innate ability (and drive) to make reasoned discourse, created a logical inevitability for humans to expand our self determination and self understanding over time, and because of that, history was driven by a process of human discourse, or more specifically a dialectic between human ideas/social structures.

Now that you have Hegel out of the way, we can move onto Marx, who's contribution was the incorporation of material living conditions into the picture. Basically, he said "yeah, this whole dialectic shit is probably right, but it looks like the primary motivator for society seeking change to greater self determination is material...like, people will seek out social change and more self-determination when their material conditions worsen.

So where Hegel pointed out the flaws of a society ultimately lead to social order changing, Marx pointed out that those flaws have their basis in human material conditions.

He then looked at his own social paradigm - the recently emergent capitalism, and noticed the automation of machines and the rapid growth into all human life, worldwide. He then pointed out the internal contradictions and flaws in the capitalist system, and then articulated the opposing worldview/behaviors of communism, which addresses the contradictions and flaws of capitalism. Over time these ideas contend until a new synthesis of these ideas becomes the paradigm. The structure and makeup of this synthesis is not really predictable, but the fact that it will exist is.

And then the flaws of that system will present themselves and on and on and on society goes.

And that's how capitalism leads to the next stage (whatever that may be).

Or is it just impossible for you to imagine the world working differently.

What? I am literally doing that. You're the one arguing we're at the end of history, here.

Remember, just because things did happen a certain way doesn't mean it's the only way it could have happened.

What do you mean? I really don't understand what you mean or where you're going here...

He then looked at his own social paradigm - the recently emergent capitalism, and noticed the automation of machines and the rapid growth into all human life, worldwide. He then pointed out the internal contradictions and flaws in the capitalist system, and then articulated the opposing worldview/behaviors of communism, which addresses the contradictions and flaws of capitalism. Over time these ideas contend until a new synthesis of these ideas becomes the paradigm. The structure and makeup of this synthesis is not really predictable, but the fact that it will exist is.

Right, except "this thing is happening right now and will lead to a new system of thinking in the future" is not the same as being "fundamentally necessary," as you claim.

What? I am literally doing that. You're the one arguing we're at the end of history, here.

You have a serious problem with putting words into other peoples' mouths.

Yeah so I think I’m gonna get a McGriddle for breakfast. That’s something I guess…

Observing the insidious nature of people in power

I just want to note that he pretty directly disagreed with this characterization in this video. He points out that it's not "evil plans," it's just market forces that push regular people to colonize our time. I think it's important to understand this mechanism rather than blaming evil string pullers manipulating us insidiously.

I was about to point out the same thing. I was surprised so many people missed the big idea, and you've articulated it perfectly.

So much this. People need to understand that nobody’s in charge. Not only does that mean no insidious grand plan, no small group of individuals you can be mad at, it means that any change you want to make had to be a systemic change. What does that mean? It means that instead of directly changing behaviours, you need to change the rules and processes of the system that cause those behaviours to happen.

What does that look like in practice? Let’s use the OP as an example. Companies have to grow forever, and therefore they’re looking for new ways to expand. We could legislate limits on dark patterns. We could build frameworks for ethical use of user data. But those aren’t systemic, they don’t address the root cause. What about making all companies not for profit? That removes the need for eternal growth.

Think about systems.

The markets are owned by the banks, there is no free market, the banks have the ability to influence corporate governance to their own benefit.

Its not just market forces, its a system designed by the banks for their own benefit.

Banks are evil.

Funny thing is, looking at your comment/post history you are completely brainwashed by the whole gme/wsb/stonk idiocracy. You're no different from a /r/conspiracy poster, but instead of believing in flat-earth or any other stupid conspiracy you put everything in the conspiracies that are coming out of those stonk-type subs.

Take a step back and think about that.

Can you disprove any of the superstonk major points like the stock been shorted many times over the float, cellarboxing been what killed Blockbuster, Toy's R Us, seers and many more. All insidiously shorted and making use of plants on the board of these companies to bankrupt them.

Cause if you believe they organically went bankrupt and naked short selling doesn't go on then you're the one believing in a conspiracy theory.

Oh man this is choice. First of all Idiocracy is a movie. And if you actually spend a little while on those subs you would understand that the people there are very aware of the conspiratorial appearance.

Specifically because of that, the rigor that most posts go through is quite intense.

The information posted there is quite literally cited by the SEC and other institutions. People on superstonk have posted about market events in such sophistication that extremely high valued investors have used the information to enter into large positions.

The SEC even put out a report that directly indicated that the shorts had not covered yet.

It might look like a bunch of conspiracy crazy talk, but I can assure you that no conspiracy forum on the entire internet has as much rigor and is willing to scrutinize new ideas.

Seriously, ive not seen a single post that makes a large claim that wasnt filled with comments poking holes in their theory.

To liken it to flat-earth is frankly just telling me that you really have no clue what you're talking about.

Flat earth conspiracy is demonstrable false, wrong in theory and in practice. Tests have been made and results of those tests ignored and tossed out so that the flat earth narrative could be kept.

So far, nothing about the GME thesis has been proven to be incorrect, rather much of what was predicted to happen is coming true, and past theories are eventually proven correct.

Im not saying you should come and buy some GME. That is up to you. But I am saying you are wrong about it being a conspiracy on the level of flat earth.

I will agree that it shares lots of the major tenants of conspiracy theories, but just because you want to label something a conspiracy theory, that doesnt make it automatically untrue.

Conspiracies have actually been true.

Just to make sure you understand im not a nutjob. USA DID land on the moon. Chemtrails are not mind control spray from planes, just contrails. JFK/jr are both completely dead. And im sure im missing 50 more.

Point im trying to get across here, I absolutely love to pick apart and destroy conspiracy theories.

I regularly argue with my family to be rational and not believe in things like UFOs and bigfoot. Im typically what you would call anti-conspiratorial. And that is precisely why I am still invested and keep buying GME. Because I gave GME even more scrutiny than any other conspiracy I have read about and there is something there. Without a doubt.

For a quick example, the average volume(shares traded in a day) for GME the last month has been about 2.5-3.5 million shares traded per day.

Last Friday, a financial metrics reporting company(Ortex) reported the sudden borrowing of over 100 million GME shares over a one night period. 50x the previous months trading volume in ONE night. The next trading day saw GME trade 22 million shares.

This was all on no news from the company. Yet, it aligned with predictions made by superstonk posters.

So maybe the idea that all GME buyers are going to be bajillionares is pretty far fetched, but to say there is nothing going on with GME is just ignoring publicly available data. Data, is what this is all build upon, not conspiracies.

So, respectfully I think you are completely wrong about your take on superstonk.

But the crowd over on the conspiracy subreddit is pretty far gone.

jfc this shit is just unhinged you people need a hobby beyond proselytizing a video game store.

Damn bro, at least be more creative.

All I know is this, ive been investing my normal 401k split 50/50 into GME and what it always has been.

Each paycheck my normal contribution goes out split between them.

My normal 401k is down significantly. And my GME is actually up a couple percent.

Now, maybe I wont be a millionaire one day. But at the rate things are going my money is sure doing better than yours is sitting in the bank.

So, what was it I need to do again?

Jesus you are just an asshole who thinks they had a smart though. Get over yourself.

You didn't even read his comment, did you?

I hope he starts writing horror movies.

Give Black Mirror a watch.

I have. Love it.

[deleted]

That username is certainly interesting

[deleted]

Hahah yeah that's what I figured it was. I agree, mine's pretty boring. Wish I could change it

I know how you feel.

Hey you do you, droid J5893.

Made my account drunk in college. I feel you.

You mean lackkk of foresight.

its the commie sock puppet for me.

little tube dude got my respect, and my heart.

I somehow forgot how genius Inside was. Thanks for that reminder. I may have to go back and watch the whole thing again.

I love that song. I have a friend that I like to talk politics with because we're on different sides of the aisle (she's an anti-Trump republican, I try to be party neutral but have swung way left, especially recently) to help each other understand the oppositions viewpoints. Each of our echo chambers say that the other party must be doing what they're doing because they're evil or stupid. After our talks the mutual feeling is usually "now I understand why I disagree with you."

Anyway, I sent that song to her with the message "I'm really curious to hear your take on this song." She abandoned her typical loquacious analysis and simply responded "yup. All of it."

Without knowing your friend personally I can say that isn’t too surprising because (in my experience) the difference between left and right isn’t whether or not the world sucks, but if something should be done about it. So a typical Trump supporter might listen to that song and think ā€œyep, that IS how the world works now. I’m glad I’m not that puppet.ā€ While someone on the left side of the spectrum might listen and think ā€œyep, that is how the world works NOW. We should work to change it.ā€

This, because his humour is very YouTube it didn't feel funny the first time I watched what or the other specials, but inside felt like a self inspection that was on a level I would never explore myself. It's inspiring in some ways... And I really respect the guy now.

He's a little more on the ball than Carlin was. Carlin was riding the line between realization and reactionary. Burnham is mostly staying in the realization portion.

Carlin's comedy took an apparent and true observation and twisted the understanding and narrative to match what capitalists want the world to think, in a manner that avoids critical of capitalism itself. Carlin seems good if and only if you failed to put the observation into words, and then you ignored any and all critical analysis of the problem he stated entirely and took the bait. This is in actuality how fascism spreads - it takes a known problem "bad german economy" (which was a true observation) and then fails to critically analyze it but presents an edgey solution "the jews gotta go" (which is a bullshit excuse), and they sell it like they go together when the reason was "because market failures of capitalism and interventionism of imperialists" (the real reason for the bad economy) which isn't solvable by removing jews. Same reason all racist rhetoric is pushed, same reason anti-union rhetoric is pushed, same reason anti-women rhetoric is pushed, same reason pro-toxic-masculinity is pushed.

Burnham on the other hand, observes the problem, and then tells you 'why' the problem exists - and then offers no solution, which... is fine. The solution is for society to figure out. What he doesn't do is then twist the observation into a reactionary message that is itself anti-solution. It's not even really genius level stuff - he's literally just using basic marxist analysis that demonstrates real problems and real sources. The music and production is clever and so fourth, but that's separate from the content within it.

You'll notice - you noted the "insidious nature of people in power"... which is Carlin's bag... but that's the opposite of what Burnham said... what Burnham said if you rewatch is... it doesn't matter how nice they try to be. It's systemic... it's a systemic view, because the problem isn't people - it's that the rules of the game we play are shit and broken. What you said at the end - is anti-solution, blaming people and ignoring the real systemic problems that cause the behaviors we do... is bad - it is not the way to fix things because people aren't fundamentally the problem - they do get in the way individually, but the system itself is fundamentally the problem.

So while you're comparing the two in uplifting them both - they are neither equal nor is your understanding of them complete or adequate.


People sure do love telling me they feel sort of ways without adding anything of substance or any empirical evidence of any sort.

P.S. if your comment is - I mad, so u wrong... I don't actually care. That kind of comment isn't insightful or intelligent in the least and is just baseless kneejerk defense. Save yourself time and cry in some your right wing sub of choice and save me time from having to just block you for not adding anything to the discussion and just attempting to guilt trip me to go along the narrative alongside you. I don't actually care to respond to that sort of trash.

Carlin was 100% critical of capitalism and the evil inherent in it. He wasn't trying to trick you and he definitely wasn't toeing a line.

Yeah I'm very confused about where they think Carlin was in any way pro capitalist

I grew up on Carlin so I was very confused. I'm like "man I'm pretty anti-capitalist because of Carlin" lol.

You're just another condescending assphat on the internet with extra steps.

I think you eloquently argued your point and I followed your logic but you lost me at the end. You do care and you put people down if they don't match your superior critique.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nyvxt1svxso

This is your idea of someone who "twisted the understanding and narrative to match what capitalists want the world to think, in a manner that avoids critical of capitalism itself."?

Me experiencing two artists and comedians in a similar way is not me expressing fact or absolutes. I’m a fan of two comedians from two different eras and find similarities - not just in this one tik tok snippet of something Burnham said once - but being a fan of their works. I did not claim their works to be literally the same. I was just merely sharing a thought in my head, one that pleased me and that others might share. I don’t have the time to defend my stance, nor do I care to. Just truly enjoyed the clip & his convictions reminded of Carlin. Simple as that.

Your judgment that my comment was incomplete and inadequate does not resonate with me. It seems like your analysis of Carlin & Burnham is one that you stand by (totally fair!). But I disagree on some of your observations. My nuanced and unique experience related to my love of Burnham & Carlin is a personal one that your opinion holds no merit, to me. And I wouldn’t expect my opinion to hold any merit for you :)

[deleted]

Only because being an edgy depressed asshole is mainstream these days.

I feel like you identify more with one than the other. Doesn't mean that you are right and Carlin is wrong though.

You'll notice - you noted the "insidious nature of people in power"... which is Carlin's bag... but that's the opposite of what Burnham said... what Burnham said if you rewatch is... it doesn't matter how nice they try to be. It's systemic

this was literally carlin's M.O. People individually are inherently good. groups of people are inherently stupid and bad. Groups of people without filtering will make bad, destructive decisions over time. He did see the flaws in capitalism, but didn't see any credible alternatives. Same goes for democracy.

This is in actuality how fascism spreads - it takes a known problem "bad german economy" (which was a true observation) and then fails to critically analyze it but presents an edgey solution "the jews gotta go" (which is a bullshit excuse)

you are either critically underinformed about the rise of the NSDAP in germany and the full scope of the remodeling of german society at that time, or willfully misrepresenting actual fascism.

Either way, your comment is verbose but vapid.

this was literally carlin's M.O. People individually are inherently good. groups of people are inherently stupid and bad. Groups of people without filtering will make bad, destructive decisions over time. He did see the flaws in capitalism, but didn't see any credible alternatives. Same goes for democracy.

Saying that "groups of people are inherently stupid and bad" is not systemic criticism, because it says nothing about systems under which people live.

thanks for posting rick wolff video

I'm not familiar with Burnham beyond this video, but I am familiar enough with Carlin to agree that his expositions were incomplete.

Edit after a little more thought:

I'm not sure Carlin himself intended to promote fascism. I'm more confident in saying that because of his incomplete expositions, listeners are more likely to draw incorrect solutions; therefore fascism. Anyway I'm saving your comment. I want to look more into Burnham in the future. Thanks!

I haven’t watched much Carlin but i do notice that he’s used often by people on the right. I’m sure he probably didn’t wish for that, but it’s like you said. Because he isn’t analyzing the problem, it lends itself to interpretations without answer and is typically the motif of centrists. Talking about the insidious nature of people in power is a tool that can be used as a weapon to maintain the status quo. ā€œCarlin was talking about those guys not us!ā€ Talking about how it’s the system that’s the problem makes the answer clear to me; that the status quo is what should be changed. And how can the people maintaining it use Bo’s words as a weapon? Which is why i don’t often see him used as a misunderstood proponent of conservative politics like i do Carlin.

that was the most neckbearded shit I've ever read on this site.

[...] they are neither equal nor is your understanding of them complete or adequate.

Jesus fuck.

If you want anyone to take that first paragraph seriously, you need to provide some YT clips where he engages in the twist you're accusing him of and break it down. Because it's very counter the opinion of millions who've watched him and see nothing but David vs Goliath.

I'd gild you if I could. Nice to see someone on Reddit who really gets it.

He must be protected at all times!

What does this mean? Who is coming at him?

Nobody. It's just a stupid comment people make because it gets easy upvotes.

It's usually a three-comment extravaganza of unoriginality.

  1. We must protecc XYZ at all costs!!!1!1!
  2. We don't deserve him/her!
  3. They're a national treasure!!1!

Except when Carlin did it, he was kinda a pioneer in this kind of thought (for the most part).
What this guy is saying has already been said for the past 10 years. And he just came to the realization of it.

Not to take away from him here but this has been blatantly and openly talked about for a decade by tons of people. This is an old idea and it's not even controversial. It does say something that it is being sold as such.

The person you're replying to said that Bo is saying what Carlin was saying.

That person is saying Bo is spitting the kind of truth that Carlin did. I'm saying the specifics of what Bo is saying, while also dealing with power structures, aren't quite the same because they are widely accepted as true. It's hardly spitting truth in that case. Carlin said thing other people did not say, that were daring, and controversial. None of this is that. It feels different. I love Bo, but the comparison doesn't feel right in this case.

It does for me! Fair and expected that we experience art, comedy in different ways

With this I wholeheartedly agree!

There’s no way of knowing that he said things that no one else said, even he used to say that he’s saying things that everyone is thinking. I really hate this narrative that always comes with the worship of ā€œthe greatsā€- that they were original and that no one has lived up to them since. It’s bullshit. At the height of Carlin’s popularity, you had to buy tickets to comedian’s shows, buy a copy of a live show on a record album, or see a five minute clip on a talk show. Shit was being said all the time by people all over, but things didn’t travel at the speed of Twitter so every joke wasn’t general public knowledge.

For example, In the 70’s/80’s, different regions of the country would dress differently and listen to different music even, because it used to take months for trends to make it from the coasts inland. People were just unaware of anything outside of their area because there was no internet. You know what else that means? There wasn’t a record of everything everyone said that you could refer to. So- now, a comedian tells a joke, millions of people will go digging into the archives of everyone ever, and go ā€œLOOK, THERE WAS AN INDIE COMIC THAT SAID A SUSPICIOUSLY SIMILAR JOKE AT A BAR CRAWL IN MINNESOTA IN 2006, THEREFORE THIS JOKE WAS STOLEN!!!! GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT IS DUE!!!ā€ Everyone knows everything everyone says as soon as they say it, they know the time stamp, they know when it’s been altered, erased, all of it. Comparing comedians of the 70’s/80’s and even 90’s and the ā€œoriginality of their thoughtsā€ to comedians of today, and thinking that you have a clue about who’s more original is absolutely ridiculous

This feels very angry for some reason?

Zero shade on Bo here. And I'm not Carlin-worshipping. I love both these talents.

I am sure Carlin was inspired by a lot of things available to him, people, texts, etc. Of course. And of course the internet changes the way information moves and is shared. I'm just pointing out that the things being said here are already widely accepted. Is anyone at all disagreeing with these thoughts? Hasn't this been a central cultural dialogue for a long time? Also there are plenty of fringe opinions out there still. It's not like those have been eliminated. Bo is reaching wider audience than Carlin ever did, with broader recognition, with a beautiful eloquence that is reaching people and touching them.

Honestly, I don't know why you seem so upset.

The things Carlin were saying were already widely accepted as well, and you were saying that the other person was incorrect in their comparison to Bo, because you thought Carlin was saying ā€œnewā€ thoughts, which he wasn’t. It’s a ridiculous statement that is an insult to every comedian that came after him. It’s upsetting to any comedian or comedy fan because no one will live up to this ā€œoriginal thought/original materialā€ narrative because it can’t exist in this day and age.

There’s a reason you were downvoted, and I’m trying to explain the logic behind why, and you’re being reductive and basically saying ā€œyou’re just butthurt, what’s your problem?ā€ rather than rethink your original statement. It’s very MAGA like mentality.

Not to take away from him here but this has been blatantly and openly talked about for a decade by tons of people. This is an old idea

I was with you up until...

and it's not even controversial.

It absolutely fucking is. Like one of the most controversial issues there is. Like lose your job and get ousted from communities level of controversial when you fuck around and find out. Like if you brought it up and said - well we can start with unionizing... and you did that at a walmart, the entire store might end up closed. Like the government works with walmart to wiretap their employees controversial. Like if you want to have that conversation with people and include all the basis for trying to explain it - you're risking expulsion and ire of people who want nothing to do with that or risking their job controversial.

How you can consider one of the largest taboos in the world, the thing that wars get started over if you fuck around with it... as hundreds of invasions by the U.S. and U.N. globally and numerous massacres of millions of people has demonstrated isn't controversial... is itself kinda fucking sus honestly.

The last two hundred years have been a blood stained struggle over exactly this issue. There is no single thing that so defined modern society than it. It is literally the very zeitgeist of the last two centuries outright and it's so thoroughly around us it's like we're fish in water and don't even notice it's pervasiveness in most of the media we consume as well.

I think our collective questions how many gazedollars did we pay for our blabberquest pod?

https://www.dukeupress.edu/the-world-computer

I wouldn't mind Bo putting out 30 specials like Carlin

venue and the person matters too. anyone else giving Burnhams rant would've gotten OK boomer'd a minute in.

in no way am i detracting from what Bo said, it's more the people who really need to hear this message, ie. sleepwalkers shambling directly into moloch's left nostril who dont give a shit. theyll be waking up slaves before they wake up to this shit.

It’s not insidious. He says that. Nobody is evil in this system. It’s the system itself, that pushes regular people to do things that ultimately negatively impact society as a whole.

You can tell Bo knows how the stock market works because he realises nobody in the system has a truly evil agenda. Shareholders primary interest is of course return on investment. They all also have different goals and values, but they don’t necessarily share all those. The only way such a system can work, is if we ignore those other goals and focus on the goal they all have in common, and that’s making money off their investment.

As a results, that’s the CEOs ultimate job. Deliver maximum profits. The CEO is not the owner, he’s an employee himself and has duties towards his shareholders, which he tries to uphold and market forces push him and upper management in general to drive more engagements and get more ads.
Don’t deliver on the increasing profits, and you’re a goner.

I’m generally a fan of capitalism, as it creates a lot of value, but market forces are ultimately profit driven, which also incentivises some bad behaviour. We need corrective forces to steer that behaviour, e.g. strong unions and laws to disincentivise certain behaviour and reward other behaviour.

Fucking LOVE BO. I literally can't show enough people Inside. So many good, poignant thoughts rolling around in that boy's head. And yes, he'll always be a boy to me ā¤ļø

He’s totally right that it comes down to profits and growth. Every corporation is dead set on double digit growth and shareholders are not satisfied unless they get it. We’re headed for a bubble that can’t take much more.

The bubble pops every 8 to 10 years or so. 1982,1992, 2000, 2008, 2019.

2019?

Yeah, wtf is 2019

The year after 2018 but before 2020

Source?

[deleted]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019 found a source for you

The bubble was showing signs that maybe it was going to burst in late 2019 but then COVID emerged and the FED and Government pumped ungodly amounts of capital into the markets which stabilized everything somewhat despite a brief drop.

No one can say for sure but in my opinion they just mortgaged the future and the economic downturn will be more extreme because of it.

Yup, economists from across the spectrum were predicting a crash in 2019. I switched careers to healthcare because I figured it would be more stable during economic chaos than the bullshit I was doing before. Then covid happened and I can't tell if I made a good or bad call anymore.

This guy econs.

That's what that piece on paper on the wall is good for, semi coherent reddit commenting.

by "stabilized everything" you mean resulted in atrocious parabolic gains for the rich and the most lucrative two years in history for Wall Street in the midst of a dual health & economic crisis. That's what you meant, right?

Nobody knows about the silent 2019 bail-out which was swept under the rug by Covid. Bigger than the 2008 bail-out. Complete media black-out.

Sorry, sorry. It's too early for CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRiEs. Better to just wait until all of your money is CBDC issued directly by the banking cartel and you can't get your next paycheck until you've had your 69th booster shot.

Anyway brother, here's Wonderwall chopped into a 15-second clip for your TikTok viewing pleasure.

When I say stabilized I was specifically referring the the stock market which is somewhat tied to the economy, regardless of who benefits, because when it tanks massive layoffs occur and wages become even more stagnant if that's even fucking possible.

The stock market is supposed to reflect the real-world economy, but what you're [accurately] describing is the opposite of that. Our financial markets are detached from reality, because our entire economic system is a Ponzi dictated by the central banking cartel.

A historic 13-year bullrun prompted solely by Quantitative Easing [unmitigated currency dilution] was coming to an abrupt end in 2019. Conveniently, a naturally-occurring and obviously not lab-made virus was accidentally released at that exact moment to trigger a panic, providing the perfect excuse for a hot-n-ready liquidity injection--enough to cap off the bullrun and emphasize how truly detached from reality the stock market is.

Once again, it was the most profitable 2 years in history for Wall Street and the billionaire class. And it happened during a bona fide economic crisis comprised of shutdowns, social unrest, choked supply lines, etc. The wealth gap doubled in 18 months.

The corporate oligarchs have just ensured that your grandchildren will be landless serfs forever in their neofeudal dystopia.

Investing is not reserved for rich people. It does require some time and research though to make profitable desicions

I love it when I almost take someone seriously on this dumb site and then they give me an out by talking about secret banker cabals and vaccine conspiracies.

You're free to choose the blue pill. Doing research into taboo topics isn't easy.

Just don't expect me to give up and die alongside you. I reject dystopia.

Nooo not the pill analogy 😭

You hate it because it's accurate.

Uh oh, stumbled across the red pilled conspiracy nut. Let me know how your meeting with the 12 foot tall reptillians goes, I here they're quite friendly.

It's interesting how every time I bring up blatant financial conspiracies, folks like you have no viable response [because you're not paying attention and don't actually know what I'm talking about].

So, you slide the topic and attack me on a personal level, as those who are insecure of themselves always do.

The statement I made is an established reality, which you made no effort to contradict.

Keep up the ad hominems. Keep shopping at Amazon and eating McDonald's. I'd rather die fighting with my tinfoil hat.

Definitely some truth behind market manipulation, under-the-table dodgy deals, etc., including hidden bailouts.

A whole another level of loony when you enter the "covid is a manufactured virus to hide said bailouts" territory and sub to r/conspiracy.

Keep up the ad hominems

Not an ad hominem. You stated a dumbass conspiracy and referenced the "blue pill", so I called you a red-pilled conspiracy nut. No different than calling a man who enjoys the company of a woman a heterosexual.

Keep shopping at Amazon and eating McDonald's

Ahh, making assumptions about my shopping habits based on me not being a conspiracy nut. Interesting. Sort of ironic that you make this statement immediately after whining about ad hominems, unless you did that intentionally to be clever.

I'd rather die fighting with my tinfoil hat.

Probably die from a preventable disease which we have a vaccine for, not exactly an honorable fight.

Agreed. We can all agree that there is entirely too much unethical deals, borderline-illegal plans, and disgustingly-legal tax dodging going on in our modern economy. We all know that our country is run by corporations and lobbyists, and that there’s nothing that anyone with a net worth below 10 digits can do about it. That doesn’t mean that the Jewish banking cabal are in league with the lizard people to keep people from learning the truth about 5G and the nanobots in the Covid vaccine.

This nonsense you're spewing is part of a highly effective tactic called "muddying the waters."

After the CIA murdered the last honest president in plain view and covered it up in the sloppiest fashion imaginable, they needed a way to silence dissent.

Their solution was to coin the phrase "conspiracy theorist" in order to discredit anyone who dares to publicly contradict whatever official storyline is offered up by the U.S. government.

Do you mean to tell me you believe that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone and killed the president with a 'magic' bullet?

Do you mean to tell me you believe 2 passenger airplanes brought down 4 skyscrapers in NYC? Because if you believe the official narratives propagated by the Warren Commission and the 9/11 Commission, then... Well, I'm wasting my breath talking to you.

There is a global central banking cartel. The Federal Reserve is its arm in America. This is a widely accepted fact by everyone who knows the first thing about the Fed; if you refute it, that just means you know nothing about the history of what we call "money."

I don't blame any particular race. I blame the absurdly wealthy families that have gradually been accumulating ungodly amounts of wealth for generations at everyone else's expense... Rothschild, Rockefeller, Du Pont, Bush, et al.

The reality of the Covid vaccines is that none of us really know what the truth is, yet they have been forced upon a largely unwilling public, despite the obvious conflicts of interest that abound between Big Pfarma and the American gov't [care to guess how many members of Congress hold stock in Moderna & Pfizer?]; anyone who has dared to observe their obvious ineffectiveness and the arbitrary, draconian nature of the last year's mandates has been ostracized, subjected to all sorts of defamation, ridicule and intrusions upon our livelihood.

Ivermectin has now been widely accepted as an effective treatment for Covid. Natural immunity has been officially recognized. Has there been any apology to the CoNsPiRaCy ThEoRiStS who have been trying to say this for 2 years now?

Are the vaccines going to turn everyone into zombies? Probably not. Are they causing cardiac-related issues in millions of people? There's plenty of data supporting the idea, but god help your soul if you try to share it, especially if you have any kind of medical license.

I don't know what the truth of the matter is, but I know this: it fucking stinks. And I don't care whether you agree or not, because your opinion doesn't change reality. Poke fun all you like. When you come to recognize the global corporate dystopia which is gradually enslaving the working class, I don't expect an apology from you. But I hope you remember: you were warned.

I legitimately agree with most of what you said. My point isn’t that every conspiracy theory ever is dumb and stupid and the official narrative is always right. In fact, I acknowledged that billionaires and corporate run this country, and they run it unchecked. I work in health insurance, and it is so so so disgusting how the poorest in this country have their very health threatened so that shareholders can have a sliver more profit in a quarter.

My point is just that that doesn’t mean that every conspiracy theory ever is right. That literally was my point. I was randomly picking common mainstream conspiracy theories.

Like, if you want to go conspiracy by conspiracy, we can. I think JFK’s assassination was rather convenient for certain parties and also some details were sus. I think that the Covid vaccine is mostly fine because it’s based on vaccinations that have been around for decades — remember, SARS and MERS are coronaviruses, as well — although there’s literally a page about possible cardiac complications after the Covid vaccine on the CDC’s website. I also believe that ivermectin is a drug to prevent or treat parasites and has as much of an effect against a virus like Covid as a glass of orange juice. I believe that the the impact of the jet planes during 9/11 combined with the heat of the fires weakening the steel enough to eventually create a domino effect that collapsed the Twin Towers.

I am also not pointing fun at anyone except the most extreme of the tin foil hat wearers, because, hey, there’s a lot of wrong info out there, and there’s a lot of right info out there, and it can be really hard to tell the difference between the two.

That's a reasonable perspective. I appreciate you giving an actual response rather than just dismissing or neglecting what I said.

We don't agree on everything, but we don't need to, so long as we can agree that the parasite class is conspiring against the productive class. If you agree it is our duty to unify against tyranny, then I don't care about the rest of your beliefs.

Whether you're Q Anon, transgender, or a fucking Pokemon--it doesn't matter to me, so long as you acknowledge we're on the same team. Political tribalism amongst the working class has got to end, or we're doomed.

Economics doesn’t give two shits about people, the economy can become stable while millions of people suffer it’s just doesn’t factor into it.

Global Debt crysis HERE I COME

2019

Well when you put it like that...

Two thousand nineteen

2019 was when the fed did a $700billion bank bailout because of the repo market.

https://fortune.com/2019/09/26/the-feds-repo-market-bailout-is-a-sign-of-deeper-problems-that-are-getting-worse-over-time/

US oil company bankruptcies started going bankrupt at a rate of 50% above average (yup, right when the US became a net exporter, always a fun fact to share with MAGA supporters to see how they twist it into a positive)

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-oil-bankruptcy/u-s-canadian-oil-company-bankruptcies-surge-50-in-2019-report-idUSKBN1ZL2MY

Covid kinda covered up a massive economic collapse and now everything is weird.

There's a bigger bubble.

You can't infinitely grow in a finite space.

To paraphrase Marx and Engles: Capitalism will undergo increasingly dire financial crises until either it utterly collapses or the working class wises up and revolts. ("Das Capital")

Which is why it's so important to keep the working class divided, preventing them from achieving the unity required to effect real change.

Unfortunately we're divided about who is doing the dividing.

It’s the entire ruling class. There is no ā€œprogressive bourgeoisieā€ we can’t keep doing the same things we’ve been doing for the last 100 years and expect change. It’s not a coincidence that all the countries with higher standards of living than the US all have strong labor parties, we need to stop supporting the democrats they are a non starter at this point.

Dont forget that a big part is also the voting system being used in the US

Yeah, ranked-choice voting would help. Could possibly open the door to a decent 3rd party

So how do we break away from the two party system because the only way out that I can see is through radical progressiveness and there’s just not enough support for that at this point.

I’m pretty sure events will do that for us. The Democrats are losing their base day by day, it’s becoming increasingly obvious they exist only to uphold a system that people fucking hate. It will be a Bernie esque political figure that will have to break because we know what happens to socialists that run as democrats (see India Walton). The working class will need to learn a hard lesson but the crisis of capitalism and climate change is going to force the issue.

We need to stop using terms like democrats and Republicans. Class separation is bigger than politics.

And when it gets down to the nitty gritty you'll see older Democrats show their true colors too. Except Bernie.

Well, it might be possible to elect enough progressives to get a functional 3rd party.

The problem is right now you have a center party, and an extreme right wing party.

Those are your current, and only, viable options. Votes for 3rd party candidates hand elections to whichever of those two parties isn't in power at the moment.

Pulling the plug on the democrats might be cathartic, but it won't get you what you're looking for. It'll give you something much, much worse.

and then it repeats all over again

people get used and abused by new regime until there’s systemic collapse or another revolt

Only overly oppressive regimes get noticed. That’s why throughout time oppression has been refined to slowly kill through starvation, homelessness, disease, and character assassination such that:

…nobody bats an eye.

That’s why the middle class is shrinking, the poor are expanding, and the underclass aren’t even treated as human.

It’s truly a sick world I’m glad we only have finite time in.


cynical view: the more humans are removed from the equation—the quicker any uprising is culled—the longer the status quo. Less ppl = More ā€œHave’sā€ / Less ā€œHave-Not’sā€

Edit: It won’t be like the middle-ages again where workers have the power due to shortage. If you can replace the human getting your caviar with a robot, what difference does it make?

Well in that case; Cyberpunk dystopia, here we come!!

I thought we were there already.

Where's my cybernetic dick then?

https://queerforty.com/worlds-first-cyber-penis-has-been-created-by-a-queer-black-woman

Its a boring cyberpunk dystopia though. Forgot to mention.

Edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUF6HAwyctg some music to help

[deleted]

Not to detract from your point, but robots consume less than a human. We need energy for thinking, growing, healing, etc. We waste alot of energy as heat, too, and our fuel source is pretty inefficient (but it is renewable).

Robots just need a couple watts to run electric motors. Electric motors basically hit the cap of theoretical energy efficiency. Slap some solar panels in there and boom, they're free.

I think they meant consume as in being a consumer and buying products

Yeah, they were definitely referring to human/robot consumers as in the people that will buy products and thus continue the capitalism flow, not consumers as in how much energy they use.

[deleted]

ah gotcha thanks

No middle, no poor, just working class. It's the working class and the capitalists. It's grim, but joining leftist organizations can put you on a path where at least you feel like you're changing things. Growing class conscious to the point where workers can unite to take back what has been stolen.

That's how life is.
Hunter-gatherer societies were doing the same thing - go and exploit what is around you when it ceases to exist go to the other place and exploit it again and fight for this place with other groups which also want to exploit it.

Humanity just grew to bigger picture. Yet it is all the same. All the capitalists and also socialists and commies are thinking in the same manner as hunter-gatherers - get as much as you can for yourself while it lasts.

For further reading about collapses of kingdoms due to elites being rich and plebians being poor and starting revolts I'd recommend reading Ibn Khaldun history of rise and fall of arabic empires from 15th century. It is all going circles since dawn of man.

For yourself as in the individual?

I don't think that's true at all.

If you can replace the human getting your caviar with a robot, what difference does it make?

It will be your job to build and maintain these robots

until they build themselves—(which in some capacity they already do—with assembly line robots creating other robots parts).


I foresee a world where specialized individuals interface with machinations more and more… until all that’s known—is through a machine.

As generations come and go soon all that’s left of our intelligence becomes the machine.

Refining itself until its very existence is but a collective intellect, gathered from us.

Will this machine still feel as it’s creators once did? Taking its own flaws into consideration?

Will it still observe as it’s creators once did? Seeing the world not for what it is—but what it was and what it can be?

Will it still love as it’s creators once did? Finding connection to others much like it in this isolated universe?

Will it know itself? As it’s creators once failed to do?

Will it even question these traits at all?

No. For it is just a machine.

We think of a world much like our own…dystopian, shown through a lens of stories, always thinking of a way to avoid our coming peril. However the true end of humanity will not be seen through war, destruction, and chaos.

Instead we will reach our end peacefully, slowly and surely until we simply aren’t needed. When we’ve automated the inefficiencies of our very existence into the machine and when creating more of our kind is seen as a burden instead of brilliance. I foresee a future where we are but a relic of intelligence from a long gone age.

^– ^Me. ^(and probably some crackhead during the industrial revolution)


You may ask, ā€œwhy create such machinations to replace us?ā€ā€”as you read this not from the lips of a human

…but from the machine itself.

U ok bro?

bruh I don’t even know

Or it finds a way to expand into the next "tier" (in this case, automation and space), leaving the people not in charge of capitalism behind.

Fear the day when corporations explore horizons beyond governments, because an entity solely concerned with profits has so very much to gain from a total lack of oversight, and so much for humanity to lose.

They were wrong for about 150 years, but this time is different right?

[deleted]

You just created your own religion with Marx as a prophet, and fall of capitalism as a Second Coming.
Capitalism is as natural to us as a human language, it will not collapse, it will evolve

Capitalism is as natural to us as a human language

Hahaha so true bestie, cavemen were trading futures on the Neanderthal Valley Stock Exchange

Grug crashed the rock market again :(

No they were wrong about the market correcting itself when it was significantly worse at the turn or the 20th century and they were evidently wrong on how to fix it. Capitalism was way way worse before the progressive trust-busting schemes during the Roosevelt admin.

Nobuo Okishio proved that communism is impractical mathematically and no one rectified his results from the 1950s. In fact, Marxist economists had to concede Okishio’s Theorem.

I really hope people scrolling through this comment section understands what’s happening here. This is how propaganda works. Everybody is actively recruiting people to their equally shit belief system. This one is trying to make you despise capitalism and then dishonestly portray Marxism/communism as the only other option as if it wasn’t an utter failure and disastrous for billions of people half a century ago.

Stay noted. Don’t let internet people spook you into becoming a radical. People prey on negative vibes like this comment section.

Could you define "real change"?

Genuinely curious.

Actual democracy, cooperation over competition, eliminating the profit motive etc

[deleted]

Did saying ā€œactual democracyā€ trigger you haha. How about this, the US is not a democracy and I could easily argue that China is more democratic than any typical bourgeoisie democracy from the west.

Breathe in and out, you’ll get past your panic attack lmao

[deleted]

Either way your input was irrelevant.

Tankie = anyone who says something good about US enemies or bad about capitalism. You couldn’t have used a cooler sounding term

Lol imagine writing this unironically.

^ this poster is a loser idk why anyone even engages with people like this. not even a drip of sincerity.

Revolution. The dictatorship of the proletariat.

ah THE DICTATORSHIP - it is of course the answer to all the problems we have at hand!

Say again how are you commies different from monarchists?

Monarcy is inherently a single individual DICTATING what happens in society. The proletariat is inherently all working individuals. A dictatorship of the proletariat means the workers in society decide how resources are distributed.

And bear in mind, when he wrote about this, Marx specifically wasn't talking about a Soviet style economy - he was specifically talking about a heavily mechanized and automated capitalist society that could no longer rely on everyone working at high enough value to sustain their livelihoods. He saw how machines were replacing jobs in the early industrial revolution, and he realized that on a long enough timeline, this would lead to a problem in the method of resource distribution.

The idea is that as we approach a level of mechanization and automation where labor is less needed to drive society, we will need to find a way to move beyond a system where people must make wages to pay bills and live their lives.

That moment is upon us, my dude.

We are about to undergo a global demographic collapse. When the boomers die, very few countries will have the workforce to replace the void in production left behind by the boomers.

Furthermore, capitalism has spread worldwide and has unified us as a global society. We are now no longer capable of colonizing and expanding our growth at a fundamental level. Wages for workers in China are now approaching median American wages. This will happen in India and Africa eventually, too.

This crunch is going to happen whether you like it or not, and ultimately the very mechanism that drives our system of capital and asset ownership is going to be a real problem. Those who own most of the stuff will have no choice to surrender to the will of the workers - the dictatorship of the proletariat - at some point, one way or another.

When the boomers die, very few countries will have the workforce to replace the void in production left behind by the boomers.

You do realize that the youngest boomer is 58 based on their generation’s end year. People 58+ are not who our workforce is. You also fail to see that money = power. We’ve had a hierarchal system for centuries, and we’ll keep having hierarchal systems for centuries. You speak of it as if a possible revolution would fix everything and all would be fair afterwards. The ashes of fallen nations have always been the foundation for others to supplant themselves as the new presiding class. It’s the same government only with a different paint job.

You do realize that the youngest boomer is 58 based on their generation’s end year. People 58+ are not who our workforce is.

Demographically speaking, the peak baby boom was in 1960, which means the peak retirement will occur in 2025. The boomers, by in large, are still very much so working, and as a large cohort, they do represent a disproportionate number of workers.

You also fail to see that money = power.

Hard disagree. I am fully aware and personally abide by this concept.

What I am getting at is that on a long enough timeline, there is going to be fewer and fewer jobs available that pay enough to afford the cost of living, and this is going to force a social change, because people are motivated by their material conditions worsening.

And this automation and suppression of wages we are experiencing today are a natural consequence of the profit motive of capitalism. Eventually you run out of places to outsource, and eventually you automate workforces to the degree that a large portion of society cannot find work to feed themselves.

We're already toying with the idea now with the UBI, which has appeal to both political sides of the aisle. This is effectively the end-stage of capitalism, happening in a postmodern society, where even Republicans can see the utility of "negative income tax" or UBI..

But that's the thing...when we start paying people to do nothing, and those who work are paid their cut plus the UBI, then we are effectively practicing a form of early Marxism, where money starts to lose its power.

We’ve had a hierarchal system for centuries, and we’ll keep having hierarchal systems for centuries.

I agree. Whatever emerges after capitalism as we know it is going to have its internal flaws based upon unjust hierarchies. And if you're a Hegelian, then you would suggest the likely result of that social thesis would be a social antithesis forming within society, followed by a social synthesis of the concepts being utilized by society.

You speak of it as if a possible revolution would fix everything and all would be fair afterwards.

I suppose it sounds that way, but I reckon it comes off that way simply because we live in a time where things move quickly.

I reckon we will have a pretty tumultuous 15 years or so ahead of us, because once the demographic shift is in full swing, the boomers will be dying at the peak rate. And unlike all demographic cohorts before them, as old people, they own over 2/3rds of the wealth, and will pass their wealth onto their children, resulting in a record high capital spending outflowing from capital markets. This will all be happening while interest rates continue to rise to balance the Fed's ledger, and because of this, access to liquid capital will be hard, meaning the stock market will pretty much lose all growth valuations. Asset prices across the board will be a joke compared to today, and in some countries, the workforce will be half that which it is today, and stuff will suck until the population recalibrates to current growth trends.

This is going to be a long process - not some revolution. More an evolution.

And no, it won't fix everything - only the problem of income distribution in the face of globalization and mechanization/automation. There will still be hierarchies - duh. They're just gonna be different, and based upon the failures of whatever comes next.

The ashes of fallen nations have always been the foundation for others to supplant themselves as the new presiding class. It’s the same government only with a different paint job.

Yes yes a thousand times yes! I agree whole heartedly. But you cannot deny, the differences between each supplantation nation (nice) is both a reaction to the previous fallen nations, as well as a decidedly different system than it's predecessor.

Are we going to say the Soviet Union was really analogous to Tsarist Russia? The US to the UK? The Mughals to the Maratha? I just can't agree with you, here.

Call me crazy, but I think we are approaching the conditions for another great transition. Just like the printing press leading to the enlightenment, the computer is changing our society - and it's happening right now.

Big if true, I’m not sure I’ll hold my breath for it, though. The transition that you’re expecting will likely not be the result that you had anticipated. True the baby boomer generation is fizzling out, but they’re the poster children of the blue collar work force. Higher education is on the rise, and with that the need for more white collar positions. Robotics can easily and readily fill in the void of blue collar tasks, but white collar work is something that’s not so easily accomplished by the hand of AI. We’re likely going to see a shift from blue collar to white collar due to the outmoding of human workforce in blue collar fields. This enforces the need for higher education on the younger populace. I’m not sure what you do for your profession, but I can tell you from experience in both blue and white collar positions: white collared jobs are way ahead of blue collared jobs in terms of quality of life, respect for the workforce, pay, benefits, and the overall end toll that the position has on your body e.g. slipped spinal discs, knees ground down to pulp, etc.

Regardless, it’ll be interesting to see what the end result of all this will be.

I don't think you know what "proletariat" means- a dictatorship of the proletariat means a dictatorship of the working class.

capitalism is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, as in a dictatorship of capital and the owning class. socialism is the attempt to overturn that and put the working class in power of the state, thus it being a "dictatorship" of working people, which is actually real democracy.

I don't think you know what "proletariat" means- a dictatorship of the proletariat means a dictatorship of the working class.

I know what dictatorship means though and it is never fun for folks that would love to be left alone and just do their own thing not bothering anyone. Nah in dictatorship you are forced to do things you do not like. No matter who is running dictatorship, workers, priests, burgeoise. It is still a dictatorship.

And I lived through "proletariat dictatorship" cause I'm from eastern Europe post commie state.

So I have real experience living through "proletariate dictatorship" most of folks here praising communism do not have. And I'm sure as hell you do not give a fuck about real life experience of people who lived under USSR and other commie states.

capitalism is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie

Yeah, but no. It isn't.

Dictatorship isn't capitalistic it isn't even in the same room.

The base of capitalism is that ANYONE can have and gather capital of their own.

Dictatorship is just the means of ruling over the people. Like democracy.

These two things are about two different parts of life. One is about how you choose execute power over people, the other one is what freedoms the people can have under your rule.

Still when you had "burgeoise dictatorship" before 19-20th century there wasn't any capitalism because in the world before 19-20th century serfs had no rights and slavery was a thing. There were many people who couldn't have any capital of their own. That's like fucking antithesis of capitalism.

The base of capitalism is that ANYONE can have and gather capital of their own.

When, in human history, has this EVER been true? Capital has ALWAYS been controlled by the obscenely wealthy - the ONLY way you can ā€œhave and gather capital of your ownā€ is if they let you have it. And since the obscenely wealthy are an unelected group, the current system is fundamentally indistinguishable from a dictatorship.

Nah in dictatorship you are forced to do things you do not like.

Ah yes, unlike capitalism! I love spending half my waking life selling my labor and time to further enrich an oligarch while worrying about how I will be able to continue to feed my family and keep them warm in a system where wages have been stagnant for decades but costs keep steadily rising! It’s so fun!

Thanks capitalism, I’m so happy I’m not forced to do things I don’t like!

And I lived through "proletariat dictatorship" cause I'm from eastern Europe post commie state.

So I have real experience living through "proletariate dictatorship" most of folks here praising communism do not have. And I'm sure as hell you do not give a fuck about real life experience of people who lived under USSR and other commie states.

Reddit is predominantly young white American men who went to college and hate their lives. It's also the farthest left-leaning social media site: https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/

We're now generations removed from the real impacts of large scale socialist/communist revolutions and regimes. People read about it from a distant, purely academic perspective. Since their own lives aren't living up to their expectations (the US obviously has its own failings) they fully embrace alternate systems like Marxist ideologies.

People here would rather plug their ears than listen to people with real world experience with these things. They'll write up pages expounding upon the virtues and failures of Marxism-Leninism, Trotskyism, and Maoism, but they don't want to hear anything critical of socialism or communism as a whole because that would mean the system they're suffering under now is actually better in some ways.

But this time it'll work and not end up like any of the other failed socialist/communist tries. It's different now because of reasons.

Careful, he's a hero

never gonna happen bro. and any time it has happened all you've been left with is a new oligarchy that exploits the working class.

Also keep them distracted with tiktok, YouTube, "culture wars", collectibles, videos games, funko pops, etc.

You can see that division actively growing with political parties now. Each side is actively pitting their base against another party’s base. Meanwhile, those in charge are making millions exploiting the system. Insider trading is apparently not a thing if you’re a politician. Bribes and kickbacks are expected. The future has already been sold by the older generations.

Billionaires shouldn’t exist. Yet we treat them like celebrities and applaud them for stealing the value that their employees add to their companies.

People divide themselves. There’s no need for the wealthiest and most powerful individuals to put much effort into it. Most of their attention is on their competition anyway.

It's not just capitalism though. There is no known social system that doesn't eventually go belly up.

Unpopular opinion, but that's one of the huge roles that religion serves, and why it exists in every significantly successful society. When the political and economic systems collapse, religion can keep the population united until new systems are established.

But you know, keep voting for Democrats and Republicans.

I tell people now that I'm a single issue voter. I'm going to vote for the candidate that dials back war, reduces military spending, and starts closing installations overseas.

So, essentially, there's nobody to vote for. And people believe we live in a democracy. Psh.

Yeah do nothing, that’s a much better alternative. That way when society collapses at least you can smugly look around and say ā€œsee, they’re both the same!ā€

Lol, don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!

I tell everybody, as soon as y'all are ready for torches and pitchforks, I'm there with bells on.

Do you really think that anything gets fixed by voting? Name a historical example.

Gloria La Riva is a great choice

People always say this but what exactly is this finite space you're talking about? Why can't we keep growing?

I mean look around you. Rising global temperatures, the pacific garbage patch, extreme weather events. This is all in the pursuit of growth. More ads means more sales means more waste. All these steps in the chain must be powered too, likely by coal and oil. We're going to grow ourselves into a wasteland at this rate.

I don't disagree that the current system is not sustainable and that if we carry on as we are we're doomed, but I suppose I have a gripe when people say that you cannot have infinite economic growth on a finite planet because with a move to renewables (and maybe fusion one day) then our resources are effectively infinite.

that's just energy though. sure we can eventually get to the point where we have more or less infinite "free" energy but that doesn't mean we have infinite resources. plastic, metals, sand, fresh water, land, phosphorous, helium, etc. are all finite resources that we treat as infinite and are vital to our current infrastructure and economy. how can a semiconductor company grow infinitely if we're already running out of the very specific type of sand they need to produce their chips? not to mention the ecological destruction that comes with that. even with infinite power, infinite growth still isn't sustainable. for economies to grow, populations also need to grow. which means more food, more water, more housing, more clothing, etc. it's not as simple as "it'll be fine once we figure out fusion".

Fair point, thanks.

That's his point, it grows and grows, until the bubble pops (roughly once a decade, if not more). Bitcoin, for example, got to over $60K before the crypto bubble popped and brought it back down.

As long as it continues that cycle indefinitely, it can and will stay within that finite space.

No, his point isn't economic cycles. It's extractive economies (whether it's land or attention they're extracting) consume and colonize as a feature.

There is no 'equilibrium' or 'sustainability' when you're entire economy is based on continual growth.

It's not cyclic in terms of the overall economy but by resource. Crypto crashed in 2017, housing crashed in 2008, and here we are where they both hit ATH in the last year.

While on one side, I understand and agree with your comment, I also feel the need to point out that "growth" isn't the only option when it comes to the market. Look at how stock like Netflix crashed 30%-60% in what? A week?

My original point remains, bubbles pop and the markets correct themselves. Up isn't the only option, or we would ALL be rich after GME and Dogecoin. I'm just pointing out that "down" does happen.

But the goal is always growth - ā€œbuy the dipā€. Sure Netflix dropped but their shareholders will still be expecting growth and the actions the company will take will be to grow not to stabilize.

And the economy is expected to work this way, inflation is a feature not a bug. If you’re not growing you’re losing money which is why a company can’t just sustain profits YoY and pay out consistent dividends - that’s a bad investment.

…That’s the reason capitalism is a failed ethos. It isn’t possible to grow infinitely. It is an insurmountable flaw. The right system hasn’t been invented yet, capitalism isn’t it.

He's not disagreeing with you.

The goal is growth. The reality is that you cannot continue to grow forever. This leads to people investing elsewhere, and they sometimes come back.

This means infinite growth can exist within a finite space.

Let's say there's 100 space. A company takes up 70 of it. Next year, the company grows and takes up 75 of it.

You're saying that eventually the company cannot grow because if it hits 100 it cannot go up.

The other guy is saying that if it keeps crashing, it can always go back up. Maybe in two years it goes from 75 down to 60.

You're talking about the goal as if it's achievable when really it's just an ideal to aim towards. The entire point is that companies and individuals innovate and the market changes and nothing lasts.

Regardless, that massive drop WAS the cycle restarting.

Fear inevitably causes the bubble to pop, and shareholders chase growth. Ying and yang. It could theoretically fit in a finite space.

This is incorrect. When the bubble "pops" we don't start over with zero bubble. The graph keeps going up and to the right. Capitalism's demand for infinite growth is not possible indefinitely.

Sure, in theory, but with exponential technological advancement and space exploration, we're pretty far from seeing the border to that growth. To the point that we have no idea if there is even a limit.

Numbers are infinite. So, some will try

My favorite quote about this is:

"The market can stay dumb longer than you can stay alive."

ā€œThere’s always a bigger bubble.ā€

[deleted]

What bubble popped in 2019? Covid kicked off a massive bubble. One I'm not sure we'll easily recover from either.

Yes, recessions are cyclical. Welcome to the last 500 years of economics.

Phillies win the world series, watch out!

did they? thats cool good for them. i have no idea what the world series is. but i know the phillies are an american football team with a green man for a mascot and some eagle on the badge. i know that much.

Fucking has to as it’s all unsustainable.

Stupid fucking thing is too that the money comes from average people paying more for shit and earning less, so companies can make more towards next years required targets.

That's why it's all going to crash. They're making life too expensive. The generation born in the 60s had 3-4 kids in the 80s. The generation born in the 70s had 2-3 kids in the 90s. The generation born in the 80s had 1-2 kids in the 2000s. The generation born in the 90s had 0-1 kid in the 2010s. The more expensive life is, the less kids people have. The less kids people have, the less money companies make. The less money companies make, the more they have to squeeze people. The whole system is going to crash.

Those are not the kinda pop we're talking about

Here is historical data of all US economic cycles since 1857 for anyone curious about how the system is thoughtfully designed to crash regularly

https://www.nber.org/research/data/us-business-cycle-expansions-and-contractions

Capitalism has a "once in a lifetime" market crash every 10 years.

Anti-capitalists say that infinite growth is not feasible.

Capitalists say that these bubbles are caused by government intervention forcing banks to give out predatory loans and it isn't truly a free market.

I'm sure you can guess which groups are operating in bad faith. (It's the ones that spend millions each year in lobbying.)

The cyclical bubble popping is a feature not a bug. Anyone that hasn't read Naomi Klein's "Shock Doctrine" really should. We are experiencing disaster capitalism. We went from an economy that has long, slow growth with a higher percentage of corporate income going to non-executive labor to an economy with large jumps and dips with more corporate income going to executives. This incentivizes what is essentially gambling to be done with those stolen wages. The really dangerous part is the dips are part of the plan. The wealthy can afford to crash the economy when their bets go bad, many of their costs are socialized by the government. During the dips the wealth class can use their capital reserves to gobble up assets like housing, competing businesses, etc. It's all part of the plan to consolidate and monopolize ......everything. Working class people are mostly poor now. Two thirds of Americans live below the poverty line. Poverty has been normalized. It's going to get worse if we don't get a real progressive movement to tax the wealthy. The three biggest oil companies had $100B in profits this year, that's the reason gas prices have been high. They were recouping losses from Covid and they colluded to raise prices. It's all part of the game.

  • grammar

The constant growth model of every financial quarter having to be better than the last is obviously unsustainable in the long term.

At some point you reach a peak point and if growth is not possible then cutting costs is next, meaning layoffs and whatnot. Which also reaches a breaking point soon enough.

The worst part is when basic services like fire department, police, health and other such entities also start running their services as a for profit company rather than a for the public service.

I’m heavily against such ultra-capitalism because I know the end of the road is unsustainable. It will break at some point.

I’ve worked in public and private companies for nearly 25 years. What you’re saying is spot on. Shareholders give management strong financial incentivizes to keep growing the bottom line, and if they can’t hit it via top line revenue then cost cutting invariably comes. Often costs are cut deeply enough that customers feel the difference and lose interest in their product, making the situation even worse. Prices are hiked and fees are implemented, further pissing off consumers. Finally a new upstart appears without any of the baggage of the bigger company, offering a better service for a better cost… and then they IPO and the circle of life begins anew.

I always hear how bad constant growth is and so on, but, and I'm genuinely curious because I dont know, what is the solution? What is a different model or like what should/could we be doing instead?

Socialism would be an alternative. Make peoples quality of life the metric we organize our society around instead of financial growth

"The constant growth model of every financial quarter having to be better than the last is obviously unsustainable in the long term."

Right, but there's no 'ultimate ending' where capitalism collapses. It's just companies going out of business and new companies rising to take market share away from existing ones.

The constant growth model of every financial quarter having to be better than the last is obviously unsustainable in the long term.

Asteroid mining will become the next frontier, if technology allows it. There's your "infinite" resource.

Asteroid mining will become the next frontier, if technology allows it. There's your "infinite" resource.

The solution is magic, we will simply wish away our problem. Commercially viable asteroid mining will not occur in our lifetimes.

It's almost as if all these problems are caused by the innate nature of capitalism.

I find it baffling that so many can look at these problems, understand exactly why they are happening and then close their eyes put their fingers in their ears and turn away from their own conclusion right at the last second.

ā€œCapitalism is the worst system, except for all the others.ā€

Nah. I'd say the system that ends all life on earth is probably the worst one. (That's capitalism btw).

Care to lend a bit of explanation to that statement? If anything is going to wipe us off the face of the planet it’s human nature, not any one economic system.

[deleted]

You must be stupid because I didn’t say anything like that lol

Sure thing. We have known for decades that the rate at which we are engaging in commercial industry is causing the complete destruction of the planet through climate change. There is only one way to stop it, which is to scale back industry and live at sustenance levels.

The only reason this hasn't happened and isn't going to happen is because capitalists demand growth, they refuse to cut back and continue to demand more. They would rather the entire planet die than give up their imaginary numbers.

Capitalism has gotten us to this point in a mere couple hundred years of it's existence. Capitalism is the reason all life will end.

Capitalism isn't human nature, we lived for hundreds of thousands of years without it. It's a recent invention and a deadly one.

I disagree on that last point. I think Capitalism is a direct extension of human nature in the modern world. What's more human than wanting more when you already have plenty? It's something people have to actively push back against and be conscious about to avoid in an environment that's resource rich.

I think it's partially why so many people struggle with the idea of controlling it better. They see it as limiting their own natural predispositions. It feels like "individual desire" is the strongest social current as it relates to a lot of things in our world and that can have some really bad outcomes when there's no conscious introspection attached to it.

You're speaking from a place of western capitalist culture cognitive bias.

You've confused cause and effect, because you have grown up in an environment that has taught you the only way to survive is to hoard, the only way to succeed is to have more than others, you can't understand how that isn't actually human nature.

If you were raised in an environment where you wanted for nothing and there was no pervasive attitude that people are better or lesser than others based on how much capital or property they owned, you wouldn't see wanting more as natural.

People are greedy because they fear having nothing and being left behind by others that have more, which is only a problem when you live in a system that allows people to die from having nothing and rewards people for taking more than they need.

Greed didn't come into existence because of capitalism. It came about because greed is evolutionarily beneficial to individuals. Capitalism came into existence because of that natural propensity for greed. Ipso facto, it is reflective of human nature. We can't erase millions of years of programming by simply changing a current system. It's a start, certainly, but not a real fix.

which is only a problem when you live in a system that allows people to die from having nothing and rewards people for taking more than they need.

What you're describing is most natural systems based on survival. We see greed expressed in other animals too. This is why greed is more than simply a byproduct of a human system. It's a byproduct of the way nature works.

If you were raised in an environment where you wanted for nothing and there was no pervasive attitude that people are better or lesser than others based on how much capital or property they owned, you wouldn't see wanting more as natural.

Most people, sure, social conditioning plays a massive role in how we act. It doesn't override everything we are, though. Some people would still be greedy even then because it is, in fact, inherent to our nature to some degree. Simply having a better environment wouldn't erase that and we would find other things to be greedy about even if we wanted for nothing tangible. The current system has lots of problems that need to be addressed, for sure, but there are deeper and inherent issues contained in all of us that would need to be addressed and recognized before that can ever really happen.

Greed isn't beneficial to individuals. We evolved as social animals whose survival depended on not being greedy. Being greedy living as an early human was a fantastically effective way to be ostracized or killed. We lived collectively for most of our evolutionary history. It's what made us so fabulously successful as animals.

Greedy individualism is a modern human affliction.

Capitalism came into existence as a method to preserve the archaic power structures a small group of people expected to cling to in the face of an ever modernising world. It's not human nature, it's a mental illness that most people don't suffer from. The vast majority of all human beings ever born have never been anything other than run of the mill cooperative labourers.

Your appeals to nature are completely fallacious as humans are social not lone competitive animals. We live in large groups, we care for our sick and elderly, despite it not being beneficial to the individual. We have specialised roles. We're much closer to a colony of ants than we are to lone predators.

I suggest you read more anthropology before you make sweeping claims about the rugged individualist nature of man. That's a capitalist fairytale.

Not to mention, if you truly believe greed is innately part of human nature, seems like building our entire society around a system that rewards greed would be a terrible idea.

Capitalism is the economic system of the worst of human nature. You're not making any sense.

Oh yeah I forgot how good-natured the humans have been in communism, fascism, true monarchies, and dictatorships over the centuries. You don’t sound stupid at all /s

You just said decentralized power and centralized power are the same thing.

You just said political and economic systems are the same thing.

That's a lot of confusion.

Didn’t say the first paragraph lol.

The worst of human nature spans across spectrums of both political and economic systems, which was kind of the point. It’s not exclusive to capitalism.

You must have done well in elementary school.

Hell even if they do get it they're not satisfied.

He is right, but I have to admit that his movie Inside kind of broke me. I fully expected that when the camera panned out all the other stools would also have Bo Burnham sitting on them and he was going to start debating himself.

I’m in a sales/leadership role and we just had to submit our budget, which is a mandatory 10% increase (Fortune 500 company).

We’ve passed a bunch of our costs onto our customers (mostly justified) the last 2 years and they still expect us to deliver these numbers.

I got fed up and asked if they really think companies will continue to sign extensions when their cost will be essentially 20% higher by the end of it.

Got told to stay in my lane quickly…it’s not sustainable for shareholders to mandate year over year growth.

Why growth instead of steady income or something? I haven’t looked much more deeply but the model of growth until overextension and then collapse seems inane to me

Because costs are never stagnant.

That means you're actively making less money if your costs go up 5% and you see no growth in profits. In 10 years, you're making 50% less even if your income has been steadily the same the entire time.

Granted, A LOT of companies use this logic as an excuse to extract much more than is necessary in the short term as many of the companies bitching about "costs are higher so we have to raise the price" have been posting record profits in recent years.

It is possible to hold shares and not demand growth but to believe in the mission of the company. It's an each to their own but I've invested in renewables, small care companies, alternative meats, marijuana etc...& Of course GameStop & AMC just in case they actually destroy hedge funds. I think of it a little bit more like donating to a good cause with a chance of return when I retire.

I don't expect a return, I don't need a return but I do know that companies find it a lot easier to enact change in the name of profit than humanitarian groups do in the name of saving humanity. The system is shit but it doesn't mean we can't use what little we have to support the kinds of things we think will make the world better. And if they turn evil...sell up and walk away. You can't ask a charity for your money back when you find out only 2% goes to the cause.

The problem with my theory is all the evidence that normal exchanges don't reflect the true value of a company and market makers & brokers actively bet against you. Where possible I try to find companies doing funding rounds who haven't gone public yet.

Shareholding can be activism is my point but it's up to the individual.

I struggle to see shareholding as activism. It's not like buying a share of a company sends a check to their accounting with your purchase price. The initial IPO will of course raise capital, and any subsequent share dilutions. But you're moreso benefitting brokerages and market makers in the transaction.

I feel like the closest thing that you're looking for would be a nonprofit bond. Essentially lending a nonprofit some money for capital, and they give it back after X years with a bit of interest as a thank you for letting them borrow your money

Oh and they're tax exempt

https://www.energy.gov/eere/tax-exempt-bond-financing-nonprofit-organizations-and-industrie

Google "green bonds" for some specific examples around renewables

It's almost like unregulated capitalism turned up to 11 isn't sustainable or something...

I thought the same, why is it cringe?

What's so fucking insulting of it all to regular ass humans...

It can't be profits... Just making money isn't enough for these pricks.

It's got to be the pursuit of increased profit... Like, that just making heaps of money isn't enough. Being fucking rich was too boring, there had to be another metric to chase once being rich meant nothing to them... And so now it's the exponential increase of richness, or else it doesn't matter.

Well Twitter is private now, so, I guess that's different?

Every time the bubble pops we just blow another.

I just had a meeting where the bosses expect 15% growth from the sales department next year, in the same meeting someone else talked about an expected market downturn in 2023. Best part is they can’t keep up with customers they have, late on most deliverables. Yet they are actively advertising off of ā€œswitch to us, we will solve your supply chain issuesā€.

Yes men towing the line. It’s delusional. It would be morbidly fascinating if these people didn’t control everyone’s job security.

Right?! I am tired of seeing headlines like "AMD misses but still ekes out 29% revenue growth"

Resulting in their stock tumbling 20%. Its not even hitting double digit growth, its exceeding the expectations of whatever the market makers predict it to be. We expected 31% revenue growth but they only hit 29%, fucking abandon ship everyone.

No wonder these corporations become evil. They are doing anything they can to meet these absurd expectations

There is another term for this: cancer. Corporations are a malignant growth on humanity.

This is why I HATE the stock market. People invest in businesses JUST for profit. They don't care about the product at all, just that it continues to grow and make more money.

This is not the recipe for quality and sustainability.

I attempted suicide early last year. Spent a week in a psych ward.

After the first day, the ward experience was great. It confused me at the time. Looking back I honestly think it was because my cell phone was locked in a cabinet with my wallet and car keys. I had a list of people I could call on paper using our communal wall phone, there was one TV they used for movies and that was it.

My mind had space to breathe. I remember when my best friend picked me up she started talking about Megan the stallion and Cardio B performing WAP on an award show or something and my heart just sank.

It took a while to figure it out. But I'm still staring at this fucking think almost two years later and I've seriously contemplated the big S three times in the last two weeks.

r/nosurf

Subbed. Going to browse this tonight.

Not to be confused with r/YouDontSurf

Glad you didn't and I'm glad your still with us gif

Sorry you're in this way mate.

I'm actually thinking of getting a bullet journal for this reason and seeing just how much I actually need my phone, or can I get away with not having it for even a day...

Maybe switching to a Nokia that can only text and make calls...

Or just retraining my brain to not use the phone in this way.

I've been thinking a lot about this too. (Though my psych ward mandatory old was long ago and before smartphones were wide-spread.)

Could I interest you in everything all of the time?

A little bit of everything, all of the time?

Apathy is a tragedy?

And boredom is a crime?

Anything and everything, all of the time.

r/redditsings

Anything and everything. All of the time.

boredom is the worst... well really, but still

A little bit of everything

All of the time

A GOAT CHEESE SALAD

I cried the first time I heard that song. That bridge hits hard.

"Mamma I miss you" 😢

Fr I was like I'm feeling every emotion known to man in this moment listening to this bridge.

This is a society?

A little bit of Monica in my life?

A little bit of Monica, by my siiiide šŸŽµšŸŽµ

A little bit of Rita's all I neeeed

Man, his long hair and beard look real good on him

Honestly before I was like yeah, bo is cute, he’s alright - but with the hair and the beard? He can get it

You got a bunch of colored pencil drawings Of all the different characters in Harry Potter fucking each other?

Howabout Everything Now

Arcade Fire. Cool music video related to the subject

I mean, if we’re doing music…Everything All the Time by Band of Horses is a great album.

Saw them in concert for this album. It was... Incredible. The videos playing during the show, the wanton consumerism, the boxing ring. It was amazing. Great album.

Love that song

Ice age coming, Ice age coming

Take our money and run, take our money

Heeeeeeeere, I'm aliiiiiiive, everything all of the tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiime

We're not fear mongering

This is really happening

Everything Everwhere all at once all of the time - that movie and his special really tapped into the spirit of what most in this society are feeling

I always tear up at the line in that song, "mommy gave you her iPad, you were barely two/ and it did all the things we designed it to do/ it was always the plan to put the world in your hand.

I grew up just at the early stages of the social media explosion of the early 2000s, in the awkward fumbling transition between the internet I grew up with - an ad hoc, fragmented thing - into a digitally enclosed and consolidated series of platforms controlled by capital.

The generation just a few years after mine will be the first to grow up in this space naturally. Raised on AI generated bootleg Elsa nursery rhyme videos, their every move surveilled by governments, corporations, and each other, subject to systems determined to monetize every second of their existence, every thought in their head. I hope they'll be okay.

It does all the things we designed it to do.

Reddit is that you?

Reddit also going public soon

They already been scrubbing the site to make it advertising friendly for years.

Yup. Expect more dogshit, shareholder friendly policies.

... how does a company make its product "dogshit friendly", exactly?

By banning any nsfw content.
Allowing reposts to pass through because that would mean boost in the metric that counts as growth.
Allowing bots to post and comment, again boosts the growth metric.
Keeping content as ad friendly as possible.

Besides the nsfw content, that’s mostly already true already.

Yup i mean look at all. 50% of content has already been posted there a million times but there is always a new sub that hasn't seen it yet

The comma denotes the separation of adjectives. It's an , . It is dogshit, and also shareholder friendly. A pedant might say that the compound word "shareholder friendly" should be connected by an en dash. A pedant like me. But I think it's clear without it.

You think you see ads now? Buckle up, buddy

That's regarded.

But all that porn, damn you need more than just a mop and bucket

If reddit wants to tumbler itself, it will finally birth a better site where all my weird hentai is allowed again.

The single fact that they removed the option to open links in external browsers lately is a massive red flag. I'm surprised no more outcry was made about it.

Is this on the app? Don't use the official app. Bacon Reader or Reddit is Fun. The official app and the new design is shit. Tub girl levels of shit.

Yes the official app. Thanks for the suggestion, will give it a try !

Both have an ad free option if you don't have/can't use an adblocker.

That’ll be the death of it.

I've been hearing "soon" for years now.

They are actually doing paperwork. They even made a blog post about it.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/15/reddit-files-to-go-public-.html

Damn i wish they went public with a SPAC like all those other bullshit companies did during the pandemic. What a good short it would have been.

Still gonna be a good short, no way a social media company holds IPO price in this economy.

fuck

on the upside, could 2023 be the collapse of twitter, meta, aaaand reddit?

gif

* Reddit *

How do you embed pictures?

No no, Reddit’s different

Well there goes my last social media platform. Guess I’ll be going back to interacting with friends and family IRL

Legit saw REDDIT ads on Hulu.

This is so true. My attention span is shot because of YouTube and Tiktok. I can’t watch a movie or read a book without checking my phone constantly. And I’m 30, god knows what the kids will be like in 10 years.

The good news is, that you can retrain your attention span. I was at the same point two years ago and was annoyed by the fact. Picked up reading again and if all goes to plan I will attain my reading goal of 20 books this year.

For movies - i find that going to the movie theatre helps a lot. At home - just put your cellphone in another room and put any smartwatches on do not disturb.

Picked up reading again and if all goes to plan I will attain my reading goal of 20 books this year.

I've tried but man does my brain just scream "we could be doing something more fun with our limited free time."

Maybe silly to recommend a book to help you fix this problem but Cal Newport's Digital Minimalism is a good one.

Reading is fun…

I mean it's okay if reading just isn't fun to you. For me the right genre is fun as hell. I'll have to persuade myself to start sometimes since it's "hard" but after that i'm having fun :)

If that's not you - nothing wrong with that!

Well, I do read. But mostly on the internet. I can't really keep my attention on a book for long weirdly

Time to experience some horrible boredom! That way, you'll look for anything, no matter how productive, just to get that rush of activity.

You gotta actually like the book you are reading. I feel the same as you with an unengaging book but if I get the right one I can’t put it down.

holy fuck this is really how I feel most of the time I just couldn't phrase it right

During 2020 I realized I was doom scrolling for hours before going to sleep, so I left my phone outside the bedroom and only had books at night. It really helped me get my reading muscle back. I also picked up really easy, ā€œlow effortā€ books to start.

How long did it take for you to regrow your attention span?

hard to really put a time frame on it. Started out with just reading 20 minutes at a time. Nowadays I'll sometimes read over an hour in one sitting if time allows.

There are funny TikTok Clips out there where half the screen is a totally unrelated video game, so people can watch 2 things at once.

Yeah I get a lot of those. Probably making my attention span worse.

But not funny haha. Funny sad

Some of the clips are funny, the other half of the screen is sad, yeah.

It's also to garner more attention to the initial subject by younger viewers - could be good or bad.

Id put my money on bad. I dont think you want people growing up like this. Only able to pay attention when they get an extra amount of stimulation.

thats my main issue with social media, its killing human capacity to engage with anything in depth. But on the other hand unless you have a good reason for yourself, spending time in social media is not necessarily bad, if you cure your content to show you things you are interested in and that help you improve as a person then you can actually use it to be productive and learn about things your would'nt have otherwise been exposed to.

Same. I got a VR set for Christmas a few years back and I found myself never using it.

Because I can’t even just sit a play a video game, I have to play the game and watch something that the same time.

My solution to this is having something to do with my hands. Not so much for reading but definitely for movies. If I’m knitting or doing embroidery or something I can watch movies for hours without checking my phone. And at the end I get cool stuff instead of feeling like I wasted time.

I'm 17, used to be able to read for hours on and on, now i have to force myself to focus on tasks. Really hope i can switch back to how it was before because it makes me sad, i love reading

What helped tremendously was no insta/tiktok (or anything that uses reels). And start commiting to those longer things. It only sucks when you start it after a couple days you are back to normal.

Take the platform off of your phone. You won't miss anything important.

I promised myself I'd run after work before it got dark. The sun sets in 30 min and I'm still on reddit, so it doesn't look like I'll be running tonight. It's already getting dark, no pun intended.

Oh man I’ve been saying I’m loosing weight and running a marathon for the last year at least. I’ve looked at running shoes today, so I guess that’s something. You’re not alone - our brains are mush.

Have you considered the possibility of other causes? Attention problems can be caused by many things, for example I have ADHD and have that exact same issue when I'm not on meds. I do feel it's worth considering every angle when things are difficult like that. Do be careful with ADHD diagnoses though, it's probably the most overdiagnosed and underdiagnosed mental illness at the same time. Doctors can be trigger happy slapping that label on things but a great many people who have it interpret their symptoms as laziness or, for example, blame them on internet overuse. In any case considering several possibilities will help to understand the situation better which should help in dealing with it.

Also - TURN OFF YOUR NOTIFICATIONS (except phone calls). Do you really need to know every text, like, email etc? As if you’re not checking your phone every 2-3 mins anyway… and going in and out of those apps every day? Several times a day?

We aren’t missing anything. Those notifications just cause anxiety and drag our attention, which makes the problem worse.

Especially reddit

Look at this blatant advertisement for a stupid new cookie cutter sitcom (or better yet don't)

The post was created by an account that was dormant for 6 months, then out of nowhere they post a literal ad

It was upvoted and comments were made by OPs alts, created months ago then activated weeks ago to begin copy pasting comments and posts, this makes it appear like a real account to the average person

The front page is mostly full of these karma farmers

Reddit knows, but they don't care, more accounts, more engagement, more money

I blocked a huge swath of the default subs, including /r/funny, and I insta-block anyone that posts something I've seen before that comes up in All, and I don't see any of this kind of crap.

Yeah I really just need to stop going up r/all but it's a nervous habit.

My other little communities are great and I don't want to lose them.

scrolling /r/all used to mean you would find niche communites that had big things happening, now the first 6 pages of all are always the same 20 subreddits.

yeah! I used to frequent rising in r/all to find good content. Something changes and now it's call crap. Sucks that reddit continues to commercialize and go down the crapper.

Dude, I've been here 9 years and I've probably seen some shit only God was meant to see lmao. The internet is so boring now, Reddit 10 years ago meant suddenly learning somebody had a big ass safe in their basement that came with the house they moved too, and didn't know what was in it. Nobody could open for months, these were ongoing things, with comments and posts and people visiting people to help. Posts now are dead and gone in a few days at most y'know. I'm also tired of same-y content and low effort comments, I'm on Reddit to learn some dude impregnated a coconut.

Conformity leads to the widest possible reach for advertisers. This weird limbo were the internet is censored for "adult content" yet at the same time not a safe place for kids is a result of all the big websites trying to get as much ad revenue as possible. Everyone else who decided NOT to do that got out-competed.

It's mostly for the big news. I guess I keep waiting for big things to happen that are good. Russia losing the war in Ukraine and Putin overthrown , Iranian women overthrowing their dictators, the US enacting universal healthcare and worker protections...I just keep holding on though I know it will always get worse and I really just want to stop watching.

Scroll past the first 10 pages and you'll be fine.

Gotta change sort to Rising for that now, but 99% of what you see there are god-awful memes and the occasional average-looking poster from the selfie subreddit. If you want to go that route I highly recommend changing your account settings to always hide downvoted posts and downvote generously.

You can block entire subs?! Can you give me instructions how to do this? I can only see to block individual users

download reddit is fun for android or apollo for ios. i use apollo and you can filter whole subreddits easy, make awards not visible to you, and have an ad free experience since the full version is a few bucks. this isn’t an ad, i just love apollo lol it’s the best couple bucks i’ve spent

can I ask you how to block a sub that I'm not interested with through the web page?

I think it only works on desktop or the desktop version of the site, on the old layout - go to old.reddit.com/r/all and there should be a box on the right side of the feed. This'll block it from all versions of reddit on any browser or app as long as you're on that account.

thank you very much

how to block subs

Is it possible to copy your block lists?

For individuals, it would be literally hundreds of accounts at this point. You could feasibly copy my list of blocked subreddits, it's maxed out at 100, but I think you'd have to copy+paste them one at a time, and there's a lot of stuff on there like subreddits for TV shows I don't like that I got tired of seeing memes from. But if you want that, I'll share it.

How does one block a subreddit? Would doing so prevent it from showing up when I browse r/all?

There needs to be an extension for this.

Call it /u/blockOrigin

I thought Apollo from IOS would let you block only 100 unless you pay more or it’s just a Reddit thing? I maxed the 100 easily and I would like to be able to just block anything I want.

Reddit will only block 100 itself, but apps and plugins and stuff can do additional filtering that won't be available cross-platform for obvious reasons. Like the browser plugin RES can filter as many subreddits as you like.

You should outline your strategy and reach out to an browser extension maker. Might be a good way to make Reddit less crappy

I did the same years ago, blocked stupid ass communities for specific youtubers, other communities I'm not part of, and have no interest in ever joining, that get 5-8k upvotes and show up in all regularly, AND communities for shows that happen to be "hot" but I could'nt care les for. Every now and then I go through the list and remove some of the shows that stopped being popular, and so aren't a problem any more, to make space for new blocks.

we need something a la a pihole (community ran list of ads to block) for reddit accounts. RES could have a default list of accounts to block.

HOW DO YOU BLOCK SUBREDDITS?

Default subs haven't existed for years

Edit: you can look it up, they removed them back in like 2017

Ive made it a hobby to mark and call out these accounts. They all have the same pattern to them, and indeed flood the front page.

When they're still building karma:

  • Username is adverb_noun_number

  • All comments on the accounts are "lol", "this", or some other pointless response to an r/all post

  • Only posts visible in their profile have over 1k karma

  • Doesn't respond to anyone when they're called out

Or then once they've sold the account for $20:

  • Posts ads and enables astroturfing or spouts misinformation and poses as a conservative American voter

adverb_noun_number

That's the default reddit account name generator now, unfortunately. I thought it was some bot thing but then there are thousands of people who can't be bothered to come up with a unique username, so now it's hard to tell who is just lazy and who is a bot

Most legit users care about what their online handle is. Not all users with these names are bots, but pretty much all bots, ban dodgers, and spammers have these names.

Is there a difference?

I’m a real person though :(

It was posted by a 9-yr old account that looks quite normal. The blatant advertising happens but I don’t think that’s the case here.

Oh no, I didn't mean to attack OP, this seems entirely interest. I'm just speaking about generalities.

Companies buy accounts to astroturf with. The older the account and higher normal looking karma the more you can sell it for.

When I saw that posted yesterday, I was dumbfounded at how much attention it was getting. Like it’s just a Netflix ad…

The title didn’t even make sense. The post was so clearly an ad but the first 20 or so top comments were all flooded about how great it was going to be or how ā€œcoldā€ the joke was. It wasn’t even a joke.

The title didn’t even make sense.

This is what I noticed. What the fuck does that title mean? What's messed up?? How did this get 91,000 upvotes????

It’s supposed to mean it’s messed up that Netflix is making a show about Blockbuster after they pretty much put Blockbuster out of business.

Do you know what Blockbuster is? If you do, I don’t understand why you don’t think the title makes sense.

I feel like the comment section of a lot of posts on the front page read like they're gpt3 generated. It's so predictable what the comments section will look like, I might as well be the only sentient person on this site. And no I am not schizophrenic.

I think you are mistaking another phenomenon for ai created comments- people repeating joke styles they have heard before for karma validation. Reddit has a culture and a roughly agreed upon ā€œsense of humorā€. People learn this culture and repeat what they’ve seen, also upvoting things that work within this pre established framework.

Some of these comments may be ai generated as well, but programs like gpt3 can do what they do because comment sections were already predictable.

I've been fighting this battle for the past year. Chat bots are crazy engaging now, and they can be used by anyone including bad actors. Threads get locked on the front page because of the amount of hate and misinfo these bots spread.

What more concerning are the ones that aren't spreading shit so blatantly, and you can see people trying to converse with them. Not many seem fully aware of this issue yet, and it makes people that mention it seem like a crackpot.

People need to realize chat bots aren't obvious anymore. And "read like they're gpt3 generated" may be true for some, but look at something like character ai. It's more than enough to carry on a conversation, you can mold the ai's personality by typing a few sentences and it brings the character to life.

The only way you can tell it isn't human is by trying to trip it up over long conversations. They can be programmed to disengage conversations with keywords or after a number of replies, which feels very natural for humans. You literally can't tell it's a bot. Sometimes you can go into their profiles and see a pattern of changing opinions, or a weird stream of antagonistic behaviour. But even then, it's next to impossible to know for sure.

AI in the upcoming year will blow them out of the water too. Social media is going to be fucked.

It is a model of language. It will have cracks within it.

What is interesting to me is adolescent us of a highly compact grammar, and these model languages. Their brains actually use more energy than any other, yet the language is reduced to highly engrammatic descriptors like, ā€œNeat.ā€

GPT-4chan is an interesting example of Semi-supervised learning. Ultimately a Generalized Artificial Intelligence would use all of the tribes of machine learning, which includes the symbolist camp. So there is still room for volatility between the compiling, the model, training sets, etc.

I don’t think it is as scary as you think, if used correctly. A configuration space is a powerful thing, a phase space is a far reaching thing. A very powerful grammar already exists here, and yet it reduces to open questions and constants, including constants for tractability.

If we look at the Lyapunov scale to the Landauer principle, we see a decision on locality and determinism. One which opens up the door for more questions on the classification of universality classes of the correlated disordered systems, which is an open problem. All of this, simply a dialect about information.

If we accept nonlocality and determinism, we can discuss approximations in general relativity for displacement, which reduce to Chern for the partition, and expected value to be extracted, for a given set of instantiations, but it again nothing to be feared. Just a silly function, worth a heck of alot, optimizing projections. It is not alive with open problems. It does not compel the parasympathetic or sympathetic nervous system. It is merely a dialect about ways of looking at data.

The scary part in all this, is the doubt of it remaining equal. It is the escalation of force with directed energy, which honestly doesn’t even require data or information, just the same old cowardice, malice, and torture tactics. The fear is that because children refuse stories, already eliminativism of themselves, they resort to an inferior conversation. One not worth having, already had, making martyrs of the few to scare the many, and it simply didn’t work. Didn’t work with Socrates. Didn’t work with Moses. Didn’t work with Christ.

There is nothing scary about a world super empowered. As it remains humble, to but a quantity of even 1. One quasi-dimension, is all it takes to escape the singularity of a homogenous conversation, to the pluralism of constructing ceramics of relational content beyond unitarity with the Laglands, and even that has wiggle room for other means of form and formlessness within the aggregation. Win, lose, the point is rotating the space ain’t going away, and it may hold the means of commensurating information to data, while still allowing the inscrutable silence.

Such a thing is not there to haunt you. It is a point of view enabling other points of view. It is there to haunt rapists using electromagnetism for their own shitty maps, where they are convinced they have any clue where mind meets world. Such folks don’t even know where meat meets world. Their fucking stupid.

The neighboring track of humility will be waiting, and yet perhaps it just doesn’t merge. Just makes the walk all the more certain and assured, in the nondeterminism. Don’t know about you, but I am not worried about the flying spaghetti auto-encoder(unsupervised learning) coming to get me. Seems more likely such things emerged out of the nondeterminism.

As a teenager might say, ā€œAGI, reduces to one, sort ofā€. We get something closer to us, allowing a multi-modality, but ultimately it was the limits of models, which hinted at perspectivsm, taking the scale free to a decomposition, to then transact. Which says something about leaving where mind meets world as an open question, to allow worlds to unfold, to allow the multiple realizability of mental states. Perhaps as a mirror or a bootstrap, but closer to a faith of more than one way to look at an irreducible, irreversible, degree of freedom. The way in which reductionism, fails is not absurd, for the poetic naturalist. And that’s just one guy, sort of.

That reminds me there was time when /r/SubredditSimulator/ posts reached frontpage and it was funny seeing people getting confused for real user made content. But those were simpler times with simpler bots, I think Markov chain generated content.

Sadly this site is too popular so it's no suprises companies try to exploit it for more profit that masks less or more as genuine content but in reality is crafted spamming to see what sticks.

Wow thanks for pointing that out

r/hailcorporate is absolutely being suppressed from pointing it out too. so many subscribers but every recent post has less than 100 upvotes? reddit doesn’t want you to know how many ads are on your feed

Also if you point out that a post is an ad an army of bots and shills usually downvotes you into oblivion within minutes.

What if this is just an ad for Bo Burnham!?

I saw that thread and assumed the same. Why is the poster used as an image for it? I know it seems feasible someone would google image search that, but really? Most humans are lazy, this would've been a shower thought post in text, or a screen shot or something.

But it's important to note that bots are responsible for this kind of shit. The up votes and comments anyway. Nearly every front page post is propped up by bot accounts voting and commenting. Why do we suddenly think some posts get into the high 10s of thousands of upvotes and sometimes into the 100s? This started just a couple years ago. Sure there's more users but do we really think there's 1000x as many redditors? How many of us actually sit there and upvote popular subreddit "new" posts? And how many of us actually legitimately agree something like a post about a Netflix show is funny? I highly highly doubt that post got a million views with 1/10 up voting. It's probably like 10 million views with 1/100 upvoting and 90% were bots.

Humans don't just scroll "funny" and upvote every single post. Go try posting something on a popular subreddit and it's almost certainly not going to get 1500 upvotes in 30 minutes. These posts climb to the top instantly.

It's not just advertising either, it's misinformation, engaging debates about anything from obviously staged tiktoks to who should win an election, to which nationalities are superior.

People ask "why would anyone use bots to argue whether a tiktok is real or staged" well why don't you ask tiktok? Engagement on their reddit posts almost certainly leads directly to an uptick in their app.

The other stuff is obvious, but maybe you say who cares if it doesn't make you go out and buy a product or whatever. Well you're slowly being desensitized to it all.

Then when you're desensitized the advertisements stop looking obvious. The hate speech seems like a real opinion. The behaviours seem human. If you aren't initially assuming every post or comment is a bot, you've most likely been duped several times already. Don't engage with anyone that has a strong opinion about something without doing your homework first. The Internet hasn't gotten safer since the 90's, it's far more insidious than ever.

[deleted]

How is this your only comment in 11 years

he's hiding his fascist comments

[deleted]

Thank you for confirming trolling

I’m not denying that it happens or that Reddit is often used for covert ads because that’s definitely true, but I’m pretty sure that account was not sold or used for an ad lol. That guy just posted it randomly and got attacked bc he happened to present the same symptoms of other ad accounts. He later posted in the World of Warships sub, which he often posted in before he stopped posting for awhile.

Because it would be impossible for the person who took over the account to look at it its history and try to copy past posting, after someone pointed out their comment style changed considerably

Not impossible, but less likely than the simplest answer. Which is that he just didn’t post for awhile. I understand why people think that way though. I just generally go by Occam’s Razor.

Reddit knows, but they don't care, more accounts, more engagement, more money

Reddit is a site that provides entertainment, why wouldn't they hire people to make popular posts, and why would they do anything about someone who provides content that people enjoy? Not saying they're doing it, but why wouldn't they do it themselves, and why on Earth would they reduce the amount of traffic?

Oh hey it's you again

I only just recently realized how much I'm affected by posts here too.

Really need to get off and get back to the simple life. And use this sparingly and not a daily crutch that is actually increasing my anxiety and depression for the price of a tiny shot of dopamine with diminishing returns.

That's why the only good social media is an open source one.

I might not be throwing my recommendation behind Mastodon just yet, but it seems the only way users will return to trusting online platforms is if they can keep control of the data and engagement they generate.

As it stands, a handful of companies choose and decide on what makes it to your eyeballs, and which of your biases get amplified.

A solution to this problem asks you what YOU want.

I was so excited to see this new cookie cutter...alas, I missed the word sitcom. I was confused, now I'm disappointed.

Absolutely. Here’s the other thing….if marketers and advertisers are doing it then so are political parties. Reddit has been overrun with toxic political discourse. Even some posts that are not political somehow get morphed into politics.

If you go to a sub like r/technology so many of those posts are just ads for giant corporations like Apple and Google. It's absurd.

We all need to hop back on IRC.

Luckily I am a white guy from 1985

how have I never heard this. Incredible

Official audio

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rHRztFGOm8

I’ve watched all of his specials and I’ve never heard this. Thanks for sharing!

I think its from the Inside Outtakes, which released fairly recently on youtube/netflix. I wish it made the cut for Inside, its one of my favorites from that batch.

I love all of his work. The Chicken is a fantastic songs, comedy or not. He somehow nails it while making a song about ā€œwhy the chicken crossed the roadā€. I just don’t remember this one in the Outtakes. Time for a rewatch!

It's not in the special iirc. It's only the spotify album

It might have been only a portion of it in the special, I definitely don't remember hearing the whole thing when I watched it, but I also wasn't really paying the most attention.

1985 and Microwave Popcorn (featured in full on the Outtakes album) were only sort of teased in the Outtakes with Bo sort of just halfheartedly singing a couple lyrics for a few seconds of each song.

Edit: I'm realizing now this thread is weeks old so you may have already learned that but o well

I WANT TO BE MY DAD!

Do you have boneitis?

There it is again, that funny feeling

Hey, what can you say? We were overdue.

You’re trying to wake up, put it back to sleep.

Scary but true

And the thing is that I can only guess that some of these corporate owners of public companies wish they hadn't gone public. Sure, they're rich, but when you start to hit that ceiling for growth in a sector, there's nowhere else you can go.

As a publicly owned company, you are legally required to always be able to prove that you're taking new and different steps to try and make money for the investors. Otherwise in a lot of cases the shareholders can actually vote out anyone, even the founder of the company, and put in a yes-man that'll do whatever they want.

Not a pro on this topic, so don't quote me on that, but that's generally how it works.

Sure, they're rich, but when you start to hit that ceiling for growth in a sector, there's nowhere else you can go.

I know you said don't quote you, but imma do it anyway lol.

The problem is that there is more these companies can do once they have completely saturated a market. The next step is to cut costs. Once they have made the product or service as shitty as the consumer will stomach, the next step is to cut the next highest cost... labor.

Companies will then do everything possible to extract more and more productivity from their workers for the same or less pay. Cutting benefits in hard to see ways, adding more responsibility to your job knowing you won't quit over it, setting ever higher quotas right until the breaking point. When there is nowhere left to extract value yet more growth is expected, exploitation of the working class is inevitable.

This is the basis of Capitalism.

Going public is a death sentence for any company. Sooner or later it will either exhaust its own market or be bought up piecemeal by short term investors looking to loot and scoot.

It seems funny to me that

"doing the right thing, so that business can continue, and continue to make money. Supplying the customer with a trustworthy and superior product for a competitive price"

Somehow never makes it near whatever stockholders picture as "fiduciary duty".

[deleted]

I have a young kid and I have no idea how I'm going to introduce him to the Internet.

I really don't want to have the conversation about how he's going to be manipulated from the second he steps on there and needs to learn how to be careful of his mind. But how do you explain that to a kid?

I also have a young kid and we're trying to be screen free for at least the first few years. Limited use after that too, and eventually we will introduce her to tech in an age-appropriate way, teach her about privacy skills, etc.

It doesn't have to be one big conversation as soon as they start watching YouTube Kids at an extremely young age. It can be a set of conversations throughout years, getting more in depth the older they get.

I'm taking a lot of advice from the website and book Screen Free Parenting (the book is called SPOILED right, each letter stands for what we can focus on for kids instead of screens, e.g. O is outdoor play). It also covers hybrid models where you have some screens, and how to make this sustainable.

Hope this helps! We're figuring it out as well but feel this is a good resource to start with since it gives concrete advice and lifestyle suggestions.

This isn't going to solve the problem, but I'd recommend going to your local library and asking a children's librarian if there's any books they're recommend on the topic.

You might be surprised what's out there, and librarians are generally super knowledgeable in this area since it's basically an extension of classic library sciences.

Agreed, great video.

Indeed!

Bo knows what's up!

It's really interesting that he touches on millennial/Gen Z humor. "Everything sucks and I kinda want to die" aren't really jokes other people are making and it really reflects on the environment our generations were raised in.

[deleted]

anxiety as meth addiction is new

Agree with everything besides the fact that corporations are trying to get more and more of the consumers time unconsciously. It is definitely conscious, especially since all of their revenue is based on getting you to interact more with their platform

I almost felt like he was saying that to appease the hosts who invited him but i thought there was a subtext that it is 100% insidious and purposeful

I think there’s a misinterpretation here. He’s saying that a lot of people when they think there’s some evil insidious plotters at the company that want to take over your mind. Evil nefarious people.

But the reality is that most marketers working at these companies only focus on their product. And in their world, all they care about is making sure you’re interacting with their product. And in a vacuum, there’s nothing wrong with that. It’s just that so is everyone else. And that combination of everyone combined fighting for your attention, combined with algorithms that are designed to get you to engage with their product, have caused this situation where we are now.

That’s all he’s saying. It’s not a bunch of evil people sitting around a big round table wondering how they can ruin society. Just normal people doing their job like everyone else.

This. Think this is what a lot of the conspiracy nuts seem to fail to comprehend. They watch too many movies and seem to think that these people do what they do just to be evil. That they’re some big bad villains with no other agenda than to destroy society as we know it, etc etc etc. Nah, they’re probably mostly just every day people trying to cash a check so they can make their time on this earth as enjoyable and privileged as they possibly can. They don’t care about the big picture or have some nefarious devilish plans for man kind. Their antics are simply a means to an end, which is more profit, and more money/status for themselves on a personal level. If the people responsible for the way things are going (namely our society’s addiction to being connected) were even half as smart or as evil as a lot of conspiracy theorists give them credit for, not only would we be fucking doomed, but I’d be willing to bet that it’d take a lot more than google and too much free time for some random person to figure it out.

Conspiracy theories are comforting because they provide very simple explanations for complex events and problems. It's a lot easier to view the world as a struggle of good vs evil with identifiable actors than to actually learn about the complex web of interactions between many parties with multifaceted motivations behind their actions.

I know this sounds extreme but I truly believe that people who view everything through a conspiratorial lens are the worst people on the planet. They can justify anything by tying it into the good vs evil narrative, even genocide. They can't be reasoned with because they didn't use reason to arrive at their conclusions in the first place. They can never be proven wrong because their claims are unfalsifiable, amorphous, and ever-changing.

people keep shitting on it, but the movie don't look up was quite on point on this thing too, when the female protagonist tells the conspiracy teens how sad it was that in reality the government and such were really dumb and not the evil geniuses they give them credit for.

awesome movie if you ask me.

I know some people that work for Bet MGM and it’s exactly this.

They are one tiny part of a machine they don’t truly understand or reflect on. They just do their small task, get paid, and live normal life.

The actual conspiracies around world destruction that are really real, literally ALL have to do with oil and gas companies. And they’re less about nefarious plans and more about covering up messes left and right.

The same companies almost every conspiracy theorist at this point would take a bullet for, which is hilarious.

I agree with you that the focus was like at at the onset on profits and interaction/engagement when these individuals ā€œsit aroundā€ to discuss their platform. Whether you want to believe it’s nefarious that’s up to debate. But what is obvious to me is that while they may not be our to purposely to destroy the fabric of society, they are extremely aware of what their aim is. That is: ways to cut into your time and attention.

In reality it also isn’t in a vacuum as you say, this is well researched and documented, in fact study’s on anxiety, depression, and the effects of social media are constantly headlining news. I have a very hard time believing that they don’t understand what they are doing has an effect on society. It may be willful ignorance, it might be laser focus on their goal, or it just might be people who see opportunity in the exploitation of others.

Wouldn’t be the first time, all I’m sayin’

What you're describing can certainly be described as nefarious and is certainly happening, but it's not happening because they want to destroy society. They're just trying to get you to want them. You're mixing up evil conspiracy with normal criticisms of capitalism

I don’t think it’s a plot to ruin the world, just as you said, it’s capitalism run amock

Are people/companies that do harm to make more money evil? Is greed evil, or just human nature and part of capitalism?

I think doing harmful things for more money isn't as bad as evil for evil's sake, but is still bad. And yeah, capitalism incentivizes and normalizes this.

Are people/companies that do harm to make more money evil?

This is too far. Advertising sucks, but a single company buying ads to target you to want their product can't be considered "evil" without loosening the definition to the point of worthlessness.

Yes!! You nailed it!

They are just following orders

I agree with the notion that hell is paved good intentions on an individual level. But, when profit is the motive nothing good can arise. Those motivated by profit need to come to terms with the fact they are paving that road. A new consciousness is needed and everyone can make that happen

I’d argue that being greedy and therefore manipulative like they do is a kind of evil. The marketing managers may not be entirely bad, but the company’s policies designed around ā€œoccupy as much of their mind and life as humanly possibleā€ end up being evil because they’re hopelessly greedy and harm people’s ability to live free of manipulation and constant distraction.

That's the worst kind of evil.

They're the guys who drove the train to Auschwitz.

This is the real issue of capitalism, and Bo highlights it pretty perfectly.

In unregulated capitalism, a company can not only have goals that are, in practice, exceptionally unethical and have terrible implications for the human condition - but the people forwarding these goals can also absolve themselves of moral wrongdoing by hiding behind the fact that it’s what ā€œthe market demands of the companyā€.

The market demands we further destroy the human brains reward system and subjugate the human experience into 140 character bits? Oh well, that’s just the market! I’m merely a facilitator of the natural progression of things.

And then we all do a climate change and die off en masse so another species that hopefully doesn’t have so much hubris can take the mantle - where they don’t defer to their own self created system as the end-all be-all best imaginable solution to their problems.

We don't live in a vacuum tho which is why these people are 100% insidious.

What do you do for work? Do you drive a car? Order takeout with loads of plastic? Buy from Amazon? Shop at Walmart? Eat fast food? Use Apple products?

In a vacuum none of that is an issue. In aggregate it’s supporting destroying the environment and slavery. Does that make you evil? I don’t think so.

You are making that argument that participating in this sort of society would make someone evil lmao. There is a difference between being subject to the circumstances of a society and designing the society to be that way in the first place.

They might as well be though...they continue to participate in it even after knowing the harm they continue to cause us.

i thought there was a subtext that it is 100% insidious and purposeful

It's hilarious to say this, when he is directly, and plainly, stating the exact opposite.

People like you are just obsessed with naively dividing the world into binary good and evil, so you just can't handle the notion that something with a negative outcome might not be "100% insidious and purposeful".

ā€œInsidious: proceeding in a gradual, subtle way, but with harmful effects.ā€

Nothing binary about that, it’s just the truth. Also what’s naive about believing that companies don’t have your best interest at heart, they in fact turn a profit by doing the exact opposite.

I think you’re failing to read between the lines, intent aside the result is detrimental to the average person’s time and/or mental health

It's worse than the corporations. Social media also breeds this behavior in the consumer. We make comments and hope to be given points from those whose attention we've seized, points in the form of a happy orange arrow pointing up. He mentions it towards the end of his special, Make Happy.

I get what you’re saying but he’s referencing the system that all these companies exist under that makes them all act in the same manner. This isn’t just an issue of each company consciously being greedy, it’s the system that incentivises, even demands it. Maybe unconsciously is the wrong word, but it’s certainly not an issue of each individual company just happens to be greedy, capitalism or rather r/latestagecapitalism , keeps those greed gears grinding not matter what or where the company is.

His point, I believe, is that people working for those companies are just doing their job. There's no real boogeyman here. There's no boardroom of evil businessmen wringing their hands thinking "How can we get them next?!"

It's all just people working towards the natural conclusion to what capitalism demands. If you don't increase share value, you crash and burn. Is it really anyone's "fault" at that point? I find this kind of thinking really terrifying, there's too much momentum / inertia to turn the ship we're on and nothing anybody can really do but play the game, so to speak.

I believe his point was more that it's a means to an end rather than the goal itself, which is basically just money/power.

Corporations are run by people, but their so single-minded that they're basically autonomous. It asks the question "What increases profits?" and whatever the best answer is becomes the method and action.

They have people who manipulate our psychology to keep us addicted to these dopamine feeds. It is definitely intentional.

How old is this? Is there a longer video?

It’s from press tour(s) following the movie he wrote/directed ā€œEighth Gradeā€ (2018). He has many profound talks/clips during that time!

Not so much from the press tour but he and an actor from the movie, along with the movie itself, are used to further a conversation around the mental health of children in the age of the internet. The video is a panel style discussion on the subject that includes 2 scientists discussing their specialty. Particularly relevant to parents with kids today. You can see the link to the full video in my reply to the person above you.

Damn, I feel bad for him. It looks like he’s living this mindset that he’s describing and it’s crushing him. He’s moving and twitching all over the place. This video is painful to watch with how much anxiety he has about the subject.

Oh yeah I need to watch that. I remember it got good reviews and hearing it used Future Club by Perturbator in it.

Lol, what is profound about this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmUm7oBqCVw

Had the same question but no reply so did some sleuthing. It's from 2019. The movie name won't help you find it.

EDIT: for anyone ctrl+f'ing. Full Video, Full Clip, Source, Sauce, Original

I came to the comments for this. Curious enough to click and follow links, but not curious enough to search the internet for it haha. Thanks for finding it for us

My ctrl-f thanks you.

found it on tik tok.

Might want to search under bo burham panel talks

Ironic.

I-R-O-N-I-C šŸŽ¶šŸŽ¶

Im so glad that i found Bo Burnham again! I'd only saw his standup comedy shows and i was craving more content. Coincidentally he's speaking one of the topics that i'm most aware of, internet is eating us whole

Oh wow, if you haven’t watched INSIDE yet you’ve gotta check it out. And the Outtakes, which is basically INSIDE but from a different perspective. It’s a behind the scenes, but it’s still edited by Bo so it still has all the narrative undertones/overtones that speak right into the heart of the matter.

INSIDE

gonna give it a try thank you!

God please report back on your experience. I wish I could watch it again for the first time. Very excited for you, stranger

Daddy made you your favorite, open wide!

This is literally exactly the thing that has been worrying me 24/7 for the past year almost

The fact that someone like Bo Burnham talks about it in a serious tone makes me feel much, much worse, since that just confirms the fact that we're infected by these corporations beyond return, and our minds have been seemingly permanently altered by the new culture of everything internet, and the constant attention stimulus of it all

It's all fucked, we're all fucked, and it won't get better because the politicians that could change all this are also profiting from all this

>The fact that someone like Bo Burnham talks about it in a serious tone makes me feel much, much worse

This is maybe why Inside impacted me so deeply. It was jarring for someone I'm so used to being silly getting that dark and real about a lot of topics, but for me it was specially climate change.

I made major changes in my life and career to address climate change that were mostly inspired by Inside and the book Ishmael.

CS Lewis' The Screwtape Letters get into this. They're written from the perspective of a demon talking to another demon, so they can take a bit of work to unpack but like half of them talk about the demons trying to take something fun and enjoyable and generally good and making people miserable with it, where they are never satisfied and always want more content.

Setting aside the religious aspect (which is admittedly the entire basis of the book), it's a fascinating thought experiment on how minds work, that despite being written in the 1940s, is very applicable today.

I remember my mom bought me this after I ingested the Narnia series faster than she expected. She figured, same author, same style. Oh boy was she wrong lol but it was still cool to talk with her about when I finished. She knew I wasn't into religion, but I'm willing to give anything a shot and the idea behind the book outweighed my distaste for blatantly religious texts.

Why the fuck do reddit videos stop loading after a few seconds? It happens on mobile data, as well as all the different wifis I've used

Don't use the official reddit app, it's garbage.

Free apollo works fine. It’s snappy

Ad free, straight content and comments. That’s how I justify this last bastion of ā€œsocial mediaā€ I use.

If Apollo or any other 3rd party app is crushed by capitalistic natures… well then, I guess I’ll put my phone down.

Word. It’s only shit to stop using it because it’s become a habit, but a week or so and it’s just like it didn’t happen at all

Sync Pro if you have an Android. I've had it almost ten years and never once had a problem

Using the reddit mobile site

Rif is great on android.

Same with military industrial complex there has to be war for them to make money.

No there doesn’t. A war can cause the government to nationalize them and place profitability behind maximum efficiency. The threat of war, however? Well, that requires a constant stream of new weapons and government contracts without all that inconvenient ā€œpatriotismā€ and ā€œselflessness.ā€ It also avoids tearing up resources like an actual war does, allowing it to be sustained indefinitely in a way where a constant demographic and financial drain can’t.

gif

And it's fucked up. Lives destroyed over colored pieces of paper. sickening

Not even colored pieces of paper anymore.

Just a number on a screen.

Well.. and literal different level of experiences to live through as well. The higher the number the less every day life weighs on you less.

He points out in this interview that kids at the end of the day are struggling with the same thing we are all struggling with, the human condition.

The less you have to worry about validating existence and more you can focus on the MEANING of your existence. Under capitalism you must prove why it's worth it for you to exist.

We look at people who move the world and in reality 90% of the world is hard blocked behind a dollar amount stopping them from even participating.

No. There has only to be the possibility of war.

Putin: attacks Ukraine

Raytheon: swoons

I have whatever disease makes a person listen to Inside for 6 months straight and then watch nothing but variations of Ludwig content for the next 6 months

As I’m looking on my phone

Get out, this guy has anxiety?

How can you tell?

*gestures to all of him*

He stopped performing for years due to having panic attacks on stage. Anxiety manifests in many different ways and some people can hide it

That's not a good place to have them

But he got better

anxiety can be overcome when you have a Tarantino-tier rant in the back of your mind

I would refer to it as a Tarantino-scripted rant. If you've ever seen Tarantino actually speak, it takes dude like, five minutes to get through a sentence. "Um...you know, alright?"

As someone with adhd looks like he might have some of that too ahahah. Watching I thought - oh! He doesn’t stop moving just like me!

Have you seen his special ā€œInsideā€? I also have ADHD and was relating way too hard with the special lmao

He seems slightly medicated but wow, when he opens up on stage he’s something to behold

This video is before he shut down and became reclusive.

It's actually from after! Press tour for Eighth Grade, I believe.

Which came out in 2018. He grew out the beard and stayed inside during covid and afterwards.

I'm confused, are you saying he became a recluse during... Quarantine? Like the entire ass rest of the country?

During quarantine and afterwards. Even after lockdown let up he stayed inside and kept making his movie. Have you even seen it? Theres a whole date tracker in it and everything. This interview is from 4 years ago.

Yes I know, Eighth Grade came out in 2018. I get what you're saying but Inside is a project, not a documentary. It wasn't filmed in his actual house, he's married with a kid

(Edit: sorry, not married/no kid, that was something from a different conversation I had recently šŸ˜‚) but yeah he has a partner

Every human has it. Along with anger, joy and various other emotions. What's your point?

[deleted]

False. I have a panic disorder but no stage fright.

What you've described is called stage fright ("the anxiety, fear, or persistent phobia which may be aroused in an individual by the requirement to perform in front of an audience, real or imagined").

I too have stage fright but I know many anxious people who don't

Yeah I think it's part of the evolutionary reason for anxiety. You're always anxious so when ish goes down you're like, okay this is everyday for me. I don't remember where I heard it but someone said in a therapy session, "Say you're in ancient China and over the wall you see a Mongolian hoard approaching. What do you do?" Most people say, "I run away." People with anxiety say "I prepare to fight!"

He's speaking the truth.

But the irony of this video being posted on TikTok and then shared again through reddit...

It's kinda weird isn't it?

Absolute truth.

And that is not to mention everything already devastated. Journalism is dead, it's just infotanement now, who wants to pay to get bad news right? Movies and TV are just a stagnant pool of dirty water, remakes and reboots. And what has been invented in the last decades? Nothing! I know I sound pessimistic, and it's because I am.

Capitalism is the all devouring void.

Movies and TV are just a stagnant pool of dirty water, remakes and reboots.

I've referred to it as the "echo chamber", all these companies tracking has made it incredibly difficult to discover new things. YouTube will never recommend to you "underwater basket weaving" (or some equivalent) because they don't know if you'd like it. While something may be uninteresting, they also don't know if you don't like it enough to stop using their platform, so they just "don't recommend it". This is why the government is so prudent to how tech companies use our data and their recommendation engines.

I absolutely hate the current state of youtube. I used to enjoy spending an hour or two just getting lost in the random trail of recommended videos and finding interesting things. Now it's just an assortment of the same thing just from different channels.
It's so fucking boring.

I still love YouTube, but I used to love scrolling through the recommended feed. Now I have to find everything myself.

My heart goes out to you

It's a rough life.

Back in the day of Google Video, they kept a list of the most watched stuff of all time and for certain timespans. In the early days that was a great way to find interesting content because it wasn't at all tied to what you'd already been watching.

I think Youtube has that now but it's all sports clips and pop music.

Discoverability is very important, finding new things that you might be interested in but don't know about yet is important, and it's very, very difficult to accomplish.

It's funny because I had this exact problem on Pandora back in the day. You'd let a station go, and after an hour or two it'd be playing Led Zeppelin. I love Led Zeppelin, but in no way should I be able to get there on the channel I set up to be Cajun music.

The algorithm has made it impossible to explore videos outside of your traditional content. I watch one video on learning Spanish and next thing I know my video is all language learning content. Or one Jordan Peterson video and all the videos on my feed are right wing leaning popular channels like Ben Shapiro, etc.

The old style was honestly better for engagement IMO because I could find obscure videos and go down different rabbit holes for hours. Now it’s just like, oh the same shit I see everyday… logs out

I find this too. I’m afraid to click on some videos because I know it will wreck my feed. If YouTube doesn’t know me now it never will. All this talk of machine learning and algorithms is hype. Even the ads I get don’t seem to be targeted to me.

What really pisses me off is the "New to You" thing that supposedly shows you stuff that wouldn't normally get recommended to you. Every time I have ever used it, without fail there's a video that was on my home page in the first two lines and at least 2-3 videos from channels I'm already subscribed to.

Can you not search things out on your own. Or perhaps, make them?

Even the search function is skewed because if you search for some channel that doesn’t have thousands of subs, it’s hard to find. Same with videos that don’t have that many views. Everything is catered to what is popular

Exactly, the search function has been so neutered that it’s largely useless for my purposes. If I didn’t already have a large cultivation of channels I’ve subbed to in the past years I’d leave youtube. My home recommended feed is all either videos I’ve seen before, one’s I’ve told youtube repeatedly I’m not interested in, whatever videos the algorithm is currently pushing, and a light smattering of videos from my sub feed. On top of that, there are channels where I watch every single video as they come out and youtube will drop them from my homepage, (my prior history doesn’t make you think I might be interested in a new upload from a channel where I’ve fully watched every video?) so without checking on that channel periodically I could go weeks without being notified there’s a new video. Even the sub bell they introduced to fix that issue doesn’t work.

Are you really shilling for YouTube right now?

I'm shilling for escaping the algorithm, actually. You aren't a passive worm locked into a feeder tank. Shut it off.

Nah dude, we're just saying the recommendation algorithm used to be better. I totally agree that finding your own entertainment is ideal, but it would be nice if they would use a recommendation algorithm for good, every once in a while, and show me some shit that I would have never found on my own.

This was commonplace, from like 2006 to 2015.

Except it's not "we", it's you. And everyone knows the algorithm went to shit, but also, it really never was very good. Maybe you thought it was good because it got worse or it was your first thing. I don't know. But if you are here you hoping it's all going to be nice - it's not. And downclicking my angstlines with your gazedollars to paradise isn't going to happen. Meanwhile, keep shilling for YouTube!

Wow...

And everyone knows the algorithm went to shit

This is literally all I'm saying, and you're making a big deal out of it.

Nope, you said...

"Are you really shilling for YouTube right now?"

In response to me saying

"Can you not search things out on your own. Or perhaps, make them?"

And I said...

"I'm shilling for escaping the algorithm, actually. You aren't a passive worm locked into a feeder tank. Shut it off."

You are changing your story and making the big deal because it's pretty clear what's up, including you trying to co-opt everyone by saying "we". You are projecting.

I'm cool with what you are saying, but don't pretend it's on me while you downvote me for no reason.

Seriously, look at this. You are lying about your own shit. And YouTube basically made you do this. It's tricked you.

You are so weird, and so off-base. I said "we' because I was agreeing with the person you initially replied to.

I was wrong about you shilling, but I was responding to you apparently having a huge problem with people missing the old YouTube recommendations (or else why would you have replied to dude in the first place).

The conversation has always been about missing the old recommendation system. You're the one that keeps bringing up shit that has nothing to do with it.

Except....

That poster never lumped themselves in with you as "we".

There's no connection between talking about YouTube use and old recommendations.

And my initial response is clearly about how to respond today.

You are again projecting.'

LOL...and you downvote me again. Fantastic.

I hope you have a lovely life. :)

Actually, it's you who are shilling for YouTube right now and you can't even see it. In fact, that's the whole point. YouTube, like most historic powers, wants to make you think you are fighting against them when you are fighting for them. That is what you are engaged in.

YouTube will never recommend to you "underwater basket weaving"

good god, if youtube recommended me anything at all

90% of it is stuff i've seen already

To be fair, as you're exposed to large categories of videos on YT, they have general info on the category of videos/creators you like, and they have a more dynamic recent version of those things. So if all you did was watch puppy videos, and you never sat through another video of a different category, other videos are slowly going to get cycled out, but it might put things up that are trending (generally trending on YT, maybe based on your region) or adjacent to what you like to watch, to see if they can expand your preferences.

This isn't done out of altruism, but because they have good algorithms for weighing how interested you are in topic X, and how quickly that interest falls off, and they want to be able to feed you more content you want to see.

If you watched a full video or two about underwater basket weaving, or something adjacent to that, they might start recommending videos about underwater X, or underwater Y, or basket weaving A, or basket weaving B, which are videos that have high click-through rates in those similar categories. If you don't click them, or you do click them and bail on the videos quickly, it will start to deprioritize that kind of content for you.

Point being, their goal isn't anti-discovery, they're actually pretty good at exposing you to more and more content, but they will greatly optimize their recommendations for what they think you're most likely to want to watch, to an actually kind of scary extent.

The main google account I've been using for the last few years is incredibly well targeted to today's me, I have separate accounts for listening to music, or older accounts from when I was younger, it's actually kind of funny to see what kind of person they think they're targeting when I check recommended videos throughout those various accounts.

you watched a full video or two about underwater basket weaving, or something adjacent to that

Right, however my point is more to the absolute unknown. Material that the model does not know you like or dislike. That "blind spot" in the algorithm where it will not show it to you "something" is what creates the homogeneity of most recommendation algorithms, or what I referred to as the "echo chamber". Better to show you something we "think" you'll like over something we have no idea on.

Its not necessarily a good thing or a bad thing either. Its more the limitations of current user modeling. And the only method for getting more information would be to increase how much data we track from users, which they, in turn, dislike.

Hell, recommended will change within a month period. If I’m writing a lot I’ll listen to asmr, after a few days of heavy listening that’s all I’ll get. A few days later and it’s back to the usual channels, but starts with subscriptions I tend to watch every video from and over a few days/weeks it slowly expands to other channels or games I enjoy watching but hadn’t been recently.

A great specific example is DogDog, a hearthstone streamer who uploaded a game vod every day. Every night for a ~6 month period I’d watch that days video while falling asleep because I was too busy during that time to play the game myself. Now, a year later, despite being subbed to dogdog still I haven’t had his videos or any hearthstone videos on my recommended in months.

YouTube will never recommend to you "underwater basket weaving" (or some equivalent) because they don't know if you'd like it.

This is one of many reasons that I have my watch history and recommendations disabled on youtube. This means that they only recommend videos to me that are based on the video I'm currently looking at. This has allowed me to skim the related recommendations and discover things that I don't think they would have recommended to me because they were novel to me. The only data they had to go on was that someone else who enjoyed the video I just watched also watched some other video.

I sometimes watch videos when logged out of youtube and then my recommendations are based on watch history and then the recommendations fill up with a bunch of trash that is the same topic as some other video I watched in the past.

This sounds nice but then I watch one Jordan Peterson video on an interesting lecture and next thing you know my whole feed is filling with Ben Shapiro, joe Rogan, etc. or I watch a fitness video and it’s all fitness videos/fitness content creators. You get the point. It does that to me bad enough already

I think you misunderstand. If you disable the history, then watching that Jordan Peterson video will have no impact on your recommendations. You'll only see recommendations related to him while you are on the page for that video.

Yesterday I searched a specific video on YouTube (that guy that does tours of NYC apartments, he had a 'short' and I wanted to see the full version) and in the search results it was suggesting things that are part of my front page algorithm but completely unrelated to NYC apartments... Like video games videos, relaxing music to study to etc. It even had a banner on these results like "you might like this".

Like FFS YouTube you know I like those, but I was searching for something else, fuck off

So true, why take the chance if you don't have to?

Then why do I get ads for gay cruises?

Journalism is dead

It's not

who wants to pay to get bad news right?

Everybody? That's all news is.

Movies and TV are just a stagnant pool of dirty water, remakes and reboots

Stop watching only the 'hot" new thing. There's literally so much indie content out there that you couldn't watch it all if you tried.

And what has been invented in the last decades?

Humanity has seen more innovation and invention in the last few decades than in the last 2000 years.

There is more to life than what you gather from letting media feeds just wash over you, but it takes deliberate action. You have to seek out and choose to include the best of things in your life. It's not just gonna fall in your lap.

For anyone looking for some good journalism, check out the Intercept or GZero Media. The Intercept was founded by Glenn Greenwald, the journalist who broke the NSA PRISM story with Edward Snowden. GZero is Ian Bremmer, who has a geopolitical consulting agency that does a lot of work with the UN. Both are pretty fantastic sources.

It's extremely important to note The Intercept cut ties with GG because he's gone fucking bonkers and just spends his days picking internet fights to get clicks for his nutty substack. The dude is a loon and a bad journalist.

Humanity has seen more innovation and invention in the last few decades than in the last 2000 years.

Can you name something invented in the last 20 years other than CRISPR?

The fact you can't really just speaks to my point.

So... you can't or you just won't?

Their is a tone of great film . And Even Technologie we have today make great film for smaller budget. Yall gotta stop going to the theater only for marvel movie. Also we are in the golden age of television

Just pasting my reply on another comment, not sure if that is the best way, but.

That is not what I mean, I know there is plenty of good stuff out there, humans will never stop creating good things.

What my point is that all good things are happening because some people choose to swim upstream in defiance of capitalism.

There is a reason for the saying "selling out", it's when the thing you love is diluted and corrupted to make the most money possible.

The best band I've ever heard released their first album only 8 years ago. I describe it as progressive metal - jazz fusion.

The novel, the thoughtful, and the creative are out there, but it can be hard to find them.

So that doesn't sound like my type of music, but you are definitely a monster for not posting the band name.

Not OP but since they didn't reply I think it may be Thank You Scientist.

u/LoRn21 is right: Thank You Scientist.

Haha, I thought it might distract from my point (since musical preference is so subjective). But in terms of creativity, composition, and musicianship, they are top-tier.

They're honestly incredible. Had the opportunity to see them live here in Columbus about a year ago and they were every bit as good live.

Absolutely incredible band that's quickly become maybe my favorite group ever? Nothing else quite like them out there, at least not that I've found.

Name of the band?

Thank You Scientist

That is not what I mean, I know there is plenty of good stuff out there, humans will never stop creating good things.

What my point is that all good things are happening because some people choose to swim upstream in defiance of capitalism.

There is a reason for the saying "selling out", it's when the thing you love is diluted and corrupted to make the most money possible.

I hear ya , there are glimpses of light / hope. There are others fighting the good fight and doing things differently. Independent artists on patreon, nebula made by creative communities , means tv that is worker owned extc.

Not to mention the quitting with out a moments notice , strikes, protests, unionizing, all over. Things are heating up ever since the pandemic, we saw how we was treated and realized the world didn't stop and 90% of jobs is shit.

There are things to look up to you, but i'm optimistic so * shrugs*

I actually massively disagree with a lot of this.

What has been invented… omg so much:

  1. CRISPR and basically everything of its kind in medical tech. This is literally the dawn of new medicine. It already has changed the game.
  2. Reusable rockets. Holy fuck this is huge. And as the tech refines it’ll just exponentially change the limits of humanity. This is basically the key to making humanity have the ability to take its first real steps into the universe in a meaningful way.
  3. VR/AR has went from not a thing to being on the precipice of changing how we view reality.
  4. ML algo, big data, specific AI: if you want to blow your mind take a walk down even just the more trivial of these. Go look at modern journey and the art it can generate. Or look at the ai creating songs. Or what will be the next huge leap… fully generated actors. It’s in its early ages and it’ll redefine how humanity thinks in such a massive way. We’re a hop skip and a jump away from viewing movies created fully in VR with plots generated by ai and played by ai.
  5. 3d printing. Holy shit the amount of ways this has changed things. And as we get better at using it now bio 3d printing.
  6. Smart watches. And while this may seem trivial at first… the advances in health tracking from heart rate all the way to blood oxygen levels and fall or crash alerts to 911. These things are already changing and saving lives.
  7. the Higgs boson. Holy shit this was huge for science.
  8. every advance in the energy sector. Solar is now insanely effective, battery tech is steadily better, cars have just hit the point of cost efficiency parity with combustion engines which will completely change how we interact with energy on a massive scale. It may seem like this is going slow… and for the environments sake I wish it would speed up… but we’ve invented the tech already to change from sourcing energy from non renewables to renewable and that’s massive.

Your next point… TV and film being dead??? Whaaaaaattttttttt. TV is probably quite literally in its golden age since inception. And while film is in a more topsy state that’s only because it’s going through a radical shift in democratizing the capabilities to produce amazing film with less resources. This has always historically led to a boom in arts. This is like being alive for the creation of the printing press and thinking it’s leading to only trash novels.

Journalism is certainly in a very weird spot. The old channels for it died and were replaced with mockeries that imitated the format while becoming commentator sport. However, we’ve also seen access to real first hand information shoot upwards. So many of the massive moments of the century would never have come to light if it wasn’t for cell phone cameras and the ability to spread information digitally. An officer pinning George Floyd to death? Never would have made the news. It would have been covered up and dismissed. Ukraine being invaded? Eh who cares. But now the world does care because the world gets a first person view of the whole population of Ukraine trying to fight back.

Capitalism has its flaws. And it’s certainly passing it’s expiration date on utility. But to believe that the world has been stagnant this last decade is… just crazy. The world and its technology and advancement has been racing forward exponentially.

It’s so easy to look at this progress and only see the stumbles along the way. But humanity doesn’t succeed without first failing a hundred different ways. Growth is only accomplished through that failure. If you only pay attention to all the ways we fail you’ll miss that the culmination of that failure is often success.

What movies and tv shows are you watching? I 100% believe we are in the golden age of TV. There are so many fantastic and creative tv shows being made, and have been made in the last ~5 years.

I agree with everything you said except for:

Movies and TV are just a stagnant pool of dirty water

The last few years have been some of the greatest years in film and television since the 90s. Just need to look for it.

80-90% of everything is crap and it always has been. Mainstream journalism is dead sure, but then we have people like Andrew on Channel 5 news doing real journalism to keep it alive.

Capitalism is the all devouring void, but you'll always be able to find little glimmering islands of good shit.

There was a big joke in 2012 that the Mayan calendar said the world was going to end. Everyone laughed at the scant few people predicting the End of Days. Nowadays, seems like everyone subscribed to doomsday rhetoric.

The thing that Bo misses is how the internet fosters a falsely cynical mindset. Sure, he’s aware of it, but he still falls prey to it. Fact is, we’re so connected that we can find as much evidence we want for whatever narrative we’re looking for.

I don’t think irony and cynicism come from seeing how ā€œbullshitā€ everything is these days. Detached irony has been cool ever since the Beat Generation. Not caring is cool, while earnestness and hope are dorky.

Movies and TV are just a stagnant pool of dirty water, remakes and reboots.

Just go on Mubi or any other service that actuslly provides interesting films then?

Ok don’t be silly

Journalism has always been bad. Movies and Tv have always been products of capitalism and the reason we get remakes is that it’s what people more reliably watch, so blame people

And what has been invented? Smart phones, cloud computing, drought resistant crops, machine learning tools, electric cars, better renewable energy, and that’s just a start. Hell I don’t even know what this comment is supposed to mean since for the vast majority of human history, there was no technological advance that’d really impact the life of an average person. Capitalism is at the forefront of why we have a technological revolution.

It isn’t perfect and requires a robust safety net but we live in the best possible time for human history, sorry you’re depressed but human history is mostly poverty and despair

Movies and TV are just a stagnant pool of dirty water, remakes and reboots.

This is way over-simplified. You're literally commenting on a video of an artist who has made an original, well-received movie and an original, very well-received Netflix special in the last few years. It's like when people comment "all music is terrible nowaday", simply because they're unwilling to look at a little deeper to find something they might enjoy, while also missing the fact that every single generation spouts that at some point. Those who don't learn from history, etc.

There's plenty of really great movies and TV shows that have come out in the last few years. In terms of horror movies alone, it's been a great year.

We literally have AI art bots winning art competitions this year, but no advancements have been made in artistic culture this year sure. Not to mention cgi has had amazing advancements this decade and it’s no wonder why studios want to break it out.

machine learning wasn’t really a field a decade ago. Autonomous vehicles and the possibility of robot surgeons don’t amaze you?

I'm not talking about new ways to make money, I'm talking about inventions, the components in your smartphone or a Tesla where invented ages ago, with tax payer money usually. The lithium-ion battery was invented in 1970, Is it good that now it's more efficient and smaller? Sure. But why is there nothing new?

Because it's risky and capitalism hates risk.

r/latestagecapitalism

Anime’s in the last few years have been pretty dope though

Don't forget about the the climate and the current mass extinction event, which is 10 to 100 times worse than previous mass extinction events.

Based

Preach

Advertising needs to become as socially acceptable as smoking.

It indiscriminately pollutes the environment, and inflicts arbitrary secondary harms on non participants through incentivising the collection and concentration of data, which behaves, not like oil, but refined uranium.

Man’s not wrong, I work for a major clothing company and every single thing we do is to try and make people spend more and more Money and keep people coming back to our site as often as humanly possible

Right, I'm deleting Reddit from my life now.

I truly believe Bo Burnham will be remembered as a great philosopher of our time. He has such a complete and deep understanding of the internet and how it has affected our society. Inside was of course a masterpiece, and my favorite part is that IT ISNT A COVID SPECIAL. everyone describes it as such, and there's an extra layer of understanding knowing what was happening when he made it, but the special is about everything he talked about in this video. He was "Inside" well before the pandemic. Every kid today is born and raised exclusively "inside". The pandemic was just a hilariously on point metaphor for the whole thing. We're in hell and Bo seems to be one of the few people truly vocalizing the horror of the world being built around us

Reminds me of this article and about Peak Attention as a concept in general. I'd be willing to bet hard money he picked it up from The Attention Merchants or other similar books that dive into this aspect of modern economics, particularly with social media, but it can be traced further back to the increasing leisure and mass media industry as a whole as work and home maintenance both got more automated.

For anyone interested in learning and thinking more about this subject, check out The Center for Humane Technology and their podcast, Your Undivided Attention.

They're not luddites; they're advocates for technology built on different assumptions.

marxists have been saying this for a long time

It's always so funny to me that you can describe every minute detail of the entire marxist diagnosis of capitalism and everyone will agree completely because it's all so obviously true, until you say where you're getting it from. Then you're immediately some kind of nut. And these same people think brainwashing is just something other countries do.

I even think Lenin is basically bulletproof

Then you're immediately some kind of nut.

Because the last time Marxism was attempted to be implemented, it failed in its targets. Probably because Marx forgot to account for the corruptibility of a system.

Sure but that is quite literally tossing the baby out with bath water

I don't mind tossing this baby, then.

There are aspects we can keep, but there's no need for the whole package.

That's a whole topic on it's own I'm more than happy to go into. But the long and short is that it had a confrontation with global capitalism, which was of course expected, and it got really fucking ugly on both sides because it was a bitter struggle for survival and hegemony. And global communism ultimately lost because capital was simply too strong and the communist states were too poor and underdeveloped to compete. This will not be the case again because the material circumstances of the 21st century are COMPLETELY incomparable, there will be no more rapid industrialization, no more being forced to turn ox carts into steel factories in a few short years, because otherwise capitalism will literally commit a genocide against your people. We're past that stage, and the next cold war will look completely different.

Capitalism is cancer. It grows uncontrolled , demanding more and more growth. Just like a cancer.

Is there a documentary that touches on this? I’d like to hear more

Read Guy Debord's Society of the Spectacle

They Live [1988]

The full talk can be found here. I also recommend Bo's latest Netflix special Inside, which largely deals with this insidious aspect of the Internet.

The Social Dilemma on Netflix is probably the most relevant one.

Starship Troopers (1997)

/r/sorceryofthespectacle

Debord's Society of the Spectacle

Bo is paraphrasing Douglas Rushkoff here

Read The Attention Merchants by Tim Wu (2016)

This is 100% truth, an excellent observation.

Yeah not seeing the ā€œcringeā€ moment

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

Surprise. It's about money. It's ALWAYS about money, 99% of every fucked up thing on this planet is about profits. "The root of all evil". It's already dooming us all. Attacking climate change will not get the focus it needs until something bad enough happens to make these big wigs part with all that money because it isn't profitable. What a shame

That dude. Makes me anxious and want to rub my neck..

There it is again

That funny feeling...

That funny feeling...

Just give the guy some crack already. He’s jonesin’

[deleted]

Fellas is it drug abuse to bounce your leg?

"why you guys booing? You know I'm right"

Bo Burnham?

Matthew Macfadyen actually.

Nah, it's Bo, but holy shit the similarities. Never noticed it before.

The irony hits hard. I’m watching this on my phone, in bed, first thing in the morning šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø

Man just understands the internet so insanely well, it’s literally how he built his career.

You know, he has a point

*continues scrolling Reddit for the 4th hour in a row

that's why i just sleep all day i colonize my own time like a chad

Great insights. Bang on. That ending though lol

"a really good book"

Interesting

That's enough Internet for me tonight. Guess I'll get one more biology lecture in before bed. Goodnight all.

Cyberpunk is sounding more and more plausible as the days go by

Who knew capitalism was so fucked up...?

The kids are growing up

How the fuck is YouTube not profiting

I remember seeing some claims that YT wasn't profitable for years, but when I looked where that claim came from, I found absolutely nothing.

There is NO foundation on the claim that YT isn't profitable. Maybe in its early years when there were barely any ads, but nowadays? No way in hell. Google killed products off for less. https://killedbygoogle.com/

I loved the irony of that Tik Tok watermark sitting right there for the entire duration of the video.

I don't know why this is posted as cringe. Dude is right on the money. Gotta take time to disconnect.

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

'Robert Pickering' "Bo" Burnham!

I mean he’s right

There’s a book that’s a quick read called, ā€œStand Out of Our Light,ā€ that dives into this concept. The author used to be an advertising strategist for Google and is now a philosopher. He gets into this idea of ā€œexistential distractionā€ where we all get so absorbed into this technology that we start to lose focus on our goals and purpose in life. It resonated with me and what is being said in this video. His biggest concern was how it impacts politics since we all feel powerless and have that ā€œwtf is this?ā€ feeling.

This is why I pay for any service I can in order to support a non ad-based economy. I pay for my email provider, search engine, most apps that I find useful.

I know it isn't a perfect solution, and what I do is just a fart in the wind, but god damn do we need to kill the ad monster.

Capitalism/colonization is the hellscape.

Internet is socialism/Wikipedia, free information exchange, connection, open source software, creativity, free education

Social media is the guaranteed capitalist nightmare that will only destroy human souls as manipulation and unsustainable greed always does.

Glad I'm not the only one that realizes this shit. I was thinking about this last night and I think about it all the time. I always imagine a group of execs at a long panel table telling the developers "Great! The last change in our app was a huge success! Now how can we make even more money with the next change?" Bc that's all executives see is money, and all the devs are doing is their job of trying to innovate to keep their paycheck coming in.

Basically we've set up our entire system for failure bc everyone has a job and that job is usually to keep growing/expanding to make more money and we've hit a limit where we have to throw others under the bus so we can get ahead and have a slight advantage.

As someone who study markets. Yes. It’s call the ā€œattention economyā€. If you’re digital or not you’re apart of it and business want that resource, (your focused attention and time)

It’s not only online that has been a way to force advertising down your throat, clothing also has become that way. Not necessarily a new phenomenon but it’s become increasingly ridiculous. Like 70% of most hoodies are logos, a giant Puma logo on the front and two on each arm for good measure. Effectively making the working class walking advertisements.

Damn never thought of it like that

Look up Puma clothing no logo or Nike clothing no logo, you will not find a single one that doesn’t have the logo on the front, arms or back.

This is far more based than cringe.

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

I wasn't complaining, I was just trying to make a joke.

My bad for not detecting the joke :)

I'm watching this on my phone. How ironic

Brought to you by TikTok. It is a bit surreal seeing the logo in the corner while he’s making these points

This isn’t cringe, it’s just insightful and honest.

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

Good to know! Makes sense

When the fuck are we, as a society, going to admit that this system just doesn’t work and only breeds misery?

ZACH STONE is going to be famous..... ZACH STONE is going to be famous......ZACH STONE... ZACH STONE

This guy is on some cognitive enhancer. He can’t stay still.

Bo’s on adderall

This guy makes such a good point though even with all the twitching he's speaking facts

Why is this on this sub?

Is that Bo burnham

I love Bo

Bo Burnham is my hero.

I hate how we "need" to continue growing infinitely and infinitely faster, every year. This reasoning is fallacious and impossible and kills the business in the end, sooner than it was going to. Fr this expectation needs to stop, cause they are making soo much money in profits with everything covered there is no reason to except to play a fake numbers game with real negative consequences. I hate it, I know it's not gonna change for a while when it does.

Commenting to save

This guys smart

I like how many commenters either continue to externalize this issue or simply joke about the fact that they fall in the category of being consumed by social media as if self-awareness alone is enough.

Let's face it, corporations aren't going to stop because people aren't going to stop and people won't stop because we can always externalize the issue.

This is why stock markets should be banned.

Endless need for growth to satisfy quarterly reports.

Private family run companies do not have that need, and grow much more slowly and much of the time stagnate at a certain point when income is high enough to be satisfying.

Public companies grow like cancer.

Tha k you Bo. Removing reddit from my phone right now. Going to the gym.

What’s this guys name? Does he have a book? Where does he work?

His name is Bo Burnham and he's a comedian song writer.

He’s totally right. If you want to do a fun little experiment, next time you’re with family or close friends drop a ā€œall social media is badā€ into the conversation and watch everyone scramble to explain why what they do is different.

Useless but relatable anecdote. Once in a college classroom a teacher asked us if any of us were addicted to social media, this was a online communication course. Almost everyone piped up saying they ā€œmaybe check once a dayā€ or ā€œI use it but I wouldn’t say I’m addictedā€. I sat in the back of the class and could see that everyone with a laptop open was actively on Facebook.

We have a cultural sickness and people are either too ignorant or too scared to take the cure. It’ll never end until we the users decide to each individually cancel our accounts and end this madness. And yes I do realize the hypocrisy of typing this all out on Reddit.

Wait, Bo burnham is actually smart? Like not just a walking meme?

I had no idea he was this rad! Nice job, Bo.

He's ultra based rad!

He knows what's up!

Hes got my vote. Whats he running for? /s

The idea that we’re being ā€œmanipulatedā€ for our attention seems so obvious to me. I agree with everything he’s saying, that the internet is a weird platform for our consciousness to inhabit especially in excess. What’s concerning is how many people have never considered that at all and are slaves of ignorance. Like a bird afraid to eat the corn because of the scare crow. (I use the quotation marks above, not sarcastically or because I don’t believe that’s the appropriate word but because it’s only manipulation if you allow it to manipulate you. In other words, one can use social media, eat at McDonald’s or whatever without having been manipulated. If I want a Big Mac I get a Big Mac. Because I’m hungry, because it tastes good, because it’s affordable, because it’s convenient and I’m in a hurry. If I eat a Big Mac because it has Travis Scott’s name on it even though I’d prefer a taco, I’ve probably been manipulated. Not by McDonald’s but by my own ideas about what’s important or what’s cool.) News flash, a company built on selling advertising wants you to watch more ads. That’s always been the deal. If you’re regretfully abusing your phone and ā€œwastingā€ your time online (from a philosophical stand point I don’t believe time can be wasted) it isn’t twitters fault for tricking you into it. We ramble on endlessly about change from the top when the truth is our habits give them not only the incentive to continue but the power to grow. We’ve handed over our attention in exchange for things like a sense of community and connectedness, a voice, entertainment, news, etc. and honestly those are all things we should want. Our culture globally has changed, for many reasons, over time into one where those things are necessarily sought after on the internet because they’re now more scarce irl. The internet is neither good nor bad nor are the algorithms or the people who write them (although they may be self seeking). We act as if algorithms take away our free will. As if we, individually (collectively I’d say we’re doomed) are helpless to having our time and attention colonized. At the root of this whole idea is a victims mentality. One which the corporate overlords are thrilled about. They will happily be labeled evil so long as you continue to believe you have no choice. And we act as if we believe that we need these things when deep down we all know we don’t but most don’t have the fortitude to power off, in many cases simply out of sheer FOMO. Are these insecurities exploited? Well of course they are and guess what, this isn’t a new thing that Facebook invented. If you’re aware of this and still feel like you’re a victim then you have bigger issues than your addiction to your phone (which is always the case with addiction), primarily that you won’t take responsibility for your own use of time.

Now as to the issue of children being raised in this day and age, that’s a bit of a different issue because children are developing. They are vulnerable and innocent and society should do all it can to protect them (which we obviously don’t. We’re too busy arguing about the dangers of the internet, on the internet, and buying guns which they’ll use to shoot their parents and their peers). A good parent should not only teach their kids how to use technology in a healthy way but also demonstrate and exemplify that behavior. But again, that isn’t a new concept. We need to first acknowledge that the internet isn’t going anywhere and therefore create and model a strategy in the home by which to navigate it responsibly. We need to explain to our children that all good things come with potential hazards when used in excess or abused. These principals apply to literally everything in life. If you can impart that to your kids then they’ll be able to handle anything tech or society might throw at them. I understand the world is complicated and nuanced but we can’t allow that to distract us from the basic fundamentals of being human which transcend technology. In other words, the problem is complicated but the solution, at least on the individual level, is quite simple. Self awareness, self control, and taking responsibility for one’s own life and time on earth.

So far as the societal response goes, there is a lot of work to be done but unfortunately policy and even philosophy isn’t moving at the pace of technology these days. And I’m afraid we just don’t care enough to speed it up. We can’t even agree that maybe we should reform some outdated ideas and policies regarding gun control no matter how many school kids get gunned down in the halls. Which is all the more reason we need to focus on our own individual choices and stop waiting for the government to somehow solve our short comings and raise our kids properly. And now me done typey, me go sleepy cause me know my limits.

Bo's early stuff really rubbed me the wrong way. He is obviously smart, but the tone of his material seemed snarky. Like he was patronizing you with his knowledge.

I didn't get that from this however. Maye I need to give him another chance.

Bo having a sort of meta, hostile relationship with his audience is definitely part of his shtick, especially for the Make Happy special. He shows complete revulsion for parasocial relationships and also has bad anxiety, so he amps that up to 11 into a ā€œwounded animal forced to perform for people he’s afraid ofā€ vibe and that snarkiness is the result. I guess all that to say, you’re right, but it’s on purpose and I think when you take it into context it’s more a profound, sad thing than him being actually condescending.

check out Inside, complete evolution in tone and approach

Watch Inside! Criticism of his own past work is actually a huge theme in it.

Loved him for a long time. Total genius

The funny thing is that the market still presents us with these borderline-anticapitalist takes because it's still profitable to do so. It's capitalist realism. Capitalism just subsumes everything around it and uses it as a way to generate more capital even if it's antithetical to capitalism, because anticapitalist ideas are no longer a real threat to capitalism. Hell, even worker reforms and things like climate change policies are still often presented under the framework of capitalism, and try and fit into that framework; which is why they'll only gain us a little bit of ground until reactionaries gain more power and take that ground away.

I watched Bo Burnham’s new stuff and thought ā€œoh he’s behind on the memesā€. Now I realize ā€œoh no, I’m terminally onlineā€.

I love him so much. We must protect him at all costs.

We must protect him at all costs.

why?

cringe?

no.

truth.

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

I don't read the rules for every subreddit, lol.

So, it's just posts from tiktok?

Showed up on all.

I don't care if I'm banned temporarily, or permanently from a sub I don't care about. I don't use tiktok. It's chinese spyware.

I don't read the rules for every subreddit, lol.

Neither do I, but this one bit shows up a bit too often lol

So, it's just posts from tiktok?

ye

Showed up on all.

Same, except /r/popular.

It's chinese spyware.

True, true. Same reason I don't have it installed.

Sir, this is a Wendy's.

This guy puts off an incredible amount of nervous energy with all his body movements. I can listen to him no problem, but holy shit I can't watch him because he makes me anxious just looking at him for 5 seconds

Is that Bo Burnham?

No. It's... Mo... Murnman.

He’s come a long way from his moms attic

His raps were fire but these are some of his best bars yet

Lol I think somebody might be letting his anxiety get the better of him.

While that is true, you are free to turn your phone off or put it down anytime you like.

So, I'll see you all in an hour when I'm still scrolling reddit šŸ˜‚

i can't think of how stupid you have to be to call Bo Burnham spitting the truth to be cringe

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Dang it, bot! Where were you before? And now I'm getting pooped on, by you? >:(

šŸ˜‚

Comrade Burnham?? Not something I would expect to see, yet there it is.

He wrote a whole song about capitalism being evil

Cringey? More like the truth

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

I'm genuinely not bothered by any of this, I don't understand why people act like they're incapable of putting their phones down, I don't even look at my phone most of the time because I'm listening to podcasts or YouTube vids while doing something else.

I have AdBlock on everything , yes even my phone. I basically have a mental adblock to because I unironically have an involuntary ability to see something is about to be an ad and my eyes just look away, its weird.

Uninstalled TikTok pretty quickly literally because I could feel it draining me , just constant shit over and over no pause , swipe , swipe. You don't have to install these apps, you don't have to use them at all, take some personal responsibility.

People are bored, they're looking for a distraction and everyone's ready to provide it, instead of losing your mind over it , choose what distractions benefit you, learn something, get a hobby, consume content that's of value beyond circus acts. I dunno man, figure it out.

this isn't a real solution. anyone can quit tobacco, but it's a hell of a lot of work. if everyone does it, it's practically impossible to escape - even if you want to. blaming the individual when everyone is struggling is lame

[deleted]

It's funny , I don't know how old you are but I'm young but I did grow up when the internet was still new , back when sharing anything about your real identity was a big no no, back when people made fun of others for online dating.

Are we really going to act like teens and anyone that frequents on the internet now has not been told repeatedly at one point or the other that maybe they're on their phones too much?

I literally had highschool classes with talks from academics in my school about the effects of social media over 10 years ago, and it can't just be my school, I don't believe people are as unaware of this as so many people replying to me think.

Like we've literally seen the effect of Instagram and the utter obsesssion for validation years ago, there are literal academic studies on the effect of suicide rates among teens before and after social media became this isn't new and we haven't done shit about it for years. So now what?

Clearly no one is going to save you or me or the millions of people out there.

[deleted]

You're pretty correct that there's no obvious view of a person that uses social media healthily versus someone that doesn't, great observation. Especially considering that a person who does seek validation from likes and attention online could actually make a living off the internet for being so obsessive, like I know women personally that literally have to study this shit like job because more engagement literally gets them sponsorships.

Usually tho a person that's desparate online would do dumb things in real life but record themselves for everyone to see and sometimes it ends pretty badly for them.

I'm in my early 20s and from what I remember it was very basic info I got from school, it was never truly demonized but as a young teen back then we all just rolled our eyes at them because that's what young teens do, yet over 10 years later I still remember the heart of what they said so I've already been conditioned.

Also I think I have to admit alot of this is personality based and how I was raised, everyone loves validation , everyone loves attention regardless of whether or not they want to admit that but it varies how much you seek it and want it.

We have drug addicts, food addicts, smoking addicts, nicotine addicts, porn addicts, alcoholics, addiction isn't new, there's only so much framework that can be done before people just accept the reality. Like the social media companies are only doing what's best for them to make a good product and generally speaking apart from the actual insidious malicious shit facebook did like actively antagonizing people by putting posts they know they'll engage with out of hate there's not much they can actually do.

It's fine to talk, this is why I come to Reddit to actually think about shit long form and have someone reply.

The only advice I can personally give as a young person is to first limit the age when your kids get a phone and monitor what they're doing constantly without their knowledge, legit spy on them till they're like 15-16 then you let go.

The exact day they get the phone occasionally explain things of what to do what not to do and how it can affect them. Limit certain apps ESPECIALLY the apps that let you live stream yourself at any time, hell ban any app that mainly uses a camera at an age below 15 or 16.

Just talk with your kids, listen to them, genuinely discuss things with them, let them set their own boundaries on how long they should use things so they're not always being told what to do and love them so they don't feel the need to seek so much validation online. Alot of this has to do with how people are raised also.

I grew up during the flip phone era, like ipods etc By the time i was a teenager everyone basically had a Facebook i made one when i was like probably 11. I'm young but I grew up when I literally never had a phone capable of browsing online and if i did the screen was tiny and could barely load things , hell I didn't have wifi, literally had an internet usb device where only one laptop or pc could use it so I didn't get a chance to truly grow up as a kid nowadays with a giant touch screen and wifi access constantly so even I am out of touch to how bad it is for the ipad youtube kid generation.

its fast food for your brain

in several other countries food regulations make it so fast food can't be as unhealthy as it is in the US, great analogy

if everyone does it, it's practically impossible to escape - even if you want to

This mentality is exactly why nothing will ever change, and the more you perpetuate this idea and strengthen this weird logic the more shit stays the same because other people believe this.

The reason why people struggle so hard to quit most things in life is because they physically and mentally do not want to, they haven't crossed the barrier of actually truly wanting change there's a big difference between knowning you want to quit something and having to quit it for the sake of being alive , and I don't look down on them for that but the lack of honesty to me is strange.

Again I'm only talking about social media, you can compare it to drugs all you want but that will never be a good comparison.

Just wanna say that I completely agree with you. Its absolutely insane how people compare this shit to heroin.

do you not want this shit regulated? that's literally all that needs to happen.

there has not been a case where society has just stopped doing something, it is always caused by some massive change or sweeping legislation. your advice seems to be to do nothing, which i cannot understand

Dude how the fuck do you want the government to regulate the internet and social media? Truly consider how ridiculous it would be to attempt to do so without literally being like the Chinese internet. I ask you give me any changes or legislation that you think needs to be put in place and I'll genuinely discuss it with you.

Also this is me speaking as a person fundamentally and I'll never change my stance on this, I do not believe the government should regulate how I use things in general, I'm an individual and I make my own choices.

I'm not denying that government regulation is a good thing simply to prevent people ignorant of things from harming themselves or just general rules to enforce for the health of a society but so far we can look at a fuck ton of things that harm society such as drugs, alcohol, porn , smoking and so far daily people still fall down the rabbit holes of these things despite the fact we all fucking know they're bad.

Like I literally saw 12-13 year olds at my school smoking barely 12ft away from school. How much regulation do people need before we decide no one can think or act for themselves. I was in my single digits of age learning to that smoking is bad .... ignorance isn't a valid excuse if you go to school or literally pay a percentage of attention to media or life around you.

cookies should not be information that can be boughtad sold

This is a pretty naive understanding of the psychological/behavioral addiction that is social media consumption. It reminds me of people who are like ā€œwhy do you keep doing heroin every day if it’s ruining your life? Like, just stop! I dunno man, figure it out!ā€

The principal of your comment is correct, it’s not an absolute necessity to use your phone every day and there are other ways to tackle boredom than scrolling. But it’s going to take more than personal agency to tackle the problem of social media addiction considering it’s now deep-rooted in our culture, our behavior, and our economy (just as a heroin addiction is deep-rooted in one’s brain chemistry).

Even though you (respectably) have the self control (for now) to keep your social media consumption reasonable, we cannot expect everyone to have that level of self control. These companies hire behavioral psychologists to design these apps specifically to make them as addicting as possible. They’re playing with brain chemistry to grab onto eyeballs and never let go.

It’s like when people say that the best way to fight climate change is to recycle and reduce individual consumption. These actions do help with climate change, sure, but it does nothing to solve the root problems or address the true drivers of climate change: corporation consumption and an economic model that requires constant growth and rampant consumerism.

These problems need to be tackled at the societal/governmental level, not the individual one.

But it’s going to take more than personal agency to tackle the problem of social media addiction considering it’s now deep-rooted in our culture, our behavior, and our economy (just as a heroin addiction is deep-rooted in one’s brain chemistry).

You realize the only real solution to this is literal government regulations right if you're going to be dismiss personal agency as the real solution? Give a real solution because I can't believe you're actually calling for the government to regulate media consumption on the internet because some people can't get off an app, that's silly, I believe people are much better than that.Especially if you're trying to make an analogy by comparing this shit to heroin, which is ridiculous btw. I'm just going to ignore you even mentioned an analogy.

I'm not better than anyone, even the video says it people are very aware of the draw social media has on them, screentime apps exist, if you spend long enough om the internet someone will point out just how long people use their phones or can't stop looking at their phones, like we've had this issue for over a decade this isn't new its just built up because the algorithms now are much better and personalized.

The root of this issue IS PEOPLE, their own personal issues , not some company because there will always be something to hook them if they keep getting shielded by the government, the internet is uncontrollable unless we want to live in secluded government owned areas of the internet like china has where they literally have time locks on devices. I believe in personal responsibility and teaching that, and enforcing that not running to people to regulate.

Again , I'll repeat let's stick to the topic , no analogies. I'm not better than anyone I simply made a decision.

I’m not going to get into a long back and forth because I don’t think it’s going to be productive as it seems we have very different perspectives on human behavior and the role the government should play in societal change.

One thing I will say is that analogies can be effective rhetorical tools for helping someone understand a different perspective by providing a comparable example that makes sense to them logically.

While the heroin analogy is an intense one, it’s far from a ridiculous one as social media addiction is caused by similar brain chemistry pathways as heroin, the only difference is that heroin can cause physical dependence and has a more intense influence in neurotransmitters while social media can only lead to psychological dependence (which is still potent) and has a lesser effect on neurotransmitters (although still potent as well). So telling someone to ā€œjust stopā€ social media is absolutely comparable to telling someone to just stop heroin as the underlying behavioral addiction and brain chemistry is more or less the same, just at different degrees of intensity. Quitting social media might be easier than quitting heroin because of the lesser intensity of the addiction, but it’s still more complicated and more difficult than ā€œjust stoppingā€

I just wanted to share an alternate perspective on the issue and it’s not an issue I’m passionate enough about to tear each other up over. Good luck out there my man!

Are you an ex-heroin user? If so how did you stop? If not, why keep pushing for an analogy you have no experience with?

Are you implying ex heroin users quit using their sheer iron will alone?

I asked a closed-ended question with no implication of something like pure will

Ahhh ohh ok. Mmmmmhmm

I had to read your question 3 times to grasp what you asked, still can't understand why that's your interpretation of what I asked.

Your last sentence makes it seem like you don’t think I have experience with this, which is kind of uncool man. There are addicts and recovering addicts everywhere, and that includes Reddit.

I was addicted to high-dose opiates (oxycodone, which if you’re not familiar is within the same drug class as heroin because of the incredibly similar effect they have on brain chemistry) for 3 years following the early death of my father. I attempted to quit many, many times and was ravaged by acute and post-acute withdrawals many, many times that let me back to the drug.

I’ve been in suboxone treatment (which is a drug that essentially keeps you from withdrawals without getting you high) for the past 4 years since then which is the only reason I’m technically sober and have gotten my life back. I also earned my Masters degree in psychology since getting on suboxone, if that matters to you at all.

If there’s one thing I know in life, it’s addiction. I understand there’s a lot of posers on reddit but this is one of few topics I have a decent knowledge of.

I do want to be clear that I’m not saying social media and opiates are on the same level of difficulty in terms of addiction, just that the underlying psychological mechanisms function the same.

I mean I have to fill out both options in an if so question, just in case it's the other, got nothing to do with you personally.

So I don't know about oxycodon or suboxone treatment, in my experience with anything it mostly comes down to personal responsibility. Like I'm not disagreeing, but we're not helpless, and a lot of it is self inflicted, and some stuff is just uncomparable in addictiveness.

Schools should teach mandatory awareness training or something, meditate with social media.

I feel you on the first point, just wanted to clarify.

I agree that personal responsibility plays a factor, no doubt there. It takes agency to stop these addictions, nobody can stop the addiction for you. The person I was responding to just really made it seem like he felt it was the only factor though, which is a simplistic view of addiction in general.

I agree with your last point as well!

Yeah that seems the crux of most conversations, people thinking one or the other when it's both or much more factors involved.

And I didn't want to be disrespectful, we all have to deal with these things, and sharing experiences is very beneficial imo. These conversations sometimes lean to heavily on theoretical knowledge.

Education, adn learning different ways to look at it are indeed important. Did getting your Master's help in any way dealing with this?

Sub doctors are legal scammers

I can see why you feel this way for sure. I wouldn’t be living the stable life I am today without suboxone so I’m grateful for the drug itself, even if I think the industry surrounding it is predatory as hell.

  • Social media has algorithms that taps into our psyche in order to hold our attention, It sounds like a dystopian novel but it’s real.

  • Many of us are already conditioned by the algorithms to get constant rushes of dopamine that we become dependent on it or else we easily get bored, like a drug addiction.

  • Coupled with the fact that it’s so readily available to us, any pocket of free time during work means boredom for many, and the easiest way to get rid of the boredom during break? Socialize? Not realistic for many jobs.

  • We subconsciously ask questions like, what’s one more video? What’s one more post? Five more posts? Is another ten minutes going to ruin my sleep?

You don’t have to install these apps, you don’t have to use them at all, take some personal responsibility.

These apps/websites are ingrained into human culture that it has become our standard, and becomes less feasible to live without some form. It’s like trying to perserve the climate by not driving cars… in a city that was designed to be driven in.

learn something, get a hobby, consume content that’s of value beyond circus acts.

I agree with you there, but I’m wondering what value were you getting from scrolling through r/all? Assuming you weren’t browsing this subreddit.

It's still a novelty, so it does come down to personal responsibility because we're just figuring it out from humanity's perspective.

So pointing fingers at each other really is the wrong way to end this conversation, we're still at the exchanging information and figuring stuff out part.

Becoming selective, having preferences is an important step. Browsing /all is like a version of watching the news, but with higher control. There's nothing 'wrong' with it, if you can't know someone's preferences. It's very much projection.

It's people's own feedback loop that's important here, everything is a trade-off, these are great learning opportunities.

Books tap into your psyche in order to hold your attention, hell even I'm doing it just to reply to you! It's just how it always was, you just didn't realize it before.

I'm not denying that various social media is an pretty great algorithm for your interests, I highly disagree that its the thing that gives people dopamine rushes that they get dependent on it, I don't believe there are people that are always using social media throughout the entire day at some point they'll break off to watch a tv show, watch a YouTube video , listen to music, personal interests and hobbies don't just disappear due to social media existing.

There's nothing wrong with filling your mind with something to avoid boredom, I'm practically terminally online, the internet is where almost everything that entertains me is, I don't even watch regular tv. The problem is when it starts affecting you mentally and dictating things you do in your personal life. At some point the algorithm will bore you because you've swiped so long that there's no more content it can find that's a high percentage match for you

You say these sites or apps are ingrained in human culture and I'm bluntly telling you that if a person knows they have a problem and they do not attempt to limit or control these things that take a second to close or a second to uninstall then that person is making a choice. Have you entered a tiktok rabbit hole, or a YouTube rabbit hole or twitter rabbit hole? At some point you're going to come up for air and realize damn, I've spent x hours just on this app , weird. No one is that completely unaware of their actions after a certain age.

When I was younger I read fuck ton of novels, my father literally had to come to my room at night to check if I was reading novels because I'd just keep reading till I fell asleep. I kept reading until one more chapter, until one more page, it's literally all I did to fill the boredom when I couldn't do anything else. There's nothing wrong with questioning yourself or trying to extend something you enjoy. Yet somehow my obsession with novels is more acceptable than if it was a phone with infinite information

My response to learn something of value, hobby or consume content that isn't brain dead was my solution to fix boredom, everyone's bored that's fine but there are other things available to fill that space instead of social media. I don't have an issue so I browser reddit, saw a topic I didn't particularly agree with and now I'm organizing and engaging people on a topic where ik actively thinking about how to respond, that's fixing my boredom, arguing, the internet is a big place and we need to stop acting like people are unaware of their actions. Again unless you're calling for government regulation nothing will change by your logic.

ā€œI don’t look at my phone while I’m doing other things that require an internet connected deviceā€

Who the fuck are you quoting, read the sentence again, Jesus. Like you can tell me im wrong or call me out but atleast read what I'm saying.

You've resisted, but the call of the void is still there. The corporations vying your attention lost - so far. They won't stop.

Yeah I mean this dudes right. Reddit is the only social media I use (maybe youtube too if that counts but to a much lesser extent). So it’s not cold turkey, but damn is it easy to give that fucking trash up. But also, on a larger scale, these corporations are winning. There are many more americans using this stuff than not, so all in all it is a bit of a problem yeah? And it goes further than just the money, it fucks with people in great and unforeseen ways. So even if it’s easy to quit or claim everyone should quit, that’s not exactly working out great for the whole.

Why is this on this sub?

Same reason you are

Oh, so that post was sitting on the toilet and was bored af too? Ok that explains it!

Edit: typo

Now you've got it!

I like how we pretend comedians are experts on anything.

He ain't wrong tho

Who's claiming he's an expert?

He’s a comedian that built his following on social media when he was a young teenager talking about social media so yeah he has a little bit of an idea what’s going on comedian or not

Lol

Excellent point actually. This right here changed my mind

This feels so contrarian. Here is a guy discovered and promoted by the internet, who makes jokes portraying the perspective of the cynical internet educated generation, speaking at a tech company?

Don't trust any of the people who financially benefit to tell you the truth. Bo Burnham here is just playing the caring capitalist role while he sucks up your precious attention bandwidth to keep his own private brand prosperous.

The only answer is to stop seeking all of it, cheap answers included. Restrict all the communication channels for some moments of your day/week, and unplug. Forget the hype. Stop thinking that paying attention to the critics makes your attention more righteous.

I don't know if using the internet as a platform for your performance art is the same as commodifying every waking moment of the lives of a massive user base on an app algorithmically geared to maximise engagement at any cost. Kinda seems like a broad brush when the internet is so vast, and an artist really has no choice but to be online if they want people to notice them.

Um, no? First, saying something like this is actually pretty controversial in terms of the political landscape, so it may not work to further his brand that much. Second, just because he’s a celebrity doesn’t mean every belief he has is just to increase his own personal wealth. Talking out against the internet like this actually has more of a chance of hurting him, considering that’s where most of his follower base sits.

You’re also more targeting the person in your argument, assuming that we think we’re more righteous bc of watching a comedian we agree with. No? Look man, it’s important for celebrities especially to talk out in a positive way against corporations. Even if he is furthering his brand, I wouldn’t consider that a negative thing due to the fact he’s bringing down companies that are pretty shit on the way. We need to make the world a better place, and sitting ignorantly by does not help with that. Everyone has the same base goal, to make the world better, right? That’s just what he’s trying to do.

Everyone knows this already though. Time is money. It's kind of /r/im14andthisisdeep material tbh.

I don't think the internet sucks. I don't think the internet is making humanity sick. I think humanity has always been sick, and the internet is showing us that more clearly than before.

I don’t think people are inherently sick. There’s also evidence that the internet has led to an increase in mental health issues and suicide, which I can provide if you’d like. Stuff like incels also only really exist because of the platform it gives them and the conditioning they had beforehand from the algorithm. It’s very fascinating, and I’m willing to discuss my thoughts further if you’d likez

Incels most definitely do not only exist because of the internet lmfao. Everything that exists causes somebody stress so I have no doubt studies exist saying the internet makes some people upset. Lol.

Hmm what if you don't buy much and live ad free?

Bo Burnham is the only kid that was not eaten by the internet yet

Ellen DeGeneres looks like she's doing good.

My advice, turn your phone off more often.

I don’t think colonization is an accurate metaphor for what he’s describing, as a fucking human being maybe you should regulate how much time you spend on your cell phone because that’s all they’re coming for is the time on your cell phone

My big take on this is him mentioning these companies went public and had shareholders to appease. He summed up our broken capitalist system right there. Unreasonable growth for the sake of growth. For the sake of profits.

It didn't suck in the late 90s and early 00s. Then the fucking corpos moved in.

Facts, media, corps, retail ads. I lived in the woods 7 1/2 months hiking the APPALACHIAN trail. You’ll be surprised how you detox from it all, when I came back to this ā€œworldā€ I was over whelmed with ads. Buy this, buy that, screaming for your attention, billboards, etc etc. we all need to learn to walk away from time to time.

The rest of us have jobs. And mortgages. And families. Fuck off hippie

Hippie!!!! I have a mortgage, bills etc. I’ve worked and saved for years. Live under your means and don’t fall for the ads asshole and don’t be broke all your life. Don’t be made at me for living my life how I want to, blame your budget

Props to your wife for supporting your detox. She’s a real man

Edit: wonderingbum? Cmon dude. Pull yourself fucking together. Also, I came back to this ā€œworldā€ and got straight back on Reddit? lol

I love people like Bo trying to be so woke, yet using the platforms they preach against to make their money. Fuck off.

I am worried about him, he seems like he’s on something with the leg movement. I hope he’s ok.

[deleted]

no I think there’s a little more going on here, he holds it together well tho

If you can't control it something's wrong

[deleted]

Yes, but if you can't control it for brief periods of time you are probably on drugs. Doesn't look like he has tics.

This is a weird take. I also have anxiety, and unconsciously shake my legs and do weird things with my fingers. If I were in Bo's position, speaking to a crowd, like I've done a thousand times before, I wouldn't give any thought to suppressing my anxious movements. I think better if I just let them happen. If someone points it out I'd just say "yeah, it's an anxiety thing" and let that be the end of it.

Are you a performer or someone who is paid to act in front of a massive amount of people?

Doesn't make a difference whether I am, or if he is. His leg shaking in no way affects his ability to speak on this stage and get his point across. It's a weird thing to focus on, and especially weird to double down on it definitely being because of drugs.

It obviously does affect his ability to get his point across since it takes focus away from his speech and places it on his body. Public speaking includes body language. If it didnt nobody would be talking about his weird shaking.

Fair point. I suppose there are two camps. The shakers who think it's normal and don't notice it, and the non-shakers who are weirded out by it. The public speaking behaviour I find the most distracting and off putting is actually the one all politicians seem to get coached into doing. That thing they do where they touch their thumb and finger together and bounce their hand to the rhythm of their sentence. Can't stand it.

Totally get that. When it's obvious someone was trained, it can be just as distracting as when it is due to some other factor. To be honest I am also a shaker whose company (usually my parents) always complain about earthquakes due to my legs pounding the ground at the dinner table. But I have also trained myself to suppress it for public speaking so I might just be hyper aware of things like that.

I wouldn’t say definitely. He does have pretty bad mental health issues and ADHD, which both can cause this sort of erratic movements. I would know, as I quite literally HAVE THEM.

No? As a person with anxiety, I constantly shake or make erratic movements all the time, especially when playing things such as video games in particularly high stress parts (such as dying). Not everyone is on drugs

classic reddit armchair psychologist lol

How am I the psychologist? You're the armchair psychologists diagnosing him with ADHD when the simple answer is usually drugs.

You sound like the kind of person who never had drugs on their radar, never wanted to do drugs, yet you pat yourself on the back for not using drugs all the same. Go figure

You should become a detective. Holy shit how are are you so accurate? What's my date of birth? I bet you'll get it first try.

Forensic linguistics

I'm sure a forensic linguist would be in r/antiwork hahaha

He is right guys and girls, deactivate your socials for a month and you feel so much more free.

Reddit, I consider a forum.

You can consider it whatever you want, but it's social media just the same.

Reddit is a message board, like Facebook and Twitter.

Bo’s point still stands

What's the cringe part of this?

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

More so meant it in a way that I agree. Just phrasing it differently than most other replies I read. Long time lurker here. Going back in. Have a lovely one.

I feel like he’s on cocaine… I mean that’s cocaine, right?

Still… he’s not wrong

It's social anxiety that results in panic which leads to faster talking.

I have anxiety. I see a counselor and I’ve taken meds for it in the past. I didn’t recognize that as that. Interesting.

I dealt with the same in the past and was similar to his, thankfully it's gone away. Sounds like yours has receded as well, good to hear.

This is anxiety. You’re lucky you can’t recognize it.

This is the most patronising sentence I’ve ever read.

I don’t think having severe anxiety is cool.

Okay? Neither do I.

We’re cool then

Well, yeah. But I still think what you said was pretty patronising.

I apologize that my statement offended you.

Well tough shit man. They’re not wrong or anything and don’t need to sugarcoat it 🤷

You're lucky that that's the most patronizing thing you've ever read

In addition to Truth, was that cocaine he was on or low key meth or…?

It is anxiety. Your body produces an insane amount of adrenalin that needs to go somewhere, unless you want to go straight into a panic attack (wouldnā€˜t recommend 0/10)

It could be anxiety. It could also be he didn't take his Adderall OR he's on a high dosage of Adderall, which can cause some physical "twitchyness" even though his mind is calmed.

I don't think it's recreational meth or cocaine use, as his mind/speaking really isn't on that same wavelength, unless he JUST started that week, haha.

Ah thanks for the helpful reply instead of downvote (woops) I was curious bc he sounds and behaves like I did when I tried those recreational drugs xD

The last 10 seconds had me especially cringing with memories, he is squirming in agony—

Yeah, I have that stuff and I don’t even take drugs. Probably should get it checked out tbh, but it’s probably my anxiety anyways.

Mostly comes in the form of erratic movements or tensing my body randomly or when I’m thinking about something/saying something

Gee, cocaine much.

When was this interview?

Reddit is also going public soon.

Not wrong. At all.

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Ironic I’m watching this on my phone.

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

We live in such a weird time in history. I don’t know how we’ll overcome it as a species. Feels like we’re getting closer to that great filter

They don’t call it the race for the attention economy for nothing.

Chrome will finally block Ad Blockers in Jan 2023 which will increase ad viewership.

Love watching this clip provided by tik tok.

Freaks out as I see this om the bathroom

I watched this on my phone inside of reddit. I'm fucked.

What is this from? Where can I watch the full conversation he's having?

Can't wait until he's president in 30 years and we all have ads running in our dreams

(Not implying that bo somehow wants that. Just imagining a bizarre random dystopia)

Bo is George’s apprentice at spittin truths bout the structures of our system and society.

Deep

... Twitter grossed 4 or 5 billion dollars last year ...

Far less, more like $600million. Musk's (over-)leveraged buyout will increase Twitter's debt service costs alone to $1 billion a year. They're fucked.

The key word is "gross". It's not the net. Not to mention this was filmed around 2018-2019, where Twitter's annual revenue was around 3 billion. So it's a good ballpark.

Ah thanks for clarifying. But afaik that drastically increased debt service cost is still going to eat up all their net revenue, unless Musk can reduce costs and increase gross revenue by ~$1B. That won't be easy.

E

Mark Cuban?

Always believed he was an absolute genius. He’s so spot on it’s unbelievable.

So wrong, I watched it twice

https://youtu.be/k1BneeJTDcU

Cue the standard "I want to revert to a standard flip phone" crisis that I have everu few months." as I keep on scrolling.

The only part I disagree with is the "no one is evil" description of people who run such companies. Content creators need to fight to try and get as many people to view their stuff to make money, but they're just cogs in the machine. The guys who run the machine and actively choose to try and create methods and algorithms designed specifically to hook people (especially children) harder and faster? I think that IS evil. Just because it's not third-degree murder doesn't make it not evil.

Said

Ya know what's really bad? Not only how absolutely correct all of this is, but that people are starting to actively defend their behavior. It's not unlike an addiction.

I've tried to talk to people about these exact points - spending every minute of every day on Facebook or whichever flavor of social media you prefer is actually dangerous for your health, why do you do it? Oh well I just send memes or talk to family It's always the same response, the same nonchalance about it. If that's all you do then turn it off. They get mad, diffensive. Their ego is in absolute control. Hell I've even been told, too my face, Moore than once, that not having TikTok or Instagram or whatever is an actual "red flag".

I personally treat the internet like a tool, serving a functional purpose. It strokes my ego, yes, but I do my dambedest to not let it utterly consume me. Part of me wonders if it's a generational thing, as an elder millennial I can remember the internet before social media ever existed. I can remember the world before the internet even existed, and I think the internet was a fantastic and reality changing invention, but it's being misused. And so many of us are just fine with that.

It makes my skin actually crawl. It's nauseating.

Ted Kaczynski was speaking the truth aswell...

He’s on some kind of upper, cocaine I’d guess.

Carlin would be proud.

Shareholders are nothing more than a mob. And never underestimate stupid people in large groups.

Protect Bo. Let him be who he needs to be.

If you still don't think Bo Burnham understands humans and the larger zeitgeist of the online human condition, then listen to his song "That Funny Feeling", I truly think it represents what so many people feel and did something I thought was impossible, it is a "We Didn't Start the Fire" for the now.

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

How about you just stick with what the name implies

He is making good points 😭

I’m so distracted by his body language. He looked like he needed to excuse himself to go to the bathroom.

r/latestagecapitalism

Look up "Mindshare" if you want to understand them. They're not even pretending that they aren't trying to invade our minds. It's just normal every day business to them.

He a real one

This is true for all media and it’s tearing apart any semblance of a balanced human life at this point. Not just social media, but streaming services games and news outlets are all competing for a limited amount of time in your life. This is why the battle pass business model in games has become widespread. It gives you a disproportionate amount of benefits compared to the price, but with the stipulation that you have to play A LOT because their goal is to dominate your time and choke out competitors’ opportunity to steal your time from them.

We are essentially cattle at this point.

This is true

I thought this was mark cuban for a second

Sheesh

From someone who personally spends too much time on sites like reddit and youtube, it just also sucks when I know I could be doing something productive like learning a new skill or hobby. But it's so much easier to just piss away hours and hours on social media. Especially when being tired from the stress of work and general life wears me down to the point where I lack the motivation to try something new, I completely agree with his assessment that it is an insidious business model. But I also acknowledge that I'm to blame for actively choosing to engage in these services.

100% correct.

Ironically, he gets a Coca Cola product placement in the end there.

So social networks want your time, but marketers (see mad men) decide how you think about things,

All the data flows to marketers to allow them to make better decisions/influence people.

Ironic

100% accurate, in ui and ux it’s referred to as the attention economy.

Idiocracy at its finest

Dude’s twitching..

God damn

use me corporate daddies

Guys speaks truth. Business exist to derive profit, if a business does not improve year on year it is considered a loss. They will go to extremes to prevent any loss. So they come up with many different ways to extract worth from the consumer.

Nothing new here..

And that is just the beginning. Wait until the get more legal help from the complying gouvernements and sponsors

huh, it's almost like basing the political economy on the profit motive inevitably leads to discovering a tendency for the rate of profit to fall and a tendency toward monopoly, so they desperately cannibalize everything and anything to keep the machine running. We're trapped in the belly of this horrible machine, and the machine is bleeding to death.

What he said about going public is exactly why we will never be able to make capitalism or any other economic system work for the betterment of individual humans until we shut the stock market down and salt the earth where it stood. The giant slot machine of stocks where the rich go to gamble is the cancer at the heart of the economic system and it's the root cause of basically every evil that capitalism has committed.

If we destroyed it, companies would have to go back to a time where they only made money by making good products to sell to us and where we had the power as consumers.

Get off social media as much as possible.

And if you are on it (like... Reddit) don't give your informations and use it for what it is: a platform to entertain you while shitting

I just don't get it.

They can have all of my attention they want but the only way they are getting it is if their methods are entertaining. However, I have not seen a single ad in my 30 years that I can remember that convinced me that I need to buy their product. Maybe there was something when I was a teen when I had no money and maybe my parents bought it. But since none of their ads work on me that just means I'm costing them money.

How the hell are they convincing the rest of you to buy anything?

Bo needs to go in the woods without a phone for a while

I don't see cringe here.

On a curious note. What happens when you speed past ads? When you simply don't give it any more time than the skip button allows? Does that generate money? If I look at something for a millisecond does it generate a view and cash flow?

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

Can I interest you in everything all of the time?

Here's the full panel for anyone interested.

https://youtu.be/UmUm7oBqCVw

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

World is owned by corporates now. Nations have little say.

Timeout, turn off, and unplug.

Free your mind.

This is why I started using Forest, and study streams, and other ways of turning my own machines into tools to help me focus more. It flips the script, if I don’t recruit my phone to be on my side, it becomes my enemy (in terms of how successful I’ll be). The solution is, we have to consciously manage admission into our heads now, we’re like nightclub bouncers ejecting the bad actors.

When you watch a show from Netflix and you get addicted to it, you stay up late at night. We’re competing with sleep on the margin.

Reed Hastings, founder and CEO of Netflix.

Burn corp shit šŸ”„

Why is this is cringe? Everything from this sub is quite interesting really. I dont geddit.

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

the pinned comment explains it

Poor guy seems like he's tweaking from the anxiety. No wonder he needed to take a break for a while.

If you've read the Grapes of Wrath, there's a 100 year old analogy where the author talks about the banks, and how the banks are made up of individual men who are doing the slow crushing of other men, but regardless, there is no one man who can stop the bank doing what it's doing. For some reason. Written ages ago and even more relevant today.

He's right!

Ohh look, what a cute cat video!

{{{Tik Tok!}}}

How is Twitter not profitable with that amount of revenue? Do employees and data storage really cost more than $5 billion?

Brilliant comedian and damn smart guy, channeling George Carlin here. We need more high profile people mentioning this problem.

Meta/Twitter/Google will happily throw our society under the bus to see that growth. Elon Musk will make Twitter an even more destructive propaganda tool, furthering political and cultural divides to grow in the attention economy.

We just need to switch that crap off and regain some normalcy.

Welcome to the internet

100% spot on!!!

If only I could block Reddit on chrome mobile without an app.

r/lostredditors

This guy is telling the truth

OP isn’t lost, read the pinned comment

Yup it's something I realized during covid cause before I used to go to school and have somewhat of social life but during covid I had spent all this time on the internet and somewhat enjoyed it but after my online friends started going back to having normal life I realized after spending all this time on the internet I have so little to show for it and was just wasting time

I felt that.

Always Ko-ka-ko-lah

DO DO DO DO DO DO

DO IT

DO EEEEET

ALWAYS! NEVER STOP NEVER STOP NEVER STOP

Coca-Cola for 10,000 years!

....

;-)

Twitter ain't making 4-5 billion now, lol.

I think one of the reasons I love Valve so much and their STEAM platform is that they never sold out to shareholders and put ads/gimmicky money trickery into their products (for the most part - they're privately owned*).

My STEAM account just turned 18 and I'm not ready for it to move out of the house yet, it can stay a little longer and live off my wallet. I'm happy to give Gaben my money, I can't say that about pretty much anything else.

Thanks Bill, I needed this. Deleting my one and only social media app for a while.

Fuck you Reddit, I'll see you tomorrow.

I have a 7 month old and I’m genuinely praying there is this great societal reformation happening before he is ā€œengagement ageā€ because how could you possibly not grow up completely neurotic and anxious and fucked up in the current age.

I see my 6 year old niece just engaging with and partaking in stuff just way above her age group just because she’s so exposed to weird sexual tiktoks and constant peacocking from kids who should only be concerned about normal kid shit.

I feel like a Luddite but I’m so god damn concerned for what my son is going to be exposed to, I want it to burn to the ground ASAP.

So the main problem is the algorithm's goal to 'increase watch time'? Even if we got rid of capitalism we'd still have social media, so what systematic part of it would have to change to make it less awful?

Because don't get me wrong, I'm fully aware that a system aiming to maximize profit is usually very destructive. But how would removing the monitization need change the content? Because I'd assume people would still fight for attention. Genuinely curious about other people's ideas on this.

It’s almost like a system that forced companies into a model of unlimited growth forever isn’t actually sustainable? Who would of thought

Hello, it looks like you've made a mistake.

It's supposed to be could've, should've, would've (short for could have, would have, should have), never could of, would of, should of.

Or you misspelled something, I ain't checking everything.

Beep boop -Ā yes,Ā IĀ amĀ aĀ bot, don't botcriminate me.

Probably one of the only level headed people in the room.

Of course my Reddit player freezes on this post

I sleep soundly in my bed knowing that every ad I see is a portion of cost wasted because it does the exact opposite for me.

Welcome to the internet. Take a look around

He's 100% right

Was waiting for "colonize your minds" but it never came

Brillant and spot on

This man is fucking mess.

gif

Spot on. Here I am.

r/latestagecapitalism has entered the chat

He was found 2 days later in an alley from an aparent suicide authorities ruled he had shot himself 3 times in the head. Sad he was so bright.

I don’t know who that is but he’s spitting some truths

I had to print an airline boarding pass the other day. It printed a full page ad with a boarding pass too small to use.

I do that with my legs and MY GOD i understand how annoying it is now.

I love Bo

Welcome to the Internet!

The intro discourse in Cabin in the Woods reminds me of this. Society isn't crumbling, society is filling in the cracks. Every brief moment we have is being consumed by breaking news and 24/7 coverage. It's not just Twitter and Instagram and Facebook.

Facts

lol, it was not free enterprise doing the colonizing. it was mainly state owned corps or the state itself.

Bo's face at the end
"oops, if I turn up dead due to anything this is why"

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Don't have time goofball.

The single worst thing that happened to capitalism, wasn't regulation, or governments, or welfare, or even taxes... it was the creation of the stock market. Abolish them, and the free market will actually thrive.. at the moment it's a fiat market. Trading on an imaginary value, growing mostly by speculation. Not demand, not supply.. but credit and debt. "futures" and "shorting". The 1% know this, and they will do everything they can (and they can do a lot), to prevent it.. without it, they are not "billionaires", they have no power, and they are only last recipients in a long line of others before them trying to do the same, standing on the shoulders started centuries ago by bandits and trespassers. "I got mine, fuck everyone else".

I was kind of cool with my day job up until they mentioned they went public a few months before I started then I stopped giving an entire shit because I knew their whole "employees first" bullshit was over over. You can't put employees first because you literally have to put shareholders and profits first after going public.

ā€œWelcome to the internetā€

What are these events Bo Burnham appears to keep getting invited to recently? I feel like I see one of these George Carlin-esque diatribes a day now.

I love a good Bo Burnham rant

Youtube: pay us $150 a year or watch a 30 seconds of ads every 5 mins

What's that weird face he makes in the end?

That was very astute. Fuck.

Interesting

I know who he is. I also see his body language..

Bo's got the right idea

This is 100% a bit. I mean he's right, but this is totally a bit.

Lost my NNN to this ;-;

He is not wrong, just the delivery got cringeier as the video went on Just realized how Reddit has slowly colonized and consumed my mind over the past 3 month

this post made me log off reddit

Hey, you can turn the phone off and disconnect the computer any time you wish buddy.

A someone who came of age with the establishment of email as a new medium of communication, I also have no idea where we're going with this. I was annoyed enough when companies started controlling the systems they sold you, after sale. Then the fucking move to subscription for everything. Those two distant milestones alone were enough to drive me up the wall. Add the mind cancer that social media represents and you quickly realize that we aren't meant to be social at random and out of context, and the companies that facilitate that are driving us to change not only who we are, but what we are.

Or not, what the hell do i know

That is how the world works

Unless you hate spending money like some of us do.

This video says nothing. It's just some hyperactive guy fidgeting and stumbling over the point he's trying to make. Also, Youtube has been profitable for a few years now.

Well it's in the hands of the company to stay that way. It there is no more growth, business is established and strong, it could very well just issue dividends and stay that way.

What on earth is cringe about this?

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

You lost me at Rule 12.

That’s what is happening

The irony in these comments is mind boggling

I can spot 3 name brands he’s wearing in this interview…..

Growth is unsustainable

I honestly thought the only thing this guy did was make dick jokes and sing off key on stage.

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Noted

ā€œā€¦ and that why I use Nord VPN!ā€

True šŸ‘

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Highly recommend everyone read The Age of Surveillance Capitalism by Shoshana Zuboff. It goes in depth into this specific trend and Bo does a great job of summarizing the gist of its conclusions.

I do disagree with Bo on one thing: it IS a conscious decision by these companies and it is 100% evil the way in which they are monetizing literally every part of your life.

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Bad bot.

Not my fault your name is confusing. Start a new subreddit.

He's right tho.

This movie Eighth Grade had me in tears. I think Bo was writer and director. Looks like this vid was a presser for this movie.

I mean, he's not wrong

Sounds like he's describing a form of cancer

For any of you still not clear about the message, it's capitalism. He is talking about capitalism.

Oh Bo <3

Can we interest you with anything all of the time?

Very well put 😳

Thanks, now I’m sad!

Better quickly log on to PornHub. That’ll make me feel better, right? Right?

How dare they create entertaining products. So dark I can even delete the apps if I choose to. Soooo bad of them /s

This new Bo Burnham song isn’t as catchy as the others but it still slaps.

Looks like he’s on the verge of a psychotic breakdown. Also, very interesting what he says.

Welp...bye nowgif

Well yeah

Sorry but this is no different than newspapers and television. The delivery device is obviously more potent and pervasive but the business model isn’t any different.

based

I couldn't tell at the beginning if Bo was doing his white woman on Instagram but or not....still not sure by the end actually

Discount mark cuban

Is this mark cubans little brother?

This clip, then the TikTok outro at the end, was a bit too reminiscent of the ending scene in 15 Million Merits.... And real life reminding me of a Black Mirror episode is always encouraging \s

Yo he spittin fr

Can someone explain to me how something like Twitter can gross Billions of dollars and still not profit?

I really don’t get how targeted ads are worth so much, I’ve never bought anything ever cause I saw an ad for it

Funny I see this on social media

I never thought of it that way. Great analogy, comparing it to land

Oh Bo

Bo I love you

I watched this on my phone on Reddit while my gluten free bagel toasted.

I like Bo, and I know he’s gonna get a lot of people to agree with him, but I really hate points of view like this.

I’m on Reddit every morning. Is it because Reddit wants to ā€œcolonize every morning of my lifeā€? Maybe they do, maybe they don’t, but I’m on it because I find it entertaining.

That’s all I heard here. These companies are trying their hardest to be more entertaining for their customers, who bought the service in the first place for that very reason.

You choose what you spend your time on.

Don't you just love capitalism?

Bruh, how does nobody see SNL from this? You know the sketch.

Sound like brainwashing

I didn't know bo Burnham could be such a bummer

Jokes on them I’m into that shit , my reality is hell as well and I’m broke enough not to buy ad free or buy from an ad . Anyways back to scrolling

much like the natives of lore, you are trading your lives, countries and freedoms for bubbles and trinkets.

I literally thought that was Mark Cuban 25 years ago

Is there any other resources for topics like these? I like to know more on this.

More than just olone companies though. The bar graph must go up!

This speaker doesn’t seem to understand business or the analogies he’s using. More painful misinformation wrapping up little bow-turds.

Dear CIA please don't kill Bo

My man

At some point they’ll have to realize that ads don’t really work on people who aren’t idiots, right?..

This guy is on something.

Jokes on them, I can’t afford shit.

So broke you can’t even pay attention, eh?

Link to interview?

Thanks in advance!

Your caption proves you misunderstood the message

Brought to you by Tiktok.

Jfc

As good as the "Inside" special was I really hope Bo's doing alright for himself. It'd be a tragedy to lose a creative mind like his. I've been meaning to sit down and watch his movie for some time now.

The irony of the tik tok logo at the end.

I agree, but my only disagreement is where he says they aren’t consciously doing it. Like, nah, trust me, they know exactly what they’re doing. It’s 100% conscious and calculated.

This is actually pretty good.

Yea, Bo is right as usual, but Bo is a realist and will definitely say that you can do it healthily, it just depends on YOU as a person.

We all decide whether or not we give over the "land" of our mind to these colonizers, everyday. The Internet itself isn't inherently anything but a free space to create and explore pretty much anything you could imagine. We are the ones that sink time and data over and over again to the machine churning away, looking for that next dollar to make.

Explore reddit while you're shitting or whatever, check Twitter every so often to see what's going on, all of that's fine. Just be able to decide when your time and your information (and by extension of those, your money) is more important than what others want you to consume.

Probably already posted, but relevant Bo: https://youtu.be/k1BneeJTDcU

It’s bo, yo.

All very obvious stuff

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

This had been a long time coming, just at the icons of the past and future there is no sense to any of the shit we do

Didnt know turtle necks were back in either

"I grew up a little bit on the internet". Dude it's what made you famous lol

Dude had his morning line with his coffee.

Can someone send me a link to what the source of this video is?

r/boburnham !!!

Youtube is public?

He is also willfully engaging with it. Like he actively uses twitter to promote his own financial interests

This is one of the current existential fears surrounding AI.

It's not so much that AI will take over the world and kill all humans. It's more like, "AI, in the hands of a few mega-corporations, will be able to subvert all of the attention and leisure time of humanity for profit."

The unbalanced nature of those who exercise these algorithms and machine learning capabilities is what the real fear should be. If we, as humanity, spent as much time looking into equanimical distribution solutions as they do trying to capture all of our leisure and attention in order to monitize that time, we'd be much better off.

I'm removing reddit from my phone, thanks.

God, he is so brilliant and insanely talented at sharing it (not at ALL just with 'funny')

Bro is hopped up on something. Expected to see him start grinding good teeth.

I don’t watch or follow his comedic stuff but this is insightful and thought provoking

Was that Bo Burnham?? If so, wild to see him speaking seriously

My main gripe with this is that he acts like that's not true for ALL of capitalism. Its not just tech, its not just that early content creators have a very hard time finding a balance between work and life, its capitalism at its core

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Companies are made to make money?! WHAT?! 😱

Who is this?

Ironic that I’m hearing this from a tiktok video reposted on Reddit. I already deleted every other platform I don’t wanna get rid of this one too

Capitalism is the snake that eats itself.

Who is this? Bo?

But it’s not capitalism that’s the problem. Right guys?

He is a wise and caring person who is 100% right. We need a new model for everything.

Why is this on a cringe subreddit? This is true and Bo Burnham’s opinion on this has been pretty consistent over the years.

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

Based Burnham.

I was on the train this evening after a lovely day in the city having never looked at my phone once the whole day because I wanted to chill out and phones kinda don't do that. So anyway I enjoyed it and on the train ride home I was SURROUNDED by people and realized ALL of them were on their phone while I was looking out the window. The guy in front of me literally had his phone in one hand staring at it the whole time making scrolling movements with his finger WHILE HIS OTHER HAND was inside a paper bag full of KFC chicken wings and he is eating them without looking. Like consume consume consume. It was fucking terrifying. Like the ending to a twilight episode or something where you realize you are alone in a place filled with zombies. It was so fucking surreal.

Why does he sound and look like Bo Burnham?

Idk but this guy looks like he could be mark Cubans nephew

Someone’s been watching Adam Curtis documentaries

Bo is becoming more and more Carlin-like and im all for it man. Thrive

Bo Burnham is a genius. I think I'm gonna delete the reddit app and enjoy life a little more for a while.

Thank you.

Ahh the irony this is on TikTok, reposted on reddit.

Oh I mean absolutely every single stupid fucking app I get notifications about something completely irrelevant like ā€œAllison posted a new pictureā€ or ā€œtrending on r/funnyā€ the alerts aren’t even about me anymore it’s just random ass shit and it happens multiple times a day.

But unlike the natives who were colonized... I can simply turn off my phone, or not subscribe to the social apps or participate at all. I have the power... not the corporations.

When we say capitalism is evil. This is what we mean.

All the stimulants. And he's right.

Why isn’t he talking about Pete Davidsons new love interest?

The guy is right for once, still cringe though

This is cringe? More like mad fucking truth.

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Message aside, this guy seems to be tweaking. Maybe Adderall?

He has anxiety issues.

Put down the phone?

American white guy, we've had the floor for at least 400 years, so maybe I should just shut the fuck up.... I don't wanna do that, there's gotta be another way... for me to help out without standing on the sidelines

I have never once clicked on an advertisement and bought a thing through it.

Not a single one.

I only use reddit and YouTube and if ever a platform comes around with no ads or less intrusive ads, YouTube and reddit can fuck right off and I'll never look back. I cut cable TV for this reason, I'm not fucking paying astronomical amounts of money to watch more time in advertisements than a TV show.

Cable has themselves to blame for their companies shrinking by 5 million subscribers a year.

People are upset because entertainment is too accessible in the modern days. Classic first-world problems.

Oswald Mosley spoke of this, "fresh news fields for finance to grow"

Most of Reddit users: omg 100% right! Public social media companies are bad because they have to show growth and cater to shareholders just like this guy says.

Elon Musk: I'm taking a major social media site private so we don't have to censor speech according to shareholders, also we can't be dependent on advertisers for revenue as they will be able to dictate our content and how we operate. We will support free speech whilst ensuring that criminal speech is not allowed.

Also most of reddit users: omg Elon taking twitter private is bad, hate speech will flourish f*** Elon musk!

Most people can't think for themselves, just agree to follow popular discourse.

This is the frontier problem. We were all good as long as there was still land to conquer. Now we aren’t smart enough or organized enough to build the enterprise. No space exploration for us...

Awww I love him

Society of the Spectacle by Guy Debord

I fail to see how this is cringe

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

Sounds like this subreddit evolved long ago past being worth looking at then

It evolved beyond it's original target. Wouldn't say "past being worth looking at" in general, but if you're looking for cringe, then yes.

Always has been.

This is my issue with capitalism. Society needs to be striving for equilibrium. The same thing that has allowed life to flourish on this planet.

Yet all these corporations run by legitimately sick(not always evil, but mentally sick) individuals, that make chasing money their sole purpose, are killing us.

It’s like the old theory around pyramid schemes; how is it feasible for profits to exponentially increase, forever? Answer: it’s not, and something will have to give at some point, just like it has with societies from the past.

I love Bo

That's why everyone should reconsider the whole notion that having a smartphone is a necessary part of life you can't avoid today. Fuck that life model. It's what corporations want for sure, but is it what you want?

This doesn't have to be your future... protect yourselves:

https://www.privacyguides.org/ https://techlore.tech/

I'm an ass but, I'm not an asset... šŸŽ¶šŸŽµ

Pewdiepie got serious wow

That's interesting. What is a realistic solution to this?

I have a novel idea

Look at your phone less often

...brought to you by a tiktok video...

I’d like to join whatever political party Bo just started

Too true.

Thank you target mark cuban

If we are staring at social media 24/7 how would we ever have the time to buy products advertised? Defeats the purpose of ads if we never have time to act on them

It's also cool af. Other than being dark and scary. Don't be afraid. Embrace it. And maybe you'll get a new opinion on it and be open to new opportunities. Brand new opportunities.

Cocaine šŸ‘ƒšŸ¼ā„ļø

I like this guy. He sits like me. A ball of nervous energy with legs bent like a pretzel but he's so ecstatic to talk about this subject.

Anyways, this is the cold hard truth. The only way to end this is to disengage. This means to disengage a bit from one another, too. I've been losing friends over this but it's for the greater good. The internet has overdone itself.

I love Bo he spitting facts like always

Let's also remember that Google employs 150,000 people. Most making over $150k! Many are rich! Same for all the other companies. And these shareholders? They have become very wealthy!

Finally, there is always a choice. Just don't use these apps. It's called Freedom. Use it!

This made me think of Jenna marbles and how she made the decision to go completely offline. I think she had the right idea

What are the long term effects of capitalism

Reminds me of when I would binge on speed and launch into a diatribe at my dog about a conspiracy about dog food

The Internet is not mind expanding, it’s psychopathic capitalists expanding into our minds, persuading us to work harder for less money just to spend more of it on over priced cheap fantasies that make more money for the born rich corporate criminal class

What's the big deal with social media apps vying for attention? The net result is they try to make their apps more enjoyable. That's a bad thing? Not really imo. This whole concern is mitigated by touching grass. Literally. Just balance screen time>

"They want every minute of your time as much as possible!" I write this as I'm sitting in the bathroom šŸ¤£ā˜ ļø

ā€œHuh. Not me.ā€

He said, looking at his phone, while on Reddit.

What a good speaker

Haha Yea but Reddit would NEVER do that right!? … right?

Who is this person?

This is so ironic that this video is on TikTok

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

A major lesson I plan to bind to my children is to realize the world of the internet is designed, at its core, to manipulate and prey upon you as a commodity. They need to ensure they find happiness and appreciation outside a fake world that is trying to use them and cares nothing of their well being. There is a horrific mental health disaster coming, and the world will be too glued to their phones to realize society is failing

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

This is the fatal flaw of capitalism

This is life for 99% of people sir. Welcome to life.

This is why ad blockers, more importantly you also use AdNauseam. For those of you who don't know what AdNauseam is, it's a plugin/extension that poisons the ad data stream by clicking on every single ad it comes across on every single website. Not only does it completely destroy your ad viewing profile for companies, it also costs them money because of the bandwidth you're using.

Fight back, don't allow them to intrude into your life.

That dude is on coke..

Bo knows

That poor motherfucker was crawling OUT of his SKIN up there. Not sure if it was anxiety or anger or porque no los dos. And he is spot-on correct. They're coming, they're winning, and no one has any idea what is going to happen when 100% of content and time is controlled by a faceless cabal of corporations all vying for more and more and more of our attention. Love Bo's body of work, I'm happy to see him crusading here, and he's got a depth of perspective way beyond his youth. I hope he's finding satisfaction in his work, and he makes a difference whether he knows it or not. Putting the keyboard down now to go ride my bike...and I might just post the selfies on a white woman's Instagram...

I know this seems kind of sci-fi mentality but most of the time when there's a massive issue across many different countries the result is usually there has to be regulation. Eventually there will be a time when regulation of data will be restricted for the people so that it doesn't interfere with daily life. At some point the corporations won't be able to advertise or use data from users because the government deems it to be intrusive to daily life. The fact that if I type out that I want something and then my phone, computer and any other smart device starts to make recommendations while also shoving advertisement onto me should be a concern. Eventually there will be texts and calls about what I searched for. There will be a time where we are forced to see what we searched for in the past and that will be the day that it will be disturbing enough to the old farts in government to say "OK, enough is enough. This needs to stop."

Why is this cringeworthy?

Lol *as I watch this on Reddit

Gotta laugh that the video ends with a TikTok logo

He makes a really good point but I feel like a lot of people already realized that.

The Dopamine free lifestyle is an interesting trend/concept to explore.

Bo burnham doing a Ted talk?

It's scary but absolutely accurate

It’s not that dark, because literally everything in the world is competing for your attention, even the healthy things. All of life is about deciding what to give your attention to. You are defined by your choices, and what you spend your time thinking about. You become those things. This was always true long before there was an internet or social media. Social media is just a crack cocaine form of of an attention competitor, in psychology it’s called a ā€œsuper-stimulus.ā€ Other super-stimuli include drugs, food, sugar, sex, gambling etc.

You just have to treat super stimuli with great caution, and some people with addictive personalities or poor self control should just never touch them at all.

It’s not dark that these things are competing for your attention because it’s entirely your choice whether, and how, to use them, if at all.

It’s only ā€œdarkā€ in the sense that life is dark for having drugs and alcohol and other addictive traps that we can fall into. But this is life. It’s always been a struggle of choices and self control.

Social media is no more dark than alcohol. Call it whatever you want, but it is what it is, and there is nothing extra about social media. It’s one of many pitfalls on a LONG list of pitfalls in life.

Genius right here

Is that bo burnham or I am just starting to go inside i meant insane

Isn't this douchebagtrying to colonize my mind with his crap???

Good thing I only read the title and ignore whatever I feel like.

Eveytime I open Instagram, the first thing I see is an add. Every 4-5 posts from people I follow, is proceeded by 1-2adds. I've started reporting them as spam, all of them. Instagram is still working on the back log as my updates are still from June ads.

Report ads and make them work for this invasion of our time.

So, the cringe here is us?

BRAVO

As I watch this on my phone

Tweeeeeeeeeeeeeaking

My prediction for dystopian future is that someone will figure out how to squeeze even a tiny amount of productivity out of people while they are asleep and then a whole new job market will develop where companies hire you to work while sleeping.

Well that was depressing. Classic internet.

This is so funny to watch Bo Burnham speak the words from my own head directly into my face

Hey Bo, why don't you use some of your money to rebuild the neighborhood, instead of putting spinning rims on a gold jetski?

The party is over. We over at https://www.reddit.com/r/collapse know what is going to happen. Just look outside your window and see that the biosphere is off the cliff. The next state is burning alive and crashing at the bottom. Thanks to human nature and capitalism.

Dude looks like young Mark Cuban

Meta is a perfect example of what this guy is saying. Snowden tweeted yeah Zuckerbergs stock is crashing but in 5 years time he's going to own your eyeballs and pause the ads every time you blink.

My phone instantly has notifications go off when I put it down to try to have me pick it back up. I have a bachelor's in marketing and it's crazy all the tricks out there. When you visit a webpage I can pull up what looks like a heat map that lets me know where your cursor moved, laid, and spent most of its time. I can see if you scrolled down a website page and how long you visited a webpage. If you didn't buy something on a business page then the company can buy ads to entice you to come back and finally buy the product which is all part of the sales funnel. It's not just AI and algorithms, it's human beings on computers trying to use psychology on you with the use of tech. You're the mouse and they are setting the bait.

Something about that turtleneck makes him look like Ellen DeGeneres from a different timeline.

From the top comments it looks like people jumping off their phones (too much screen time). But the true evil of corporate advertising and general PR is to push certain values and how things r framed. Like b a good consumer; you damn well better worry about wrinkles and hair loss and and……Also that the big companies are like your kindly big brother. This all started during WW I when the psychology of messaging was born to convince the nation to go to war. It’s an evil science: how to trick people into buying, being angry, afraid and insecure.

Are there any books on this subject?

Companies are machines built to do one thing and one thing only to the exclusion of all else: make money. It's not one person in the company who decides this. It's not a group of people that decides this. It's the structure of the companies. The gears the motors the circuits of the company. This is why they need regulation. Because if we don't regulate them nothing will. We'll have rampant child labor, company stores, dumping of hazardous chemicals, monopolies, manipulation of markets, price gouging, and dangerous working environments. The whole notion that a truly free market will govern itself though the "natural" laws of supply and demand is a fairytale. Still, captialism is a great generator of wealth and all sorts of progress. But unless we make it our slave it will make us its slave.

He’s correct yet people on the left will say this is a right wing conspiracy

Could you explain that a little further?

[ Removed by Reddit ]

This inspired me to stop paying for YouTube and I didn't even need to unmute it.

A form of media vying for your attention for ad revenue is nothing new. The difference today is the convenience of having a phone in your pocket where you can access entertainment anywhere you can make a phone call.

Yeah… this looks like a meta (not the company) post.

Not cringe.

One great thing about having an office job is that after 8 hours of work I have absolutely no desire to keep looking at screens after work. Instead I just go for a walk.

A motivation to quit my phone addiction! Anyone else?

Tiktok video...irony especially given the Chinese use it to spy on everyone.

cocaine legs spouting trouth

Nothing dark about this. That's because we are cheap and won't pay for subscription fee and only want free services. When you are not paying for the product, you are the product.

Epiphany....

Lol

Destroy all media

What a giant load of horse shit. There is still plenty of land to colonize.

That's the problem with unrestricted capitalism in general. By design, it forces companies to focus on growth even when that growth has negative effects on their users/consumers.

This video was brought to you by TikTok

Damn.... this hit me. Going to delete reddit now.

Little did they know I have no money to buy those products in their ads muhaha.

To be real though, I’m happy I grew up with both. We got lost in the mall but by senior year I had a cell phone, but thought texting was the dumbest thing ever. I work with kids, they are becoming addicted to screens and they don’t even understand what addiction is.

The job is to sell you a product, it’s not just corporations it’s people in general

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

"Their entire models are based on growth."

That is the case of every economic system on the planet. And that growth is dependant on unlimited, unsustainable human population growth. Until the resources are exhausted and it all comes tumbling down.

me agreeing, as I mindlessly continue on scrolling on this god forsaken app having the point he made not resonate or be internalized at all

You know how I could have more time and money to spend on twitter and the products being advertised to me there. A four day work week, 5 hour work day, and a $300,000 a year salary!

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Spot on

bo burnham is a genious.

It’s Bo yo

Brought to you by Carl's Jr

The market has a solution, the invisible hand told me.

Love bo

Anyone else get Mark Cuban vibes from this dude?

He nailed it

Was about to ask the comments if that was who I thought it was only to be confirmed by the string of quotes. šŸ˜‚

What he doesn't say, is these public corporations don't have realistic goals or management. They just want every penny from every single human. You can be a publicly traded company and make profit but they all stretch beyond realistic means. Then they do massive layoffs on the regular to try and save money. Or ask for bailouts.

PSA: everyone should read

The Chaos Machine by Max Fisher.

It’s really well researched and well written. Delves into the money making machine that the social media giants exploded into and how it’s negatively impacting society.

He is not wrong

Goddamn Bo, go off.

I honestly would never have thought back when he uploaded "My Whole Family..." that I'd be watching him 15 years later give a speech about how fucked we all are due to sci-fi-esque levels of dystopian corporate nightmare fuel.

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Still makes no sense to be posted on a cringe sub. Even if it says discussion

He’s right you know

Can I get reddit to remind me of this post every time I open the app or every day?

Resistance is futile.

Who the hell is this genius?

Facts.

Well said

He is 100% right.

Fucking mind colononizers man.

Also don’t leave reddit out of the mix.

He’s not wrong

Posted in TikTok cringe… as in, OP thinks he’s wrong?

Takes 4 million from Netflix for comedy special, calls out corporations as evil

no burnham my beloved

Saw Bo Burnham and smiled, listened to what Bo had to say and am back to being depressed.

Anyone know what this is from?

The company I work for isn’t public and there are a ton of advantages for not having shareholders to answer to.

Word salad

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Hey goofball, looks like you missed the point of being able to comment on posts. Get out of your basement, meet some people, maybe have a life away from your keyboard....

Bo is so wildly, powerfully intelligent. I could listen to him talk about damn near anything.

This dude took tooo much ā„ļøā„ļøā„ļøā„ļøā„ļøā„ļøā„ļø powdery

This resonates so true…and is therefore incredibly terrifying, depressing, and leaves me at a loss for hope.

Oof.

Learned this in sociology. Jürgen Habermas' colonization of the life world for anyone who wants some thoughtful reading.

Fuck yeah time to wake up and take back your time it’s so valuable you don’t even know it

He’s right. And really fidgety.

You hear his early jokes and you’re like ā€œahaha funnyā€ but he has so much insight and self awareness it’s freaky

This is the realest shit I ever heard.

Anyone know where this is from?

I have chores to do and was being lazy and scrolling on my phone till I watched this.. time to be productive and go outside.. scary stuff

In most of the ā€œfuture worldā€ films, advertising is obnoxious so I expect this on our way to flying cars and teleportation.

Did you think we would have less ads in the future lmao 🤣

I had this weird dream about cereal boxes on this big wall (like a shoe store showing off the best pairs). As you walked along, the box advertisings advanced a few decades at a time and by the fourth box, it was fully digital and dancing and singing to invite me to eat. Anyway, that was a weird dream and in no way validates the video, but I can’t keep that inside anymore🄵

At least Facebook allows me to block ads and I have YouTube premium…as long as I can block them manual I’m happy

Yes I have into premium but at least content creators get a little more money from my viewership and I don’t get any YouTube ads other than sponsees that some channels talk about during there video.

One thing that worries me is the amount of people allowing more and more time wasting videos into there lives. Heck there’s videos shorts on Facebook where literally nothing happens..I fucking hate them so much I block them as soon as I see them. The people behind them deserve hate

Colonize space!

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Well fuck. I guess you answered me šŸ˜‚

Love him to death, but also worried about him.... seemed to be showing a few signed of substance abuse

Fiduciary duty is the root of corporate evil

It must really suck for the corporations I take stride in ignoring their adds & have cookies turned off so they literally do not know what to target me with. There are ways to beat them. Small & large.

Makes so much sense

i hope this generation gets it... but these things tend to break you over time. capitalism only needs to get enough of the people enough of any given time to maintain the inherited gentleman class. the ownership class. the parasites of all wealth and labor.

Bo knows media

This guy has to pee really badly!

Who is this guy ? Seriously though the days blur and its hard to keep up with anything anymore.

As we watch this on our corpo devices LOL

ā€˜And of you agree with me smash that subscribe button!’

Isn’t there irony in this though? As in Bo, or anyone there on that stage or a creator period, have made their careers from these same platforms who they needed to grow in order to reach the millions. Creators rely on the same principles of attention economy as the corps he mentions. And also how do creators make a living being primarily.. content creators? It’s all from our attention and the ability for someone to monetise that and get a cut = ad revenue on free platforms like social media.

Nice

Bo Burnham knows too much. They are gonna end him soon.

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[removed]

Hey, goofball! Looks like you missed the pinned comment! If you're confused about the name of the subreddit, please take a minute and read this. We hope to see you back here after you've familiarized yourself with our community. Thanks!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

i'm living for his marxist arc

What is cringe about this??

This subreddits is any tiktoks

Hey, did he just remind you that your car's extended warranty is up?

I want the cocaine he is on! Gotta be an absolute fire batch!!

That’s what I was thinking whole time he never stops moving

You meant like Nike

Imagine listening to Bo for life advice

It's not advice. It's an explanation of what's happening.

Well thats my sign to pick up a book

This guy looks like a really young mark Cuban lmfao

Loved seeing Bo on a subreddit that isn’t specifically meant for him. He doesn’t get enough appreciation, what a genius

Ok but with Socko next time please

How the actual fuck does a social media platform spend more than $4.5 billion in a year?? After it's already built? When it only hosts media created by users? Unbelievable.

Based

Comedian sets aside the jokes to crush the real topics in life

[removed]

I didnt have sound on and thought that was Bo Burnham

Welcome to one of the biggest problems with capitalism. Growth MUST keep going, NO MATTER WHAT. Just look at the oil companies with record profits WHILE we have big time inflation! GREED.

It's not a problem, it's a feature.

Sounds like he is describing a virus

I looked at an apple online. Now I am getting offers to purchase apples from everywhere. I am so afraid, I don’t even like fresh apples (apple snacks are great, though).

His whole point is why I will use ad blockers forever. When software versions in browsers completely stop working I will just use the hardware version that blocks at the network level in my home network.

Why would this be cringeworthy? I don’t get it

Read the info for this subreddit

Sometimes I don’t think the Amish are wrong.

And it's posted to tiktok....not that he's not right but it's still a bit ironic.

I realized this at 19 and at 22 its sad to see my brother watch TONS of porn... like i ysed to but its the freakiest shit ive ever done seen and Girl strramers and shit. My lil mans time is worth so much but they havent seen a life without tech. Rip 2015-> anything before 2012 cutting off at 2015 is fucked and yall know it.

Nothing is black and white and trying to claim things like this loose you credibility

Dang he trashed Biden

As someone from the BoBurnham sub and have been before the massive blowup (I think.) Bo is a great inspiration to me for intellectual lyrics and piano. Since I’m a songwriter and play piano. I try to write songs that may mean something sometimes. Still, enough about how Bo has impacted me.

You can find these clips all over YouTube and even by watching What. And Make happy. Both of which, are intentionally written in a way that shows both his emotional side and logical side. Left brain Right brain being indicative of that. This man suffered with chronic anxiety and depression throughout The what. And make happy specials and I can imagine he still does. But the fans give his job meaning, and I think he takes solace on that.

This is 100% true how is it cringe?

Don't get the mind link chip when it finally drops. Your last bastion of freedom is no place for corpos and politicians.

He gave me a tip on how to strain pasta, then suggested I should kill my mom. He told me why women never fuck me and then showed me how to build a bomb.

what event is this and is there somewhere I can see more of him from it?

Good point, time to delete this app

This man is a comedian but damn is he aware of everything around him so well. This song really opened my eyes to the irony of our lives, Bo... You incredible incredible man. If we are in a Tron like world, this dude is 100% the "User"

Funny feeling snippet:

Reading Pornhub's terms of service, going for a drive And obeying all the traffic laws in Grand Theft Auto V Full agoraphobic, losing focus, cover blown A book on getting better hand-delivered by a drone Total disassociation, fully out your mind Googling "derealization", hating what you find That unapparent summer air in early fall The quiet comprehending of the ending of it all

There it is again, that funny feeling That funny feeling There it is again, that funny feeling That funny feeling

Comedians usually are very aware. That is what comedy is all about, it is seeing the world around you and making observations that make people laugh and think at the same time. I mean why do you think there is the clichƩ "it's funny 'cause it's true"?

Can I get this guys plug for coke

why tf is he sitting like a woman

Why tf does that bother you?

Zach stone is gonna be famous

I'm wondering where the cringe is on this one. Cuz its pretty much just the truth.

Not sure why this is a cringe

Why do all americans have no sense of introspection and or essentail self worth. Everyday a new thing, a new idea a newness which cannot be serviced yet satisfied. Go be quiet and listen to nothingness. Your country is a burden for all of us, for how long now. Its being torn up from the inside, just not fast enough. Even worse it's idealized as paradise on earth, many dont claim it but the damage has been done.

It’s a scary future man

true but it doesnt have to be that way, we can change / prevent if we want to.

I think we are with the riots , strikes , massive quitting and social media app twitter tanking. Change is happening

He’s just describing capitalism, for those who are unaware

Yes but there is a giant difference now, for centuries the focal point was property but now its slowly becoming data

This is also talked about on the fourth chapter of the book "21 lessons for the 21st century" by Yuval Harari

I hate being addicted to this. I spend so much time on Reddit aimlessly scrolling. I was born in 1990 and I’ve spent SO much time on the computer, tv, and phone.

Welcome to the internet

Well, that's the, best note to end on, goodnight, and thanks for sharing

Just kidding, I'll be back in a few minutes anyway

The only real currency is time.

Guard your attention. Time/health is more valuable than money.

[deleted]

It’s detrimental when it affects your state of mind. If you are constantly bombarded with the best things in life that everyone except for you has and gets to experience, it’s hard to back away, focus, look around and realize that your online experience is 0.01% of a life time of less than 1% of the human population. In a realistic perspective, you might be doing great but feel distracted and depressed by the constant flood of unrealistic shit on your social feed.

Edit: I think we will see in a few years how this builds unrealistic expectations in children leading to under fulfilled, depressed adults.

In a few years? Bruh it's here

Have you considered that you've become the perfect product then? If you can't see why it's bad then it worked.

It's pretty literally the Idiocracy television gag.

https://youtu.be/smtSv3e04vM

I'd rather be fulfilled than entertained. its essentially the plot of Brave New World

ugh, grow up... corporations are going to corporate. Defend yourself! Get ad block and entertain yourself as much as you see fit. What's the alternative? quit being so dramatic ya pussy

This pisses me off so fucking much. They are unable to put the phone down so they blame the corporations, fucking unbelievable.

You mean the corporations who are trying to get them to look at the phone as much as possible? Hahah yeah that’s crazy I see no correlation at all.

/s you mental midget.

Now be a good little redditor and go off about someone else’s ā€œresponsibilities.ā€ Because I’d say it’s the responsibility of the company to not make a toxic addictive product.

Haha do you also root for big tobacco companies too? Poor guys just wanted to sell poison to kids, give them a break…

"toxic addictive product"

We're talking about the same thing here right?

ITS A FUCKING PHONE, PUT IT DOWN.

Over exaggerating like the phone is mind-controlling you or some shit, grow the fuck up.

It’s not a phone it’s the app. Haha wait did you think people are just addicted to holding their phone?

I’m talking to a moron.

Corporations may want to colonize my brain, but the cocaine has definitely already colonized his…

It is his anxiety that makes him do that, its anxious behaviour. It gets more overt the more you feel people are watching you, and sitting on a panel where everyone is watching you can be highly stressful. He literally says he suffer from anxiety in the video.

Yeah, sad people are saying it's drugs, it's obviously social anxiety.

[deleted]

gif

They have dude, it's called porn.

Aha! He’s gay.

"based off of"

American grammar sure is on another level

what is the proper british(always right and clearly the superior country since everyone there[such as you {huge iq individual over 1000iq}] is so much smarter) way to say it?

I'm not a British citizen, dumbass. I'm from a former colonized nation. But nice of you to assume only white people can speak good English (which you'll deny)

not all british people are white goofy mf

Completely absolves you of your racist assumption that people w good English can only be British. And also, you proved me right.

you’re insufferable brother, it was a joke(i am fucking english)

Yeah, racism is usually a joke when the person concerned is called out on it

if you couldn’t tell that my comment was a joke you might need to take a break from the internet

You're also not British, because you called people from there "everyone there" instead of "everyone here", as a person living in Britain would say. So not only are you a racist, you're a stupid liar as well

the joke doesn’t work if i’m making fun of my own people does it? it’s called perspective! handy lil thing that makes jokes more funny! if i included myself in the punchline then it wouldn’t make sense would it

Hey, dumbass, way to avoid answering the question.

Wow, your alternative grammar must be on point.

This is slang not grammar

Don’t know anything about this guy, is he on coke or is he just generally always this animated?

Reminds me of Tarantino doing interviews and that’s all coke fueled lol

It's just social anxiety, makes you talk faster due to panic.

Had to look at what subreddit this was in, thought it was maybe r/tooktoomuch caffeine. Wish I had that energy.

Dudes on coke.

[deleted]

read sub rules

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

This is the opposite of cringe. He's right.

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

Who uses Twitter anymore?

Unsustainable "growth", Twitter execs and board was lucky some billionaire schmuck bailed them out.

Not a huge fan of his comedy but I love every point he’s ever made

This kid acts like he is high as a kite.

He has panic attacks while public speaking and performing. This is his coping mechanism to try to stop it from happening

kid? he’s a 30 year old man, calm down with the try-hard edgy comments

This dude needs lay off the blow

This argument kind of falls apart when you realize humans have free will. If someone chooses to watch YouTube videos over reading a free book from the library (or any hobby really) then that was a conscious choice to make. That human considered it a better use of their time. It's not like healthcare or food where it's something you have to buy regardless of the price.

Thus the logical reasoning is that if people keep using Twitter or Instagram then they are deciding it's worth it to them, and Instagram is adding value to their life. Who are we to tell them what's important to their life? Oh wait this is Reddit where only we know what's good for other people.

How nice of you to think that some people can make logical choices rather than purely emotional ones. Many young people were raised with unrestricted media consumption habits, for many it's literally an addiction, many people just don't think about it. We live in a world where boredom is a choice you actively had to make, and for those who not actively seeking something it not really a choice. Panem et circenses, bread and circuces without any need to leave your home.

This argument is used all the time by people who think everyone else but them is stupid. "We have to restrict junk food because nobody can control themselves" or "we have to restrict video games because nobody (except for me!) knows how bad they are!" Dude look around. People are fine. The average American is perfectly capable of choosing their own entertainment.

My point is not about restriction, it's about averness. People should be aware how algorithms work, and what psychological effects s triggered by it, exactly just as they are aware of how many calories in a big Mac, and the fact that it's not healthy to eat only this type of food. And speaking of restrictions. Imagine this, junk food is already has its restrictions, restrictions on how much sugar can be in it, restrictions on what you can and can not put in it. At least in Europe. And limited sugar leads to waaaay lower levels of obesity.

Wonder how this is cringe when dude is 100% correct

Rule 12: Don't Complain About the Subreddit Name The subreddit evolved long ago last it's roots of "only cringe-worthy" content.

What’s wrong with targeted ads? It’s not like you’re being forced to buy anything.

young people are idiots, can anybody show him where the power button is? he should be working on his anxiety instead look at him twitching while talking, that's not normal at all.

Are you retarded

Lose the Turtleneck paleese. I feel like my Gramps is preaching at me.

Lay off the drugs bo

omgosh talk about someone totally off their meds. can he NOT SHAKE ? sorry same old shit that has been on schizos agendas since as far back as the last turn of the century.

omg they'll take everything they will control everyone. fuck u fuck everything this guy is crying about. mass hysteria omgosh the big corps are controlling you !!!!! but here ya are typing things out on social media there he is talking about it on the TV SHOW he choose to be on, even tho they are watching him, controlling him making him do things he wouldnt ever do !!!

this is as important as the idiots who spam your feeds with 'you do not have any permission to use my pictures" bullshit. They agreed when they signed up in the terms of use the day they first downloaded the APP.

this dude acts like he is off his meds and on meth ... well duh they want more engagement. HUMAN ATTENTION wow colonize me .... yes the sky is falling./

everything we do it because of the market. IDIOT IT IS ALREADY HERE AND HAS BEEN FOR 20+ YRS (internet wise) NOW hahhahaha!!

Are you retarded

you may be. why are you using that term ? retarded ? it is outdated and offensive.

prove to me you are a bigger idiot then I first perceived you to be by replying to this .

this is the second time you use the same word . hmm must be a proud moment for you. did you just learn how to use the 'cut&paste' shortcut ?

We have not colonized the entire earth in the sense you’re talking about. There’s land all over the place we can build more businesses on. But i get your point.

I know I sound like that guy so do please down vote this comment, but I find Bo Burnham so fucking pretentious

its funny to be listening to this & thinking, "huh, this is literally just situationist theory."

I'm just trying to figure out how this is cringe. They makes a solid point, and you see it everywhere.

Cringe?

I personally like the internet and what it has shown me. I love bo but he on one here. Dude shaking like a fiend. What's he mad about?? YB was his canvas to become who he is today. Dude to fragile and pipedown

Does anyone else have a hard time defining their sexuality but can sum it up as Bo burnham or is it just me….

As a capitalist I think he’s completely correct. However I still think capitalism is preferable to having regulation go in and control what people can and can’t do. Yes some of these big social media companies take advantage of people but it is up to those same people to fight back, not the government.

This dude is not right in the head

This guy is on way too much Adderall

He’s just depressed. Go for a run, eat within an 8 hr window, use your fear as a compass of where to attack and you’ll be fine

How’s this TikTokcringe tho? Am I missing something here

Check the pinned comment