Comments (385)

Not even a hunting arrow .. poor bird -.-

whats the difference between this one and hunting arrow?

The arrow you see here has a field tip, used for practice shooting because they can be pulled out of the target easily. I have no idea what idiot would shoot an animal with one of these. Most hunting arrows are broadheads, which are broader, and cut through arteries and vital organs.

oh man :(

Imagine 4 razors at the tip of the arrow. That's a hunting tip.

Hey if someone is trying to kill me, I'd take the most lethal option so I don't run few blocks with an arrow in my chest while slowly dying.

Well it's better to instantly kill your prey rather than let it suffer like this.

[deleted]

oh that makes sense

As a bowhunter, this is disgusting.

Some dickhead used the wrong arrow head and put an animal through needless suffering for god knows how long. Broad heads cause massage haemorrhage and death in seconds, target points (seen here) are for shooting targets.

While not everyone sees eye to eye on the concept of hunting, I think we’re all on the same side that animals deserve our respect. This is absolutely abhorrent.

Even if using the right arrow head, you should never take a shot unless you’re absolutely certain of its placement. We owe animals that much.

It's illegal to shoot birds of prey no matter what kind of arrowhead you use

Of course you’re right, I’m just upset by it is all

Maybe not the exact time or place to ask but I've always liked the idea of learning to hunt. My SO is very anti gun to the point where even if I wanted to have a bolt action rifle it wouldn't be happening.

How would one start looking into and learning how to bow hunt? I've shot at targets before and had ok enough aim that I could be pretty good with some more practice.

I've taken my firearms safety course but I'm assuming that doesn't pertain to bows.

It’s as fine a place to ask as any other!

Chances are there’s an archery club near you. I rocked up to mine, asked who the hunters were (there will be some), and asked questions about gear/animals in the area. In my experience, hunters love to talk about their stuff and are welcoming of newcomers, especially if you go to an open day (or whatever your club calls it), shoot some arrows and generally let people see you’re serious.

Ask for some guidance/form check and you’ll be in good graces quite quickly. Club shooting will not only give you some insight into the sport of bow hunting, but you’ll also discover if you like the concept of it- some prefer their archery to “totally zen” without live targets and are only in it for target shooting, but each to their own.

If you’re in Australia, we have year round season and don’t require a license for bows (NOT crossbows). It can be easy to find someone with a pest problem on their property, but if you’re in the States I can’t speak as to hunting seasons and whatnot. The initial cost can be high but it depends on how much you want to start with; a good bow will run a few hundred bucks, hence my suggestion of open days ($5 a day at my club).

TL;DR go to an archery open day, rent a bow for a day and shoot the shit. It’s a very welcoming community. Hope this helps

I'm definitely going to look into finding a club to just ask around. This is good information thank you!

That was all great information. Look for archery and hunting shops nearby too. Especially small ones that are not chains. Generally owned by people who are actually passionate about the sport and want to help newcomers, these will be your #1 best resource early on. If, after becoming comfortable and proficient with the bow, you still want to try hunting, ask your local dnr or fish and game agency about new hunter orientation classes. Alternatively, your local chapter of Backcountry hunters and anglers will likely have several willing mentors who'd love to be part of getting you into the sport.

Depending on your age you'll need to take a hunters safety course before you can buy a hunting license. It's s one time thing. Get a bow and a target and practice, practice, practice. Once you think you've got it down practice some more. Most states have public land to hunt on. You'll want either a ground blind or tree stand. Make sure to read all the rules. The DNR doesn't fuck around. Join r/bowhunting.

Well first off, a little unsolicited advice. Dont stay with someone that dampens/curbs your interests and curiosity to learn new things. Anyone that tells you that you cant do it because of their personal beliefs is not the person you should be with.

Now, as for bow hunting...depending where you live (if in USA), I believe most, if not all states have a hunters education course. I know in my state, it is required to get a hunting license. That course teaches you all the laws and regulations relating to hinting in your state. It doubles as a firearm safety course which is always a good thing to go through, even if you have done it before. A general safety course on firearms is not going to cover things like how to safely traverse a fence with a rifle, and how to keep yourself and others safe when hunting in populated areas where civilians or even other hunters are.

These courses usually cover archery as well. While you wont get a chance to practice using a bow, they will cover the basics of safety with a bow. At the end of these courses you will have a better understanding of bows in general...like what kind of bow do you want to hunt with? Depending on where you plan on hunting will determine the best bow for you. Bow hunting is more of a cat and mouse game (generally) than rifle hunting. Rifles are more precise in the sense that you have a higher probability (if you are a good shot) of your target going down quickly. With a bow, you may have a good hit, but the animal takes off with a arrow sticking out of it. You have to follow the blood trail for a while to find it. This happens with rifle hunting too but not as frequently. Bow hunting usually causes death by severe hemorrhaging which isnt instant.

I know I said a lot here, but in the end, look for certified hunting ed courses in your area. Do research on different bows. If you live somewhere where you can safely shoot a bow, buy a cheap one with field tips and practice. Again, only of you feel comfortable doing so and its safe! You may pick up a bow, let a few loose and realize you just arent interested.

Good luck! Stay safe!

She's experienced gun violence in her life and it's more of a passing interest of mine. Something I certainly don't need so I'm more than happy to respect her feelings about it.

She takes a great interest in my favorite hobbies and after a few years with her I've decided for sure that she's the one for me. But in general that's good advice. If we had met and I had a large responsible collection I loved and she wanted it gone I would agree with your sentiment. But this is something not near and dear to me and I'm totally ok with just respecting how she feels about it. It's not a loss for me.

As for the hunting information this was informative! The idea of the "cat and mouse" tracking afterwards sounds like something I may enjoy. I'll definitely look into those classes you mentioned. Maybe see if I can find (or know and not realize) a bow Hunter I can tag along with sometime!

Hey, its great finding the person you want to spend the rest of your life with! Congrats

I know on my state, we have a apprentice license. You can only get it once in your life. You find someone you know that hunts and you are allowed to tag along with your own weapon. You can take the animal on the tag. Its only good for that one season. Its meant for people in your exact situation. You want to see if hunting is something you want to get into.

Also, some of the major sporting stores (dicks, cabellas/basspro) actually have archery ranges in their stores. You can go and test bows for free. I would take someone you know that may have some experience if you can, that way the employee doesnt get nervous if you walk up and say, "hey, I've never done this before but I want to try."

The apprentice license sounds like exactly the thing I'm looking for. Giving it a good try before jumping in totally is exactly what I was thinking.

I'll see if I can find someone to take to the range with me and try it out!

Last question. After the hunt when the animal is tagged do most hunters typically bring it home to skin and butcher themselves? I thought I read one time that local butchers will often do the work in exchange for some of the meat

So, you are going to have to do something called field dressing. Lets use a deer for example. This is going to be a precise and delicate operation. You remove the organs from the deer through a large incision you make. I'm not going to go into detail about how to do that. Thats something you will need to learn from the person who takes you out, or the way I learn everything, Youtube. It varies depending on whether the animal is a male or a female.

So, depending where you are, it may be the law to remove the organs from the kill site or it may not. Thats something you will learn in hunters ed. If you have to take them with you, make sure to bring a trash bag. If you leave them out there, be courteous. Dont leave a huge mess for other people to stumble on. Bury them if you can.

Now you have a deer carcass with no organs. Make sure you put your tag on it. Time to haul it out. If you are way out and you hiked in, its a good idea to bring a sled for transporting the body out. A lot of people ride ATV/UTV way out into the woods and then hike the rest of the way in. I would say most people just park on the road and hoof it in a little ways. Easy to find your way back and hopefully not too far to carry the animal.

Secure the animal on/in your vehicle (on the roof/in a truck bed. I dont recommend putting a bloody deer in the backseat lol). You have to take it to a weigh/check station. These are often local convenience stores or what not. I only hunt my state so I dont know laws outside of here but we have to take the kill to the closest station to where the kill was made and do it as quickly and safely as possible. Pretty much dont shoot it at 8am and then take it in at noon, or the next day.

Depending where you go for a check in station, they may be able to process it for you. If not, you can find a local place that will. Sometimes they will do it for a trade, but a lot of places wont. If they are a busy station, they dont need a hundred people trading them meat. If you shot a buck and want the head mounted, they can do that for you, at a price. If you want the skin, same thing.

Again sorry to ask so many questions. I work in IT so this stuff interests me but I really have no background in it.

With this chunk of information I'll stop bugging you guys and jump into some more of my own research but you guys definitely gave me a lot to start with! I appreciate your time!

Not a problem pal! Have fun!

I'm not the person you've asked, but I've been shooting archery for almost 20 years now. Most places in the Midwest US at least have archery shops all throughout the suburbs surrounding and major cities. A lot of them have extra hand me down bows you can get a lot cheaper than something new. And I think in most cases you can just tell them you'd like to learn and they will either help you then and there or recommend a class to you if their location is large enough to offer classes.

When looking at getting a bow you just have to decide if you're interested in shooting a compound bow or a traditional bow. And if you pick a compound bow look for an old bow. The shop I go to still has a bow from the late 80s, it's heavier, uglier, and not as nice as something new but it works just the same and anytime a first timer comes in wanting to learn to shoot they give them that bow for 20 bucks. Later they can decide if archery is fun for them but and return the old bow and buy a new one. You could see if a nearby archery shop has something like that?

Love the idea of the old bow just to try it out. I'll definitely look into that.

No shops in my town but I imagine since are close. I love in New England so shouldn't be far I imagine.

Good luck, I hope you can find a good shop where people can help you.

And don't worry about having the newest or best stuff. Seriously there have been improvements in tech over the years but they aren't a huge deal when you are just starting out and brand new top of the line bows can be very expensive. Get some cheap stuff to learn.

[deleted]

She's experienced gun violence in her life and it's more of a passing interest of mine. Something I certainly don't need so I'm more than happy to respect her feelings about it.

It's not like we met and I had a huge collection she wanted gone.

Man it always bums me out when I read things like this. Your SO needs to let you live your life and not be so controlling.

Did u hear about the bald eagle that was killed tending her nest?! I am so livid at the sack of shit who did this! Like, who the fuck would do that to an animal? While fixing her fucking nest! I hope they find this fuck but I have a feeling they won’t.

Here’s the article: https://www.wdsu.com/article/authorities-searching-for-whoever-shot-killed-a-female-bald-eagle-near-her-nest/27072916

That's a shitty massage.

Yeah. Hot stone massages are way better in my opinion.

I'm partial to Thai, myself.

At least it's over quickly. I hate when they work on one area for too long.

Really more like acupuncture.

[deleted]

It was my understanding that this was a given.

Apparently not, sadly

You're a dickhead too, because you're a bowhunter

holly fuck that poor bird

This isn’t metal. This is cruelty caused by a human.

This hawk will develop an infection and without proper care from a licensed rehab it will die.

Red tailed hawks are protected under many laws including the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It’s never legal to hunt them.

Source: 5 years volunteering with a raptor rehab center.

Cruelty caused by humans is the leading topic of a large amount of metal.

This is metal as fuck, it's just not pleasant or caused by nature.

Rule #1 says no human involvement.

Cruelty caused by humans in actual metal songs is one thing. Celebrating a picture of cruelty caused by humans is not metal.

Rule #1 says no human involvement.

Yes, that would be agreeing with what I said. Also, what I reported the post for.

"Metal" is not synonymous with badass. Suffering is extremely metal and there is, again, a lot of metal about suffering caused by humans.

https://youtu.be/xvEqiBJYSTY

https://youtu.be/Ylyqoxh-cXk

https://youtu.be/LXEKuttVRIo

https://youtu.be/QagXBusT5NE

https://youtu.be/s43yLMgXXOU

https://youtu.be/rVLBF3cpOhU

https://youtu.be/9HQmE_8cgD4

Then I misunderstood your earlier comment.

I’m quite versed in the world of metal and don’t disagree at all with what you’re saying about it being about more than just badassery.

That bird has a [ S T A N D ]

Who the fuck was the idiot that tried to hunt/kill an animal with an arrow made for sport target archery?

Probably a child.

I don't get the idea behind bow and arrow hunting. You don't hit vital organs and the animal continues living until it has died from sepsis or starvation. Not that fire arms always kill in the instance but this here...poor bird.

I don't bow and arrow hunt but I do believe the arrow head used for the job here was the wrong one, suggesting the guy was a dick and took a pot shot at the bird.

The arrowhead here is a nib used for target practice. There are other hunting specific arrowheads like broad heads which have a much wider slicing area (therfefore more likely to hit a vital organ or vein/artery)

For birds and small game there are thumper heads which have a large flat surface area to increase blunt force trauma/ shock when they hit the small animal, usually killing it.

Im sure bow hunters here will elaborate more on this stuff

Also it's always illegal to kill a hawk, as in there are 0 times in the year when it would be legal to do this. Coupled with the fact that this isnt a hunting arrow, it's safe to assume whoever did this is a general scumbag.

Not that laws always correlate with ethics tho

Edit: Oh fuck you guys downvoting, laws aren't always logical or good. With hunting laws, often not. Like how EU only allows 3 bullets in the magazine for hunting bear while it's 5 otherwise, if you want a source please ask.

Yeah, I have a mate who hunts deer and kangaroo, he owns two rifles and a bow. He prefers the bow.

iirc, deer have a near constant open season on them here as feral introduced species, kangaroos need permits for when its culling time.

And broad heads have plenty of stopping power, they dont just nick a lung, the organs completely collapse/bleed out as the arrow carves a path through. The animal should haemorrhage hard. The loss of blood pressure can easily drop them after only a few steps.

Just have to get close. Which is part of the appeal and challenge.

Hold up, you can hunt Kangaroo?

Yeah. They can get very over populated with no natual predators, especially the ones closer to civilisation. Out in the bush, they are more controlled by water sources than anything iirc.

When they boom, they start starving themselves and causing a shitload of damage to the natural forests and shit.

Also like deer, they are big and tend to get hit by cars. So controlling their population in semi urban areas (which is honestly a significant portion of Australia) is quite important.

You do need a permit though and its not seasonal, its based on when a culling is needed. So its on a "as needed" basis. Some ecologist or someone who is tracking their numbers reckons its a bit too much, lets say for example 500 need to be removed from this area, 500 culling permits for this area are put up.

Huh TIL. For which ever reason the concept of hunting Kangaroos never crossed my mind

Meat is very lean. You can buy it at the major supermarkets, I forget either coles or woolies or both stock it in small amounts usually for people bulking and want a lean meat for protein.

This was some cunt that thought it would be cool to shoot a bird of prey with a field tip. A broad head would have killed it.

The sheer disrespect for a fellow hunter. His weapons should be taken away.

That's actually pretty accurate. Though arrow heads for small game look more like claws or a fork. But yes, the impact almost always kills the small game instantly.

You are obviously uneducated in this subject. The guy that shot this bird was just being a dick while target shooting. The tip on his arrow is a field point which is used for target shooting. When hunting with a bow and arrow you use a broadhead which has very sharp razor-like edges on it. I've seen countless people cut their hands just opening the package. Needless to say, if this hits any animal in the vital area it will have a much more painless death than their teeth corroding of old age and dieing from starvation or a pack of wolves/coyotes eating out the butthole first while it's still alive unable to defend itself.

Not to mention bow hunting is very very very hard. A good bow hunter will not shoot an animal beyond 60 yards. If you try to get in this range of any wild animal the chance of it detecting you greatly increases. Unlike rifle hunting where you can shoot 200+ yards and the animal doesn't even know where you are.

I wish I could upvote this more. In this guy's mind hunters hit an animal with an arrow and wait a few days for sepsis finish it off.

And who has time to wait for the thing to starve?

While tracking it. Assuming you're hungry and hunting for food, that's just a competition to see who dies of starvation last.

No. I don't think that way. I didn't say that the hunter will wait for the animal to die due to starvation or sepsis. I said the animal will die because of this and not due to internal bleeding or shock. My bad for my quickly written comment as I was at work. I should have seen that this was a point for sports archery and should have redacted it that way. But again, I was at work. In the contrary, I have a hunting license (no hunting experience yet though) and it seems logical that this bird wasn't shot in an attempt to hunt it with dignity. This was an act of cruelty with the sole intention to kill for fun. Only that that bastard did even kill it on the spot.

It is a good question. Why would someone with access to modern firearms settle on the bow? I believe it has to do with huntings ancient beginnings. Using the simplest and yet most effective tool. A bow can be made in the wild, ammo can be retrieved, and bows are much quieter than a firearm.

This is what happens when a neighborhood idiot (or kid) shoots his bow at an animal while the arrow is tipped with a field tip. Field tips are used to be easily removable from a target, not to hunt with. If this bird had been hit with a broadhead it would not be perched where it is. It would be an ex-bird, it would have bled out and be ant food, it would have been no more, it would have ceased to exist, curtains closed, joined the choir invisible, met its maker, became ashes and dust once again.

[deleted]

!The bird is deceased at this point in time!<

No! Fucking add a spoiler alert to that shit! Absolutely ruined now.

You said it. I was absolutely shocked.

Birb is now a dirb

That's not what they were saying at all. I'm no expert but I went through an archery phase, a feels point is a type of arrow Head that is not used for hunting, and it's what was used in the picture. It's round and not particularly sharp. A broad Head is what you would use to hunt and would have killed the birdv almost instantly. Broad heads have sharp edges and t he Head is bigger than the arrow ahead diameter typically, hence the "broad" in the name.

He met his maker, bit the dust. He’s pushing up daisies, gave up the ghost, kissed his ass good-bye, went belly up. He expired.

He's off the twig and kicked the bucket.

/r/montypython appreciates your dead parrot reference

I will give ye the honor of posting fine sir.

Would he be pining for the fjords?

ex-bird

It has ceased to be

He'd have fuckin' snuffed it!

fallen off his perch...

So he wouldn’t be swimming with the fishes is what you’re saying?

Aka he’d be alive and well?

No it's just pinning for the fjords.

Joined the choir invisible lol

If it wasn't nailed to the perch it would be pushing up the daisies

Mostly likely a kids bow or it would have gone through too and hawk would have bled out. Likely some kids 15-20 lb bow.

ex-bird

Nice

Plus why would you hunt a hawk? It’s not even edible

Are you certain? I think hawk nuggets would be mighty fine.

There are people who do it to make it more fair for the hunted animal. Generally, it’s not used for bird hunting. Whoever did this is an imbecile. It is much harder to get within the range required to use a bow than a rifle, so the animal has more of a chance of detecting the hunter and avoiding a shot.

I think the challenge of bow hunting also plays into it.

Bows don’t have the range or stopping power of a hunting rifle so a hunter must get closer, have more precise aim.

A hunter must use more of the traditional hunting skills like stalking the prey, following tracks and droppings, adjusting for wind to hide your scent. All necessary in hunting with a rifle but more so when hunting with a bow.

And they’re quiet. I like the skill and patience required to competently shoot my bow, and like that it doesn’t make a deafening crack when fired.

It's more primitive but also more spiritual in my opinion. You feel more connected with the animal and feel like you are a part of the circle of life.

Breakers of the circle

Why? Are humans not animals?

Humans are animals. The circle of life here was this raptor's role as a parent and as a predator. That ancient circle was shattered to satisfy the vanity of some human who had no business inserting themselves in it.

This specific person is a cunt for sure, but most hunters don't do this shit.

Hawks aren't prey and this wasn't even a hunting arrow.

Humans have been the apex predators since the dawn of mankind. We are biologically designed to hunt and eat meat, and there's nothing wrong with it if we do it responsibly. You wouldn't blame a lion for using it's claws to take down a gazelle. I would much rather have to put in the time and effort to take a deer with a bow than go buy a cow that was raised just to die. I think it certainly is a lot more humane and natural.

This is ridiculous. Some asshole shot this bird for pleasure, and here you are literally lionizing them. Needlessly mutilating animals is the act of a psychopath. This is not humane.

Everybody is calling the person that did this an asshole, nobody is arguing that. But hunting isn't "needlessly mutilating animals". A lot of those photos you posted are fake or types of mounts. The others are hunters who don't know how to use a bow or freak accidents. You don't shoot a deer in the face, you shoot it behind the front leg with a double lung and the heart so it bleeds out quickly. You're most likely not going to peirce the deers brain with a headshot, even with a gun. Harvesting an animal quickly and humanely is a big part of being a hunter.

You are promoting bow hunting as being 'more spiritual'. More spiritual. Christ the night. The connection with nature you are celebrating is the act of reaching out and ending it.

It's a dark place; but I get where you're coming from.

"Don’t talk to anyone about wounding animals, especially in public places or among non-hunters... If you videotape your hunts, don’t show bloody kill scenes, rough handling of animals and animals struggling, kicking or quivering as they go down, to non-hunters or anti-hunters." - Larry D. Jones Western Bowhunter Magazine 1991

It's not a dark place. Is a lion an evil animal because it uses it's paws to take down a gazelle? The human brain is our primary weapon. Mankind has used a bow for thousands of years to provide food and sustenance. If done correctly, it is as humane as a gun. It is sad to see an animal go down but if you are a good hunter then it doesn't take long. You simply don't understand or appreciate it. We are a part of nature and are at the top of the food chain. When we die our bodies will decay and be absorbed into the earth and be ingested by the others.

Humans have choice where lions don't. That's why predation is a moral issue for us but not for them.

Humans aren't biologically herbivores, we are omnivores. Our bodies can't survive off just plants. You have to take B12 suppliments so you don't get anemia and die. Our body is made to break down proteins from animal tissue and convert it into energy. Our mouths have incisors that are designed for tearing meat and skin. Hominidaie are omnivores, not herbivores. You can say you refuse to eat meat because of philosophical or moral reasons, but we aren't genetically designed to not have meat in our diet.

Oh, they have stopping power. They don't reload very fast though. Modern broad heads have razor edges, Teflon coats, and can also slap through most body armor..

TIL animals wear body armor.

What happens if a bunch of kids with body armor jump on a Bear?

Bullet proof Bear.

Some of them have hide almost as thick and tough as body armor.

Some who walk on two legs do.

Well.. not in so many words, but boar gristle (?) is super strong stuff. And their foreheads are like metal helmets.

You are getting stopping power confused with penetration

A 1911 has stopping power

A Compound bow has shock and awe

A 155 grain Thunderhead™ that has razor edging and a Teflon coating will go completely through a 200lb white tail buck and leave an exit wound the size of a dinner plate. It has good stopping power IMHO.

Well yea I didn’t say they don’t have any stopping power. Just that they don’t have as much as a rifle. An arrow fired from a compound bow may have a speed of what? 400 feet per second? A hunting rifle, on the other hand, 2000+?

An arrow is deadly absolutely. There’s just less margin for error with a bow and arrow.

Arrows have about 0 stopping power. They slide through skin and muscle, and unless your arrow slams into a shoulder blade (which is not ideal), the arrow slips right through the animal. That is the intention. Bullets, on the other hand, are blunt force. Just look at slow-motion of a bullet hitting ballistic jelly vs an arrow. Much more impact. Or videos of bowhunting vs gun hunting. Animals often flee for a short distance after being shot with an arrow. Animals who are shot with a gun convulse and drop right there.

Your are mistaken sir or madam. Check my other reply. A broadhead arrow can stop you dead in your tracks as often as a rifle shot. The placement is far more important than you seen to realize. I've seen deer run miles after being shot with a high powered rifle and drop dead on the spot from a bow shot. I've seen them run after an arrow hit and die after a rifle shot. Trust me, the bow will drop ya.

Also worth noting that a lot of states don't allow rifles. Bows are not significantly worse than shotguns and they usually have longer hunting seasons.

It's also safer to shoot into the air. Shoot a rifle into the air and that bullet is traveling for miles; not safe at all.

this thread is fucking retarded, and now i'm in it too. someone shot a fucking hawk, it's illegal as fuck, and y'all arguing about the challenge of bow hunting and 'they shouldn't have used a field tip.'

No one doubts it’s illegal. No one said it’s ok.

Someone simply asked why any hunter would choose a bow over a rifle for hunting purposes and some of us have answers.

You’re right to be upset about the hawk. But no need to take it out on fellow redditors who were simply answering someone’s question

i'm not mad, i just like to curse. i read about 30 comments before anyone even mentioned that the bird was a hawk. they are arguing about hunting practices! hahaaa someone shot a fucking hawk, and the top comments were judging the broadhead! and i'm getting downvoted... not mad one bit, just incredulous. lol i love reddit.

Bow hunting also has different seasons. Gives hunters the first chance at a buck before rifle season opens, at least in my state.

A big part is that there are earlier seasons for bow only hunting. And contrary to popular belief bows usually are just as deadly as guns (at least in hunting and to an extent) as hunting arrow heads have large diameter cuts due to the blade lengths but the arrow in this bird is a practice head and is meant to just be shot at targets so probably some evil little kids wanted to do something twisted....

I mean, probably not wrong but how is this more "evil" than more "sporting" forms of hunting? Unless you're hunting rhinos with a slingshot it's not going to be a fair fight—or any sort of fight.

He means that a kid saw a hawk, and decided he wanted to shoot it with his non-hunting bow. I doubt the kid had any intention of actually eating the bird or anything, he just wanted to shoot something that was alive. See also: kids who kill neighbourhood cats.

Average harvest rates for most bowhunting seasons are around 20%.

Bow hunting season also lasts for a lot longer.

No, this isnt really it at all. Modern hunting arrow tips have 3-4 razor sharp blades and make huge bleeding channels and shock. This hawk would be dead in minutes. The problem is that some cunt shot it with a feild tip which does nothing but penetrate and seals up the holes.

I only know of two reasons. Personal preference and for deer season a girl in my class hunts with a bow, when its still not legal to use a gun.

That answers most of the question. The rest would be "why would you shot an arrow at a falcon (or whatever it is) in the first place?"

Some guns are banned in different seasons. But real bow hunting is a different beast, arrows described to kill with a high success rate. This picture is not representative of what a actual arrow would do to this bird if it was a hunting arrow. That bird with the right arrow would damn near be split in half.

Bow seasons tend to be during periods where trophy animals are more accessible. For example, bow seasons tend to be more in the prime of rut, so big bucks which are usually more hidden and isolated most of the year will venture out more during this prime rut in search of banging a doe. Also during rifle season in a place like Wisconsin, there are so many hunters that you will hear faint gun shots everywhere. Deer know this and usually become alot more timid to show themselves.

Bows are a lot of fun to use and have a lot more tactile feedback and involvement than just pulling a trigger. You feel really accomplished when your arrow hits its mark.

That being said, fuck bow hunting. It wounds too often.

My buddy lost his FID and can only bow hunt now too after he was convicted of something.

I have hunted with bows several times and idd like to defend bows a bit. First off we have proper hunting arrow heads that help hitting the vital parts. Like they spread when inside the animal. Secondly. No one serious would hunt with an simple woods. Arrow like that at lest use a carbon fiber and compound bow.

Largest takedown I have done was a deer

And reason why hunting with bow is is so more gratifying as you have to stalk your prey and you do not make a shot unless you are certain you can hit and kill the animal as an carbon fiber arrow is expensive.

Also, bullets usually made with lead. Arrows not so much.

the arrow in this picture only has a field tip, aka practice tip. when hunting you are required to use broad heads. these are basically 3 or 4 razors on the tip. certain animals also require the diameter to be a minimum size.

you can still do organ damage. if you aim and shoot correctly you should still double lung a deer. arrows mainly cause bleeding, and a deer can bleed out fast. guns cause shock and internal organ damage normally. you can get similarly bad shots with both.

but arrows are just as deadly as firearms and still can cause clean deaths. neither cause the animal to immediately die.

Dude.... your comment hurts my head as a firearm enthusiast and Instructor.

Many locations with many game and wildlife are close to residential areas. The best example is Northern Virginia. Hundreds of thousands of residents and hundreds of deer accidents a year. Long rifles are banned from use there because anything that goes up comes down and when there is a near certainty that round lands in a residential area you could unknowingly kill someone. This is why cities and towns have restricted usage of weapons. If you discharge a forearm within city limits in some states it's a felony. Most of the children killed by gun violence every year are collateral damage from shootouts between cops, gangs, drug dealers, etc.

Except that most people who bow hunt use modern composite compound bows, which are way more advanced and powerful than any wooden recurve bow.

Its also more challenging. Its just seen as a different way to hunt. Also bow season seems to be significantly longer by me

Also the fact that most states have much longer hunting seasons for bows than guns, so you have more opportunities to go hunting with a bow.

Why someone would shoot a hawk, I have no fucking idea. They are not a prey animal and I'm almost positive it's entirely illegal.

Because you can't hunt in city limits/neighborhoods and if you fire a gun more than likely you'll get caught. Bows though are silent and anybody can get one specifically youths.

Edit: a set of three or more triangular blades.

have a lot of cousins down south who bow hunt. it's not a nature connection, it's just that after a few years of using a gun, it becomes boring, and hunting with a bow and arrow is much more sporting.

they absolutely do hit vital organs, cause they practice with the bow so they can get a kill. i don't know a single hunter (maybe i'm lucky to know good dudes) who wants the animals they hunt to suffer so they make sure they get a kill.

that's a red shouldered hawk though. you don't hunt hawks, and you definitely don't hunt them with arrows, and you definitely don't hunt them with arrows you shoot at targets, which is what is sticking out of it. either this is a really unlucky accident at an outdoor range, or some prick thought it would be funny to take target practice at a bird.

The potentially crippling legal repercussions would be a good start as to why this derelict chose a pre-religion weapon to use in his felony

The animal might be too small for a firearm. If the bullet ruins more of the usable parts than an arrow would, that might be the preference.

Not really, you can just use a small caliber firearm. Hawks arent really meant to eat. A real hunting tip would have killed this hawk humanely in minutes.

The allure of hunting with a bow is it takes much more skill and the hunter is usually someone who appreciates the beauty of the animal and the meat that it provides for their family. To hunt with a bow one must be very stealthy and it takes a ton of patience. Whereas with a gun you could should an animal from 200+ yards away. My guess is no one was actually hunting this animal because first off no one hunts hawks and second the tip of the arrow is not a real hunting tip.

That arrow has a field point on it which is meant for target shooting and is absolutely not appropriate for hunting...as this picture shows. Bow hunting with modern broadheads plus actual skill with bow means the animals I shoot generally drop within 10 to 30 seconds of being hit. I have never missed a lung shot and the animals I eat will never have a chance of a less painful/stressful death. The deer/moose/bear doesnt know I am there and doesn't know what happened. The other options of dying in the wild are awful, ie. predation, disease, starvation, weather exposure or being hit by a vehicle. (I am a paramedic and have seen dozens of moose and deer suffering on the side of the highway after being hit by a vehicle. Its awful and breaks my heart). My bow doesn't disturb anyone or anything else other than the animal I hunt, as opposed to when I used to only gun hunt. The sound shuts down the forest around you for a while...its quite eery. I fill my freezer, feed my family, I donate to our local hospital which has a wild game menu for the First Nations people it serves and the animal doesn't suffer the way it could have. Thats why I bow hunt.

Edit: spelling, grammar, missed half a sentence...bear with me, I just finished a night shift

Thank you. As I just rectified myself...I didn't mean to disregard bow hunting. I don't even question hunting. Clean and environment friendly way of feeding your family. In case I get my desired job in the forestry administration I will go hunting myself. Btw I should have edited, too as I was writing while working. Enjoy fair and respectful hunting!

Bows are next to silent, unless you bend the arrow shaft or tear a fletch it can be reused an unlimited amount of times since tips are replaceable, if you are hunting for sport i.e. getting an animal stuffed or collecting pelts then you don’t have to worry about large exit holes ruining the pelts and if you are hunting for food then you don’t have to worry about lead poisoning because arrows are mainly comprised of iron, steel, and aluminum. And lastly bow and arrows are much much cheaper than fire arms and are generally more safe to use all in all bow hunting is a better way to hunt. Also bow hunting takes more skill because there is more drop making ranged shots very difficult

Bows can also be expensive AF

A good quality hunting rifle is also quite expensive.

Well for one you don't fucking shoots hawks.

The main reason I've heard is its painless. If you use the right arrows they are sharp enough that when you get hit you can't feel it and you'll die or be unconscious before you realize something is amiss. Also you should take a shot unless there is little to no chance it will be a kill, so who ever shot this bird was plane irresponsible

Lmao

A bow, painless? If anything, a rifle kills instantly and is more likely to be painless. With its low energy, a bow doesn't kill as consistenly and makes the animal suffer more often than a rifle for sure.

I've seen deer get a complete pass-through with an arrow, look around, and resume grazing until they dropped. If your broadheads are sharp enough and you don't hit bone, they don't feel much. Bullets have a much higher impact and they cause much more severe internal damage. Both are deadly enough in the right hands, but if you hit a deer too high or hit the close shoulder and it walks away, it will likely survive. If you make a bad shot with a gun, you're shattering bone and blood vessels and the animal will expire in a few days.

[deleted]

Not saying he is right in every situation but lots of people get stabbed without feeling anything and if you get stabbed in the heart you die painlessly, but I guess the same could be said about getting shot.

I'm no expert but the hunter I was talking to was shot by an arrow by accident of course. He was confused as he saw the shock on his trends faces before the arrow and only felt the pain when he saw it

Because A) there is no hunting for hawks and whoever did this is a massive prick, B) that’s not a hunting tip on the arrow C) you can hit vital organs with patience and practice, the same thing as guns.

This isn’t hunting. There is no hunting season for hawks.

People hunt with bows because it is rewarding. Its literally what our DNA is designed for. Eating meat that was slaughtered by industrial farming is not what we were designed for.

If hunting to food a bow is a lot easier to “clean” out of the meat vs bullet fragments.

Because it requires a significantly larger amount of skill to hunt with a bow and for a large majority of hunters it isn't about the kill so much as the hunt. With a bow you need to be very close to your target, quietly move in, draw and release whilst sticking a tiny rod through enough vital organs to kill an animal clean and quick. Unfortunately there are people who don't use them under the "clean and quick" mantra and you end up with horrific scenes like this.

To be fair, the arrow head used is not the correct type for smaller game. Using the right head makes a big difference depending on what you are hunting.

Firearms likely kill more reliably but I agree they don’t always, but same goes for using incorrect ammo when hunting. I’ve seen some people hunt deer with .22s, it’s illegal to do so because the round is too small to be reliably effective, same goes for arrows.

Thats a target point not a hunting arrow,some dick without a clue shot an animal for kicks, a proper hunting arrow has a large head that cuts and causes massive internal bleeding and rapid death.(edit, someone already pointed this out earlier,sorry. just annoyed to see this stupidity).

When you bow hunt, you use arrows tipped with broadheads. When a broadhead strikes the animal, it cuts a wide wound channel that allows the animal to bleed out very quickly. In addition, bow hunters generally close in on their game in order to ensure they can hit the vital areas ie the lungs or the heart so that the animal bleeds as quickly as possible.

The arrow in the picture is tipped with a field point which are used only for practice or target shooting. They are absolutely not designed for hunting.

With a bow it is more of a hunt that just walking out into the woods to kill something. I exclusively bow hunt whitetail, but I have never released an arrow without 100% confidence in the shot. I want to HUNT, not murder. I have let MANY trophy animals walk on by, simply because it wasn’t a comfortable shot

A bow hunter told me once that rule number one was always get your arrow back. Don't shoot unless you're confident of the kill, like you said, or if by some misjudgement you don't make a clean kill, you better be prepared to track that animal and finish him.

this isn't hunting. this is some stupid kid with a starter bow and arrow wontonly killing (or trying to kill) every animal he sees to satisfy his primitive urges. his parents should be punished for giving him a dangerous weapon without the proper respect for it or the creatures around him. as a life-long hunter (and no, not the "safari" style lion murderers, I hunt deer amd rabbit n such) this really pisses me off. people see shit like this and lump us all together, all because a few stupid fuckwits can't be bothered to care about a living creature. poor hawk

Bow hunting has actually become quite high-tech and deadly. The problem is, this bird was shot with a target arrow not a broad head used for hunting. Also, hunting birds of prey is usually illegal in the US so this hawk was most likely shot illegally (if it is in the US).

I don't get the idea behind bow and arrow hunting

Because you know nothing about it, clearly.

Lots of comments like yours. I did not mean to offend bow hunters. Really not. I am not even against hunting (apart from trophy hunting of big game like in Africa). NO, of course, if properly done it is a fair and clean sport. I hust learned something about hunting arrow heads and agree. They would work. But then...that's for bigger game than a tiny hawk. This one was anyways shot because of some asshole. Sorry for my comment which was to be understood wrong easily.

This is not bow hunting. As stated elsewhere, this is a dickhead kid being a dickhead kid.

Looks like whoever shot was using the wrong type of arrows. Also, that doesn't look like the kind of bird that should be hunted. Just a product of moronitis

Killing birds of prey is federally illegal you fool. Plus this is a photoshop.

Why has no one else pointed this out? If you zoom in you can see the outline of the cut out of the arrow.

Bunch of naive liberals, that’s why.

Interesting, didn't know liberals weren't allowed to hunt.

That’s some crazy mental gymnastics you did to come up with that statement by reading my comment.

  1. I am no US citizen - but I assume.
  2. That had not crossed my mind. Well played then.

People have been hunting with bow and arrow for 10's of thousands of years. What is there not to get?

Hunting with the incorrect arrow head for starters.

Was probably just some shithead screwing around, not that that's any better. True hunters know better.

Different seasons. You get more tags if you hunt in black powder and bow season as well as gun season.

I don’t hunt, but if I ever do, bow or crossbow for me.

Gotta hit vital organs with firearms too.

You have to add a numbing agent to the arrow so they go sleep and you can grab them.

Otherwise it's impractical.

Because a lot of hunters prefer the challenge. It is a lot harder and there's a lot more work involved and it is almost like a spiritual ritual. You feel more connected with the animal. It's not just you and a gun and seeing something at 300 yards you can shoot. Sometimes you have to stalk, sometimes you have to sit in the same spot upwind for 8 hours straight. It's more natural instincts and putting yourself into nature. That being said, you don't hunt with field tips. There is very little chance you hit something vital and if you don't, the arrow plugs the wound so the animal won't bleed out. You should use broadheads for hunting. This was some asshole that was probably messing around and chucked an arrow at the bird and hit it, and now it is going to suffer for days or weeks most likely.

No, the problem here is that some cunt used a feild tip to shoot a hawk that was probably illegal anyway.

Real hunting tips have 3-4 razor sharp blades that do massive damage and cause huge bleeding channels and any hawk hit like this would be dead in minutes due to blood loss amd shock even without hitting major organs.

A feild tip does nothing. It coasts through and pushes organs aside and seals up the holes so it's not even really bleeding.

This hawk is gonna die but its gonna take days.

Ahh.. You should look into newer arrowhead technologies. They make arrowheads that will slap through body armor. Like, no joke, better stopping power than lots of rifles. They're not inhumane or slow to kill. That said, you should never hunt with the wrong weapon, and it's BS that someone shot that hawk with a bow, or anything at all really.

Nah dog, you literally only hunt with arrows that will kill with a high success rate. This picture if of something completely different.

Modern compound bows and broadheads are equally if not more lethal at range than a lot of hunting caliber rifles. Even with a misplaced shot I've seen broadheads shatter hip bones of elk. I cant think of any big game that wouldn't be easily easily trackable and dispatchable after the thump of a hunting arrow.

Come on, don't you play Red Dead Redemption? The game clearly teaches you it's best to use your bow and arrow to hunt small animals! /s

My family owns a cattle ranch which we and dozens of our friends hunt on. Bow hunting is not allowed for this exact reason.

Bow hunting is much more challenging than gun hunting. You have to train more, be in better physical condition, get closer to the animal (which isn’t easy), and you have to be much more precise with your shot placement. It connects you more with nature, and yourself. Unless you’ve experienced it, it’s very difficult to explain. Chris Pratt explains it very well here: https://youtu.be/hkeEmYF8gOI

And any well placed bow shot will kill an animal as effectively and ethically as a gunshot. And I don’t think this was a hunter. Any true hunter wouldn’t do that to an animal, especially not a hawk. This was some jackass that got his hands on a bow, and is not at all a good representation of a hunter.

A lot of people think that hunting is all about the kill, and that that’s all that hunters do it for. But that is far from the truth.

This is right through the chest. Hunter made a nice shot, maybe using the wrong arrow head because that should be a kill shot.

So I think the dude that shot this hawk which I don't know about shooting hawks but they aren't game bird.

Probably a kid (and a real P.O.S.)

more importantly... who tf hunts a hawk ??

I agree if someone was going to shoot it I would hope it would be with gun because if it was inevitable the gun would most likely kill it on the spot and reduce suffering

This isn’t hunting, this is poaching a protected species, the person who did this was not a hunter.

Well you're supposed to fix a 2 inch wide razor broadhead onto the arrow, not a practice point.

As far as I know, hawks are protected animals in North America. Whoever shot this bird was just being an idiot; probably some back yard robin hood wannabe. However, IF they used a broadhead that bird would not be alive.

it's the challenge, obviously you aim for vital organs but if you miss and just hit it you are responsible to track it. but in this case it's a pointless attempt...it's not like they were going to eat a fucking hawk. dick move

Not a hunter myself but from my understanding from people who do go bow hunting like it much more because of the difficulty of it. You have to get closer. You have to be more patient. You have to be skilled with the bow.

The people I do know who bow-hunt practice almost every day to hone their skills to make sure they get ethical kills.

You are right. A proper skill set and the right arrow head will do their work. None of it present in the image above.

This bird was shot with a target tip, meaning that it does not expand or create damage as it pierces through. Actual hunting tips are designed to cut everything they go through, so even if you miss vital organs slightly they still cut vital vasculature and the animal still died relatively quickly

That's not how bow hunting works. Bow hunters SHOULD aim for vital organs and use arrow heads made for hunting. Also, most shots are taken with a distance of less than 30 feet. Plus, if a vital organ is missed, it's illegal for hunters (at least in the US) to use barbed arrow heads or arrow heads that cannot easily be removed or work it's own way out of the animal.

That being said, the person who shot this poor hawk is an asshole. Not only is there no season for hunting hawks, there's no reason to. Not to mention if they WERE illegally hunting hawks, this assholes didn't use the proper arrow heads to ensure a reasonably quick kill (arrow heads made for hunting have a diamond shape, but made with razor blade edges).

And as far as why people hunt using a bow and arrow? Personally, I feel it's more "fair". You not only need to get fairly close to your target (ensuring you aren't seen, heard, or smelled), but you need a good amount of skill to actually hit your target.

The person used the wrong type of arrow.

It looks like the arrow has a field tip (mostly used for target practice). When hunting you normally use a broad head which have razor sharp blades, to sever vital organs and arteries. The animals normally die from massive blood loss. Ideally a good hunter doesn’t take the shot unless he has the right angle/distance to ensure the animal doesn’t suffer. This dude was obviously a dickhead who took a shot at a cool bird.

Deer hunting with a bow you aim for the lungs...a vital organ.....and it dies pretty quickly. This guy was a dick shooting a bird and especially a federally protected one. But saying bow hunting doesn’t hit vital organs and the animals all die from sepsis or starvation is really stupid. How can the animal not be able to eat if it has been shot with an arrow? That makes no sense. If you make a clean shot the animal will not suffer

I did't say it doesnt. I referred without pointing it out to that kind of head used. My bad, I know. To answer your question regardin starvation. These birds are no scavengers neither do they feed on seeds. They hunt. I imagine flying precisely is very hard not talking about hunting down an animal. It looks like a falcon - they hunt mid air. Next time I write a comment I take my time, off work, to properly redact it. This one left lead to too many wrong assumptions over my original intention.

But a clean shot with a head like this does not necessarily damage important vessels or organs but only goes throug muscle and skin. That won't kill. A shot person doesn't die if shot in the shoulder but will perhaps if not treated long time after.

Is hunting red tails or other hawks/eagles/falcons even a thing?

Everything is hunted. Birds of prey mainly for trophies tho

I’ll chime in since I am an avid hunter and use both archery and firearms.

First I’d like to say I hear the opposite from many anti-hunters. They say things like “your using a high powered rifle, why don’t you give the animals a fair advantage and use primitive weapons?”. So the argument goes both ways.

Now I don’t hunt birds with archery because it’s not really a thing as far as I am aware. But I do hunt deer and hogs with it. You make a good point about hitting the animal and weapon effectiveness. But keep in mind regardless of the ammo that goes into the animal, if it doesn’t hit a total organ it probably won’t immediately kill the animal either. So if you shoot a deer in the hind quarter with a gun or bow, it will do about the same damage.

Modern arrows have large broadhead tips with basically razor blades. The amount of damage they do is astronomical so it’s just as lethal as a firearm in most cases

Sorry for my partly misleading comment. This was not hunting, of course. This was killing out of fun. I did not want to disregard archers. Hunting heads will cut important arteries and leave the animal to bleed out internally. Yet it requires a lot of experience. Where as with a bullet which expands and destroys organs due to its energy release inside of the body kills instantly as long as the chest is hit. But birds are better be shot with bird shot. In game a belly shot would in severe cases cause a slow death making the animal suffer for hours. A jaw shot will starve it to death.

Shoot a non vital part with a hunting cartdridge of your choice and watch the deer run off and you'll spend the day trying to track it down with dogs. You hunt with hollow point bullets, because they expand on impact and damage as large an area as possible with shrapnel and hopefull hit the important bits nut that doesn't always happen so you're kinda fucked.

Deer and small animals though, can easily be taken down with a shotgun as the swarm of pellets penetrate shallowly all at once and causes the nerves to overload and the animal goes into shock, often just dying on the spot. But this post is about single projectile weapons, not shotguns I assume.

Poor bird indeed, but what you gonna do? Unfortunately

The arrow shown in the picture looks like a target arrow. Arrows used for hunting have triangular blades on the tip for maximum damage.

That's a field tip, you gotta use a broad head and make sure you get a kill shot on a vital organ.

Firearms, when used by idiot hunters, can cause as much pain and suffering, If you don’t have the right sized caliber or shoot an animal in a non-vital area it will live in pain like this bird above.

What it boils down to is hunters who know they have a clean kill shot that would cause the animal the least amount of pain and have the right equipment. In this case, the bird was shot by a field tip (which is ONLY used for target shooting). If this were a legal bird to hunt the hunter would be using a broad head (which is designed to kill effectively)

Not that I disagree with you but the bow hunters I know see it as more of a challenge than firearm hunting. The side effect of this is you simply NEED to be more reserved and responsible. A good broad-head (not a target tip shown here) and a clean shot can fold almost any animal. The weird thing about this picture is the arrow is still in the bird. A high powered bow can through and through an elk but this stayed in? Weird

Because in cities where you cannot shoot animals with a gun but you need to thin the deer population, you need to be able to hunt the animals without risk to houses if you miss. It’s a thing in a lot of major cities with wild areas. They will shut them down to the public and allow hunters to harvest deer and other animals to keep he population down

If you don't hit vital organs with a rifle you're just as much SOL...

You're not a hunter are you?

Not yet. I made it clear in some other comments that I did not express myself in the best way. I just had a look at the arrow head and did not recall the hunting heads when I was writing my post.
However, no shit storm broke down on me. I have a hunting license for firearm hunting but haven't made use of it so far.
I commented because of the cruelty, the senseless killing of an animal and extending its suffering.
I am not saying that there is no clean bow hunting and hunting with firearms is always safe for the aim. By far not.

For people who hunt for sport and not for food, it's all about how manly you are. Bow hunting is like hunting on hardcore mode. Its dumb as fuck. But my real father who's a loser and only cares about hunting would love to brag about the animals hes killed with a bow.

Is it just me or is this really fucked up? Fuck whoever did it I don't care if it ate your chickens I don't see any reason to kill birds you have no intention of eating

As other people are saying this happened because the shooter used a field tip arrow which isnt meant to kill. So the shooter was inexperienced, but we dont know why they were shooting at it in the first place, likely fucking off testing their bow.

As for your second point, however, are you saying protecting property and livelihood isnt a good reason to kill predatory animals?

You are legally allowed to protect your property in the US from certain nuisance animals. All hawks are protected by law. The penalty for violating can be up to 6 months in prison and a $15k fine.

As for your second point, however, are you saying protecting property and livelihood isnt a good reason to kill predatory animals?

Nope, not a good excuse, there are better ways to protect whatever one thinks this raptor will take, and at least in the US, it’s illegal

Unless you have a permit. I agree there are better ways to do it. I didnt claim it was necessary, only pointing out that there is a practical reason for doing it.

Having a reason doesn't really make a difference when it's illegal and easily stopped with netting. In reality most hawks this size won't kill a full grown chicken. The hawks aren't big enough to carry off a chicken and would have to eat it in place. It happens but is not a regular thing. Foxes are a more likely culprit.

Taking Ed birds into rural populations we would deal with this issue a lot. Most people wouldn't even see what actually took their chicken. They just assumed that a red tail took them because they grew up calling them chicken hawks which isn't even a real thing.

That’s right! Even a red tail would have trouble with a full size chicken. Get a large, active chicken breed and you won’t have problems. I have only seen a hawk try to take one of my chickens once. It was one of the new baby red tails for that year and the little guy was left sitting on the ground wondering what happened.😀

I see your point, there are reasons to kill predators, but personally I would never kill any bird of prey because it killed some chickens

That's fine as your personal preference, but then you'll likely never want to own chickens. It's true that losing 1 or 2 chickens wont ruin a coop, but the problem with predators like birds and foxes is that they'll keep coming back if they know where to get a meal.

I have chickens, live near a nesting pair of redtail hawks, owls and coyote families and and have never lost one. I keep them under netting until they are old enough to not be a target. My puppy is a bigger threat.

Ditto, I also live in an area with a ton of coyotes, eagles, hawks, mountain lions, and bobcats. I keep my chickens in a pen and make sure they are protected from the predators and bad weather. Their health and safety is my responsibility and I won’t blame a wild animal for following its instinct when it’s hungry. If a predator takes one of my chickens then that was my fault and I need to improve the coop to protect the rest of my birds.

“I dislike no animal because he eats” Olaus Murie

Our dogs always did a great job of protecting our chickens. We let them roam the yard freely and I don't remember losing many at all.

The only chickens I’ve lost has been to my little twerp of a puppy

You're a smart owner. I'm not trying to suggest you need to kill animals, only that theres a practical reason for doing so.

I've owned chickens before. They were in a fenced area with a large coop and ya know who killed em all? Not the hawks or kites that live around me. It was my German shepherd. He also killed a neighbor's goats. Man I loved that dog but I guess we called him wolfy for a reason 🤣🤣

Hawks are protected federally. You can't kill them to protect your animals. You're required to properly protect your animals. Now, coyote are fair game all day long. Fire away.

or perhaps your seemingly arbitrary desire to keep a few chickens probably doesn't justify murdering majestic apex predators who play a vital role in the ecosystem?

and doing it with an arrow is insanely cruel. yes we have a right to hunt but it is 2019. we are guardians of the environment; justifications for torturing fellow inhabitants of the earth are dwindling

I'm not even defending the guy who shot this bird with a damn field tip, so I'm not sure why you're on about that.

And you call keeping chickens arbitrary, yet wouldn't raising and maintaining your own food source allow you to diverge from corporate food industries that torture the animals they raise before slaughter? Wouldn't that give you the autonomy of knowing exactly where your food came from and how it was raised? You can get a constant supply of eggs and the occasional chicken to eat from a small coop, but not if some asshole predator keeps killing them. You do realize that our race is a part of the ecosystem too, right?

What about full fledged farmers? Are they supposed to just let their animals, who are incapable of escaping, die to every predator that passes by, or decides to live in the area because theres easy food? Do they just let herbivores eat their crops up?

Theres a lot more factors at play here than your arbitrary desire to ogle pretty birds.

asbolutely: freerange / locally sourced foods are preferable to cruel factory farms / unsustainable corporate models

however... chickens are not a prerequisite for human survival. it is an arbitrary food choice

it is 2019. we can thrive without having to needlessly decimate local predator populations

here in australia a farmer recently poisoned 100 wedge tailed eagles https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jun/07/more-than-100-wedge-tailed-eagles-found-dead-on-victorian-farm

these are an important predator because they keep grazing species in check and that facilitates vegetation regrowth

the farmers produce is arbitrary. the government subsidises (indulges) his lifestyle choice because farmers are a politically powerful group. however, their activity is often harmful to the environment and compromises the prosperity of future generations. it is short sighted

mindless environmental destruction simply to appease a consumers penchant for a burger

we are better than that

Wow, okay, so you condone farming, but not protecting farms or actually eating one of the easiest and most efficient animals to raise.

This example you brought up is asinine, for a lot of reasons.

The article says the investigation is ongoing, with farmers being suspect. So your claim that one single farmer did it is an assumption. They dont even know how the birds were poisoned.

Wedge tailed eagles are also primarily scavengers, otherwise hunting rabbits and other small mammals that arent raised by farms, so they pose little threat to farms in the first place. Actually helping them by eating rabbits and foxes.

Even if they did pose a big threat to farms, it would be the fault of the farmer for setting up in their territory.

Especially if the species is endangered, which is a whole debate that's been going on ever since governments started protecting certain species. Farmers are rendered helpless to protect their farms and in some cases are forced to relocate because they're interfering with endangered species territory.

On top of that, here in America, introducing unregulated pesticides into the environment is a pretty heavy crime. Even in the case that a farmer did do this, hes a criminal who is way out of line and in no way represents the average farmer or chicken coop keeper.

You're just reaching for any reason to vilify our strawman who killed a fuckin hawk because it kept snagging his chickens.

And your problem with government subsidies for farmers is an entirely different discussion from the justification of legally killing predators.

What year it is also isnt relevant, so you just sound kinda dumb repeating it over and over because you can't specify what actual factors in the world make your claims credible.

no. the year is relevant

you live in america

your society is advanced

you can live comfortably without having to murder predators

yes I condone farming but I don't eat animals because my survival doesn't depend on it

you are swearing and you called me dumb. you have lost this debate

you know what is dumb? shooting a hawk with an arrow

dumb and cowardly

strength is about being aware of our unique position in the ecosystem and looking after nature

[deleted]

i cut meat out of my diet because i like animals. i'd prefer not to participate in a system that involves torturing and murdering animals

i live in a rich country where there are plenty of other food sources available

your response to my choice suggests you are threatened by it. why is that?

Insults are the last resort of insecure people trying to appear confident in their weak position

_

have fun

enjoy your life

try to be gentle to those creatures with whom we share the earth with

Hmm, no, you definitely didnt win this. Your hurt feelings dont entitle you to a win when you cant provide any credible evidence for your reasoning. Learn what you're talking about and come back.

ok, done my research and come back:

  • chickens are not a prerequisite for human survival

  • for those of us who live in developed nations, shooting a hawk with an arrow is an unnecessary act of cruelty

enjoy your life

inside you there is an endless capacity for love and compassion

your penchant for eggs (or whatever) does not define who you are. it's a just a random choice

[deleted]

let me explain why i won the debate

(i can't believe i'm writing this sentence, it makes me lol)

chickens are not a prerequisite for human survival

it's just a random food choice. like choosing to eat an apple.

this is not a complex argument

it seems that my opinion threatens you for some reason

perhaps try to direct your energy towards something positive

enjoy your life

[deleted]

Getting out into the wild is a poor excuse to kill a hawk illegally because you don't know how to coop your chickens

[deleted]

How bout you go fuck yourself you don't know where I'm from

[deleted]

You ever been out in nature and not killed an animal unnecessarily? You should try it sometime. It's nice

[deleted]

Did you also graduate at the top of your class in the navy seals? I commend you on your hike, it sounds like a great experience. Your need to tell me that you did it is kinda funny tho

[deleted]

You think just cause I'm not confirming to you that I don't live in a city means that I'm a fatass who never goes outside. Man I love nature. I grew up in a nature reserve in Belize. I've done sea turtle conservation since I was a baby and my mom took me to the beach to protect sea turtle nests and then release the hatchlings. I've kept chickens by the way, and none of the local bird population ate them. I'm not against killing animals either, I hunt, I just don't find it necessary to kill predators to protect chickens. I do live in a shit hole city for the time being, but only because I want to get a degree, but as soon as I'm done I'm going home.

It's too bad we got off on a bad foot we probably like a lot of the same shit

I was born and raised in a rural village in a national park

i live in a city now. 10,000 miles away from where i born because i am interested in experiencing new environments and i'm not afraid of change

have a nice life. perhaps you ought to refrain from assuming strangers were born in 'shithole' cities

jumping to conclusions is a sign of limited cognitive functioning

In our discussions you jumped to like 15 conclusions on a whim.

[deleted]

I’m from Scotland

I live in Western Australia now

Took your dog/cat?

I'm also an archer, I know what field tips are. I didn't see that as pertinent to my opinion

I'm fairly confident it was a child who did this without fully understanding the consequences of their actions.

Their fault for not protecting their chickens.

I went to a seminar on some sandpiper bird species that was endangered and they used predator control on some raptors to try and protect the sandpiper. They talked about how it was controversial there and even mentioned how that raptor was also threatened as well! Although this may not be that situation of course

If this guy made the laws murders would be legal if you eat the person..

🤣🤣Waste not want not. If you're gonna murder might as well do it Texas chainsaw style

What about pest control though? Invasive species are no joke

Fucking cunt that did needs needs put away imo

It's pet shop, from JaJa's kooky quest.

That’s an hawk classified as a bird of prey and that’s illegal asf harming it even finding and injured one and trying to help is illegal unless you’re licensed wildlife personnel

One of the ways we worked out that birds migrate was when storks arrived in Europe with sub Saharan African arrows stuck in then. There are stuffed examples in museums I think.

Why would anybody hunt a bird of prey? Especially when there are so many endangered

its really bullshit someone did this

Hawks are fucking units of the bird world.

Edit: Said falcon instead of hawk because I'm mildly dumb

It's a hawk not a falcon.

Ah dammit. I mixed the two up. Thank you for letting me know

Falcons are quite small compared to some other raptors.

Tis only a flesh wound.

This isn't nature, it's just some asshole.

This is illegal and makes me so angry.

Just a little scratch I'm sure he'll walk it off

"I used to be an adventurer like you, then i took an arrow THROUGH ME"

0 fucks given

This makes me sad

Do you like to be overrun with rodents? Because this is how you get rodents. Idiot.

My question is why was anyone hunting a hawk in the first place...gun, bow or otherwise....

That seems nearly fatal.

Eventually, people survive being shot with field tips all the time. It's just a big needle at that point.

Oh, great, so now all the bird has to do is remove a needle twice as long as it's body from its chest. Awesome. I was worried there for a second.

Yep, hell be finneeeee

I used to be an adventurer like you...

This bird looks like my Mount and Blade character after a battle.

How is the bird even alive with an arrow through its chest? Plus its just sitting there like nothings wrong...

No vital organs were hit but I can assure you it’s dead by now.

Maybe he can use it like a medieval lance and swoop down and stab its prey along with its talons...

As an ass hole ten year old I bought a bow and arrow and killed a bunch of squirrels with it....man I feel bad about it now

Is this how Pet Shop got his stand

Someone was an asshole. Key word here being was.

This fucker is sitting there like, "what? Do I have something in my feathers? I'm fine."

One who the fuck shoots a hawk? Two you should use a flat head or a broad head arrow tip.

Shitty ass people that do this can fuck off. This is a hawk and if this was the states it’s HIGHLY illegal. Not that it stops anyone from doing it but I wanted to point this out. I own a small chicken flock and have had hawks scoop up some of my birds that are heavy egg layers. Did I get pissed and shoot them or kill them ? No, I know the need they have for feeding themselves and their offspring.

First, why try to kill that bird?...

What I see. Is moron trying to kill a bird, for no reason

Not much “nature” about this.

I’m only here for the jojos references

no this isn’t nature being metal... this is humans being assholes.

why kill innocent animals when you can just not? why do people feel the need to be murderers? just because they aren’t intelligent in the same way we are, doesn’t mean their lives are worthless. let them live in peace.

let the downvotes come. and fuck all of you in advanced for downvoting me. people who don’t care about animals (at least enough to not kill them) are worthless pieces of shit.

I’m not above doing the same thing to the shooter

There’s a few reasons why this is messed up. One, why would you hunt a bird with an arrow? There’s shotguns for birds that are way more likely to instantly kill it. Secondly, this is a hawk. Why are you hunting a hawk? It’s not a game bird like pheasant or quail. You don’t eat them. You need them to keep rodent populations in check. They’re very important for the ecosystem and don’t reproduce as fast nor are they as plentiful as other birds. And finally, the coward who did this shot the bird in the back while it was sitting on a perch. Look at the angle of the arrow. This wasn’t a skillful shot, this was an attempt at execution from behind on a bird that could have been sleeping, feeding its young, or just looking for a meal. This was someone who waited for an opportunity, got his bow, loaded it, then fired the arrow into its back from below. Disgusting behavior.

He’s the Steve Martin of Hawkes.

[removed]

Yep. Who’s early stand up famously (I thought) featured him wearing an arrow through his head.

I was an adventurer like you once, but then I took an arrow to the wing.

I don’t know whether to be mad about the shot or impressed he hit a bird.

r/fakealbumcovers

Ok guys I call next week

I've got a photo of a wild turkey with an arrow through it.

around 1997-8 I knew a guy that was near destitute and was taking geese with a bow (mid 20s onset of schizophrenia) . He hit one like this and the goose was on the local news several times over the next couple weeks as it flew around people kept spotting it and calling it in. No one could do anything for the guy either

you have to be a complete asshole to hunt birds like these, I won't condone hunting it's a broad topic but it's especially disgusting when the person is trying to kill stuff just for the sake of it, I have 0 respect for people who kill animals just for the joy of doing so

Whoever did this really sucks. That's a target practice tip, not a broad head for hunting. He shot this bird to wound it, not kill it. Anyone who shoots to wound is despicable. If you have to shoot an animal, at least have the decency to offer that animal a swift death.

Fuck,someone needs to euthanize this poor thing.

Holy fucking shit this isn't mental this is.. what the fuck am I even looking at!!?!? Someone either shot an arrow at a hawk, or missed and hit the hawk accidentally and... WHAT

I don't know what kind of asshole would shoot a bird with a field tip. It's not humane and somebody should shoot him through the chest with one.

In bird culture this is considered a dick move.

In human culture too

This is a clear example of poaching. There are no tags for red-tailed hawk.

All the top comments are talking g abou the arrow that was used and not the fact that it's a raptor, and it's illegal to own any part of that bird, let alone kill it, in most countries.

Where did you get that picture of my soul?

this bird developped a stand. that's what happened

The night king’s ready for that second dragon

"That feathery bastard stole my arrow!"

But seriously, why would anyone want to shoot this type of bird? I don't know much about birds, but it doesn't look to have much more meat on it than a chicken. Would it be taxidermied and put into a collection?

https://imgur.com/a/lPWoERW

Word cloud out of all the comments.

Fun bot to vizualize how conversations go on reddit. Enjoy

I used to be an eagle like you

Until I took an arrow through my fucking body

Oh shit it petshop

Staying alive, staying alive, AAH, AAH, AAH, AAH Staying alive

'tis but a scratch

Well he does have a nice fancy spear to poke his enemies with now.

The bird is so stoic.

Like I give a hawk

That’s decidueye

some fucking asshole,

This angers me greatly!

Phineas Gage of birds

Pet shop

Why is someone shooting hawks?

That’s a federal offense to shoot a raptor like that

Who tf is out here hunting birds of prey

What’s the point?

Leave the eagles, hawks, falcons and owls alone

Yo this is also super illegal. At least in the US, birds of Prey are highly protected.

:( poor guy

F

When I say I hate %98 of humans, people don’t get why. That’s why. I hope a huge pandemic or the 3rd world war wipes all of us out from this beautiful planet we disrespected all the time.

Fuck this made a me a big sad

Insert skyrim knee joke here

This has been posted here several times already and is clearly photoshop

I fucking hate people. Reasons like this is why there SHOULD BE POPULATION CONTROL.

Nooooo da birb is dying!

Pet shop

Hawkeye.

This really fucking pisses me off. Whoever did this didn’t do it for sport, just to kill something.

Wasn't this picture proven to be a photoshop?

If we could all stop killing things for fun, that would be great.

/r/ThisIsMyLifeNow

Picture of hawkeye loafing around during infinity war

BoP are really important to the intercontinental global system.

There are few of them and they keep the pest population in check.

Needlessly killing them like this for revenge or even fun is pointless.

No respect at all for nature. Despicable man... humans suck.

this kind of action gives archery and shooting sports a bad name and image

what the fuck has a bird with an arrow in its chest to do with "nature is metal" ??!?! an arrow through the chest doesn´t seem too natural to me \^\^

Humanismetal

It used to be an adventurer...

Is this sparrow?

REEEEEEPOST