The word 'philanthropist' now has negative connotations, whenever I see it next to someone's name I shudder.
The word has always been a whitewash of 'Robber Baron.'
But Bill Gates is a new breed - the Philanthro-capitalist. He doesn't give money to charities, he gives money to corporations, so he can use them as part of his plans. Lots of money to media for favorable attention, for example.
He also starts his own charity corporations and just funnels his money there.
Donations to a charity are 100% tax deductible. Even if you own the charity. So you just transfer your taxes due to another account (charity).
Robber Baron
Agreed. Learned of this term in college, kinda blew it off at the time because the prof was a hardcore leftie.
One of the only other things I remember from that easy A was that the reason so many things are named after Carnegie was because he suddenly caught a conscience later in life and started shelling out money to anyone he could....in the name of philanthropy.
Rockefeller says Hi…
He also gives money to a lot of “futuristic” type science. Makes you think
Makes you think
About what? Would you think it makes more sense to give money to old science? The important of innovation and progress in science and medicine can't be exaggerated.
I think that is just something you would need to look into yourself for those answers
He also gives money to a lot of “futuristic” type science. Makes you think
When you remove God from society, the new idols need to be seen as immortal to continue the ruse. See Mohammed, the Pharaohs, and all the kooks that have "led" Scientology, just to name a few.
Gates knows he isn't, knows he can't manipulate people to believe he is, as has been done in the past, and is grasping at any chance to make himself so.
Agreed
Indeed I've always been puzzled about why USA based "philanthropist" feels the need to fund a UK public service broadcaster (BBC)..
Right. It's not 'charity' and it's not really 'philanthropy.' The recipient is not in need, and not a non-profit.
It's INFLUENCE PEDDLING, and everything he does shows he is unscrupulous.
He gives a ton of money to non-profits. You can see see for yourself.
First of all, supplying a link to defend a guy doesn't carry much water if the link is FROM THAT GUY.
Second, did YOU actually look at that list? None of the money is going to actual charities - it's all going to shape POLICY. And those policies are according to HIS agenda, not yours. Like depopulation, for example. The subject of the OP.
Just because they are labelled "non profit" does not mean that are altruistic.
I see that word, I think of Charlie at the restaurant telling people he's a Full on Rapist.
I'll have your finest milksteak
"You know... old people, children."
Definitely made me think of Charlie lol
Minorities
i prefer philanthropaths - it has that sinister ring to it
“Full on rapist”
Beat me to it!
Micro-Soft
[deleted]
I really wanted to like that book but it was very, very disappointing.
Its just a means of tax evasion and money laundering
And buying influence
Yes, good point. It works wonders, most people regard Bill as a wonderful selfless human
Same with companies established to protect children and victims of abuse.
It's a bit problematic that you would associate philanthropy with something negative, but I'm not surprised after watching bad actors dedicate so much propaganda to taking words and assigning them negative connotations to brainwash people. The term "woke" has been around since the 1960s, and has not only replaced the term "politically correct" but is being used in actual legislation to attack the First Amendment and keep students uninformed. Teachers have used the term "safe space" to describe classroom environments where bullying, violence, etc. won't be tolerated, and where there is a free exchange of ideas without attack, yet that term was also suddenly turned into a bad thing.
Now controlling the population, which would be done through access to birth control and sex education, is somehow this evil thing. Why? Religious extremists want to turn the country into a theocracy, white supremacists want more white people to reproduce because they typically have more resources, and they want everyone else to reproduce themselves into poverty, famine, and war, and corporations want more people to sell stuff to.
In reality, controlling the population through sex education and access to reproductive healthcare leads to less war, famine, pollution, child abuse, domestic violence, gender inequality, and low educational attainment. But yeah, who wants that, huh?
Controlling the population isn't bad, in theory. But in practice, historically, it's gone a lot farther than sex ed and access to abortion. Try limits on peoples right to reproduce, forced sterilization, and even mass murder.
I'm not talking about eugenics, the forced sterilization of women, or genocide, and neither is the article. Access to sex education and reproductive health care has the added benefit of population control. At least know what it is you are scared of, ffs.
They’re Full on R4p!$ts. Accuracy counts.
We need to familiarize ourselves with search engine alternatives
Yandex.com
This shit happens (results are rapidly changing) whenever the weird side of the web starts re-publishing the same story over and over. It's super easy to find the original article.
I wonder how AskJeeves is doing propaganda-wise…
Is that still a website people use? Haven’t heard the name in forever. Ask Jeeves I mean.
Might be overly used but I'm still gonna ask you, what's the version of operating system do you use?
If not ask Jeeves you would've heard ask.com?
Qwant!
The only search engine you should care about is Searx
European search engine? No thanks. Every country over there has forced vaccines and banned weapons. Seems like a honeypot.
What this has to do with the other? They haven't banned weapons and there is not mandatory vaccinations right now anywhere in europe
Brave search.
https://search.brave.com/
Brave is sold out, one of the default browser screen pictures used to be a big red/orange pyramid with an all seeing eye but they seemed to have removed it.
Currently, when you create a new tab, the icon is Saturn. https://i.imgur.com/DwgY77N.jpg
I never noticed it, they just seemed to have the most unbiased results to me, at least so far anyway.
they just seemed to have the most unbiased results to me
you say that but what is your baseline?
Startpage
Howdy 👋 https://www.mojeek.com/
DuckDuckGo.com
They sold out my guy
What makes you say that
They did, someone proved it some time ago
how so?
They were bought by Microsoft
It's public that they were censoring search results regarding Ukraine
fuck, so what's the alternative these days? I hate Google I only use Duckduckgo but never again
It’s obvious
then explain
Try searching for conspiracy stuff in it and you won’t find much except propoganda
I'm sorry but why is a guy who got rich off an operating system worried about overpopulation? In more than a general sense?
Is this our collective fucking future? Having these billionaires viewing themselves are a new fucking Mount Olympus looking down on the peons and trying to institute whatever "solution" they want to force on everyone?
They believe in eugenics. Gates' dad was a trustee and worked on the board of Planned Parenthood
1+1=2
Gates friend Epstien wanted to seed the human race with his dna. Check that one out.
Also cryogenic. Epstein might be frozen next to Disney.
Haven’t heard that one before
When rich people hit a certain age all they care about is their 'legacy.'
That is when they should be removed from society and forced to live only on a subsistence budget. They are just rich, being rich doesn't make you 'right' in any way or sense.
Take away the fiscal rights of anyone over 65. They never do anything good with the money. If you want to accumulate money your whole life than fuck you, you don't get to use it.
How do I know you have boomer parents.
Lmao fuck off with this consumerist bullshit. So we should just cooooom and spend all the money we get?
Nah dawg. Eugenics was the program in it's infancy.
In order for the ponzi scheme to work properly, people had to die and return their money/assets to the system.
At first, they decided to kill off the "unwanted" which spawned Eugenics. Then through experiments, they found it doesn't improve the stock.
What did improve stock was the natural selection process that evolved us into humans in the first place.
So they pivoted on their purpose. It stopped being all about Eugenics and more about killing the numbers necessary to keep the ponzi scheme going.
his daughters are both in interracial relationships, LOL!
explains a lot
I mean who isn't when you think about it. Why overpopulate the world with inferior people?
Is this our collective fucking future? Having these billionaires viewing themselves are a new fucking Mount Olympus looking down on the peons and trying to institute whatever "solution" they want to force on everyone?
yep.
Growing populations in the developing world and scarcity of resources has been talked about and studied by governments, corporations, scientists and media for a good 60 years now.
If your goal is to improve people's lives on the biggest scale possible looking at developing world education/health is an obvious place to start.
This topic has been talked to death since the 1970s.
Why are you all freaking out about it now?
Coincidentally Billy boy’s father was HUGE into eugenics and population control, lol
And Billy Gates is balls deep into "education". Major funder of CommonCore and dumbing the populace down.
Yep. But we’re freaking out 🤣
Because they are violating the Bill of Rights. People have had vaccines forced on them, churches closed, jobs lost. You're clearly getting paid to say this.
Sorry you used too many characters in this comment and must pay a fine. Your weekly check from the GQP will be changed to reflect this.
What is GQP? Love your comment though. Lol
But you'll own nothing and be happy! Wanna pet, nope, they are methane fart producers, none for you. Want cow's milk, cream, butter, well, we got a deal for you the survivors of our mRNA injected herds will give you all that goodness you can put on or combine with dried "mystery coating" cockroaches or salted termites. Would you like reconstituted urine water with your fried grasshoppers? How 'bout some baked crickets grown in our labs, tastes like people, err....... sorry ..... soylent green. Hmmmmm ....... soylent green. Gotta taste for adventure, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation pretrials for Hunger Games is on this weekend, don't miss out.
Yupp, I pay my mortgage with this. Posting comments online pays really well.
Y’all are so scared lol
Sad thing is you probably don't have a mortgage and probably rent. Keep running on the hamster wheel.
Never had to pay rent, commenting online paid for that too. Nice side hustle ya know?
Keep building your gilded cage.
Gilded? How posh. I’ll run that idea past the missus.
Called "Great Reset" and that combined with soylent green = you will own nothing and become food.
Every conversation about "levelling up" involves an implicit levelling down for someone else...
Well he kinda did already so id say it's our collective present
I'm 99% sure the operating system is using some 33 (!) bit integer which will overflow and collapse society when the population reaches 8,589,934,592.
how did you find this number?
It's 2 to the power of 33.
Real life James Bond villain.
What blows my mind and boils my blood about these “over-populationists” is ALL of them seem to have kids. And more than one. Oh okay, I get it, rules for thee…
Probably resource-related. Say you found out there's only 20 years of oil left at current consumption rate (and consumption rate is projected to GROW over the next 20 to 30 years), you'd look at the proles differently.
Try fresh water. You think oil is a big deal but nestle has been ahead of the curve in big evil by locking down water supplies to sell back to the thirsty. We have already seen big cities redline their water supply. Rivers and lakes drying up, the aral sea disappeared, salt lake city poisoned by the dust bowl where it's great lake used to be.
The CEO of Nestlé brought up during an interview he doesn't view clean water as a resource that should be available for everyone, if people want water they have to pay.
They will let people die of thirst while they are golfing on green grass in the desert.
Well ya, too many people means less quality greens. Its funny, but that mentality is starting to bear it's fruits here in the Vancouver/whistler area. Prices of homes have gotten so expensive, no one can afford to live here on servers wage. There tons of empty mansions in whistler, and tons of jobs. No one to fill them, because you can not afford to live there working those jobs. So. Who's gonna cut their greens and serve their coffee?
Hey there are tens of thousands of people waiting just south of the us border who would love to live 8 to a room and eat beans while earning vancouver servers wages. They could retire back home after five years with that kinda money.
This is it. This is happening all over the world. People are not dumb - they leverage their position as you describe it. I would too.
The Earth has been making oil and will continue to do so. It is a natural resource.
How much available and accessible oil you have at hand, and the fact that the earth is always making oil are two separate facts.
But why do they keep killing off the ideas that take little resources? I remember reading a story of a man making a car powered off water. And the government came and noped that shit.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/
Yes I believe its called "stakeholder capitalism" in WEF terminology.
philanthropists!? hahahaha
Igor Chudov's post: https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/curbing-overpopulation-bill-gates
Link to the article: https://archive.ph/RawDw
..and it couldn't be more appropriate here! Meeting in secret is conspiracy by definition..
only if the meeting is about committing crimes
Lol, as if the people in the club are completely devoid of wrongdoing. Fuck’s sake, Oprah was buddy-buddy with John of God, baby-farming sex cult rapist, who also coincidentally was Bill Clinton’s faith healer.
You saying “only if the meeting is about committing crimes” is so blisteringly naive, it hurts. These types of groups and events need 1,000% transparency, especially if it concerns the global population.
I'm merely arguing about semantics. In the context of "conspiracy theories", "conspiracy" means "criminal conspiracy"
No, it does not actually.
If a bunch of government officials conspire to hide the existence of Bigfoot, that is a conspiracy theory. Despite there being no crime.
Thank you!
Thanks for posting. So many things are being scrubbed, and when/if they reappear, they are changed.
As you can find it on the internet these are very literally not being scrubbed.
And what's in the article to scrub?
What's to scrub??? How about their goal to kill people aka "population control"!?!?
They said nothing about killing people. Population control is important for the long term good of the planet and our species.
Exactly. The question is which population to control. And I think most people are in agreement it’s other races and the disabled.
GOD decides which humans live and die and when. NOT your fellow man...
Neither YOU nor these billionaire creeps can decide anything re MotherNature.
Take a seat and realize that GOD and MotherNature will always win.
Religion is the greatest conspiracy of all.
Yep, God decides which children to give cancer to and who to kill in earthquakes Because that's infinite love and wisdom.
Of course you can control population. China did it with the one child policy. Other parts of the world can have contraception subsidised etc. Whether or not you think it's a good thing is irrelevant to the fact you can take steps to alter the population.
Of course, this response isn't even close to staying on topic. Nice diversion tactic.
It actually is precisely on topic because it is through birth control measures that Gates hoped that it would be possible to limit population growth.
it is though. if you introduce healthcare like birth control, make it so that parents don't need to produce children just because just incase to get 1 or 2 into adulthood. and then introduce that to areas where average family size is 6-8 compared to richer countries like usa,sweden,finland,japan,norway where average family size is between 2 and 3. you find that population growth slows down because said countries where was 6-8 average family size. gates has said this already earlier in his ted talk in 2010, you know the one that this sub likes to quote only the part that sounds wrong without context, if you don't use your brains at all.
[deleted]
I disliked the one child policy and the impact it could have, especially when parents essentially murdered their children because they longed for a boy.
However, the point was that the one child policy worked through parents using contraception to limit the number of children they had. I was not making any value judgement about it but simply showing that the population is not controlled by a fictional genocidal war god.
Fuck your god.
[deleted]
That's an active denial reaction you got there.
[deleted]
yawn
[deleted]
This definitely seems like the right sub.
I responded to the wrong comment. I meant to respond to the comment above yours.
That’s cool and all but if you actually tried googling it you would see that it’s still the first result.
A 14 year old article is "changing quickly"
The Gates foundation is just an adjunct of the Rockefeller foundation.
Rockefeller foundation.
But, but, but... Rockefeller is a big philanthropist too....
They do amazing things for the climate.
Anyone who sees those “fact check” warnings and doesn’t immediately become skeptical is an actual fool. They’re literally telling you that you don’t have to think because they did it for you.
I would let it go if it was about news that came out hours ago, but when I check something from years ago and this come up its total BS
My favorite are the articles that start with "No!, XYZ didn't happen" ha. Of course that means it usually did
I like when the headline of the fact check is refuted with it's first paragraph. They'll say something like "well, yes, this did happen, but that's not what they intended when they said and did it"
Literally just happened to me again.
Looked to Gates' Dad.
Fact check: No Gates Dad did not run Planned Parenthood
Later in the article : He was a trustee and worked on the board of Planned Parenthood.
Like what do they think the Board of Directors does if not run the strategic planning aspects of a company haha
Lol you are obviously 'missing some context'!
This isn’t a ‘fact check’ - it means a ton of pages with those keywords have recently been posted and they haven’t sorted them yet.
That’s literally all it means, and every time it shows up we get a post in this sub about how it’s ‘really’ some random other thing.
Ok even if it isn't a fact check, there are actual "fact checkers" out there whose only job is to think for the masses. Or people who will remove things for being "disinformation" only to find out it was more a matter of opinion than anything else. See: Twitter
That's concerning.
For real.
How do you become endowed with the power to determine what is and isn't factual? It's laughable that some tech nerd running social media gets to settle a scientific disagreement about covid and cancel the loser. 'Fact checkers' are even worse.
Agreed who is the fact checkers? What are there credentials is what I’d like to know.
They typically explain how they came to the answer they did. Why don't you pick apart that, rather than just say "fact checker must be wrong", that's just intellectually lazy.
cause you're a rootypoot.
we are the sheep, don't question the shepherds
You're right, we'd better get back in line. Don't want to be late to slaughter!
It is a warning that the query results are rapidly changing, as it says in the picture. The reason they show this is to make people sceptical of the results as false information is rampant and because the Google algorithms can be manipulated by people with nefarious motives.
They're basically saying that the jury isn't in yet so stay vigilant in regards to the information you're reading.
Russian disinformation trolls hate this one trick. Which is why they're bitching about it on Reddit.
Women are doing a great job at not having kids
I know plenty of young people who’d love to have kids. But they’re stuck in dead end jobs barely able to support themselves.
All by design
Yes the design of American capitalism. Can only keep things cheap and yourself rich you pay people absolutely shit.
Sounds pathetic
That's because men took over that 'job'.
Men can't give birth to children
That's not what i was told...
You are mentally ill if you think a biological male can give birth to children. To think such delusions and be confided in them also shows you have no real understanding of biology and reproduction.
Yeah, ofcourse a trans man can have a child, because that "man" was once a Woman and still has their uterus and all their baby-making organs.
Babies don't magically poof into your body nor do the organs which are responsible for baby-making just form on their own because you want them to.
I guess you reaalllly needed an "/S".... LOL.
I'm sorry man.
The amount of people infiltrating this subreddit that would gobble up what you just said as truth is ridiculous.
No problem. And for the record, you are completely correct.
Prime example of Egalitarianism
Or just a joke...
Who blew up the guidestones? They swept that under the rug further than the Pelosi hammer attack
Did you guys read the part where they call themselves "The good club" hahahaha well i guess ill just look the other way now. Theres no way "The good club" does anything evil.......
Talking about this usually brings out a shill army.
True. And remember, it’s a waste of time arguing with bots.
I see.
So you’re going with the “anyone who disagrees is automatically a shill” argument, instead of addressing the actual issue.
There’s a reason the OP only screenshotted the first few paragraphs of an article.
Population growth is a massively unsustainable problem in developing countries. Parents are having large numbers of children because of the seeming inevitability of some of them dying from disease.
And there’s also an issue with lack of education and access to contraceptives leading to a large number of pregnancies.
The median age in many of these countries is in the teens. It wreaks havoc. In a place where there already isn’t much to go around, now there’s even less. Poverty increases and the issue compounds itself.
By increasing access to medical services and education, the birth rate goes down.
That’s what was being discussed. But somehow it’s turned into this bizarre “Bill Gates wants to kill people” argument, which has no basis in fact.
But I’m guessing you don’t want to talk about that. You just want to point fingers and claim anyone who disagrees with your narrative is being paid.
“Those countries” are only poor because we, the western 5-eyes super criminals, steal their resources and bomb them into oblivion.
Imperialists want population control. The sane know that earth can support 20x the life it currently does - we just need to get rid of the psychopathic 1% who falsely consider themselves in positions of higher moral authority on the basis of affluence, and remove the repressive evil grip they have over our societies.
On the basis of human rights, Gates and his fellow citizens have the blood of millions of innocent peoples lives in their hands. THAT is the biggest threat to life on earth at the moment: war criminals getting away with it.
So Bill Gates is spending tens of billions of dollars trying to cull the population of the world, so he can have more money?
It’s not about money. They can print money. It’s about power and control. They can’t control 8 billion people. Population control doesn’t just mean controlling the amount of people, it literally means control over the population
So how does Bill Gates providing doctors and medical equipment to countries in Africa give him “control”?
How would such “control” benefit him?
Sorry, but this is a lazy argument that always seems to crop up when people are trying to prove their theories and can’t come up with any evidence or motive.
They just say “Uhh…it’s because they want control.”
That’s fair. The argument in support of him is perfectly accurate. Providing medical help does reduce the population, they don’t have some rule that says they have to do it in the most horrific way possible. Bringing modern infrastructure to a poor area also allows for further control of that population as they become dependent on said infrastructure. They’re not dumb. Of course it’s better to do it this way when they can do it flys under the radar and they have people like you going to bat for them for free but they wouldn’t hesitate to genocide if need be
How is it “horrific”?
The only horrific thing is babies and children dying from diseases virtually no one gets anymore in developed countries. No one in the 21st Century should be getting sick an dying just from drinking water.
And I never said the population was being “reduced.” That implies they’re being killed. We’re talking about reducing the rate of reproduction, which prevents overpopulation.
Now if you want to talk about controlling a country through infrastructure, take a look at China and their exploitative loans all across the continent.
Go focus your energy on learning about that, instead of believing Bill Gates is killing off Africans because he wants “control.”
Also, you didn’t answer either of the questions I posed.
First of all stop acting like an angry prick and just have a conversation.
Second it’s not horrific. I said they don’t have to do it in the most horrific way meaning they don’t have to it through murder they can achieve it through reducing the rate of reproduction.
Third your questions answer themselves. The people become dependent on something he would control and how would control not benefit someone?
I’m angry because I’m tired of people trying to come up with reasons to explain why Bill Gates is some sort of evil supervillain just because they don’t understand the statements he’s made about population growth.
Reducing the rate of reproduction is a good thing. It is 100 percent not sustainable for two people to have ten kids, and then for each one of those kids to start having kids 15 years later.
There are countries in Africa where the median population is in the teens.
And again, you’re just falling back on the “he wants control” argument, which is fundamentally lazy and is a way of dodging an explanation.
Are you claiming there will be some date in the future where Bill Gates will flip a switch and suddenly start charging people for the medical services he’s helping to provide? And that all the charities he donates to that carry out this work are in on it, and will suddenly become for profit businesses?
If so, how would Gates expect these people to pay?
Or are you just going with “Bill Gates is evil and gets off on controlling people”?
It’s not about getting them to pay. Like I said they can print money, it’s about having them be dependent on him and his cronies. They want to ensure their thrown as demigods with the entire population subservient to them with their minds wrangled in with no chance of an uprising. Sounds silly I agree and it is
So like I said…
Your entire hypothesis rests on a theory that Bill Gates is an evil supervillain.
No evidence of anything, just “He wants to be in control.”
Got it.
Ironically your version is the opposite, no evidence other than he wants to be a benevolent superhero.
I never stated anything about his motives.
The evidence is clear: the tens of billions he’s given.
Why does he do it? Maybe because he genuinely wants to help. Maybe because he’s one of the few billionaires who’s actually realized that once you’ve amassed a certain amount, making more isn’t going to have any impact on your life whatsoever.
Or maybe he feels guilty about the underhanded business tactics he used to become successful in the first place, and is trying to counteract that.
Or maybe he only cares about his public image, and is doing it all just so he can look like a philanthropist.
I have no idea what his motives are, and I never claimed to.
Frankly, it doesn’t matter. All that matters is that he’s created the largest charity in the history of the planet, and people are being helped because of it. It’s more than we can say about many churches that take donations.
Bro your lost, just stop.
[removed]
Good. I’m glad I could help
What conspiracies do you believe? Or are you one of those dudes that showed up during covid to argue and just never left
Gates owns a lot of ancient historic artifacts. It is a key factor in his identity. You don’t drop millions on a Da Vinci codex without developing an appreciation for carving one’s own name in the sands of time.
He wants his name to be remembered 200 years from now. Money is no longer the issue - longevity of identity is what he’s up to: refactoring society in his own image.
Future subjects of his vassal state may well be programmed through their history books to think of Gates as a savior. Imagine the scenario where there are only two hundred thousand humans left on earth, and all the wealth they will control.
That is Gates’ cult vision.
So your evidence for your theory that he’s creating a “vassal state” and plans on killing off everyone but a tiny percentage of the population is that he bought a Da Vinci notebook?
One which he didn’t name after himself, as has been the tradition, and made fully public?
That’s your evidence?
And by the way, what “ancient historic artifacts” are you talking about here?
No, I’m not claiming this as evidence - just clues you can follow for yourself to gain an understanding of Gates’ motivation.
Someone willing to drop tens of millions of dollars on an ancient artifact isn’t thinking in terms of present time goals.
Gates knows history better than most and his purpose is to play a huge part in the future of human history.
Lol.
He doesn’t even keep it. It’s almost always loaned out to museums.
Still waiting for you to back up your claims on all these artifacts he supposedly owns.
Straw man argument. He can put his junk wherever he wants to put it - doesn’t change the fact that Gates is attempting to write his own name into human history this way.
Still waiting for you to list these “artifacts.”
Not so hard:
https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=bill+gates+ancient+collection+of+artifacts
So…
Nothing, then?
Just the one Da Vinci notebook, which doesn’t even qualify as “ancient”?
Your weak-ass google-fu is not my problem.
Lol.
I googled it, professor. There’s nothing to back up your ridiculous claim.
Your google-fu is terrible then. He had over $124 million worth of historical artifacts in his private collection.
The point is: the rich, once rich, are no longer motivated by the accumulation of wealth - but history calls, and once you have an understanding of human history gained by building your own museums and choosing the artifacts for them, the next step is the desire to write one’s name into the sands of time, likewise …
As Gates is trying to do.
Then post a link.
It sure is odd that he consistently and repeats loans out the Da Vinci notebook to museums all over the world instead building his own, like you claim.
It's so much bigger as you think.
https://steemit.com/news/@clarityofsignal/large-compilation-of-great-reset-agenda-21-resources-exposing-the-draconian-plans-of-the-parasitic-global-elite-being
Gates is a member of a satanic death cult that wants to do it and clearly he no longer gives a shit about western materialist goals, preferring instead to write the future of human history according to his free will over others.
If you’re living in a paycheck month to month I don’t expect you to understand this but once you get to a certain wealth level your identity reorients around the history books, not the bank books…
Lol.
What “Satanic death cult”? What’s its name? Who’s the leader? What books do they read to get their information on Satan?
Until you raise your own understanding of Americas death cults beyond a banal tabloid level, you won’t be prepared for the answers. This is not your average American street cult. This is a power-broker cult that literally controls the revolving door between the CFR and JCoS… and Gates is it’s high priest.
Just have a look at his private ownership of cultural artifacts extending over a period of thousands of years. You’ll find the answer you seek in his material possessions.
Ah, I see.
Instead of answering my questions, you’ve chosen to claim I’m just not “prepared” to hear the answers.
Is it tough being so knowledgeable? I imagine everyone must be really jealous of you.
...just go take your chip like a good follower of the science. Its good for you. The research proves that obedient zombification is good for the social body. It is progress. Don't fight it. It is progress. Love it!
It's a bullshit argument pushed by old rich assholes who jet around the world while consuming more than some cities in Africa.
If we are going down the road of resource consumption, overpopulation is an outdated and bad argument.
At any time there are 25 billion farm animals not including fish farms.
The top 1% of the population consumes double the amount of resources as the bottom 50%.
Bill gates and his asshole friends conveniently forget that they are the problem and not Africa. It's a blame shift of epic proportions.
Why would they change any of it?
I’m not sure what you’re asking. Why would they want to help improve the lives of others?
[removed]
I believe the best medicine against unwanted pregnancy, overpopulation and poverty is the concept of 'female choice'. Patriarchy created overpopulation.
That’s part of it, for sure. But I think a lot of that has to do with changing culture, which is far more difficult than providing doctors and teaching women how their cycles work.
Many people think that doctors and education are the clue, that there was a high infant mortality in the middle ages, but this isn't true. Overpopulation only set in around 1700 AD, and with it came the high infant mortality; this happened after 300 years of witch hunts with the only purpose of extinguishing the knowledge of contraception. The Catholic church put death penalty on contraception and every form of love that didn't produce children. Thus the ruling patriarchs caused overpopulation. Today, they stare at the masses of people like the sorcerer's apprentice at the water.
Africa and is still the only continent experiencing “unchecked” population growth. I wonder what Bill and friends will propose next?
I wonder what Bill and friends will propose next?
They have talked at length about this, check out Bill's TED talk.
The number one way to reduce families with 'too many' children is actually reducing the childhood mortality rate. More kids surviving to adulthood = less need to have so many extra kids.
Yes, I’m familiar. He said carbon emissions are bad and that people x services etc. = carbon emissions. He then sublimated population growth to being a mere a consequence of infant/childhood mortality. It’s been halved since the year 2000 and the quality of life index has increased substantially in Africa since the now infamous TED talk.
My question is: what are the next steps that this wonderful “humanitarian” will delineate?
https://www.statista.com/statistics/997040/world-population-by-continent-1950-2020/
Edit: If it’s unclear, his initiatives up til now seem ineffective (in spite of the reproductive issues his vaccination programs are know to cause in Subsaharan African women).
Did you have a point your were trying to make?
Agreed
If they truly wanted to reduce or limit the population they would have started giving away birth control decades ago. As a young female during the 1980s I can tell you that we struggled to afford it. I do not know what the cost is now, being elderly this has passed from my basket of personal interests, but I would hazard a guess these newer, and safer, forms of birth control are not free to the majority of the world's females.
Rather I believe they want to limit growth in areas where people get better educations and therefore are more capable of critical thought than the developing nations. Just look up the birth rates per woman and compare countries.
Why would they do this? People who do not have the benefit of extensive education and technological advances just might be more pliant, it might be easier to control what they think and how they react.
Just my two cents, but that's my take on it.
[deleted]
That is not at all inconsistent with the previous point.
Just because a shill usually shills in a way which agrees with the face of the duopoly you have been led to agree with doesn't make them a shill for the thing as a whole.
Thankfully Oprah didn’t reproduce
Meh so they wanted to cap population at 8.3 bn - clearly failed as we’ve hit 8 bn and counting. Also the whole article is a bit sensationalist. There are other forums like the one mentioned where overpopulation is discussed e.g. Bilderberg.
Bringing Bilderberg in adds to to the conspiracy angle, rather than diffusing it.
This is what the billionaires and govt want u to think we are over populated.. I watch a Native American video and he said we’re not over populated like the govt says , he said we have enough land for everyone to live but the govt and the rich people took over the land.. He said the land is supposedly be free for everyone as God created or Holy one as he calls it ..i agree with him ..
if everyone had a piece of land of their own to put whatever on it to be able to live and have running water and electric if they choose to use it.. call me crazy but how did the Indians and Europeans live b4 we had luxury..
The govt and billionaires runs and owns everything they are so greedy.. all this money they send to other countries could spend it right here taking care of our own helping them have shelter or place to live we wouldn’t have this homeless issues..
if we are over populated then why in the h3ll are they allowing all these illegals immigrants and citizenship to everyone that comes here.. put them up in luxury hotels and give them cell phones and name brand clothes and shoes free money and even remember back in day free homes to live in , while our poor n homeless has to wear whatever they can get… the govt not for us at all they for themselves and foreigners…
I pray one day God will bring down every evil govt officials and billionaires to their knees let them suffer what they done to our people…
Yeah satanic pedos gather to decide what's good for the rest of the world! What a wonderful world we re living in!
What a wonderful world we re living in!
Some might say this is the playground of the devil.
With the rabbits foot out of the box in the attic I head out back to sacrifice a chicken to moloch
-Hillary Clinton
Not a very secret meeting
The Good Club. The name promoted in the article screams Manufactured consent and shows you how dumb they think the plebs are.
Such a secret meeting that it was written about in newspapers, and google is in damage control mode except all of the stories are still there, and gates has told us himself what his plan is to curb overpopulation. And it’s mentioned in the 2009 story in an oblique way, they just didn’t get into the details. You take the impoverished and malnourished parts of the world and you make them healthier and when they’re healthier they have less kids voluntarily. Most of these areas need the labor of the children but a lot of the kids die from easily preventable diseases, so the families have extra kids to compensate for the ones they expect to lose. But if the kids are healthier, the families won’t expect to lose them and they won’t have as many.
Richer people (and that's a relative term) have less kids but they have bigger carbon footprints and use way way more resources than an impoverished family with 8 kids.
You’re an environmentalist that thinks having children and being poor is superior?
Just stating a fact. Man, this sub.
Ok, but that’s a different problem that requires different solutions.
The suggested solution to the overpopulation problem in the third world was always better healthcare, better schooling and better women's rights.
This notion that Gates wants to murder everyone willy-nilly is nothing but an insane fever dream.
Shh get out of here with your facts and information.
We need to curb wealth. Nobody should have control of populations other than the creator of man kind. Let nature take its course.
..So by "saving lives"- We hope to reduce the population by about 10% maybe even 15% if we are lucky!
-Bill Gates and other "El-Ites".
Truth of the real world is that Earth is nowhere near being overpopulated.
What it does have? Too many people for evil men like Gates to control. That is why they keep on pushing 'less population' on us.
Yup, first thin out the flock while making the rest of them as dependent on the governments as possible by means of destroying the global economies.
Herd everybody who is left into big, completely monitored and controlled cities under the disguise of saving the planet and implement a social/ carbon credit system combined with a cashless society.
Let people transform themselves into transhumans and take complete control over humanity.
It's happening so blatantly and people sit here fighting the facts. When will people wake up?
When will people wake up?
After the global financial collapse and they lost everything.
When money's only value is as fuel for the fire to keep you alive
Yup and food and water are scarce.
Every single person on this planet can fit inside the state of texas. The earth is fine
Dude. The problem with overpopulation clearly isn't the physical amount of space.
I’m a woman
Dudes can’t be women. Don’t care how you spin it.
Sorry about that bro
Anyone here bother to read the article before commenting?
Google is already so funneled…it’s not a real research tool anymore unfortunately.
You know, if you continue the trend, then theoretically the healthiest population has zero kids. And it coincidentally will have zero footprint on the environment in a generation.
I can't wait for us to be so healthy that we are extinct. That...is health!
Many people still have not figured out yet that the carbon "they" want to get rid of is most of humanity and all of it's morals and values..
MAiD’s new slogan: The pinnacle of health is nonexistence
It’s called the mouse utopia experiment and yes. It ends with everyone depressed, lazy and unable to reproduce. Goals
Also count and Google to keep us safe and effective
What's Google doing about it?
How about the video of bill gates presenting the v@x technology to the military.
I dont get why is this a conspiracy ... Realistically In a nutshell:
Rich/Developed country: Good quality of life , low infant mortality , Preference for quality over quantity , overall old an d low population due to it
Poor/developing country: Bad quality of life, high infant mortality, bad education, low female power of choice in fertility , cultural need of labor in house works, more children , younger and higher population (people die easier) .
Thats why europe is 700 mil and Africa is 1.5 bil . Or india alone more than 1 bil
If you educate them and provide enough stability and infrastructure you level them closer to normal standards of life and less need of more children than normal (aka having 2 good kids instead of 10 because half will die, or because you dont know what condom is, or then woman doesnt have a say in it, or because you need labor workers for farm / thats also a thing in third world).
thats what this is referring to....
Not killing western population off, or anyone for that matter....
If you think, low western population and higher third world population is a ploy to kill you off, then drop your life standards (to live bigger family with small wage), remove freedom of choice from women, have 3+ kids (with low education and values) and raise them to want to do manual work (less cost of educating, easier to find job) like all the people from developing countries do.
-->This is not an actual advice, i was being sarcastic <---
[removed]
which part seemed odd to you? Its all about resources and their abundance/scarcity
That just may be Scott Adams - he's been saying this, practically word for word, for a week.
Dont know him, just realized i've seen some of his comics though
Because the overpopulation narrative is outdated and wrong and is pushed by old assholes like bill gates for a single reason: shift blame. They coat it in nice words like "bringing education","cultural change" and "female choice".
But in the end what's actually is happening is that everytime some progressive government was formed in some of these "developing" countries, it was fucked into oblivion. What a actually is happening is that bill gates makes shady gen experiments in regions no one looks. Creates schools that mostly teach Microsoft related bullshit because we don't need thinking people we need drones.
Bill Gates continues to make more money than ever while buying 0.1% of the USA and continuing to buy for dubious reasons, flying to Epstein island for dubious reasons and building bunkers.
The top 1% of the population uses double the amount of resources than the bottom 50%. We have 25 billion farm animals at any time not including fish farms. To push the overpopulation angle as THE main problem is logically inconsistent expect if you are a walking city in terms of resource consumption.
Does this change the fact that ...
...high infant mortality, non existent female choice, lack of reproductive education/healthcare (condoms) , lack of quality of life and backwards culture lifestyles(having family to help with manual labour, having multiple kids to help around)...
...is a reason of hight population?
The above logick has been observed all over Europe in the old days, before technological/educational and healthcare advancements
No. I didn't say that the goals are wrong. I am saying that what actually is happening contradicts those goals. And that's why it's extremely hypocritical and manipulative.
fair enough. Until an alternative other than "lets bring them all to Europe" presents itself, I will support modernising developing countries and whatever that includes, in order to increase their standard, lower their population to viable normal levels, and make them another global hub which will interact with the rest , from where they are. That's the only socioeconomic diversity i want to see.
I mean one big alternative would have been leave them fucking alone. The amount of friendly dictators established in those regions and the amount of killed democratically elected presidents is just brutal. Not even talking about the colonial legacy or the amount of "philanthrophic" endeavors, destruction of in-place higher production and so on. Of course china also tries to meddle in those regions.
if border control was left equally free and up to each government, to stop the ever increasing waves of immigration coming from said places, and if countries had the freedom to mandate assimilation, then leaving them alone would be sure the best option. Not every country in Europe had slavery, some even were themselves (Balkans) , yet everyone pays for it. SO,Yeah ,if they didnt migrate or interact with Europe in any way in Modern times , your logik would be fine. but since there not stop to this, fixing the problem form its source (albeit, fixing their countries to make them stay there), is the only viable solution...The discussion shouldn't be whether that should happen, but rather HOW it will... Foreign political intervention? Economic intervention (investment)? CIA settings government shit? Consulting to trustful governments? whichevers helps makes Africa ideal for the locals to stay. Otherwise raise walls and let people to Europeans (especially in borders) deal how they see fit , which doesn't happen either. Just because Nigeria or Sudan, Middle East or India, has millions they cant sustain, and they see Europe fit place, I as balkaner or a Swed or German , shouldn't have to deal with the drawbacks of excess uneducated, intolerant migration that contribute a fraction of what is provided, and has shown to clash culturally everywhere they gathered en mass. with exceptions being far too few to make up for it.
...and old methods were running cover even then....
WSJ Q from 2009...."That said, almost all of the attendees are politically liberal. Do you think this Star Chamber of Philanthropists is something to worry about or something to be grateful for?"
They aren't doing a good job since we are now at or slightly above 8 billion people.
Bill Gates is the Anti Christ
You are the anti-christ!
Fun game, this..
Going well for them, right? They made and let viruses out, jabbed people with a blood clotting mixcure that will cause problems to even those who are not vaced but need blood, they provoke and start wars all over the world… add more
Yup. They keep trying to thin the crowd yet fail to do so every time and underestimate the resilience of life
Wasn’t Epstein a philanthropist? 🤔
When you can't dispute the message, demonize the messenger.
He is not doing a good job at it since he decided on feeding people McDonald's.
Pretty sure that'll kill plenty of people by itself.
McDonald's is a strong cause behind heart attacks and obesity.
Didn't really help humanity...
What do you think "joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles" means? Teaching people how to use protection so they stop having 11 children like they used to 100 years ago because 2/3 of them would die before turning 10 years old!
Well have those billionaires changed their mind in the meantime? These things can happen tbh.
I'd be surprised if they had, but it's still possible. Or else they've changed what they say to the media, which is a bit more plausible
Yeah they have not changed their minds
Google might as well change their name to Ciaoogle.
That explains why his 'vaccines' have killed so many in Africa.
Overpopulation always means depopulation to you people, it never means what it actually is; finding new ways to profit off a bigger audience.
YOU ARE ONLY TO THINK WHAT YOU'RE TOLD
LOL. Truth is stranger than fiction.
For the full article: https://archive.ph/LActH.
the de-population agenda is nothing new
Totally watched the 1% documentary on YouTube from 2003 and I now know bill gates dad must have had this planned because the last scene when the kid finally gets his dad to talk is haunting. the 1 percent
I don’t think anyone really cares to try and hide something like this. They literally issued a press release about this meeting. Overpopulation was/is a major concern for the future and they are concerned about it, big deal
Corporation is an approved scam & spy business. Their approval was obtained through manufactured consent. Corporation is not the industry of manufacturing products. Corporation is in the industry of manufacturing consent.
Corporations through governments and vice versa are harvesting our biometric, behavioural data on global scale. So they can get to know us far better than we know ourselves, and they not just predict our feelings but also manipulate our feelings and sell us anything they want- Be it a product as a service or politician. Have you heard of focus groups? Now with always online/big data collection. You are in focus groups. Except you don't get paid for it. You get exploited and you pay to be part of it. Nothing is free, except the energy from the sun, but some get a bill(skin cancer) for that. Thanks to always providing industrial surveillance corporatism.
Social credit score indoctrination
Original was deleted. Wonder why?
WHO doesn't want [you] to be healthy? World Health Order.
-.-. --- -. ...- . .-. ... . / .-- .. - .... / -.-- --- ..- .-. / -. . .. --. .... -... --- ..- .-. .-.-.-
.--. .-.. . .- ... . / -.. --- / -. --- - / .--. .- .-. - .. -.-. .. .--. .- - . / .. -. / .- / -.-. .. ...- .. .-.. / .-- .- .-. .-.-.-
.- -. -.. / .-. .- - .... . .-. / - .... .. -. -.- / .- -... --- ..- - / .--. . .- -.-. . ..-. ..- .-.. / --. . -. . .-. .- .-.. / ... - .-. .. -.- . .-.-.-
Coincidence theorists will assure you that Billy and friends just want to reduce the world population "humanely" via women's reproductive services, basic healthcare in 3rd world countries, etc.
Apparently they believe we can go from 10 billion to the desired 1 billion in a few generations simply by reducing birthrate a bit. Someone needs to teach these people math.
Can someone explain to me what is bad about curbing overpopulation, just like in nature when 1 species becomes overpopulous its bad for the world and ruins other eco systems?
Are rna Covid Vaccines leading to the depopulation desired by Bill Gates?
So i see an article about a group of wealthy people trying to stop poverty and increase general health. Plus give an education to the needy,
I guess this doesnt penetrate your jealous addled brains.
I keep seeing this "overpopulation" thing the past few months and it makes no sense.
The more people there are the less power any individual person has. When people are a scarcity they have more power.
For example if you're an employer you would rather have 100 people competing for a position than there only being a handful of people who can do it. When there's fewer workers it's more difficult to pay them less, withhold benefits, etc.
Why do the wealthy and the powerful want to kill everyone off? What's the motive? It doesn't make any sense.
In fact the opposite is true, and all the scare articles you see about declining population (ie. millennials are bad people for having less children) are being paid for by rich assholes.
You did not notice yet they are forcing the 4th industrial revolution through?
Pretty soon "they" won't need most of us anymore, in fact, maybe they already started with culling the herd..
ht tps://www.bit * chute.com/video/xF6K5F7aBjeK/
That article doesn't even address overpopulation at all. It just talks about the positives and negatives of technological advancement and job automation.
And the ones "forcing" job automation are business owners trying to save money. I'm still missing where the conspiracy is.
Maybe it's this quote from the article:
Fourth Industrial Revolution has the potential to raise global income levels and improve the quality of life for populations around the world.
Oh okay, so the shadowy powers to be are conspiring to... make our lives better?
This is maybe the worst conspiracy theory I've seen on here in awhile.
Everything the WEF says and does looks good on the outside but it's rotten to the core on the inside.
well - before reading anything the 1st thing i thought is when OP says "someone dug up a 13yo article" - that article wasn't really hidden in a secret internet site - it's been there & still is wherever it is - i mean it might take a person a bit of time to uncover it but if an article has been posted in/on the internet it's gonna stay there.
the part of OP thinking Google has gone into "damage control" is unfounded - their algorithm simply does latest news stuff 1st - so if it's like 5yrs or older it says it can't be found quickly or it's "new" news - - - it still relayed the proper information below its explanation - it's a way google covers its ass for possibly having slow search results.
people are so quick to think bad stuff.
& btw - glad someone is considering human overpopulation -
Their most obvious gaslight is saying that reducing infant mortality rates with 'vaccines' will encourage people to have less children. Like that is why people have large families and not because more children means more prosperity in many cultures.
The Geoengineering team!
Checkout SAIL1 & SAIL43k
Oh yeah, look at then trying to improve education eh? What a monster!
Whats wrong with efforts to address overpopulation?
I understand its not actually a thing, overpopulation that is.
I’m pretty sure they would want more people so they could pay people even less because of too much competition
Archive everything
but the world is overpopulated though, and it's precisely the result of what these billionaire philanthropists did starting all the way back in the 1970's. they've been feeding millions in underdeveloped regions such as India and Africa, allowing the population to skyrocket. now that they've made billions of dollars in more wealth from the parabolic increase of consumers, they want to reduce population.
Their brand of philanthropy is unique, combining analysis of the problem with counseling of the affected peoples. A new term is needed to describe what this new breed brings to the global table. This is the era of the Fullonanalrapists.
These guys have no problem with their type of dialog, it's normal for them to talk this way, no moral compass needed.
It couldn’t all come back to bill gates. Lol jk., it will. He’s at the top of the list in a decode I found hidden in a movie from early 2000’s
Those good old CIA and FBI agents at Google at work I see
I’m old enough to remember when this article came out and was originally posted here. 🤣
The worlds richest men are not found in FORBES
Bill Gates is a bad guy from a Dan Browne Novel.
[Meta] Sticky Comment
Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.
Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.
What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.