The other night, I caught "Operation -- Annihilate!" on H&I's nightly run through all the Star Trek shows. I enjoyed it from a lot of different perspectives. It introduces Kirk's brother and, more broadly, the idea that he has a family apart from the ship. It famously gives us Spock's "inner eyelid" that saves him from blindness. And it is the first episode to have an extended outdoor shot, not a stage set -- which was actually pretty jarring, given the different lighting, etc. There were also a lot of interesting one-liners that I could recognize as the source of later episodes and tie-in novels. In short, exploring this corner of the Star Trek canon was a nice way to unwind after a long day at work.

But looking at the episode from a more objective perspective, I found it harder to enjoy. Why introduce Kirk's brother and kill him off is Kirk is hardly going to react at all? Why try to set up a moral dilemma where Kirk may have to kill "millions" to stop the spread of the virus when -- probably due to budget constraints -- the entire settlement was portrayed as being mostly empty? Doesn't Spock's internal eyelid feel a little cheap as a solution? And doesn't it break his character that he wouldn't think of or mention that possibility until it actually happens? What motivation could he have other than to rib McCoy? And aside from quibbles with the logic of the plot, the pacing dragged -- as often happens in TOS episodes. You can really see them struggling to fill the whole runtime.

In short, there's probably not much enduring value in "Operation -- Annihilate!" for someone not already invested in the idea of Star Trek. Only the fact that it is part of that bigger project makes it worthwhile to dig this baggy and kind of phoned-in sci fi story out of the archives. What it lacks in itself, the rich web of associations created by the franchise makes up for. And I would venture to say that "Operation -- Annihilate!" is close to the median TOS episode. If you were to pick episodes at random, that's the level of quality you're mostly getting.

This leads me to the title question: How many episodes of TOS would you feel comfortable recommending to someone who doesn't care about Star Trek and never will? I'm not asking for good introductory episodes for beginners here. I'm asking for episodes that hold up as standalone works of fiction -- episodes where the plot, characters, concepts, and moral dilemmas are still thought-provoking and enjoyable. Which episodes would be worth digging through the archive for if the Star Trek franchise had petered out in the early 70s, never to be heard from again?

Please show your work -- don't just give a title. What makes your chosen episode an enduring work that transcends "Star Trek"?

Comments (137)

City on the Edge of Forever is definitely one of the best TOS episodes, but also one of the best episodes of television from that era, IMO. It does not rely heavily on canonical knowledge of the source material. Everything introduced in this episode can be contained within it.

More importantly this episode is a love story and a tragedy. The story urges us to reflect on the loss we have experienced in our relative pasts and understand how sometimes, even when we are not aware, a death can have lasting meaning both for the world and for us as individuals. The story also gives us a chance to take a familiar setting, like the great depression era USA, which for the time in which this episode aired was only 37 years prior. So, when my dad, as a child, watched this episode he was also able to connect with his parents who were themselves children during this time.

One thing I think newer fans (like myself, who was not alive for TOS) tend to overlook is what was going on in the minds of audiences during the production and airing of these episodes. Episodes like City on the Edge of Forever are like watching a fictionalized snapshot of this time. Likewise, Kirk, Spock and McCoy, are all living in a snapshot of a distant past relative to them.

Also, performance from DeForrest Kelley in this episode is so good.

That scene where the three of them finally connect after a few near-misses, are overcome with joy and then immediately that joy turns to tragedy. It happens so fast but you can feel the energy.

The story also gives us a chance to take a familiar setting, like the great depression era USA, which for the time in which this episode aired was only 37 years prior. So, when my dad, as a child, watched this episode he was also able to connect with his parents who were themselves children during this time.

That’s also true for the setting that the Iotians were imitating in “A Piece of the Action”, which was also an excellent episode and 1 of the funniest TOS episodes. However, I’m guessing that there were fewer parents who witnessed that sort of mafia violence.

One thing I think newer fans (like myself, who was not alive for TOS)

Haha at this point I don't think one to be a "newer" fan to be predated by TOS.

Hah that’s fair. I don’t know why I consider fans of 90s franchises as “new.” I’m just trying to stay young.

I do think though that like sometimes we take when something was contemporary for granted.

I still think of TNG and everything that came after it as newer Star Trek. I grew up during the age when there was only one Star Trek, and it was really something that we were starting to get actual theatrical movies for it! And I still remember my initial dubiousness at the prospect of a new generation that didn’t have anything to do with Kirk and Spock, and had an old bald captain!

And I still remember my initial dubiousness at the prospect of a new generation that didn’t have anything to do with Kirk and Spock, and had an old bald captain!

I remember feeling this way too, and I was born in 1984.

I recall my dad telling me something like, "You know, they actually have a new Star Trek on TV now, but I haven't really gotten into it, I like the old characters."

5-6 year old me: "Yeah, Star Trek with NO SPOCK!?!?! I DON'T THINK SO!!!"

This was the first thing I thought of. City on the Edge of Forever is a precursor to so much entertainment across so many years.

I'd say A Taste of Armageddon. It's been a while, but I remember thinking it was a cut above the average. Plus, It's got drones, and simulated, pushbutton battles, and suicide booths for the casualties, forever wars, and terrorists (matter of perspective) blowing up the machines that make it all possible.

The single best episode of the franchise, I often argue.

"It's instinctive. But the instinct can be fought. We're human beings with the blood of a million savage years on our hands, but we can stop it. We can admit that we're killers, but we're not going to kill today. That's all it takes. Knowing that we won't kill - today."

Progress doesn't require perfection. It doesn't require ignoring all the sins of the past or all the mistakes that you've made. All it requires is that you make a choice to do better - today.

There is no better presentation of the humanistic values of Star Trek.

I read that in Shatner's voice. Particularly the " - today".

I did just watch this again a few weeks ago and definitely took note of its insight.

I had forgotten what a masterpiece that episode was. It’s also a good example of why Captain Kirk really was an iconic captain despite Shatner being Shatner. For that role, in that context, Shatner’s strange, almost naïve approach to acting actually really reads well. He was the right man for the role even if he isn’t the same level of the actor as some leader Star Trek actors.

The same lesson was learned by the children of soong in the final episode of Star Trek Picard. of course, for them, the goal was to prevent a war in the first place, not end one where millions had already died.

I'm not certain the lesson was learned there on Picard - we hope so, but I'm not sure we really see evidence of that. The scheme doesn't work out, Soji changed her mind, but I don't know what we really see of the attitudes of the rest.

Then again, we don't know if Eminiar and Vendikar went to war again moments after the Enterprise left the system.

(Beta canon - specifically, DC comics - says they did, nuclear wastelands dot both planets now, and that they hold Kirk responsible. Really quite dark.)

Still, damn stirring speech.

Arguably Soji learned it, but the others? It doesn't seem so to me because all of the Coppelian synths seemed very emotionally uninvested in the whole situation, and actually quite alarmingly passive in general. Sutra was the obvious exception in that she felt strongly enough to murder a sibling, but she was deactivated by "dad" Altan Soong for that. The others barely reacted to those losses, as well as the news of "other dad" Bruce Maddox's murder by Agnes Jurati.

They probably adopted stoicism as their default emotional setting.

Its one of my favourite TOS stories too, i really like how its an effective criticism of warmongering, no matter how "tidy" your war is, the fact that people are dying should be reason enough to stop.

also kinda a metaphor for poverty as well, as long as people dont need to see the cruelty done by poverty, the pain it causes people, they are willing to let it keep going for no reason other than thats the way its been done.

I have analyzed this episode at length for years, but never thought about it as a metaphor for poverty. That is an entirely new way to approach it.

Thank you.

I would say its mostly about the way we sanitise cruelty, i just brought up poverty as its one of the cruelties we as a people like to sanitise and hide away

[deleted]

I wouldn’t be surprised if there were films or episodes of The Twilight Zone that were the actual 1sts for these plots. “Balance of Terror” is actually The Enemy Below in space. The aspects that are similar to Run Silent, Run Deep were supposedly coincidental.

[deleted]

Something that I think is true is that whether or not “Mirror, Mirror” was the 1st time a show or film showed a parallel universe, it’s definitely the most influential and well-known parallel universe episode.

Whether it is or not, it certainly introduced the single most beloved trope of such stories: https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/southpark/images/3/3e/EVIL.png/revision/latest?cb=20180516155555

Nope not the first. Dark Shadows premiered a year earlier

Didn't Dark Shadaows have very little supernatural stuff its first year?

TOS was really the only series that hired Science Fiction writers. Even in TNG most of the writers were writers with a general television background rather than a science fiction background. Some were new writers without a lot of experience that had grown up watching Star Trek and thus were people who knew mostly of Star Trek specifically rather than having a broader science fiction background. Over time the franchise only grew more insular.

I just watched this episode today! One thing that really sticks out for me in this one is that Starfleet has General Order 24, which apparently is a single code phrase that a captain can issue to call for the total devastation of an entire planet. Kirk calls that in, and Scotty just a hundred percent goes for it, and issues an address to the planet saying "Hey, you've all got an hour and forty five minutes to get your affairs in order before we burn your entire civilization to the ground."

That's all within one single order that Kirk issued, and they never even suggest that either he or Scotty wouldn't have gone through with it.

The Federation is goddamn terrifying. It's a damn good thing they think of themselves as explorers and scientists.

These poorly thought-out plot devices are what make watching TOS difficult for me. Granted, at the time they were just trying to make a show and move on to the next story. And I appreciate them for what they are.

But still, what sensible (military or not) organization would have a standing order like that?

My head-canon is that it was a bluff. That "General Order 24" is justified by Kirk by saying "well, at least the war would be over if one side was sent back to the stone age," but that doesn't fit with how Starfleet operates. If I recall correctly, Garth of Izar was sent to the mental rehabilitation asylum for basically doing the same thing to another planet (before the events of Whom Gods Destroy). It makes a whole lot more sense for Kirk to have been trying to push the planet towards peace with an empty threat - he was searching for any answer to save his ship and end the war.

We see another example of a coded message in Bread and Circuses - Kirk says "condition green" to Scotty, which means he's in danger but Scotty can't do anything about it.

It'd fit with Kirk's "I don't believe in the no-win scenario" ethos, and I think that it was a bluff, too... But on the other hand, it's a very good bluff, and Kirk never outright tells us that it was.

And I think it's quite possible that Scotty would have pulled the trigger if Kirk had been killed before he could call off the attack.

Or it’s a bluff…

It's not really a good thing that they think of themselves as explorers and scientists. The British formed a vast empire, subjugating a quarter of the world's population under the rationalization that they were bringing civilization to the heathen savages of the world. If there was a series that had an alien civilization in place of humans at the head of an empire that acted just like the Federation, people would have a much different opinion of them. A people who talk of peace while constantly waging war, who talk of equality while clearly holding all the positions of power with only a few token minorities allowed to serve under them on the enforcement arm of the empire.

That actually is a fair point.

I think Star Trek can sometimes be critical of the Federation. After all, Errand of Mercy explicitly portrays the Federation as being just as willing to go to war as the Klingons are.

That being said, the Federation does seem to more benevolent than the British Empire in its heyday.

TOS and DS9 in general were more willing to take a critical look at it. The TOS approach to optimism was that it's a future where people could recognize when they've erred and improve themselves, but didn't have any delusions of grandeur about being a perfect society. TNG initially took things a little too far in saying that 24th century humans were more evolved and that the Federation had solved all the problems (Roddenberry bought a little too much into his own hype), but they did tone it down in later seasons. DS9 was then a bit of a deconstruction of that while VOY basically just continued TNG with a new cast and slightly different setting.

I suspect that the root of the problem is that Star Trek is essentially a combination of a Western and an Age of Sail "Wooden Ships and Iron Men" series that was originally created in the context of the Cold War and a lot of the tropes that were established because of that aren't exactly in alignment with some of the messages they want to portray. Expansion is after all inherently an aggressive move; even when the displacement or subjugation of native peoples isn't involved, it's still a power grab.

It shows Kirk willing to exterminate an entire planet over an offense that, while not trivial, was relatively limited. And willing to trigger a catastrophic escalation of an existing conflict in order to force his view of progress on a weaker planet. Gunboat diplomacy at its most ruthless.

I love the episode. Part of what I love about it is the darker side of good intentions.

Doomsday Machine, especially the remaster, ditto Balance of Terror.

Both are excellent action episodes, "60's effects" aside, both are tense and well-played, with excellent guest performances from William Windom as the PTSD-stricken Commodore who lost his ship and especially Mark Leonard's so-good-they-cast-him-again turn as the unnamed Romulan Commander.

And Tribbles, because it's still funny 55 years on, has an interesting "scifi" dilemma that's just campy enough to be funny with cold-war-era posturing for good measure. Plus the whole "matter of pride" barfight and Scotty's revenge.

Decker is Kirk if he lost his crew.

Amazing performance

Was he the same Decker from TMP?

And the DS9 episode is a lot of fun, too.

The Doomsday Machine episode scared me shitless as a kid. Great episode.

I always like The Trouble with Tribbles because it shows Kirk having a 'Monday'

The Devil in the Dark had some elements of horror that were pretty rare for television. It also contained some elements that certainly feel more modern; particularly the unfolding of the puzzle that Kirk, Spock and McCoy had to solve.

The mind meld turned into something of a gimmick to move the plot along, but the episode lead you through the puzzle.

Plus it was raw with Shatner’s emotions. His dad died during filming

Concur. This is another one of my favorite TOS episodes and another really stellar DeForest Kelley performance.

This one also was the first science fiction thing that got me to consider that not all life looks the same and intelligence isn’t measured by similarity to humanity.

I was going to recommend this one myself. I also appreciate that it's one on the few instances where the alien lifeform isn't humanoid yet sentient and sapient. "No kill I" is still one of my favorite quotes.

One I would add to the ones others have already identified is The Conscience of the King. There's really no reason it would need to be a Star Trek episode at all -- could pretty much be set in any time, any place. Questions about seeking justice long after atrocities have occurred; questions about determining guilt and innocence with limited information.

And some great dialogue between Kirk, Spock and McCoy - "You should be told the difference between empiricism and stubbornness, Doctor."; "Even in this corner of the galaxy, Captain, two plus two equals four."; "You're an actor now. What were you twenty years ago?"/"Younger, Captain. Much younger."

The only weakness of that episode, I think, is the fairly silly dismissal of technology partway through - they check voiceprints, and Kirk ends up literally setting the results aside, saying, "I've got to feel my way" to a decision about who this is.

The acting, though, is stunning. "That voice...that bloody thing he did." Right before Leighton turns desperate, begging. And yes, "Younger, captain. Much younger." Chills.

Yeah, that's a valid point about the voiceprint issue. I've read some critical reviews that point that out and also point out a number of other plot holes (aren't there better ways of trying to murder someone than sneaking up and using a spray bottle, etc).

To me this episode is a lot like Wrath of Khan - if you think about it too much, there are plenty of plot holes. But it's so well paced and so well acted with such good dialogue, I don't notice them.

I agree. There are a ton of issues that are easy for us to pick on from decades on, but were hard to anticipate at the time. DNA identification, computer technology, the reality that spray bottles aren't cool and futurey anymore.

But that's why the Nitpicker's Guides are their own thing and analysis of the episodes can continue on unabated.

This would be one of mine, too. I think it's oft-overlooked, in part because it's not as sci-fi focused.

It’s a really underrated episode and it was the 1st of many times that Star Trek did Shakespeare in space.

This was one that came to mind for me. It asks the viewer an interesting question, and doesn't hand them an easy answer.

Balance of Terror - the tension, the cost and futility of war, sense of kinship with opponent

The Trouble with Tribbles - the humor, bureaucracy is still a thing

The City on the Edge of Forever - romance, comedy, time-travel, tragedy (and probably Kirk's one true love)

The Corbomite Maneuver - sense of exploring the unknown, showcasing respect for life

Amok Time - great exploration of the Triple friendship in TOS, Vulcan culture, Kirk vs Spock fight

Devil in the Dark - nice tension, meeting a non-humanoid alien, also showcasing respect for life no matter how different

Mirror, Mirror - an episode that is a lot of fun! (bearded "evil" Spock, anyone?)

Journey to Babel - interesting family interactions, I liked the fact that a non-Federation group was behind the strife, fun seeing more aliens.

(I edited after following comment to show why I liked those episodes)

[deleted]

My bad.

Thanks for adding your explanations! And now I see that my comment asking you to do so got downvoted a ton because people didn't understand the sequence of events....

Let that be your last battlefield totally stands apart from the rest. Perhaps a bit too on the nose at times, but sometimes that's needed.

It points out just how insane it is to fight each other based on whether your skin is white on the left and black on the right, or vice versa. It was completely meant as a allegory as to the current civil rights movement, but is still relevant today.

white on the left and black on the right, or vice versa

I like how nobody notices that until Frank Gorshin mentions it.

I totally forgot that was Frank Gorshin.

But yeah, I feel like that was the point of the entire exchange. In that future Humans had evolved so far past racism that they didn't even notice the differences. Or at least that's what it was trying to portray.

This is one of my absolute favorites. I remember when I first watched the episode as a pre-teen, I snidely thought that the make-up on set messed up and got one of the actors colors wrong and simply didn't notice their mistake. Needless to say that ends up being the crux of the episode and when the realization hit pre-teen me, it blew my pea-brain mind.

Also the last scene with them both running through the wasteland kept me from sleeping for a few weeks. I realize it might be a little heavy handed by todays standard but it made its mark on me.

The Galileo Seven holds up as a military story, to me. I wouldn't recommend it to someone who didn't enjoy war movies, but there's a lot of drama there for people who are into that kind of storytelling. Spock's struggles with the challenges of command, his tension with McCoy, Kirk's desperation in fending off bureaucratic pressure to abandon the crew and move on, and the desperate gamble where Spock risks burning the shuttlecraft's remaining fuel as a flare are all memorable moments with real stakes. I find it emotionally engaging in a way that some of the stiffer TOS episodes are not.

This episode was an homage to Lucille Ball and one of her first big movies: Five Came Back. They did this because it was Lucille Ball who convinced the studio to let them have a second pilot.

I never heard that. Do you have a reference?

https://www.cbr.com/star-trek-lucille-ball-inspired-galileo-seven/

Thanks. That was a good read.

I've never heard of Five Came Back, but it sounds pretty dark for 1939 cinema. I'm glad Galileo Seven was able to parallel it within the constraints of 60s television.

I'm gonna do a watch and see if there are other elements beyond the general plot that they share.

The biggest problem with this episode is that they overlook an obvious source of weight - the chairs! Ok, perhaps they are necessary to withstand the G-forces of liftoff, but they still took off with seven chairs on the ship, two more than were needed.

[removed]

Spoiler syntax is not permitted in this subreddit. Please repost (do not edit) your thread or comment without the spoiler syntax.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

Devil in the Dark.

On its surface, Devil in the Dark is a boilerplate "monster of the week" episode. Miners are getting killed by some otherworldly 'thing', and the heroes have to delve into the creepy caves to find and stop it.

But the story grows into something much more. For one of the first times in science fiction history, the inhuman monster was given entirely honorable motivations. It was as "the other" as the other can get, literally just a blob of molten rock made of Nerf foam; it was made entirely relatable.

Devil in the Dark set in motion the tone for Star Trek that remains foundational to the franchise to this day. It is a story not about monsters and villains; but about communication and understanding. About shedding your prejudices and trying to see yourself in someone- or something- very different.

It's one of the best episodes Star Trek ever did. And for 1967, especially poignant.

For anyone interested in general pop culture trends I'd say The Return of the Archons.

Period of time where laws are set aside and people are allowed/required to exercise their base urges? Check.

Anachronistic planet in a sci-fi show? Check.

Weird cult stuff? Check.

Underground revolutionaries? Check.

Society secretly controlled by a computer? Check.

The episode hits an amazing number of tropes that were explored quite a bit at the time and have continued to echo through modern pop culture. Also important in terms of Trek trivia since this was the first episode to invoke the Prime Directive which is something that plenty of non-fans are vaguely familiar with.

I have a deep and abiding love for A Taste of Armageddon, as detailed in a reply above, but Balance of Terror is also a great work in its own right.

Aside from the introduction of the Romulans and the fleshing out of future history, it is an astonishingly well-done episode that should be held up as a masterwork of both scriptwriting and acting.

For the script - on thinking about the episode, it has no less than five distinct plotlines running through it, all of which are given sufficient time to make a serious impression on the viewer.

  • The relationship between Tomlinson and Martine.
  • The conflict between the Enterprise and the Romulan vessel.
  • Stiles' family history and racism towards Spock.
  • Kirk's personal crisis of confidence, counseled by McCoy.
  • The doubts of the Romulan commander and the subtle power struggle aboard his ship.

An A plot/B plot structure is typical. Some Star Trek episodes manage an A/B/C arrangement reasonably. But five? All given time to shine? That's an astonishingly tight script, worthy of an Oscar-winning film.

As for the acting, well...Mark Lenard steals the show. He's probably the most emotionally stirring character in the episode - tired, worried, devoted to his duty to an empire that doesn't deserve him, sensitive enough to note beauty even in the midst of battle and violence - and we don't even know his name.

He's not the only great actor, though. This may be one of DeForest Kelley's best episodes, delivering one of the most iconic pieces of dialogue in the series ("...and in all that, and perhaps more, only one of each of us..."). Shatner, Nimoy and Paul Comi playing Stiles all also do very, very well here. Even Barbara Baldavin playing Martine gets a subtle moment that makes clear that their interrupted marriage probably isn't the best of ideas. If you wanted to present something to an acting class showing every single person in a production bringing their A-game, this is it.

I'm a HUGE fan of Balance of Terror as an example of great Trek, great sci-fi, and all-around great fiction. It's a submarine movie, it's about the Cold War, and the Red Scare all at the same time. It talks about prejudice, conflict, the nature of humanity, and the vilification and othering of the enemy. In nearly 55 years, I don't think it has even once stopped being relevant to the world. From the perspective of looking at what fiction can tell us about ourselves, I think it is one of the best pieces of all time.

I recommend this to anyone who don't like Trek or say they don't get why anyone would care about Star Trek. You don't really need to know anything about any of the characters or factions to follow it, and it doesn't matter if you're a fan of Trek, or of the genre. It contains all the context you need. It still works and the value and impact of it is pretty easy to see even for a first time viewer.

Balance of Terror is a great episode. Everyone loves City on the Edge of Forever, which is very good. But I think people remember that more out of Harlan Ellison love than because it's the best Season 1 ep. I certainly prefer Balance over City. But then, I'm not a big fan of Harlan Ellison either. His work isn't terrible, mind you. Just not fantastic either.

My thing is that everyone can like what they like, but I think from the perspective of using sci-fi to talk about ourselves (one of the things that is a defining trait of the genre), Balance of Terror is simply one of the best.

Came here to say just about exactly this. Balance of Terror is top 5 of the TOS episodes, right up there with Amok Time and City on the Edge- for all the reasons you listed.

My dad did not like sci-fi in general, and definitely did not like Star Trek. "What's this shit?" was the invariable question whenever he'd enter the room while I was watching...anything.

Except.

Except that one time he came in during The Doomsday Machine, just as Commodore Decker drops, "Mr. Spock knows his duty under regulations, doctor. Do you?"

He sits down. He watches the struggle for command of the Enterprise unfold. He even pipes up with a, "Take that, Commodore!" when Spock finally wrests the centre chair back from Decker.

The one time my Nascar-loving dad sat and watched 40 minutes of Star Trek with me, and actually got into the story enough to pick sides. That is an episode that transcends.

I'm surprised that "The Ultimate Computer" hasn't been brought up much. For all the pop culture semi-joking references that SkyNet will kill us all, here's a New Wave Age tale of that trope of what happens when humans make a real thinking machine. It falls down hard late in the 4th act when that silver tongued devil Kirk talks a mad computer into committing suicide (for the 3rd time in the series!), but the story is excellent until William Marshall cops the worst Vulcan neck pinch face in the history of the series. (lol'ing) Marshall is absolutely fantastic and eating scenery like he's an awkward starving nerd/man. The cast has great discussions about why they feel uncomfortable with a real thinking machine, with a great soliloquy by Shatner about his 'replacement' and his measure of acceptance. Which is then promptly shot to hell when baby decides that blowing shit up is FUN.

The real twist is that the machine goes off the rails not because of a cold analysis that the universe is better off without biologicals, but because a human tried to make it too human with his own psychology and reasoning. This isn't Nomad or V'Ger with programming errors or wrong assumptions, or Landru making humans into automatons because of a lack of emotion. It's a conundrum that carries into TNG, and it's still wrestled with in Picard.

Kirk's reaction to being called Captain Dunsel always stuck with me too.

I didn't see it mentioned so I'd like to toss "Who Mourns for Adonais" into the mix.

One of my favorite episodes of all time, the away team finds themselves face to face with a literal Greek God. They find Olymlus, broken and isolated, only Apollo remains refusing to lose hope in the once devoted human worship that sustained them.

This episode always stood out to me as it gets to tackle the possibility of mythology or religion having been true, and without taking on one of the major beliefs and potentially offending millions. The idea of one of Apollo being the only remaining member of the Greek Pantheon while all the others faded into history. His desperation to be worshipped again, to restore the devotion be and his people once had. The lengths that a God would go to when they're crippled, showing that in the end, omnipotent, powerful, mortal, are all the same. We are all equal in the end.

Idk I might have no clue what I'm talking about but I think that even as a standalone episode of some random sci-fi that never gained traction it would still be a great episode.

Neil Gaiman takes this concept and runs with it in American Gods.

Man, I’m so glad you mentioned this episode. It is my all time favorite TOS episode!! They did a follow on episode in the TOS project “Star Trek Continues” episode 1, Pilgrim of Eternity. The original Apollo actor reprises his role! It was a great show. It’s a shame it stopped, but I loved it.

This really is a thought provoking episode. I mentioned it offhandedly to a friend and he eventually watched it and had so much to say that I had to rewatch the episode because he had entire trains of thought going from lines I barely remembered or had thought of as one-liners. "What is a god with no one to believe in him?"

TOS had the unique advantage of being made when “the Star Trek franchise” meant Roddenberry could sell you an IDIC pin. Almost every episode stands alone and tells a complete story, as was pretty much obligatory for dramatic TV at the time. It had no canon to follow and was happy to contradict itself.

As a result, I’d say that the episodes that satisfy your criteria best are the episodes that are the best: Devil in the Dark, Balance of Terror, City…, and so on. There’s no franchise to be a part of, and the episodes are designed to be accessible to any viewer, so the most accessible episodes are generally also the best ones.

The Menagerie might be the sole exception, but even that episode goes out of its way to explain (and partly to reimagine) Pike’s history - a good thing too, since nobody had seen The Cage.

The matter of Kirk’s brother seems less important, not more, if you look at that episode as its own thing rather than an episode of a franchise. It works on the same level as Stiles’ backstory in Balance of Terror (though less well because Balance of Terror is great): a motivating backstory for a character you’ll be spending an episode with, not a big character-defining twist on the elaborate history of the legendary Captain Kirk.

TLDR: all of them, especially the great ones

Pretty much all of the TOS episodes are stand alone.

For a first timer I would recommend The Trouble With Tribbles. I think it has more humor than any other TOS episode.

Another is City on the Edge of Forever. It is very deep and explores conflicting issues. And even delves into politics. It is my favorite TOS episode. When I showed it to my mother (her first Trek of any kind) she loved it too.

For a first timer I would recommend The Trouble With Tribbles. I think it has more humor than any other TOS episode.

This is the episode my dad used to convince child-me to check out TOS after I'd already been sucked in by Next Generation while watching with my parents. Tribbles are just so damn adorable!

"Somebody please close that hatch."

A Piece of the Action is right up there as a comedic episode. Whether it's even funnier than Tribbles depends on how much you love Kirk's gangster impression. (I love it a whole lot)

I agree with everything you said but I give Tribbles the edge for a first timer because they are cute.

“Errand of Mercy” which introduces Klingons and sets up the Dahar Master Kor as the template for all Klingons.

Why does someone who isn't into Star Trek care about "introducing Klingons"?

I'm not the person you replied to, but I suppose it would be hypothetically possible for someone to appreciate Klingons in terms of characterization and worldbuilding, while not caring about Star Trek overall. One could think Elves are cool without giving a whit about the rest of Tolkien.

Unlikely, but theoretically possible as a matter of abstract logic?

Still not in the spirit of the question.

Well, no, Commander, it isn't, and you're right, of course.

I'm just rambling about my favorite TV series.

But I think you'll have to admit to yourself that *if* someone had said, "You know, I've never really cared for Trek as an overall canon, but I think Klingons are just the coolest thing ever, and I especially love as an example of worldbuilding and character introduction the episode *Errand of Mercy* which established this awesome race that would be equally awesome if they were a throwaway in the Twilight Zone...."

I'm sure Scotty would have something to say to me all this. Ach, hypotheticals. They're like week old haggis, laddie, no one wants a part o' them an' if ya leave em a-layin around they're libel ta make the whole place stink like rot.

It's also possible they would like "Errand of Mercy" simply because Kor is such a badass.

One reason the show still holds up is that much like The Twilight Zone, there's a bunch to choose from. City on the Edge of Forever, Conscience of the King, Balance of Terror, and I'd argue Return of the Archons, and Arena.

City on the Edge of Forever is always on the best episode lists, and I'm not sure there's anything else I can add beyond that it was originally written by Harlan Ellison with some heavy edits, and both his version and the aired version are really good, I highly recommend reading the comic of the original script. The comic I'd recommend to anyone who doesn't care about Star Trek because there's an enormously powerful moment from Kirk at the end, "We look at our race, this parade of men and women, and the unbelievable harm and cruelty they do. And we sigh, and we say 'Perhaps our time is past, let the sharks or the cockroaches take over,' and then without knowing why, without even thinking of it, the worst among us does the great thing, the noble deed, that spark of impossible human godliness. And we say, 'Perhaps the human race is entitled to a little more sufferance, let them keep trying to reach the dream.'"

Conscience of the King is a fascinating and powerful story of guilt and the hunting of war criminals. It's a very good story, and I'd expand more here, but I don't wish to venture into spoilers.

Balance of Terror is great for the combat, but also the Cold War challenges, seeing both sides just want to make it home in one piece. EDIT: There are some fascinating ideological differences, and while both sides are sympathetic, that does not mean we have to view both of them as in the right.

Return of the Archons is a bit cheesy, but interesting for the study of such a society, and for the solution to the problem.

Arena is fascinating as a study in mercy, and alien thinking. It's one of the core themes of Star Trek, people are alike all over.

Balance of Terror is great for the combat, but also the Cold War challenges, seeing both sides just want to make it home in one piece, and that no one is really the bad guy. They're just doing their jobs. "In another life, we could have been friends."

I'd take issue with that. While the Romulan commander is an extremely sympathetic character, he and his ship are fundamentally on a mission to launch an unprovoked series of attacks on Federation outposts and kill absolutely everyone they find. His crew, even his personal friend, are a batch of barely-restrained warmongers who keep reminding him that his musings about maybe wanting some peace may get him relieved, or more likely shivved.

I am reminded of a naval history of World War I I just recently read, which was written with a notable amount of evenhandedness, even sympathy for the Germans as it described the moves towards an unrestrained U-boat campaign late in the war. Their surface fleets were trapped in harbor, the armies were struggling in the trenches, people were eating crow and pigeon in Berlin, so you can understand the back-to-the-wall feeling that led them to want to lean hard on any advantage they had - but that doesn't change the reality that the strategy of unrestrained U-boat warfare was nothing less than a campaign of sneak attacks to sink civilian merchant ships with the aim of starving English civilians to death. Germans cheered and submariners got medals for sending unarmed civilian ships to the bottom of the sea.

The Romulans in Balance of Terror - or at least one Romulan, maybe two - can be sympathetic, but they absolutely are the bad guys. They were "just doing their jobs" to go murder people and kick off a new war of conquest to please their Praetor.

You're right, I stand corrected. I was a bit tired when I wrote this, so forgive me for my analysis being less than optimal XD

No apologies needed. It's all discussion - and honestly, that Mark Lenard's portrayal of the Romulan commander makes you admire him even as he's doing terrible things is another reason the episode is a great work of television.

Also, you brought up Arena, another of my favorite episodes, in which the Gorn have clearly done terrible things (killing children as their parents beg to surrender, among others) and yet Kirk is willing to make peace because there was a misunderstanding at the root of the whole conflict.

That you don't have to be friends to stop being enemies is a good Trek lesson, too.

Yes, certainly! I wrote an entire paper about Arena a few years ago. Arguably, it's a reflection of Balance of Terror, with a relatively non-humanoid enemy this time. I'll see if I can abbreviate some of my thoughts from the paper;

The Gorn were just as terrified of the other as the Federation was, and reacted in a similar, but not identical chain of thought. The Gorn and the Federation are more alike than they think. It was a terrible thing to destroy the colony, and likely Kirk's history with such events(Tarsus IV) caused him to be emotionally compromised, pushing to annihilate the enemy instead of just pursuing and crippling them. Though he was able to defend his position to pursue the enemy starship with policy and regulations. At the same time, it echoes the Gorn; their reasoning also seems correct on paper from a certain point of view. It's different from Balance of Terror, where there's an active antagonism about the Romulan attack, here it's an alien perspective instead. A colony as large as Cestus III could easily be seen as an invasion, building a base from which to attack. The Gorn might not differentiate between soldier and civilian. For all we know, maybe they can, but fought an enemy in the recent past that had similar disregard, and the mentality just carried over. Perhaps the Gorn captain had history with such an engagement, surviving the destruction of a colony himself. He and Kirk may share kinship in that area.

Perhaps they thought the Federation was setting up a large base for an attack, arrogantly thinking they could take on any threat and not be noticed by the Gorn. Many armies in past parts of history also took civilians along as part of their logistical train, and even in the 20th century, civilian agencies and universities developed weapons like the atomic bomb, chemical weapons such as Agent Orange, new flamethrower mixtures, napalm, cluster munitions, and powerful explosives. Civilians can easily be judged as part of the enemy war machine. Certainly the Gorn don’t reflect the “standard” human behavior. The slaughter of the civilians at Cestus III is something the Federation would never do, but one could imagine humans doing such a thing in our historical past, whether it be by accident or simply the side effect of a war. Reactions to Allied bombing of German civilians during the Second World War ranged from “that's a darn shame” to “good riddance”. They were all seen as part of the German war machine, and the Germans were targeting civilians too, so the various Allied Bomber Commands asked, "why shouldn't they be targets?" This doesn't make it right, and it doesn't excuse it, it explains it.

In regards to the the individual commonality; when we hear the first conversation between them, with the Gorn saying he'll be merciful and quick, Kirk snaps back about Cestus III, and the Gorn sounds almost offended. He angrily snarls, “You were intruding! You established an outpost in our space.” He's no raider or pirate. He's a member of his people's military. He's angry at such blatant invasion of their space from his perspective, just as angry as Kirk. Kirk asserts that they were doing more than defending themselves, that they were butchering helpless human beings, and the Gorn hisses, “We destroyed invaders, as I shall destroy you!” One feels the urge to judge them, but this is only a reflection of what Kirk did. Both he and the Gorn captain saw a terrible violation of their territory, and viewed the other as the monsters in the dark out to get them. Kirk earlier wanted not just to scare the enemy, but to annihilate their ship, mercilessly destroying it no matter what. Spock, earlier in the episode, protests on the grounds of preserving sentient life, but Kirk did not have any of it. This is exactly what the Gorn did, annihilating a perceived enemy without getting the other side of the story.

With the Romulan captain, it was easy to see the similarities partly due to his humanoid shape. With the Gorn captain though, he looks so alien that one wonders what he could have in common with Kirk. And yet both human and Gorn reacted in very similar ways to their situations, mirroring their behavior, anger, and ingenuity. The Gorn is the first to assemble a weapon, which Kirk must counter with his cannon. And considering the Federation isn't at war with the Gorn in the next episode, was clearly sensible enough to be able to agree to terms. Despite their immense physical differences, there is common ground between the two.

Kirk’s behavior reflects the Gorn captain’s. The fact that the Gorn attacked so viciously is reflective of their alienness, and their difference from the Federation. While they share similarities, they’re not identical. But one could see why they would make such a decision, even from alien life. We can find common ground. It's a very

Again, none of this is meant as justification, it's analysis. I hope this is clear. The episode had a much better understanding, and answer to the problem posited in the original short story the episode was based on of the same name. In that story, the human won the fight against the alien, killed it, and went home. The episode is a much more nuanced understanding of the problem. It's what Star Trek is all about.

Also, I'm generally a fan of the Gorn for being a good but underutilized part of Star Trek. After writing this paper I ended up writing a Voyager-era Star Trek fanfiction that involved a Gorn first officer on a Federation ship, a second generation immigrant to Earth.

Thank you very kindly for sharing your analysis of Arena.

I don't have much to add on top of it, but have you submitted this as a post rather than a comment? If not, you should.

(Maybe minus the fanfic detail, though that is giving me ideas about creating a Star Trek Adventures Gorn character.)

I have not shared it as a post yet, I don't think. Of course, without the fanfic detail, :) I was writing it for a class on Star Trek after all.

I thought it would be amusing if the Gorn officer was straight-laced, diplomatic, and by-the-books. The seemingly-terrifying and brutal Gorn is calmer and more tactful than the human captain, who's a veteran of the Federation Marines. He's also from Broken Bow, Oklahoma. I figured alien immigrants would settle around major spaceports on Earth, but also the famous places where aliens landed on Earth, like Phoenix, Arizona and Broken Bow where the Vulcans landed and a Klingon crashed respectively.

Conscience of the King

Is one of the few episodes that doesn't have a supernatural element and the only episode written by Barry Trivers.

My two first thoughts are Devil in the Dark and The Doomsday Machine.

Devil is still a pretty fine portrayal of the sort of 'ecological' collision, of fundamentally different natures, that we have when considering living space on this planet, and of the hulking void of understanding that might exist between us and an alien intelligence. The story brings two thoughtful and sensitive being to the edge of mutual murder before a little recognition of suffering cracks the story open.

Doomsday appeals to me in a similar vein; it's an archetypal story of how tools of violence are often the greater enemies than the parties to a conflict.

I'm gonna give a meta-answer, that, as a fellow holder of TNG (and maybe actually DS9) as the real narrative center of Trek, might have surprised me once upon a time- that most of S1 and S2 of TOS is pretty great once you get through the '60s cheese, and in a pretty real way 'solved' procedural fantastical television. In terms of creating drama, of creating thorny situations from plausible personas, of 'worldbuilding' and all the rest, yeah, it's all over the place. But if you want to literalize your philosophy class discussion by going to the Planet of Perverse Consequences and Outsized Metaphors, like, it's done, to such a thorough extent that we have an entire bargain-bin of SF shows that we regard as second tier almost entirely because TOS did it first and better.

I don't know if this is quite what you're looking for, but last year my partner found "The Way to Eden" and "The Cloud Minders" to be too timely and relevant. The first one has a charismatic leader insist he has the right to not be quarantined despite his contagious disease. The second one has gaping inequality and also stupid people who refuse to wear masks to avoid getting sick.

I'm rather surprised nobody has brought up "Space Seed" yet.

First and most obviously, it is the setup for what most people regard as the best Star Trek movie of the franchise, namely The Wrath of Khan. Secondly, it's also one of the few episodes to really address what happened on Earth in future history; namely WWII and the Eugenics Wars. Khan was also on some levels a dark mirror of Kirk; I think there's some parallels between their charisma and ability to convince people to follow them, see also Lieutenant McGivers.

Again, I was asking about episodes that hold up separate from the rest of the franchise.

Well that would explain a number of things. Ignore me, carry on, these are not the droids you're looking for.

You ask really good questions and make a lot of high quality posts. I'm starting to notice your username and guess when it's an adamkotsko post. LOL.

I don't know that I'll add a whole ton to what's already been said, but . . .

I think Balance of Terror is a great war / naval battle / submarine flick, condensed into less than an hour, and with some good suspense and commentary on social issues. It's tight, focused, and gives us some good character development. There's a minor self-contained arc with the crewman overcoming his prejudice, and we get a good sense of all the characters - including the villain. It's well written. It's probably the TOS episode I've watched the most, and there's a reason for that.

For similar reasons, I really like The Doomsday Machine. This may be just because it's one of the first episodes I have a clear memory of watching with my dad as a little kid. But I've watched it many times and it holds up. The tragedy of the grief-stricken commodore who ends up killing himself, and the way our heroes' ingenuity ensures he doesn't die in vain, is awesome. It's poignant and kind of, I don't know, instructive without being preachy?

The Arena is just good old campy 60s sci-fi fun. I don't know if it matters that it's Star Trek, but it certainly doesn't hurt. The fight scene is probably one of the worst I've seen, but isn't that in itself amusing? Moreover, they tell a fundamentally good and resonant story - overcoming a bigger, stronger, threatening enemy through persistence and creativity - that I think speaks to a lot of human values and struggles.

These episodes tell stories that are "psychologically true." Chris Vogler would be proud. [I mean that in a purely positive, admiring way, not intending to be snarky at all (I just saw a thread on r/writing that made me realize there are a lot of people hating on that guy).]

I'm sure I'm missing some, but I wanted to offer my thoughts and these are the ones I come up with as I ruminate over my second IPA. I am not spared the dubious benefits of alcohol. But I hope this helps, because it's a fundamentally fascinating question that deserves a good discussion.

Thanks for the kind words!

  • The Ultimate Computer: relevant today even more, a great tale about whether we should want artificial intelligence (not that the current state of the art is deserving of the word intelligence) to run critical systems and prematurely replace human thinking.
  • A Taste of Armageddon: again, highly relevant. a war that's been fought over something nobody even cares about anymore, virtual warfare with real-life casualties, got it all.
  • The Squire of Gothos: this one's just fun. No serious implications on any episode before or after, just a funny Englishman playing games with the unwilling crew. William Campbell really carries the whole episode on the back of his wonderful acting.
  • Patterns of Force: there's kinda a theme here with me picking episodes I feel are relevant today, but I think this one is the episode with one of the strongest messages in the whole show. But also, it's just kinda fun to watch. Spock and Bones got some fun banter in here, and the whole heart-to-heart.
  • The City on the Edge of Forever: probably the most suggested in here. Aside from the absolute hilarity of watching Kirk barely trying and spectacularly failing to blend in and thus standing out like a disco ball at a funeral, it has imo some of the best Spock–Kirk bromance going on and, afaik, is widely lauded as the single best TOS episode.

Three episodes that I think still hold up particularly well not just in relation to the show but even on their own:

Balance Of Terror - Since this is the first time the Romulans are even mentioned there's no backstory to be aware of and you can fully indulge in the brilliantly told and incredibly tense Cold War submarine hunt type scenario with lots of psychological games and tricks.

The Doomsday Machine - another incredibly tense episode that blossoms on the timelessness of its characters' inner motivations and the conflict between them instead of outdated or utopian ideas of the future. The question of how far people are willing to go and sacrifice themselves in the face of ruination or to redeem their failures is a really fascinating one.

Let That Be Your Last Battlefield - "the one that makes you think". Yes, the visual representation of the warring factions is incredibly on the nose, in my opinion deliberately so to get the point across, and some people actually dislike the episode for it. But it's a strong moral lecture in hatred between humans based on the most superficial features and ideas, and the damage caused by giving into it, which quite apparently is still as relevant of an issue today as it was fifty years ago, a hundred years ago or a thousand years ago.

I'd personally recommend Spock's Brain as it's so bad it's good. The absurdity of the plot really gives new viewers an insight into the rest of the series, as there more often than not there are episodes like this one.

You're still thinking primarily about what it tells them about Star Trek. Would you watch an episode like Spock's Brain that came from some forgotten 60s sci-fi show you'd never heard of?

yes please! Bring on the cheese.

Probably not.

The Doomsday machine. Both for the central concept and for the portrait of a broken man

Ultimate computer, same reasons

I really love “What Are Little Girls Made Of” because its spooky, deeply philosophical, topically relevant, and absolutely ridiculous all at the same time

I haven't seen The Empath mentioned. It's a very overlooked episode.

It's a strong character driven episode. You learn about the characters of Spock, Kirk and Bones. You also learn about the friendship that binds them together.

[deleted]

Day of the Dove is that episode.

IMO there are really only three episodes of TOS really worth watching if you don't care about Star Trek. First is a piece of the action, which a really fun gangster romp with some good fish out of water humor. The second is the Trouble with tribbles, which is just the best. and finally, the Omega glory is very so bad it's good.

Honorable mention goes to the savage curtain and the paradise syndrome for Space lincoln and peak Shatner acting respectively.

This is actually a really tough one because although I have lots of favorite episodes I am looking back and embracing the cheese that is '60s acting and directing.

For a good work that is standalone it has to overcome the inherent cheese of the setting. And I'm honestly wracking my brains to remember one which actually does that. There are the fun romps which are just good entertainment and perhaps give you a sense of the fun and camaraderie of The Original Series. These would be episodes like I, Mudd, The Trouble with Tribbles, and A Piece of the Action. These embrace the cheese and they're just good clean fun.

A worthy standalone story however? Especially with the remastered special effects, this allows some of the more effects-heavy episodes to shine better. A prime example of this would be The Ultimate Computer with its weighty pondering on the replacement of Man with automation and computers, and the dangers of doing so. It also has probably the best space battle in original series.

The heavy moralizing that Trek is famous for and is the main distinction between it and Star Wars (which is just good versus bad fantasy in space with Wizards), we have A Private Little War which is an allegory for the proxy wars of the Cold War era. While a good story I don't think modern audiences are even aware of never mind interested in this kind of thing so it's not really one I would recommend despite the being a very good episode. Similarly, Let that be your Last Battlefield hit me pretty hard too as a kid but it is very heavy-handed and as such may be seen as ridiculous to the modern viewer.

The aforementioned Balance of Terror, City on the Edge of Forever, and Errand of Mercy too, are all good stories -- but old stories. Told in the old style of the '60s I don't know if it has that much resonance for modern audiences who are hooked up on either Lower Decks style slapstick comedy or Picard style gritty realism and gore.

Then we have the more abstract ones where the budget had been cut and they had to make do with what they had at hand. I'm specifically remembering Spectre of the Gun which came off very well in being surreal and abstract, but carried a weight about it that still resonates with me now even though I don't really recall more than the plot line itself.

So to kind of sum up and come to a conclusion about episodes to actually recommend, I feel that due to the cheese factor of the show itself only the fun romps and the serious heavy concepts which come through despite that cheese would be ones I would recommend. To that end we have:

The romps: The Trouble With Tribbles; A Piece of the Action; I, Mudd; Assignment: Earth; Mirror, Mirror.

The Heavies: City on the Edge of Forever; A Private Little War; Patterns of Force; A Taste of Armageddon, The Devil in the Dark, Let That Be Your Last Battlefield

The character-focused: Obsession; Balance of Terror; The Ultimate Computer; Spectre of the Gun, The Galileo Seven, Amok Time.

Been waiting for someone to mention Ultimate Computer.

For a good work that is standalone it has to overcome the inherent cheese of the setting.

I don't know if I agree with that premise. Can't an episode be good TV independent of Star Trek, and still be campy 60s sci-fi?

I see "the inherent cheese" as being the overall cultural milleu (?) of the works that were being produced in this genre, setting and time - American 1960s sci-fi. I think something can be part of that and still be a good standalone work. Don't you?

It can be but let me give you another example of even earlier sci-fi values.

I had my wife who is not a big science fiction fan watch the classic 1950s Forbidden Planet. And I like this story and the theme is trying to convey and this is what I was hoping my wife would pick up on and agree that it is a good thought-provoking story.

She could not get past the horrible 1950s acting style and portrayal of characters.

And this is what I mean by recommending to other people who are not in it simply for the nostalgia or watching it because it is a classic.

To recommend to somebody watching today as the OP suggests, it is my feeling that the story has to be strong enough to make the viewer forget about the '60s cheese which is standard for the era I agree.

Personally I can enjoy stuff with horrible production values and very old storytelling techniques if it's still a good story. Similarly if it's the latest movie and it's a no-brainer with ridiculous plot and dialogue then I don't care about it. But to some people this is going to be more acceptable than what I prefer.

You forgot Shore Leave. It's one of my favorite romps.

Shore Leave was very much in my mind for romps, but I don't really consider that to be a stand alone "great story that transcends Trek" to recommend.

Is a very enjoyable one, and I personally love it, but I felt that it doesn't match the OP's criteria.

[removed]

You may run your life how you see fit, but that isn't actually relevant to the question OP is asking.

[removed]

I won't be specific

Daystrom Institute is a place for in-depth contributions. Specifying what you are talking about is obviously mandatory.

As someone who grew up on Stargate and ENT, I can't stand the CGI, acting and scripts of TOS

However, City on the Edge of Forever is good, like really good

Well, there being no CGI, I'm not sure what there is to critique there. There's the remastered versions, deliberately primitive CGI, but honestly, would you complain about a Bruce Lee movie not having wire-fu or bullet time?

The scripts, on the other hand...there are a handful of cringeworthy artifacts of the time they were written (treatment of women, silliness about computers), but for the most part, the scripts, especially from the first season, were the foundation of an entire franchise. What is there to take issue with in the scripts of Balance of Terror or A Taste of Armageddon or Errand of Mercy?

Acting is a whole other discussion. The 60s style is very different there, but I understand why some find it occasionally off-putting. For me, the acting is what saves several episodes, but I think that is often more a matter of taste.

To me, “Errand of Mercy” is clunky and underdeveloped. It isn’t as good of an introduction to the Klingons as “Balance of Terror” is to the Romulans.

[removed]

Personal attacks are not tolerated here, as clearly stated in our Code of Conduct. Your post has been removed. Do not engage in this behaviour again.

If you have any questions about this, please message the Senior Staff.

Tribbles